Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Trade W810i for W900i

Previous  12
Author Trade W810i for W900i
goldenface
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM
Posted: 2006-09-01 15:47
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@boba

But you asked "do you need UMTS?", implying that it was an extra burden or something else to worry about when in reality, it is nothing more than fast GPRS - just like EDGE.

If you were pondering over whether to get a W810i, would it make any difference to you if it had EDGE or not - its no extra cost so why should it be an issue?

You just think the W900i is too Sony

_________________
T18s>>>T300>>>T610>>K700>>S700>>J5>>W900i

[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2006-09-01 14:48 ]
QVGA
Nokia Lumia 1020
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-09-01 15:50
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Keep in mind that W810 is to be cared for a lot, its quite sensitive.
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-09-01 15:53
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@goledn then u got me wrong... i just asked, if umts is a must or not. to mention edge wasnt even in my mind, he has w810, so probably he recognized it already, that it does support edge. imo its useless to go for a umts fone, if u dont wanna make any video calls or watch tv, listen to radio etc
Aquila non capit muscas - /// 4ever!

/// Ericsson Forum
goldenface
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM
Posted: 2006-09-01 16:09
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@boba

But thats exactly what I am saying. Take away the video-calling and UMTS and EDGE are basically the same. So when you say its useless going for a UMTS phone, its just like saying its useless going for a EDGE phone.

Also, just done a quick check on eBay and :

A boxed W810i, BIN is going for from £150 - £205.

A boxed W900i, BIN is going for £200 - £325.

I reckon you could get either for much cheaper but thats what the going prices are for both right now.

Considering the W900i is quite a bit older than the W810i, the former is holding its price probably as good as any other phone out there.

IMO, if you CAN trade your W810i for a W900i then I would - if just for an investment.

I'm holding on to mine until a higher-end cybershot handset comes along- one with better Video recording.

_________________
T18s>>>T300>>>T610>>K700>>S700>>J5>>W900i


[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2006-09-01 15:22 ]
*dust*
W900 black
Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 138
From: South Africa
PM
Posted: 2006-09-01 16:19
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@QVGA How come you say that the W810i needs care as it's delicate? I would think a swivelling thing with a cinema size screen would be more delicate. Is there something I don't know about my W810?

This message was posted from a W810i
goldenface
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM
Posted: 2006-09-01 16:23
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I was wondering that
QVGA
Nokia Lumia 1020
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-09-01 16:28
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-09-01 16:19:49, *dust* wrote:
@QVGA How come you say that the W810i needs care as it's delicate? I would think a swivelling thing with a cinema size screen would be more delicate. Is there something I don't know about my W810?





This message was posted from a W810i


It is. I've used both. Because W900 is massive, its durable. I used a W810 personally, and it felt very light and plasticky. Just didnt feel like I was holding something tough. But then again, thats a personal opinion.
*dust*
W900 black
Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 138
From: South Africa
PM
Posted: 2006-09-01 16:32
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Just because it weighs less doesn't make it more delicate. Wouldn't the swivel of the W900 wear out after sometime.

This message was posted from a W810i
goldenface
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM
Posted: 2006-09-01 16:45
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@*dust*

I had a S700i for over two years (its gone missing recently ) and there was absolutely no problems with that at all and I have never heard of any. If you were careless enough to sit on it when the phone was 'open' then that might affect the alignment but thats all.
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-09-01 17:19
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
useless to go for a umts fone if u dont wanna make video calls, watching tv or listen to the radio. thatswhy i didnt mentioned browsing and data transfer, cos edge offers u almost the same speed.
Aquila non capit muscas - /// 4ever!

/// Ericsson Forum
goldenface
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM
Posted: 2006-09-01 17:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@boba

Why?

Why is it useless to go for a UMTS handset if you don't make video calls or watch TV?

_________________
T18s>>>T300>>>T610>>K700>>S700>>J5>>W900i

[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2006-09-01 16:34 ]
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-09-01 17:32
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
well, as u wrote, edge offers fast data transfer. so why to make umts fones, if i cannot have the whole fun with it? i make many video calls for example, so devices like m6 or e60 seems a bit pointless for me... but its just my opinion
Aquila non capit muscas - /// 4ever!

/// Ericsson Forum
goldenface
Sony Xperia Z3 Compact
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM
Posted: 2006-09-01 17:41
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
But there are 3G phones out there that don't have video-calling.

It just so happens that those pushing 3G thought videocalllng would be a really big thing when it isn't. Its just a little extra.

So just because you don't videocall or watch TV on your UMTS phone, doesn't make it useless.

Otherwise it would only be as good as EDGE - and EDGE is not useless - is it?

The extra speed comes in handy when downloading or streaming video. But I wouldn't call it useless.

We have had these EDGE v 3G discussions before and if people didn't want faster and faster data transfer then we would all still be stuck with GPRS and there would be no EDGE.

_________________
T18s>>>T300>>>T610>>K700>>S700>>J5>>W900i


[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2006-09-01 16:47 ]
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi