| Author |
P700 is on its way |
DocTorpor
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
Posts: 107
From: M-town
PM |
That's it deuxani! Again, nice work!
Who needs photos anyway? Everybody is always shouting about photos that they have been photoshopped (often the case, sometimes not).
This is the phone I played with last week and I can confidently say that it's properly depicted here. Since it's already photoshopped, no one should complain about that fact now! It's real!
[ This Message was edited by: DocTorpor on 2007-04-17 16:47 ] | |
|
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
I really like the style. The brushed metal finish and black plastic gives it a rugged look and will make it nice and weighty at the same time.
Great stuff! All we need now is a solid list of specifications.
|
ITstudent
Joined: Apr 03, 2007
Posts: 23
From: Germany , SODA
PM |
and the announcement^^
if the final handset looks like this one i'll buy it when it comes to stores in germany
owner of a PSP and a TM100(very old but good stuff) sry for my english i trie to improve it
want to visit another forum?
then look at this www.tg-heidenheim.de.egg |
kokosalaki
Joined: May 04, 2005
Posts: 61
From: Krakow, Poland
PM |
I agree
one of the best looking SE phones ever IMHO
can't wait till I put my fingers on it |
deuxani
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Amsterdam, Merate, Pula
PM |
@ DocTorpor, thanks to you the design looks like this, because it was you who gave the final instructions and hints!!  Thanks a lot!!
EDIT:........... bad news.... this is what rog posted over at M-R as reaction to the friday announcement:
"I wonder how many times more someone will make up a date...
CHeers,
Rog."
[ This Message was edited by: deuxani on 2007-04-17 17:12 ] |
thklinge
Joined: Feb 21, 2003
Posts: 40
From:
PM |
On 2007-04-17 10:34:46, jung wrote:
On 2007-04-17 09:30:43, PeterKay wrote:
well then, the P700 is definately for you then, 3.2mp cam is just what was needed and  have implemented it. However the phone is just slightly thicker.
yes i agree, i don't own a digital camera, so my phone is my primary camera. i'm not overly bothered about the new cybershot with 5pm, as i only take quick snaps most of the time.
as long as it has xenon flash i'll be more than happy.
in terms of marketing i can't see why they wouldn't put one on there. last year the major selling point of the k series was the xenon flash, so nothing else had one, but this year it's the 5mp, so perhaps other phones will have the flash.
i will definitely buy one if it does.
I'm 99% sure it wont have an Xenon-flash like the K800i. Numerous sources have said that it's just slightly thicker than the M600i and that the backside is flat. Most of the space in the K800i camera-buldge on the back is occupied by two condensers that charge the flash. The space needed for those two badboys is why we won't be seeing a Xenonflash in the P700, sorry. I'd sure love to be proved wrong though. Parhaps already this friday? |
jung
Joined: Mar 14, 2005
Posts: 86
PM |
On 2007-04-17 19:39:39, thklinge wrote:
On 2007-04-17 10:34:46, jung wrote:
On 2007-04-17 09:30:43, PeterKay wrote:
well then, the P700 is definately for you then, 3.2mp cam is just what was needed and have implemented it. However the phone is just slightly thicker.
yes i agree, i don't own a digital camera, so my phone is my primary camera. i'm not overly bothered about the new cybershot with 5pm, as i only take quick snaps most of the time.
as long as it has xenon flash i'll be more than happy.
in terms of marketing i can't see why they wouldn't put one on there. last year the major selling point of the k series was the xenon flash, so nothing else had one, but this year it's the 5mp, so perhaps other phones will have the flash.
i will definitely buy one if it does.
I'm 99% sure it wont have an Xenon-flash like the K800i. Numerous sources have said that it's just slightly thicker than the M600i and that the backside is flat. Most of the space in the K800i camera-buldge on the back is occupied by two condensers that charge the flash. The space needed for those two badboys is why we won't be seeing a Xenonflash in the P700, sorry. I'd sure love to be proved wrong though. Parhaps already this friday?
but when you look at the k800, the back is actually almost flush, the only reason it's raised is due to the shutter, and the flash is actually flush with the housing, as is the lense.
correct me if i'm wrong, as i don't know sod all about flash technology... |
soane28
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 401
From: NZ
PM |
P700 wont have a xenon flash - look at the photoshop pictures which are confirmed as correct by DorcTroper and peterkay. You will see two LED flash sitting next to the cam. The reason why it didnt get a xenon flash is because it is not Cyber-shot branded.
[ This Message was edited by: soane28 on 2007-04-17 23:26 ] |
thklinge
Joined: Feb 21, 2003
Posts: 40
From:
PM |
On 2007-04-18 00:19:40, jung wrote:
On 2007-04-17 19:39:39, thklinge wrote:
On 2007-04-17 10:34:46, jung wrote:
On 2007-04-17 09:30:43, PeterKay wrote:
well then, the P700 is definately for you then, 3.2mp cam is just what was needed and have implemented it. However the phone is just slightly thicker.
yes i agree, i don't own a digital camera, so my phone is my primary camera. i'm not overly bothered about the new cybershot with 5pm, as i only take quick snaps most of the time.
as long as it has xenon flash i'll be more than happy.
in terms of marketing i can't see why they wouldn't put one on there. last year the major selling point of the k series was the xenon flash, so nothing else had one, but this year it's the 5mp, so perhaps other phones will have the flash.
i will definitely buy one if it does.
I'm 99% sure it wont have an Xenon-flash like the K800i. Numerous sources have said that it's just slightly thicker than the M600i and that the backside is flat. Most of the space in the K800i camera-buldge on the back is occupied by two condensers that charge the flash. The space needed for those two badboys is why we won't be seeing a Xenonflash in the P700, sorry. I'd sure love to be proved wrong though. Parhaps already this friday?
but when you look at the k800, the back is actually almost flush, the only reason it's raised is due to the shutter, and the flash is actually flush with the housing, as is the lense.
correct me if i'm wrong, as i don't know sod all about flash technology...
The flash-lamp itself is on the side, yes, but the capasitors are in the bulge.
[ This Message was edited by: thklinge on 2007-04-18 01:14 ] |
Gok
Joined: Aug 29, 2005
Posts: 77
PM |
On 2007-04-18 00:24:38, soane28 wrote:
P700 wont have a xenon flash - look at the photoshop pictures which are confirmed as correct by DorcTroper and peterkay. You will see two LED flash sitting next to the cam. The reason why it didnt get a xenon flash is because it is not Cyber-shot branded.
[ This Message was edited by: soane28 on 2007-04-17 23:26 ]
But it does have Autofocus. If you really need Xenon flash, you can always use the MXE-60 |
Spinz
Joined: Aug 24, 2003
Posts: 178
PM |
On 2007-04-17 16:14:25, deuxani wrote:
As requested
Ohhh myyyyy GGGGGGGGGGGGGGggooooooooooooooooooDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDd
Did i experienced an Orgasm
If the P-700 is gonna look like this, I am gonna be a very weak man |
jung
Joined: Mar 14, 2005
Posts: 86
PM |
On 2007-04-18 02:03:25, thklinge wrote:
On 2007-04-18 00:19:40, jung wrote:
On 2007-04-17 19:39:39, thklinge wrote:
On 2007-04-17 10:34:46, jung wrote:
On 2007-04-17 09:30:43, PeterKay wrote:
well then, the P700 is definately for you then, 3.2mp cam is just what was needed and have implemented it. However the phone is just slightly thicker.
yes i agree, i don't own a digital camera, so my phone is my primary camera. i'm not overly bothered about the new cybershot with 5pm, as i only take quick snaps most of the time.
as long as it has xenon flash i'll be more than happy.
in terms of marketing i can't see why they wouldn't put one on there. last year the major selling point of the k series was the xenon flash, so nothing else had one, but this year it's the 5mp, so perhaps other phones will have the flash.
i will definitely buy one if it does.
I'm 99% sure it wont have an Xenon-flash like the K800i. Numerous sources have said that it's just slightly thicker than the M600i and that the backside is flat. Most of the space in the K800i camera-buldge on the back is occupied by two condensers that charge the flash. The space needed for those two badboys is why we won't be seeing a Xenonflash in the P700, sorry. I'd sure love to be proved wrong though. Parhaps already this friday?
but when you look at the k800, the back is actually almost flush, the only reason it's raised is due to the shutter, and the flash is actually flush with the housing, as is the lense.
correct me if i'm wrong, as i don't know sod all about flash technology...
The flash-lamp itself is on the side, yes, but the capasitors are in the bulge.
[ This Message was edited by: thklinge on 2007-04-18 01:14 ]
thanks for that, it's something i didn't know.
no flash then i guess  |
Exilim
Joined: Nov 06, 2003
Posts: 60
From: Denmark
PM |
But what about the K810 then...
It does not seam to have the K800 bulge
And it still have Xenon flash, right..?
Correct me if im wrong  |
mustafabay
Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Egypt
PM |
The K810 has a bulge, it might not be as big but you can see it in the pics.
If the P700 isn't going to be a cybershot I don't see why it shold have xenon flash. The LEDs are quite enough imo.
I don't want a signature anymore. |
vegetaleb
Joined: May 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Lebanon
PM |
I agree with you Moustafabay,the flash of the K750 was already enough also don't forget that you can use it as a torch
Prince Vegeta,prince of all sayans  Administrator in Dailymobile | |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2007-04-17 16:42
