Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > 5MPX camera vs K800i vs K850 (A true comparison)

Author 5MPX camera vs K800i vs K850 (A true comparison)
-PERFECT-
K850 Blue
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
Posts: 461
PM
Posted: 2008-03-10 21:17
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Less noise but less details, in the edited pic you can’t see the particulars of the green trees, it’ s not better for me
Amras
C702 Speed Black
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-03-10 21:41
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I agree. It's not better for me too. I prefer 100% grainy pics with lots of details.

That's why K850 will be perfect if it has the K770/K750's reprocessing method. Grainy, but lots of details.

[addsig]
plankgatan
Apple iPhone 5S
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM
Posted: 2008-03-10 22:05
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
think the pictures telling the true

k850 is the clear winner

K850..1..

K800..1..

K850..2..

K800..2..

K850..3..

K800..3..


_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-03-10 21:06 ]
Amras
C702 Speed Black
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-03-10 22:28
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Yes, K850 is surely better. The only thing I don't like from K850 pics is the sky. Seems too overbright in the 2nd and 3rd pic, and the blue of the sky is better in K800 1st pic. [addsig]
Luci'sPower
Sony Xperia Z1
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-03-10 23:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
well k850 is much better than the k800 in almost all areas...the only thing k800 it's better sometimes are te color reproduction(red color)...in rest nothing...i can post more pictures k850 vs k800 if you guys wan't,but you will get the same effect as in those pictures.......k850 the winner!
DarKMaGiCiaN
C905 Black
Joined: Aug 25, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-03-11 06:47
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@sadeghi85
I gave the example because lots of people ( sp nokia people ) hate the K850 due to the noise ( they like the hard noise reduction in nokia phones )

me 2 I prefer original pic!!

@-PERFECT-
hehehe it look like the pic is taken by nokia phones ( hehehe I like the trees and water fall in nokia shots heheheh it looks like someone paint it ^_*)


@Amras
watting for editing the camera driver

@Luci'sPower
there is no doubt about that ^_^


"The only thing I don't like from K850 pics is the sky. Seems too overbright in the 2nd and 3rd pic,"

I think this is a simple problem that can be solved by camera driver ^_^
Radiux399
T650 Blue
Joined: Sep 06, 2007
Posts: 246
PM
Posted: 2008-03-14 02:58
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-03-10 21:41:58, Amras wrote:
I agree. It's not better for me too. I prefer 100% grainy pics with lots of details.

That's why K850 will be perfect if it has the K770/K750's reprocessing method. Grainy, but lots of details.




Agreed. I picked up a K800 to compare with my T650. While its not bad, its amazing just how much detail the K800 loses in its processing that the T650 manages to keep. Not to mention the colors - they are far more accurate on the T650.

Really, the only advantage beyond the xenon flash that the K800 has is sharpness, but even that can be fixed in a second in photoshop.
Amras
C702 Speed Black
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-03-14 05:09
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-03-14 02:58:19, Radiux399 wrote:

On 2008-03-10 21:41:58, Amras wrote:
I agree. It's not better for me too. I prefer 100% grainy pics with lots of details.

That's why K850 will be perfect if it has the K770/K750's reprocessing method. Grainy, but lots of details.




Agreed. I picked up a K800 to compare with my T650. While its not bad, its amazing just how much detail the K800 loses in its processing that the T650 manages to keep. Not to mention the colors - they are far more accurate on the T650.

Really, the only advantage beyond the xenon flash that the K800 has is sharpness, but even that can be fixed in a second in photoshop.


Sharpness? I don't think that the artifact that K800 produces can be fixed in some PS. I mean, it's much easier to interpolate some grainy images (to have the feel more like K800's pics) rather than the opposite (sharpen an interpolated image to have the feel of more grainy).

IMO K800 has worse interpolation than K850. K850 comes with better details, and thank God in larger resolution too. But still.. prefer the K770/T650/K750/K550/W610/W800/W810's kind of post-processing to K850/K800/K810/K790's.

About the colors, I do think the same. K770/T650 can produce better colors in outdoor shots like that (using Daylight WB). (If you seen worse K770/T650 pics on the internet, it's just because the users just haven't known yet how to find the right settings - the same thing also applies with K850. You have to find the most proper setting.)






_________________
---- tempat sapi-sapi ngumpul kebo...

[ This Message was edited by: Amras on 2008-03-14 04:10 ]
Radiux399
T650 Blue
Joined: Sep 06, 2007
Posts: 246
PM
Posted: 2008-03-15 22:57
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-03-14 05:09:20, Amras wrote:

On 2008-03-14 02:58:19, Radiux399 wrote:

On 2008-03-10 21:41:58, Amras wrote:
I agree. It's not better for me too. I prefer 100% grainy pics with lots of details.

That's why K850 will be perfect if it has the K770/K750's reprocessing method. Grainy, but lots of details.




Agreed. I picked up a K800 to compare with my T650. While its not bad, its amazing just how much detail the K800 loses in its processing that the T650 manages to keep. Not to mention the colors - they are far more accurate on the T650.

Really, the only advantage beyond the xenon flash that the K800 has is sharpness, but even that can be fixed in a second in photoshop.


Sharpness? I don't think that the artifact that K800 produces can be fixed in some PS. I mean, it's much easier to interpolate some grainy images (to have the feel more like K800's pics) rather than the opposite (sharpen an interpolated image to have the feel of more grainy).

IMO K800 has worse interpolation than K850. K850 comes with better details, and thank God in larger resolution too. But still.. prefer the K770/T650/K750/K550/W610/W800/W810's kind of post-processing to K850/K800/K810/K790's.

About the colors, I do think the same. K770/T650 can produce better colors in outdoor shots like that (using Daylight WB). (If you seen worse K770/T650 pics on the internet, it's just because the users just haven't known yet how to find the right settings - the same thing also applies with K850. You have to find the most proper setting.)




Sorry, I think you misunderstood. What I meant is that the K800 offers better sharpness by default than the T650/K770, however you can easily add some extra sharpness using photoshop to T650/K770 images which would make them just as sharp as K800 shots - only without the loss of detail.
sblant
Model not set
Joined: Mar 10, 2008
Posts: 34
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-03-16 14:38
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I want two second exposion for night photo as K750 with modded camera driver
Grle95
Model not set
Joined: Dec 31, 2009
Posts: 2
PM
Posted: 2010-01-18 22:30
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The K850i is way way better than K800i.There is a big difference.Details,light sensitivity...K850i is the KING
Raiderski
C901 Black
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
Posted: 2010-01-18 23:00
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
The K850i is way way better than K800i

only when comparision is sponsored by Plank like above K850 is not much better, I think you haven't seen pictures from K800 without fingerprints on front glass, without haze. sharpness and details are great in both, colors almost equal and equal dynamic range, even quality of 2s exposure pics is equal. only K850 flash rocks all the way and of course more MP... way way better? not really

hiuhh, very old topic
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2010-01-18 22:01 ]
Luhccas-U1a
Satio Black
Joined: Mar 24, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
Posted: 2010-01-19 00:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
King?
is a lifestyle!
mriley
Samsung Galaxy S II
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM
Posted: 2010-01-19 00:48
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2010-01-18 23:00:53, Raiderski wrote:
The K850i is way way better than K800i

only when comparision is sponsored by Plank like above K850 is not much better, I think you haven't seen pictures from K800 without fingerprints on front glass, without haze.


Why does he do this Its very strange imo, if you think a camera-phone is very very good why would you bias the results??

@luhccas-c905

King is
Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III
followed shortly by the C905 DM 3.8
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010!
-------------------
Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can
Raiderski
C901 Black
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
Posted: 2010-01-19 10:39
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I was not even irritated by this, that's just pathetic attempt to deny that black is black and white is white you must have a powerful imagination to believe that the camera in K800 can be discredited by K850 (except of flash power)

King is
Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III followed shortly by the C905 DM 3.8

"just wait for next firmware update for C905 and then..."
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi