| Author |
Jackson - Inocent |
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
What im curious to know is what was he doing with pictures of naked boys in his house?...if he's so innocent and pure as he says he is then why the hell did he look at porn?
[addsig] |
|
|
darky
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Posts: 299
PM |
if you believe him you'll believe anything....
this is a sad sad world we live in 
|
carkitter
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Auckland, NZ
PM |
@axxxr
Where did you hear that? That is an offense in itself, punishable by Jail. I think you'll find that's more rumour than fact.
I'm a fan of his music, not his behaviour. The jury had an oportunity to hear ALL the evidence, we did not. The two kids who accused him, recanted thier statements when cross-examined by MJ's lawyer. Thier mother showed herself to be a first rate idiot, and the defense presented witness' like Macauly Culkin who said "nothing happened".
The prosecution didn't prove thier case. Therefore MJ should be given the benefit of the doubt BY US ALL!
I think MJ should take a good look at himself and the way he behaves around children. I think he still has alot of growing up to do.
With his MASSIVE financial difficulties, I can't see him being allowed to move to OZ by his creditors. |
methylated_spirit
Joined: Jul 07, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bonnie Scotland
PM |
Im sure that theres a hell of a lot more going on in that case than we will ever know...they had their reasons, im sure!
Hello, Scroto!
U.G.L.Y. You ain't got no alibi, you ugly! |
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-14 13:26:36, carkitter wrote:
@axxxr
Where did you hear that? That is an offense in itself, punishable by Jail. I think you'll find that's more rumour than fact.
|
|
It was actual evidence that was presented in the case and not a mear rumour as you suggest see: Here Here Here
[addsig] |
DJcreamz
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Posts: 463
From: Luton / UK
PM, WWW
|
Hopefully this small article will help you decide if the verdict was a good one.
"I'm relieved that justice was done," said an overjoyed Jackson, who was wearing a T-shirt depicting a naked child. "I feel like I have wrestled the toddler of justice, wearing my jockstrap of truth."
Jackson also made a surprise announcement during a prepared speech to reporters outside his Neverland Ranch, stating he was getting out of the entertainment business. "When I look at the world today, with so much suffering, I realized that what I need to do is to try to help people who are suffering, and no one suffers more than little children with no parents. And that's why I am changing Neverland Ranch to the Neverland Foundling Home and Orphanage," Jackson continued. Now, little children who have no parents to love them, and no lawyers to look out for them, can come here and be cared for and loved."
Reaction from Michael Jackson fans was swift. "Omigawd!" opined Tracey Spitzer, 31. "What an amazing human being he is! I don't have any kids but if I did, I would kill myself so they could go live with him!" Tennessee native Fran Billings, who has spent the entire trial and in fact the past 15 years standing outside Neverland Ranch dressed like Jackson's scarecrow character from The Wiz, had strong feelings too but was so overcome with emotion that all she could do was spout incoherent gibberish.
"I love you all!" shouted Jackson to his fans, wearing pajama pants and visibly aroused. "I'll see you all here tomorrow for Naked Tuesday!"
The new Neverland Foundling Home has been allowed to open for business without obtaining any permits or licenses. An official at the local licensing board confirmed that the normal licensing requirement was waived. "We don't have any licenses for shit that is too nice weird to think about," he said.
|
carkitter
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Auckland, NZ
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-14 12:30:13, axxxr wrote:
What im curious to know is what was he doing with pictures of naked boys in his house?...if he's so innocent and pure as he says he is then why the hell did he look at porn?
|
|
I followed the link you provided and it does NOT substantiate your claim. Your claim is that he had pictures of NAKED BOYS at his house.
If so, that is posession of CHILD PORNOGRAPHY and is punishable by jail.
You didn't read the Article properly.
It said the young accusers fingerprints were found on a PORNOGRAPHIC MAGAZINE called Hustler Barely Legal. This is a magazine which it is legal for ADULTS to posess, as are the Penthouse and Playboy Magazines also found. MJ was charged with presenting these to the two accussers and found Not Guilty. Maybe they found his private stash by themselves? We'll never know.
@DJcreamz
HAHAHA very funny, I like 
[ This Message was edited by: carkitter on 2005-06-14 12:51 ] |
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
I know that your a big MJ fan by the looks of it,and trust me i was a big fan of his music aswell and still am.You can't really fault him on that part of his life.But as a person he is mentally unstable and a disturbed human being.Pictures of naked boys were found at his home and were presented at the trial,even a servent at the MJ's testified that she saw him having a shower with a 12 year old one night?..but i guess MJ has a good lawyer.here's a quote from the BBC link:
Here
Prosecutors in Michael Jackson's abuse trial have shown the jury two books seized from the singer's bedroom which they say show naked boys.
[addsig] |
methylated_spirit
Joined: Jul 07, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bonnie Scotland
PM |
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/mi[....]ckson-never-copped-a-feel.html
Flash video...to the tune of The way you make me feel..."i never copped a feel"
_________________
Hello, Scroto!
[ This Message was edited by: methylated_spirit on 2005-06-14 12:57 ] |
carkitter
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Auckland, NZ
PM |
@axxxr
While you were typing your last reply, I was just working out that those were three different links 
In the third link it is clear that one of the "naked photos" is actually a painting of boys IN SWIMSUITS and the inscription shows that it has GOOD motives not bad. The photographic esssay had an inscription on it showing it to be a gift from a fan! And they were from the 1993 case.
That's what is called 'Clutching at Straws' me thinks.
Fairs fair. He's been found not guilty on ALL charges.
Live and let live eh? |
BOSSHOGG
Joined: Dec 19, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
Most predictable topic ever!
This message was posted from a Z600 |
carkitter
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Auckland, NZ
PM |
I know, I was waiting for someone to start it up.
I honestly though MJ was going to be found guilty. But if the Jury is so sure of his innocence that they found him Not Guilty on even the minor charges... |
DJcreamz
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Posts: 463
From: Luton / UK
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2005-06-14 14:28:13, BOSSHOGG wrote:
Most predictable topic ever!
This message was posted from a Z600
|
|
well dont post stupid replys then, even better go dip your big fat head in a tub of boiling fat
|
Jim
Joined: Jan 20, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Belgium
PM |
That was nice ...
|
DJcreamz
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Posts: 463
From: Luton / UK
PM, WWW
|
sorry but it annoys me when people just post patronising replies like that
|
|
|
Posted: 2005-06-14 12:30
