Author |
Sony ericsson K750i 2 mp camera phone vs Canon PowerShot A40 2 mp digital camera! |
DeLa Joined: Jan 22, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: PM |
I'm about to buy a w810i and one of the reasons for that is the camera i got tp know from the k750. It is an amazing piece of thechnology.
Just like the k700, the k750/w800/w810 camera has that hard to define quality to it that just makes you take better pictures - though of course the k700's camera is more than two leagues away from the k750/w800/w810's, just check the k700 pictures thread to get the idea.
A good camera gives you the confidence that what you see on the viewer is going to work out fine. Also the colours of the k750/w800/w810 camera are very natural, something 'real' camera's often keep having troubles with... |
|
SaLiH Joined: Jul 30, 2006 Posts: 460 From: Bosnia & Herzegovina PM, WWW
|
@DeLa - I agree, yesterdazy I tried some Kodak 3,2 MP Digital Camera, and the colours are awful, comparing to K750i.
Nokia 3310->Nokia 2100->Nokia 3100->Sony Ericsson K700i->Sony Ericsson K750i->i-mobile 902->Sony Ericsson K800i->Sony Ericsson T650i->Sony Ericsson C901->Sony Ericsson Elm->iPhone 3GS->iPhone 4s->iPhone 5->iPhone 5s->iPhone 6->iPhone 6s->iPhone 7 Plus |
antichrist Joined: Sep 26, 2006 Posts: > 500 PM |
On 2006-10-29 20:23:38, SaLiH wrote:
PowerShot A40 Features
* 2.1 Megapixel CCD for images up to 1600 x 1200 pixels.
1600*1200 pixels means 1,9 megapixles not 2.1
|
SaLiH Joined: Jul 30, 2006 Posts: 460 From: Bosnia & Herzegovina PM, WWW
|
I just copied official information about the camera. |
*Jojo* Joined: Oct 15, 2003 Posts: > 500 PM |
On 2006-11-21 16:10:45, SaLiH wrote:
@DeLa - I agree, yesterdazy I tried some Kodak 3,2 MP Digital Camera, and the colours are awful, comparing to K750i.
@salih - I manage to OWN some 4 and 5 MegaPixel KODAK Digicams in the past . . . and I can say that they deliver one of the LIVELY images amongst all the digicams around (though will be left behind if to compare with that of a Canon and a Nikon though . . .) Also, their HUEs is a bit on the YELLOWISH-side . . .
I think in order to appreaciate the images taken from a digicam . . . you must START at LEAST from a - 4 MegaPixel ones and not the - 2 or 3.2 MP ones.
[addsig] |
shaliron Joined: Jan 15, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Melbourne, Australia PM |
Strange to see that the Canon has worse purple fringing than the K750, which I wouldn't have thought due to the (assuming) 'worse' optics of the K750.
The Canon colours are a bit nicer IMO, but the K750 holds up very well.
A wooden spoon is a spoon made from wood. Source: WikipediaWinner of: Best Thread (Huge SE Portfolio) 2007, Best Post (Huge SE Portfolio) 2007, Best Signature 2007, and 2nd Best Nickname 2007. |
sahak Joined: Feb 06, 2007 Posts: 15 PM |
i'm agree with shaliron, both camera are with the same megapixel (2MP)
but canon capcure a sharper and better photo. how this happen? can
someone explain to me about this?
i hope salih can give us his canon camera specification here. anyway,
thanks for the news salih. |
|