| Author |
N82 vs k850.......(some new good pics [800 x 600]) |
Janbobejan
Joined: Jan 24, 2008
Posts: 35
From: Southern Africa
PM, WWW
|
@Razec You should consider accepting 'defeat' bud, is the right thing to do  SAMSUNG RULES |
|
|
Luci'sPower
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Sorry for posting here.... but i have one little question is the k850 flash stronger then the one on K810? |
C905
Joined: Jul 08, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM |
guys this thread leads no where !
those how want a good cam only, go for k850 :L)
those who want verg good features + a very good cam, go for n82 
OR.... if you want a cameraphone, the best on the market is samsung G800  |
Sony α
Joined: Dec 23, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: LDN/TYO
PM, WWW
|
@Luci'sPower
No, its the same Flash Module used in both handsets - they are both powered by two 330V Capacitators!
Sony Alpha.
imaging.like.no.other
|
Dupet
Joined: Nov 15, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
N82 Design looks terrible.. and K850 looks little better..
are you serious? the k850 looks like a toy and its fashion design wont age well. the n82s design isnt as out-there, but its alot easier to keep clean and just fits better in your hand |
Luci'sPower
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Soni_q thanks for the answer |
xironghostx
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2008-02-04 12:43:29, Dupet wrote:
N82 Design looks terrible.. and K850 looks little better..
are you serious? the k850 looks like a toy and its fashion design wont age well. the n82s design isnt as out-there, but its alot easier to keep clean and just fits better in your hand
The n82 design looks like a thing that would fit with an old english woman that lived in the 19th century.
k850 design kicks ass.. |
SilveR.
Joined: May 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-02-04 12:43:29, Dupet wrote:
N82 Design looks terrible.. and K850 looks little better..
are you serious? the k850 looks like a toy and its fashion design wont age well. the n82s design isnt as out-there, but its alot easier to keep clean and just fits better in your hand
Yes I'm serious.. N82 looks too terrible to me.. And yes K850 looks better.. But I don't fall for any of them..
--------------------- |
puestadelsol
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Posts: 310
PM |
We shouldn't compare the k850 with n82, or k800, just compare it with k750... unfortunately the k850 isn't decidedly winner in this case too.
K850:
K750:
Details (I've cut a part in 100% from original picture):
Details (I've cut a part in 100% from original picture):
Look the details! The scale besides the numbers looks better in the K750's picture, the little scale in the left side on the bottom of the clock looks better with K750, and finally, the SONY inscription from the VHS tape's box is legible in the K750's case and is illegible in the case of K850.
BUT in some pictures posted by other users we can see that with documet settings k850 produces qiute nice details (but in that case too should be better the details), and the colours become really vivid with twilight portrait settings (and remember the one of the strongest features of Sony's Cybershot cameras is the vivid -in some case even unrealistic- colors).
SO the k850 would produce accectable details and colours, the fault is in the software and not the hardware.
I checked Exif data, and in indoor pictures, with bad lighting conditions k850 uses often 1/8 sec. exposre time. But below 1/60, or 1/32 pictures easily become blurry, because every minor motion can affect the picture. I don't know how much can help in this case the picture stabiliser... |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
???? my k750, my friends k750 (and many others k750), take worse indoor pics then k850...very strange..eeehhhh
i get much sharper indoor pics with k850 then k750.....(k750 take nearly often realy blurry indoor pics)
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-02-04 17:44 ] |
Merkie2
Joined: Nov 06, 2006
Posts: 109
PM |
Statements, just statements. Show some comparison pics instead of saying that your K850i is the best camera phone ever, which is obviously not true, (K800i, K810i, K770i, T650i, W810 and K750i, and that's only SE, are better).
Btw, the lack of detail in K850i is really bad. You can read "Sony" from the K750i pic (2MP!), but not from K850i's 5MP pic! That's really awful, don't you think? Comment on this, in stead of arguing that your K850i is awesome.
[ This Message was edited by: Merkie2 on 2008-02-04 18:04 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
k770, w810, k750, t650 ??? he he he
so this is bad details, bad colors, bad pictures ????
it seems that you have no clue about photographing.
(i have no newer full size pics, otherwise i had showed them)
http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/7424/dsc00210la3.jpg
http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/8600/dsc00394hk7.jpg
http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/6889/dsc00401uf9.jpg
http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/2938/dsc00487nx9.jpg
http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/4180/dsc00409qn9.jpg
http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/8671/dsc00391kq9.jpg
http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/1962/dsc00383kh9.jpg
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/2411/dsc00388ep8.jpg
http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/8567/dsc00220qm6.jpg
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-02-04 18:27 ] |
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
On 2008-02-04 17:28:51, puestadelsol wrote:
We shouldn't compare the k850 with n82, or k800, just compare it with k750... unfortunately the k850 isn't decidedly winner in this case too.
K850:
K750:
Details (I've cut a part in 100% from original picture):
Details (I've cut a part in 100% from original picture):
Look the details! The scale besides the numbers looks better in the K750's picture, the little scale in the left side on the bottom of the clock looks better with K750, and finally, the SONY inscription from the VHS tape's box is legible in the K750's case and is illegible in the case of K850.
BUT in some pictures posted by other users we can see that with documet settings k850 produces qiute nice details (but in that case too should be better the details), and the colours become really vivid with twilight portrait settings (and remember the one of the strongest features of Sony's Cybershot cameras is the vivid -in some case even unrealistic- colors).
SO the k850 would produce accectable details and colours, the fault is in the software and not the hardware.
I checked Exif data, and in indoor pictures, with bad lighting conditions k850 uses often 1/8 sec. exposre time. But below 1/60, or 1/32 pictures easily become blurry, because every minor motion can affect the picture. I don't know how much can help in this case the picture stabiliser...
nice coprasion!! great to see that
k750 with mxe 60 is better then n82 and k850 in most situations!!!
OnePlus 8 |
davidsic
Joined: May 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Belgium
PM |
N82 by K850i
K850i by N82
I'll post some comparative pictures later
|
MWEB
Joined: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: somewhere nicer than you
PM |
I have to state that the camera phone pics thread on M-R is full of excellent work by Davidsic who has earned an enviable reputation for posting good and reliable shots!!
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-02-03 17:21
