Posted by anas
I think nokia is baaaaaaad
I agree that the 7650 is the best phone on the market
But come on the nokia 7210 the long waited phone is incomparable with my t68i
no email, no Bluetooth, no wap2.0, no sync, no voice dial, no infrared, no screensavers, no hscsd, no melody composer, no digital camera connectivity, and the memory is not like t68i, and the battery is f**ked up in all nokia phones,99% of nokia phones is dual band, I always travel to usa.
And the 6610 is worse
7210 an 6610 is better in polyphonic bullshit and I don’t think somebody cares about that, speaker, java, and not the radio u can buy one its 20 dollars
And if u told me quality
My t68i fool down from me more than 10000 times nothing happened at all no scratches nothing, infact t68i have a very low radiation
There are 6 things I really hate about t68i
1-screensaver
2-the color fades quickly
3-256 colors
4-the sound of the melodies is very low sometimes
5-no java so I can’t get rid of this stupid games and download others
6-no changeable covers and this is what I like in nokia
And there are only 3 things I like in nokia:
1-high-res display with an impressive backlight
2-changeable covers
3- Trendy flashy design
f**k nokia
nokia is for someone that dont need the huuuuuuuuuuuge package of features in t68i it is for children who cares about ringtones, games, radio.
the t68i is for bussines men and people who have PDAs and care about the features, even the t68i can store unlimited melodies, the nokia cant, the nokia dont have that dynamic memory.
i think t68i is the best phone for messaging, gprs, bussines and its really sexy, the 6610 looks like the old 3210.
so there is a big difference between t68i and nokias
the only phone that i dont consider it a nokia is the 7650 it is a really high tech phone and i agree its better than t68i but not than the p800
and if u still dont agree with me see this:
http://asia.cnet.com/reviews/handphones/0,39001719,39069935,00.htm
the t68i is the number one phone on the cnet network
i hope that some body agrees with me
[ This Message was edited by: anas on 2002-08-23 07:40 ]
Posted by GOwin
whether someone agrees with you or not,shouldn't matter. you are entitled to your own opinion.
Posted by anas
no thats not my opinion thats the truth
ISN'T IT?
Posted by Super G
| Quote: |
|
yes hscsd, yes infrared, yes wallpapers, yes screensaver (I think so), camera connectivity likely yes (they have what they called pop-port interface to which I hope we'll see some camera), yes triple band, GPRS 3+2, Java, polyphonic ringtones (you're soooo wrong about these
) etc etc
Posted by anas
| Quote: | |||
| |||
@super g
i think u r wrong, i know that there is hscsd and infrared and triple band in 6610, but when i said no hscsd no infrared i was talking about 7210, and when i said no triple band i was talking about that 99% of nokia phones is dualband (7650 and 8910 are dualband)
and i am correct when i told u that there is no digital camera connectivity and no screen savers, nokia, said that not me
http://www.nokia.com/phones/6610/faq_other.html
and i didnt said that there is no gprs or no java or no polyphonic ringtones
next time read the post correctly
[ This Message was edited by: anas on 2002-08-24 08:15 ]
Posted by arus
| Quote: |
|
Are you same guys at thread at link below ?
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=9841&forum=2&13
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=9852&forum=2&9
If so, what a so pity.
Seems you have known detailly about Nokia 7650, 7210 and 6610 but you still confuse to choose the best one for you.
Or is it just ...........?
[ This Message was edited by: arus on 2002-08-23 08:17 ]
Posted by Super G
@ anas:
| Quote: |
and i didnt said that there is no gprs or no java or no polyphonic ringtones |
Next time, don't misunderstand me.
I didn't say you said there is no gprs, no java... I said yes to hscsd etc, and underlined the gprs, java functions. You claim Nokia is baaaaaad (that's your opinion, fair enough), but I wanted to highlight some points going clearly against that. Now, you may think it's bad, but it doesn't mean it is. You just don't like it.
besides it has integrated handsfree. T68i doesn't have.
And yes, there is a screensaver. It can't be changed, but there's one. Ok, I'm playing on words here, but your post was misleading.
Regarding camera connectivity, you can't connext a digital camera to it. Not a traditional one at least. Neither can T68i. But what I said is that I would expect some similar cameras to MCA20, given that there is this pop-port interface that to my mind could definitely allow this.
Posted by anas
i've choosen the 8910
but still nokia sucks
Posted by tobi
check this out....
http://attach1.groups.yahoo.com/v1/cN1lPSWAGIpPXlV2LQTpqItEgPCDC8_dEaU8z5sAerMtqp-s8g2491_VtGM2UE1gNS_o7ZSdahTYItLIEZxplbDmzNnBDkoSLGdl3VM8amx7Xu8N/Nokia.jpg
Posted by sebtek
just a note....
the 6310i is also triband
Posted by Super G
Sebtek: you're right, and it's a one of the best sellers in France.
http://www.fnac.com/Label/MeilleuresVentesMicros.asp?NID=1587044&RNID=%2D49&SID=96DD77B3%2D8206%2D0A58%2DA7BC%2D8C36EEC12441&Origin=FnacAff&SearchType=LABELSEARCH&LabelId=1587044&SubjectId=1576792
Posted by anas
nokia 7650 must had tripleband but it dont
same thing with 8910
[ This Message was edited by: anas on 2002-08-24 08:19 ]
Posted by Raven
8890 is also triband
Posted by Deltayoda
This topic is just confusing...
Posted by anas
its not confusing or bullshit
one weak and the 7210 will come out and then we will have the real comparison between t68i and 7210
i think the most useful features in latest nokias is JAVA
nokia 7210 sux
but nokia 6610 may be successful
i may switch to 6610 and sell t68i but i dont think i will, i will wait until 6610 hits the market and i wont get it if it was lower price than t68i
thanks
Posted by Froddan
Let me see if I got it...
You hate Nokia, because they suck and lacks in features.
7210 sucks, and 6610 is even worse. But you could replace your t68i with a 6610 anyway, but only if the 6610 isn't cheaper than t68.
Ok? And you just had a 8910, which is a Nokia, and therefor sucks.
Right, not confusing at all
Posted by anas
ok
i had a free 8910, and no way i will keep it i will sell it, its very nice but i cant live without color, so im waiting for the 6610, see it in real life, if it was an unbelievable increcible nice phone, i will sell my t68i and go for it (if only the t68i had java).
Posted by Jison
Nokia disconnecting people
Posted by decoy7
it's hot and sunny in London...get out more.
Posted by anas
| Quote: |
|
thank god somebody agreed with me
Posted by anas
sony ericsson t68i is better than 7210, but maybe not better than 6610.
we will see when both 6610 and 7210 come out
Posted by evoke
| Quote: |
|
Yep it is!
Ed
Posted by anas
if u dont like it just ignore it
Posted by anas
if u dont like it just ignore it
Posted by anas
if u dont like it just ignore it
Posted by anas
if u dont like it just ignore it
Posted by Johan
@anas ..
Anas wrote:
"I think nokia is baaaaaaad"
If you dont like it, just ignore it!!!!
Give the "lets hate Nokia discussion" a rest will ya?!
everybody get the picture .. you hate Nokia!, who cares anyway?!
Posted by decoy7
anas,
i find your writing most constructive and informative, please take the time to review products from other manufacturers in this way so people like myself dont have to endure such bad quality and make life threatening mistakes by purchasing them...do not limit yourself to mobile products, i'd like to know about fridge freezers, washing mahines etc please.
Johan,
i care, very much in fact...not everyone who reads these boards thinks anas is talking complete and utter sh**...just most of us
Posted by wrecked_porsche
I agree with anas too.... NO kia SUX !! Burn in hell and DIE !!
Posted by B@RTje
why is everyone always complaning about nokia...!
why not about a samsung or a siemens or something..
Posted by Rui_Costa
I don't know?
Maybe people think Nokia is
biggest threat
Posted by Froddan
Having such a small market share as SE has, everybody's a threat.
And SE:s biggest threat, are SE themself.
So why pick on Nokia? Sure they've had some "bad" phones, and their strategy isn't always the best. But neither is SE:s, or anyone elses.
Posted by boysaint
who said 8890 is triple band? wrong! dual band only! read the box, read the brochure, read all info about it!
nokia a threat to SE? no.... we have to admit nokia is more popular before. SE came out (after being just a "Ericsson"..) and became popular. so....SE is a threat to nokia.
Posted by bart
there is only one problem whit ericsson most people already had an ericsson but on old and cheap one, T18,a2628 and they sucked they were cheap but very bad, and now they think that the 3310 is the best of the best,well they are so wrond but they don't know it! i hope the T300 does good but i think it wont sell much, because of the more sony like design
Posted by Evilsummer
people still compare SE with nokia because they were once the two BIG competitors but unfortuanly things have changed... SE arent that big anymore wheter we want it or not...
Posted by evoke
| Quote: |
|
Yep sounds like a good idea to me!
BTW thanks for posting that 4 times I may have missed it!
Ed
Posted by anas
nokia is f**ked up
baaaaaaaaaaaaad
all nokia phones lacks 80% of most needed features
lets have an example
the Ericsson T39 that came out before long time is still better than 3310, 6510, 8310 and all this bullshit, and it was the very best phone on the market until t68 came out,
then the t68 was the best phone on the market until the t68i came out, and now the t68i is the best or the second best phone on the market, and in a few days the p800 will be the best phone on the market, so where is nokia??!!
6610, 7210, 8310, 6510, 3610, 8910, 6310i, 3510, 3410, 3310, etc.
i think T39 is better than all of this
_________________
Sony Ericsson T68i R2A014
[ This Message was edited by: anas on 2002-08-31 20:14 ]
Posted by Froddan
| Quote: |
|
Now this is a bit confusing, don't you think?
Posted by Raven
| Quote: |
|
I wrote that. Ok, so maybe it is not technically a triple-band phone, but it does have worldwide coverage.
Posted by anas
| Quote: | |||
| |||
whats confusing?
7650 is the only good phone in nokia but it wont be the the best so long.
Posted by Froddan
You talked about all the good SE phones, and asked where is nokia.
At the same time you admit that NOKIA 7650 is the best for now.
That's confusing, at least for me...
Posted by decoy7
anas isnt confusing, he's just cleverer than everyone else mate...live with it, the rest of us have to.
Posted by anas
the 7650 is the only good phone in nokia, but i think that the 8910, 6310i, 8310, 7210, 6610, 3610,etc are garbage
Posted by anas
Nokia SUX
Posted by decoy7
anas - is that your real name?
Posted by Froddan
| Quote: |
|
Thanks mate, I thought it was me being dumb...
Posted by Johan
| Quote: |
|
How can u be so sure of this?.. have you owned all of these phones?? .. dont think so!
Btw .. where were Ericsson when the brickphones 868, 888 and so on was on the market ??
You keep talking shit about Nokia! .. in reality you are just plain jelaous.
Posted by markboyce
The 8890 is not tri-band you dim wit! It's dual band 1900 & 900 frequency that can be used in America.
Posted by Raven
Like I said, you fu*king prick, it is not technically tri-band, but does have worldwide coverage, atleast according to the information on Nokias website!
Posted by anas
and now sony ericsson has a good going with the t200,
very nice phone
check this out:
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=10228&forum=2