| Author |
Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810 |
amarsidhu
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
Posts: 361
PM |
@sarmadgilani
please post your driver frnd. |
|
|
pakraider
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Posts: 313
PM |
On 2007-06-18 08:17:48, amarsidhu wrote:
@sarmadgilani
please post your driver frnd.
Sarmad's 5.7 driver
...based on 4.5 W810 stock driver
Normal mode = Faster EN/ENM - JPEG 89%
Fine Mode = Slower EN/ENM (more exposure) - JPEG 89%
Good and Accurate Focus and Sharpness
Improved Color correction always on
Auto Exposure Lock
LED white balance defaults to Flourescent for better tint
Fixed bug with white balance in LED ENM
MXE-60 Flash accessory support
Macro mode = Enhanced Mode (slightly longer exposure)
Manual Focus (use zoom keys to select focus)
1.0:autofocus, 1.1:infinity, 1.2-4.0 manual
Macro + Night = Enhanced Night Mode (longer exposure, very low noise)
Manual focus (as described above)
VIDEO RECORDING: Normal 15fps, Night 10fps, EnhancedNight 5fps
Normal mode has Smooth Zoom
Normal mode with Macro has same quality but with Manual Focus
EnhancedNight mode has Manual Focus with zoom keys
Download:
For W810 users:
Sarmad 5.7 driver: http://www.mediafire.com/?6njgyymqtlx
Sarmad 5.7 w/ Spot Photometry: http://www.mediafire.com/?3wntxdhyeqz
For K750/W800 users:
Sarmad 5.7 for K750/W800: http://www.mediafire.com/?e6nbhywy2nd
Sarmad 5.7 w/ Spot Photometry for K750/W800: http://www.mediafire.com/?bzzxt3dudze
moved on to the Nexus One..  needs a better Android  |
679
Joined: Oct 05, 2006
Posts: 174
PM |
@Raiderski
I'm sorry for delay, but still i dream to test 21.91 with SPU adaptive JPG. Realy i have my own sample test picture where i can clear see the difference between JPG level in snaps. BTW it is just A3 size page with text printed with different font size from 5 till 48. JPEG artefacts are seen clear around the letters edges. I cant use 1.3b4 because of spontanius problems with SE joistik.  . hope will clear it soon... THX.
[ This Message was edited by: 679 on 2007-06-18 08:28 ] |
pakraider
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Posts: 313
PM |
please note.,.. this is the SAME 5.7 that has been around for a while, just reposting the info and links upon request..
so what do you guys think.. should there be a new version with something like the SPU adaptive jpeg compression? i havent had a chance to test it out.. but if it works well, I'll find some time to test it out and take a look.
[ This Message was edited by: sarmadgilani on 2007-06-18 07:41 ] |
wayne_rooney
Joined: Nov 30, 2006
Posts: 100
PM |
@ sarmadgilani or any other modder
i have one request for u....
this is 4.4 sony r1l002 firmware driver...
can u add in this driver with following features...
manual focus.. EM,ENM respect to normal and fine mode.....Color correction,
,LED white balance.......
thanks...
http://www.sendspace.com/file/1rzukn |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
@679
www.sendspace.com/file/vmri59 you can pay attention not only on quality but on file size also (remember: 21.91 normal and fine mode equals)
by the way, to be exact - we have here small misunderstanding with two various things. our phones don't have adaptive compression but variable quantization (which works sometimes better, sometimes worst). it was always present in our phones
|
679
Joined: Oct 05, 2006
Posts: 174
PM |
On 2007-06-18 12:23:51, Raiderski wrote:
@679
http://www.sendspace.com/file/vmri59 you can pay attention not only on quality but on file size also (remember: 21.91 normal and fine mode equals)
by the way, to be exact - we have here small misunderstanding with two various things. our phones don't have adaptive compression but variable quantization (which works sometimes better, sometimes worst). it was always present in our phones
Yep! It works. Thx! Pictures size is 530-602KB against 395-412 KB for the same text image. But seems u r right, after comparison of the same part of snaps i cant be sure which one is better or more sharp...
Ah yes, i will use text recognition program to be sure which snap provide better percentage text recognition... |
Mr.Kája
Joined: Mar 22, 2007
Posts: 180
PM |
On 2007-06-18 05:42:39, radicalgel wrote:
@Choz
Ferrari F430!!! 
That is one HOT car...
Well, I'm a bit OT, but common, if you can't differences between f360 modena and f430... In that picture, it was classic f360  Muhehehéé
Nowadays, I'm enjoying Elm, fw R7BA076. And here camdriver database for k750/w800/w810: www.camdrivers.wz.cz  |
SPU
Joined: Feb 07, 2007
Posts: 131
From: Russia, SPb
PM |
679
Most artefacts on contrast edges are given by camera sensor not the JPEG.
You need to compare a smooth areas which always has noise. When the quality is low you'll get a "porridge" of big smooth points and you'll lose all small soft details in this areas.
JPEG works like MP3: higher compression - more soft sounds you'll lose.
W800i CID36 R1BD001 |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
the best way to reproduce crash is to get very bright (+2.0EV) picture but with some visible details (blank white screen can't cause crash). even latest SPU's compression settings at 90% can't hold on this type of image content
|
679
Joined: Oct 05, 2006
Posts: 174
PM |
On 2007-06-18 13:51:00, SPU wrote:
679
Most artefacts on contrast edges are given by camera sensor not the JPEG.
You need to compare a smooth areas which always has noise. When the quality is low you'll get a "porridge" of big smooth points and you'll lose all small soft details in this areas.
JPEG works like MP3: higher compression - more soft sounds you'll lose.
Yes, i've got near the same level of text recognition in OCR (Abby Fine Reader 7.0) for both 412k and 568k pictures size. And mb this comparison is like to compare Stradivary violine sound and good ordinary one violine. Only musicians can hear the difference. And may be me - under the very big zoom  .
And BTW - once i've went out from the camera mode - mb of picture size was above buffer size. Is it useless to correct buffer size to 616K (966640 - in cam_ss_jpeg_buf_size_8=927C0)? |
heiyei
Joined: Jun 02, 2007
Posts: 39
PM |
@ raiderski @all
hey buddy i have a real problem with my k750i camera.....last week my phone got dead as i tried to flash the erom and eventually got it repaired at a local shop but now when i change my camera driver (any modded) there seems to be no difference in the pictures all appear to be having more contrast and very low brightness......dark areas appear to be little noisy.....please help me out i dont understand what had happened!!! |
Aur3LiaN
Joined: Feb 21, 2007
Posts: 19
PM |
w810i vs Nokia 5300
I use sarmad 5.7, macro 1.1:infinity, sharpness "5"
w810i
5300
w810i
5300
The pics of nokia are very sharp but not real colour. Sarmad 5.7 are good colour but not so sharp :| .
[ This Message was edited by: Aur3LiaN on 2007-06-18 14:51 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Aur3LiaN on 2007-06-18 15:00 ] |
jangjr
Joined: Feb 22, 2007
Posts: 20
From: Malaysia
PM |
@Aur3LiaN
i think the w810 is more rich in details.
maybe the 5300 look sharper but its lacks of detail in pix.
i'll post back ur image taken with w810i and ive make a round mark on it and just compare it with the nokia pix.
cheerz.. |
radicalgel
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: 98
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-06-18 13:26:51, Mr.Kája wrote:
On 2007-06-18 05:42:39, radicalgel wrote:
@Choz
Ferrari F430!!!
That is one HOT car...
Well, I'm a bit OT, but common, if you can't differences between f360 modena and f430... In that picture, it was classic f360 Muhehehéé
Ooops. My mistake. Guess I missed it in a hurry. Both very hot cars and look very alike but IMHO the F430 is hotter.
-----------------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/radicalgel/ |
|
|
Posted: 2007-06-18 08:17
needs a better Android 
