| Author |
Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone |
yanyanyan881
Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
Let me enlighten you people..
PLank takes 100 photos but only choose the top 5 photos best quality shots and resized them into this forums.
And
Did you guys notice that he posted mostly board daylight shots? Of course the quality is there.
[ This Message was edited by: yanyanyan881 on 2008-08-19 06:15 ] | |
|
D Lee
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 12
PM |
@ muhammed-Oli
Make sure you've got the newest FW. When I got the first release FW last month with my first C902, I wanted to cry. The phone froze every other day. Then there were frequent pauses when I was playing the music. There might be dropped calls too. I was momentarily cut off a couple of times during conversation. Fortunately, I got a replacement whose FW is R3BH002. Now, three weeks have passed & only ONE incident occurred. One evening, I thought I lost all my Media content when I turned on the phone. I turned off the phone, removed the battery & turned it on again, the Media contents all came back. Now I am very happy with this C902 again. It functions well & without the dreaded unreliability of recent SE phones. I would recommend anyone to get SE phones, especially this one, but only a few months after the initial release. |
yanyanyan881
Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
On 2008-08-19 05:20:16, AbuBasim wrote:
Not if you want to know the true quality of a camera. 1024x768 is NOT the whole picture. It's only 15 percent of the whole picture. What about the remaining 85 percent you throw away? If you never use the full size of your photos, why bother buying a 5 MP camera (phone)???
Very true. Resized pics are too small to see individual faces and details of buildings and cars. If 1024x768 is enough, why would anyone buy 8MP true digital camera. They buy them becoz they want to view the pics in full size seeing the amazing details.
At Plank,
Seriously, i'm sure you are much older than me. But i feel tt you are cheating on yrself that C902 has a good/best/top/amazing camera. Isnt that childish? |
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
On 2008-08-19 07:04:44, D Lee wrote:
@ muhammed-Oli
Make sure you've got the newest FW. When I got the first release FW last month with my first C902, I wanted to cry. The phone froze every other day. Then there were frequent pauses when I was playing the music. There might be dropped calls too. I was momentarily cut off a couple of times during conversation. Fortunately, I got a replacement whose FW is R3BH002. Now, three weeks have passed & only ONE incident occurred. One evening, I thought I lost all my Media content when I turned on the phone. I turned off the phone, removed the battery & turned it on again, the Media contents all came back. Now I am very happy with this C902 again. It functions well & without the dreaded unreliability of recent SE phones. I would recommend anyone to get SE phones, especially this one, but only a few months after the initial release.
Thanks for the warning, but don't worry, I'm used to a W910i!  Dionasaurus bought his C902 from the exact same supplier as me and he says his is on R3BA035 with no problems and there is apparently a firmware update available to him, so that sounds pretty good to me! Cheers. 
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
abu... why in hell do you keep nagging about sizes of photos, nobody cares if I/we/you post in 1024 x 768 or not....dont you get it
(and pleasse, if you have EXAMPLE USE A 17" SCREEN, THENE IS 1024 X 768 THE BIGGEST RES IF YOU WANT TO SHOW THE WHOLE PICTURE AT ONE TIME....must i explain any further ?).
@yanyanyan881. dont you understand..... THIS IS A THREAD THERE YOU POST YOUR PHOTOS, OF COURSE YOU POST THEM SHRINKED. WHATS THE POINT TO POST FULL SIZE (just some link to imageshack, etc). PEOPLE WANT/LIKE TO SEE THE PICTURE HERE AND NOW, NOT VIA SOME LINK.
THIS IS A THREAD FOR POSTING C902 PICTURES, NOT SOME "POST YOUR FULL SIZE PICTURES".
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-19 08:29 ] |
b4mbi
Joined: Aug 13, 2008
Posts: 31
From: Serbia
PM |
@yanyanyan881 = are u blind or what ? Lot of users post here good/quality photos, so u wana say they all cheat and c902 is a crap?
Just LOL |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
hhmmm. C902 do its job pretty well:
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-19 08:36 ] |
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
Plankgatan, I noticed on your Flickr photos that you are still using the R3BH002 firmware. How come you haven't upgraded to R3CA038?
I thought you of all people would be keen to get the latest firmware!
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member. |
yanyanyan881
Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
On 2008-08-19 08:50:41, b4mbi wrote:
@yanyanyan881 = are u blind or what ? Lot of users post here good/quality photos, so u wana say they all cheat and c902 is a crap?
Just LOL
No. The way plank makes conclusion and judging of photos quality is very wrong. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
i happy with 002. (sooooo many times i have uppdate or dpy-flash to newer fw but i didnt need it).. 002 works like a clock, and have nearlly perfect color-reproduction.........thats why
just look at the picture above.. no color profiles, plain auto
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-19 09:20 ] |
yanyanyan881
Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
On 2008-08-19 08:08:02, plankgatan wrote:
abu... why in hell do you keep nagging about sizes of photos, nobody cares if I/we/you post in 1024 x 768 or not....dont you get it
(and pleasse, if you have EXAMPLE USE A 17" SCREEN, THENE IS 1024 X 768 THE BIGGEST RES IF YOU WANT TO SHOW THE WHOLE PICTURE AT ONE TIME....must i explain any further ?).
@yanyanyan881. dont you understand..... THIS IS A THREAD THERE YOU POST YOUR PHOTOS, OF COURSE YOU POST THEM SHRINKED. WHATS THE POINT TO POST FULL SIZE (just some link to imageshack, etc). PEOPLE WANT/LIKE TO SEE THE PICTURE HERE AND NOW, NOT VIA SOME LINK.
THIS IS A THREAD FOR POSTING C902 PICTURES, NOT SOME "POST YOUR FULL SIZE PICTURES".
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-19 08:29 ]
That's right. This thread is about posting resized photos. However do not judge its quality, compare with other cam phones and ...... based on resized photos. with exception of colours. |
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
On 2008-08-19 10:19:08, plankgatan wrote:
i happy with 002. (sooooo many times i have uppdate or dpy-flash to newer fw but i didnt need it).. 002 works like a clock, and have nearlly perfect color-reproduction.........thats why
just look at the picture above.. no color profiles, plain auto
I guess that's fair enough if you're happy with it! I'm getting a C902 and when mine arrives I think I will update, just to have the very latest firmware.
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
yeh you do that. (its one thing whos little better with latest fw, and thats super clear close-up pictures on people...like this one:
002 dosent have this extra little twist on the quality on portrait, but 002 produce little clearer ordinary pictures... so its little hard to choose i guess
edit.. just one tip before you uppdate your phone. USE EMMA ! (go to your local shop and DPY-flash it... i "allways" do that, and the phone ALLWAYS works little faster & better)
------------------------------------
-------------------------
our beatiful church
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-19 09:50 ] |
chombos1
Joined: Jun 06, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: IRAN.
PM |
On 2008-08-19 07:08:23, yanyanyan881 wrote:
.....
Not if you want to know the true quality of a camera. 1024x768 is NOT the whole picture. It's only 15 percent of the whole picture. What about the remaining 85 percent you throw away? If you never use the full size of your photos, why bother buying a 5 MP camera (phone)???
.........
Very true. Resized pics are too small to see individual faces and details of buildings and cars. If 1024x768 is enough, why would anyone buy 8MP true digital camera. They buy them becoz they want to view the pics in full size seeing the amazing details.
..........
i think you are a little bit wrong about this one.
for the first part...: that 85 percent is not thrown away when you resize the picture... the extra pixels take part in correcting the final pixel on the resized pic. ( i hope you get what i'm trying to say ) i mean the final pixel on the 1024x768 one is an average of the whole pixels on the same area on the 5MP one... and this means sharper edges... less noise and etc on the resized one...!
for the second part.... no man i just don't shoot pictures with my 7.2MP digicam just to zoom them on picture viewer to see a bee on the 10 meters away flower and then be amazed and happy................
although high quality on 5 or 8 MP pictures has benefits such as a better quality crops of the original pictures and the most important one ... Printing.
btw... do you knw that in the art of photography sometimes you need to take 10+ pictures of the same object to get the optimal quality... it's a rule |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-08-19 08:08:02, plankgatan wrote:
abu... why in hell do you keep nagging about sizes of photos, nobody cares if I/we/you post in 1024 x 768 or not....dont you get it
(and pleasse, if you have EXAMPLE USE A 17" SCREEN, THENE IS 1024 X 768 THE BIGGEST RES IF YOU WANT TO SHOW THE WHOLE PICTURE AT ONE TIME....must i explain any further ?).
I assume that you are still talking about the Photos gallery. You think those people visiting the gallery and then click on the full size link actually want to see your edited (resized and what else?) photos? I think that's wrong and that most people want to see what the photos look like straight from the camera, to judge camera quality. That's what the full size link is for.
Didn't you notice the instructions you get when clicking the upload button? This system is semiautomatic and require that your phone pictures are unmodified and not altered in any graphics editing software.
This thread is for resized photos while the gallery is for full size unedited photos. If you can't help yourself but have to shrink and edit your photos then post them here - not the gallery.
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-08-19 12:20 ] | |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2008-08-19 07:00
