Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > Accessories > mca 25 sample pics

Author mca 25 sample pics
blitz
T68i mineral
Joined: Oct 16, 2002
Posts: 4
PM
Posted: 2002-10-21 13:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
http://www.pbase.com/jomi/mca25
====================
dashwerks.port5.com
Brimme
P900
Joined: May 18, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Netherlands Amsterdam
PM
Posted: 2002-10-21 16:55
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
what are your experiences with the cam in comperission with the mca-20 ?
P900 + P800 + K700i + T68i+ HBH-60 + ms duo128
Superluminova
K610 red
Joined: Feb 24, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: ...Mummies Tummy!
PM
Posted: 2002-10-21 17:08
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
looks just the same as the quality from mca-20

[ This Message was edited by: Superluminova on 2002-10-21 16:12 ]
Brimme
P900
Joined: May 18, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Netherlands Amsterdam
PM
Posted: 2002-10-21 17:09
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i think the mca 20 looks better
P900 + P800 + K700i + T68i+ HBH-60 + ms duo128
The_Novastorm
T68i
Joined: Oct 21, 2002
Posts: 13
From: Bristol
PM
Posted: 2002-10-21 17:11
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Whats your opinion of the CPW Communicam2 clone?
===================================
Mandrake Rocks! Long Live the Penguin!
blitz
T68i mineral
Joined: Oct 16, 2002
Posts: 4
PM
Posted: 2002-10-22 05:02
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
it seems they have the same pic quality, comparing it with other sample pictures ive seen using the mca20, but the huge difference is the addition of an optical viewfinder.
this is a real plus when you have difficulty framing your shot using the phone's lcd screen as a viewfinder.
kin0kin
T68i
Joined: Oct 07, 2002
Posts: 70
From: Malaysia
PM
Posted: 2002-10-22 05:22
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i have never used the cam before but if those pictures are really taken by MCA-25, I would way that is fantastic. Anyway u sure that those pictures are sample from MCA-25 n not the sony cybershot in one of the pictures? i might consider buying MCA 20 if thats real quality but i bet printing those pictures out will be yucky...
P800 is very TEMPTING!~!~~ I want it!
In fact im in love with it when I try the prototype
blitz
T68i mineral
Joined: Oct 16, 2002
Posts: 4
PM
Posted: 2002-10-22 05:33
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
the pics of the mca25 was taken with a cybershot u10, but any pics without the mca25 in the frame was taken by the mca25.
====================
dashwerks.port5.com
jcpsad
W800
Joined: Oct 15, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
Posted: 2002-10-22 15:56
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Looks like the quality is clear... is it better than the 7650 in terms of the quality?
www.photos.panelo.com
www.panelo.com
www.bilog.panelo.com
www.pbalive.panelo.com
nbuela
T68i
Joined: Oct 16, 2002
Posts: 43
PM, WWW
Posted: 2002-10-23 03:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Do you use IR when sharing images with your PC? pls email me how can i share pictures to my PC thru IR,,tia!-nbuela@yahoo.com

This post was posted from a T68i

MFB
T610
Joined: Jun 16, 2002
Posts: 73
From: Philippines
PM
Posted: 2002-10-23 03:37
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The mca25 and p800 were among the products featured at a recent exhibit by se in the Philippines. I was able to save the shots i took from both cameras. I own a mca20 and the pictures are great however the picture quality is only 72 pixels per inch. You can see this info when you use a photo software like the one that came with xp, paint. Just right click and you'll see properties. Anyway, the p800 and mca25 both have 300pixels per inch! One negative comment on the 25 is that the colors are not as rich as

This post was posted from a T68i

MFB
T610
Joined: Jun 16, 2002
Posts: 73
From: Philippines
PM
Posted: 2002-10-23 03:45
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Cont. Are not as rich compared to the mca20 even with the mca25 color boost set at 25. One very positive comment about the 25 however it that the shots taken for mms size is a lot better! This may be due to the fact that it has 300pixels/inch and even if you use zoom, the image will still have a higher pixel per inch compared to mca20. Unfortunately, zoom only works with the t300 which was also displayed. The p800 camera is another post for another thread.;-) by the way, the 25 is slimmer and lighter than

This post was posted from a T68i

MFB
T610
Joined: Jun 16, 2002
Posts: 73
From: Philippines
PM
Posted: 2002-10-23 03:52
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Cont. than the mca20. It doesn't bulge much in the pocket plus saving images on the communicam after a shot is much much faster! What i despise is the coating that surrounds the lens area. If i remember right, its chrome. For me it attracts too much attention that makes it more obvious you have a camera connected on your phone. Well, that's all for now. Hope the info i posted satisfied the curious ones.

This post was posted from a T68i

blitz
T68i mineral
Joined: Oct 16, 2002
Posts: 4
PM
Posted: 2002-10-23 08:04
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
the chrome lens coating is just for the prototype version, the mca25 i used doesn't have such coating.

@jcpsad: the communicam takes way lot better pics than a 7650

[ This Message was edited by: blitz on 2002-10-23 07:07 ]
MFB
T610
Joined: Jun 16, 2002
Posts: 73
From: Philippines
PM
Posted: 2002-10-23 09:45
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
That's great! How much did you buy it?

This post was posted from a T68i

Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi