| Author |
SE And 16M Displays |
AntonisCy
Joined: Mar 28, 2004
Posts: 139
PM |
Like it or not we have to admit that THERE IS difference between a 256K and 16M colour display. And i have noticed it alot after changing from my W850i to a Nokia 6300...
Why is SE not coming out with a better display? Im really dissapointed |
|
|
jcwhite_uk
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Dorset, UK Phone:Xperia Z1
PM, WWW
|
Never really noticed the difference myself. Also it helps the W850i to have about double the talktime of the 6300.
Checkout my photos at My Website"Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together." |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
i think what you noticed was the fact that nokia makes better screens overall, even if it was 262K |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
indeed, just compare w810/w850 screen with 6233 screen for example. have to admit, in the past p910 screen do amazed, but then nokia popped up with their amazing screens and if u have a 16m screen, its hard not to get used to it. seems the 16m screen is still not that cheap, probably thatswhy are so few in nokia fones aswell.
|
jcwhite_uk
Joined: Feb 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Dorset, UK Phone:Xperia Z1
PM, WWW
|
I was using a 6280 today and would say it was on par with an SE screen.
My TYTN only has 65k but looks about as good uality as my W880i or a 6280
Checkout my photos at My Website"Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together." |
AntonisCy
Joined: Mar 28, 2004
Posts: 139
PM |
well Nokia has moved to 16M and so has Samsung... I was hoping that with the new models announced now we would have moved to 16M too... Nope |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
6280 is a very old phone. |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=145269&start=0
[ This Message was edited by: BobaFett on 2007-05-08 22:43 ] |
umerhayat
Joined: Feb 27, 2005
Posts: 285
From: Pakistan
PM |
one of my friends have 6288 and it screen is very impressive
This message was posted from a P910i |
baconnugget
Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Posts: 429
PM |
the 6280 and 6288 are only 256k screen, the 6300 and n95 are 16 million screens if if you think 5he 6280 are good the 6300 and n95 have even better screeens
[ This Message was edited by: kokoko on 2007-05-09 08:47 ] |
JK
Joined: Feb 24, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: S. Africa - JOZI
PM |
On 2007-05-09 09:46:10, kokoko wrote:
the 6280 and 6288 are only 256k screen, the 6300 and n95 are 16 million screens if if you think 5he 6280 are good the 6300 and n95 have even better screeens
[ This Message was edited by: kokoko on 2007-05-09 08:47 ]
N95 has a LCD screen, the "white" is not as clean as it is on a K800, the "Black" is even worst.
|
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-05-09 09:58:26, 786KBR wrote:
On 2007-05-09 09:46:10, kokoko wrote:
the 6280 and 6288 are only 256k screen, the 6300 and n95 are 16 million screens if if you think 5he 6280 are good the 6300 and n95 have even better screeens
[ This Message was edited by: kokoko on 2007-05-09 08:47 ]
N95 has a LCD screen, the "white" is not as clean as it is on a K800, the "Black" is even worst.
LCD is different than TFT or can LCD be TFT? |
aragorn666
Joined: Mar 18, 2006
Posts: 229
From: ------+------MIDDLE EARTH-----
PM |
low end se phones screen is bad when camparde to low end nokia phones.
but for performence se is superior.
O seeker ! KNOW wHAt YoU SeeK AnD tHEn SeeK. |
PeterKay
Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: The Ummah
PM, WWW
|
Superior indeed.
well said.
|
LEVO 75
Joined: May 03, 2006
Posts: 56
PM |
On 2007-05-09 10:11:33, aragorn666 wrote:
low end se phones screen is bad when camparde to low end nokia phones.
but for performence se is superior.
Your spelling and grammar is bad compared to that of a 6 year old. |
|
|
Posted: 2007-05-08 21:53
