| Author |
Nokia N73 vs SE K800i which is better? |
maggflodd
Joined: Apr 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: <500
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2007-01-12 08:08:08, 786KBR wrote:
Quote:
|
On 2007-01-12 03:51:16, mario2004 wrote:
You seem to have missed the biggest advantage of the N73 - is a S60 phone ! Is like looking at my laptop and comparing it to other portable DVD players and while comparing the buttons, screen size, battery etc etc, failing to realize a laptop is actually a computer  Never the less - nice comparision you've summed up there 
This message was posted from a N70-1
|
|
Iv been using a E61 for a while now, I dont see the big deal with symbian!
Whats the point?
|
|
"what's the deal"????? "what's the deal", as in "I've been driving a Porsche, what's the deal with this Turbo-thingy?"... Or:"I haven't yet opened the manual... by 'using' I meant looking at it?" Thanks, your bit of inspired humour has lightened up my, eh, last 2 minutes.
Happy new year
[addsig] |
|
|
j_duqueno
Joined: Feb 20, 2007
Posts: 2
PM |
2GB Memory Stick Micro M2 cards are already available:
http://www.mobymemory.com/Micro-M2.asp
Interestingly it appears the N73 does not support greater than 2GB SD cards (only supports SD 1 not SDHC) where as the M2 has a theoretical limit of 32GB. Shame M2 cards cost so much more than SD, but at least K800i owners will have the option to use 4GB+ cards in the future.
[ This Message was edited by: j_duqueno on 2007-02-20 17:07 ] |
SloopJohnB
Joined: Oct 28, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: the blue planet
PM |
Yeah but by the time 4gb micro cards reach a reasonable price people will be buying ´k850´ or at least saving money for it  |
mario2004
Joined: Sep 16, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: South Africa
PM, WWW
|
Well, theoreticaly the 2gig cards may be a limit for some. In reality if you won't manage with 2 chances are you'll find 4 inadequate too. On the other hand I wonder what costs more - the cell or the card?
This message was posted from a N73-1 |
j_duqueno
Joined: Feb 20, 2007
Posts: 2
PM |
I think we will see a 4GB M2 card available for £60 in the next few months. I probably won’t be getting my K800i for a month or two anyhow and chances are the 'K850' will also use M2. |
xerx
Joined: Jul 31, 2002
Posts: 375
From: New York City
PM |
get the k800i of course!
|
HamsterVil
Joined: Jan 11, 2006
Posts: 109
From: Santo Domingo
PM |
i find it ironic that a high end java based  phone can be on pair with a miraclous symbian powered phone.... and then i wonder if can do such a great work on a java based phone why their uiq phones are full of bugs?
BTW if u take out the unique symbian apps(the ones that a java app cant emulate) and then compare the n73 with k800 wich one performs better? |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-03-12 00:56:35, HamsterVil wrote:
i find it ironic that a high end java based phone can be on pair with a miraclous symbian powered phone.... and then i wonder if can do such a great work on a java based phone why their uiq phones are full of bugs?
BTW if u take out the unique symbian apps(the ones that a java app cant emulate) and then compare the n73 with k800 wich one performs better?
N73 still because of its far far better interface and UI. K800 doesnt come close in that department. Active standby rules! |
aatuif
Joined: Sep 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: KASHMIR
PM, WWW
|
N73, of course. No second thoughts.
|
thetmaxx
Joined: Oct 25, 2006
Posts: 89
From: California, USA
PM |
i know this topic is old, but i wanted to get my nokia problem out here... i would never buy another nokia as long as i live!!! their screen quality is poop. i thought my GF's cheap nokia was jst low quality because it was cheap, so i bought here a higher end one, and the screen is still poop. maybe it's because i have 18/20 vision, but the pixels are way spread apart, and the screen is horrible. even my t616 had higher screen quality.
also the UI sucks. SE is so much better, nokias UI doesn't even make logical sense. so my personal opinion is to never buy a POS nokia. (until i see one that proves other wise)
[gisdda] |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-03-12 17:19:19, thetmaxx wrote:
i know this topic is old, but i wanted to get my nokia problem out here... i would never buy another nokia as long as i live!!! their screen quality is poop. i thought my GF's cheap nokia was jst low quality because it was cheap, so i bought here a higher end one, and the screen is still poop. maybe it's because i have 18/20 vision, but the pixels are way spread apart, and the screen is horrible. even my t616 had higher screen quality.
also the UI sucks. SE is so much better, nokias UI doesn't even make logical sense. so my personal opinion is to never buy a POS nokia. (until i see one that proves other wise)
Stop talking crap. Go check out the E series and N80 and then repeat your words. |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
@thatmexx our choice depends on individual uasge and taste...
for me is se is unlogical, thatswhy i turned to nokie and in average all n and e series do fits my needs ate usage.
|
bavlondon2
Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Someone should have closed this thread ages ago.
For general purposes the N73 is better but in terms of imaging the N73 simply isnt up on par with the K800. Xenon flash, need i say more> |
SloopJohnB
Joined: Oct 28, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: the blue planet
PM |
Lets not start this discussion again... |
korbindallis
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
let me add my 2cents before this trade gets closed
in terms of price K800i is better and in terms of feture N73 is
so bottom line k800 is a cheaper phone if u want a better camera.
[addsig] |
|
|
Posted: 2007-01-12 20:31
