| Author |
se d750i ( 2.0 mp )vs nokia 6680 ( 1.3 mp ) |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
guess its the first and the last time i participade here in such an actions, but i am interested in your opinions ( the ones with date in the pic are made by d750i ):
personally i culdnt fine such huge differences between the 2 cams, so where is the 0.7 mp difference? i didn made any settings, just made some shots. so as i see, the nokia cam is pretty good or the se cam is poor. whatever, i dont make so many pix, for quality photos i would go for a normal cam. so pls share with me your thoughts. tia
|
|
|
Residentevil
Joined: Feb 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Raccoon City, USA
PM, WWW
|
The second pictures have more vibrant colours.
Tough times don't last, tough people do!
Free Tibet |
thegreatone
Joined: Sep 28, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: hellmouth,sunnydale
PM |
i agree the second is better |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
thats right, those are the se ones. but as i see, thats the all the difference, if i would have done some settings on nokia, it could be better quality..
|
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
6680
K750i
i must say my k750 takes much better pictures than 6680
_________________
...Sony Ericsson Everyday...
K750 PERFECT PHONE
[ This Message was edited by: sasha-SE on 2005-10-26 22:05 ] |
Vein
Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Wilts, UK
PM |
6680 has less contrast in the pictures. Great cam though, a step up from the 6630.
Vein Autostyling (+28 -0)
www.cliosport.net
www.e30zone.net |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
but actually there arent many differences imo. guess if i had made some settings... ok 2mp is more, it didnt amaze me that much...
|
ph-m
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Posts: 19
PM |
i had a nokia 6630 1.3mp cam and wasn't impressed the cam was taking pics and they look like a mist is over the top whereas my D750i pics are crystal clear and sharp and very true to colour i could definately see the difference in cams with these two |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
crystal clear? which one? maybe at the macro mode, but generally we all make normal pix imo...
|
ares
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Coimbra, Portugal
PM |
So bobba, try to make one of these with da blokia:
k750/w800 has won over n90 in several comparative reviews, and n90 is undoubtly the best camera phone from nokia, so...
if you want i can give more examples of photos 6680 simply canīt make beacuse lack of quality/features...
looking to the photos you made yourself, well, only someone with problems in the eyes canīt see the d750 photos are better in colors, sharpness, etc...its has simple has that
[ This Message was edited by: Arez on 2005-10-26 23:11 ] |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
i was talking generally about the pix quality. for my eyes the difference is not that much, thought 2mp is better.
|
djuro
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Posts: 121
PM |
Dynamic range (density of a colors) is far better on SE pics |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
indeed, the nokia ones are "darker" and i bit "colourless".
|
sapibobo
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Posts: 214
From: Indonesia
PM |
Nokia seems has blueish cast on their color saturation.
It is true then, from many reviews i red, that "Carl Zeiss Tessar" at N90 is just a maketing jargon and not reflecting the true Carl Zeiss lenses quality found in many Cyber Shot cameras.
What makes me wondering, who is manufaturing lenses for SE? Are they making it themselves or by giving it to Sony? |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
that would be interesting to know, indeed. guess its sony behind the cams.
|
|
|
Posted: 2005-10-26 21:57
