Esato

Forum > Sony Ericsson / Sony > General > Sony ericsson K750i 2 mp camera phone vs Canon PowerShot A40 2 mp digital camera!

Author Sony ericsson K750i 2 mp camera phone vs Canon PowerShot A40 2 mp digital camera!
DeLa
T600
Joined: Jan 22, 2003
Posts: > 500
From:
PM
Posted: 2006-11-21 14:44
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I'm about to buy a w810i and one of the reasons for that is the camera i got tp know from the k750. It is an amazing piece of thechnology.
Just like the k700, the k750/w800/w810 camera has that hard to define quality to it that just makes you take better pictures - though of course the k700's camera is more than two leagues away from the k750/w800/w810's, just check the k700 pictures thread to get the idea.
A good camera gives you the confidence that what you see on the viewer is going to work out fine. Also the colours of the k750/w800/w810 camera are very natural, something 'real' camera's often keep having troubles with...
SaLiH
Apple iPhone 6
Joined: Jul 30, 2006
Posts: 460
From: Bosnia & Herzegovina
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-11-21 16:10
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@DeLa - I agree, yesterdazy I tried some Kodak 3,2 MP Digital Camera, and the colours are awful, comparing to K750i.
Nokia 3310->Nokia 2100->Nokia 3100->Sony Ericsson K700i->Sony Ericsson K750i->i-mobile 902->Sony Ericsson K800i->Sony Ericsson T650i->Sony Ericsson C901->Sony Ericsson Elm->iPhone 3GS->iPhone 4s->iPhone 5->iPhone 5s->iPhone 6->iPhone 6s->iPhone 7 Plus
antichrist
M600 black
Joined: Sep 26, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-04-12 22:28
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2006-10-29 20:23:38, SaLiH wrote:
PowerShot A40 Features

* 2.1 Megapixel CCD for images up to 1600 x 1200 pixels.



1600*1200 pixels means 1,9 megapixles not 2.1
SaLiH
Apple iPhone 6
Joined: Jul 30, 2006
Posts: 460
From: Bosnia & Herzegovina
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-04-12 23:29
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I just copied official information about the camera.
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-04-12 23:49
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2006-11-21 16:10:45, SaLiH wrote:
@DeLa - I agree, yesterdazy I tried some Kodak 3,2 MP Digital Camera, and the colours are awful, comparing to K750i.



@salih - I manage to OWN some 4 and 5 MegaPixel KODAK Digicams in the past . . . and I can say that they deliver one of the LIVELY images amongst all the digicams around (though will be left behind if to compare with that of a Canon and a Nikon though . . .) Also, their HUEs is a bit on the YELLOWISH-side . . .

I think in order to appreaciate the images taken from a digicam . . . you must START at LEAST from a - 4 MegaPixel ones and not the - 2 or 3.2 MP ones. [addsig]
shaliron
K610 red
Joined: Jan 15, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Melbourne, Australia
PM
Posted: 2007-04-13 04:09
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Strange to see that the Canon has worse purple fringing than the K750, which I wouldn't have thought due to the (assuming) 'worse' optics of the K750.

The Canon colours are a bit nicer IMO, but the K750 holds up very well.
A wooden spoon is a spoon made from wood. Source: Wikipedia

Winner of: Best Thread (Huge SE Portfolio) 2007, Best Post (Huge SE Portfolio) 2007, Best Signature 2007, and 2nd Best Nickname 2007.
sahak
T68 gold
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
Posts: 15
PM
Posted: 2007-04-13 05:00
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i'm agree with shaliron, both camera are with the same megapixel (2MP)
but canon capcure a sharper and better photo. how this happen? can
someone explain to me about this?

i hope salih can give us his canon camera specification here. anyway,
thanks for the news salih.
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi