Welcome to Esato.com


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Explosions on London Underground!

Click to view updated thread with images


Posted by peeta
i was one of the people saying there will be thousands of bin ladins but that is a whole world away to your neighbours seeing the same things as me on television and deciding to blow themselves and lots of other innocent people (poss even me) up. did they forget most of us were against the war yet its us they went after and not bush and blair (not that i'm advocating that nor would it solve anything as theirs lots more of the b*****ds who would replace them). What they've done is going to divide society even more and make things WORSE.
Just like Bush created thousands of bin ladins this will create thousands of Bushes.


Posted by absinthebri
Quote:

On 2005-07-13 02:50:01, london-uk wrote:
People who are in such a deranged state as to attempt to justify the killing of innocent people should not be listened to.



Agreed. And I will not attempt to justify the kiling of innocent civillians in London, Madrid, New York, Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine or Israel. Innocent civillians are innocent civillians where ever they are.

Quote:

It is complete lunacy to advocate that we (the UK) should in some way have brought these mindless attacks upon ourselves.



Is this a different sort of lunacy to the one that advocates that the London bombings are random and totally unconnected with any other world events? I have *no idea* what the motivation of the London bombers was; all I know is that *nothing* happens in a vacuum.

Quote:

Our (elected!) government has done what it sees as reasonable in order to attempt to restore security to the world.



But we KNOW that the Government's own security services staed that there would be LESS security if we attacked Iraq. Your statement is simply untrue.

Quote:

The war in Iraq is wholly seperate to any attacks within this country, the bombers will quote any cause in order to validate their insane rampage.




Yeah, 'causes' that spring to mind are 'democracy', 'WMD'. No, wait, that's the other insane rampage.


Posted by themarques
Guess Who?????????





Posted by axxxr
Is he one of the bombers?

Posted by JiggyJaggy
Supposedly so...

Posted by themarques
Shehzad Tanweer, 22, blew up a Tube train at Aldgate, East London.
Two other killers were 19 and 30.
The fourth member of the Yorkshire gang, who all wore backpacks, is thought to be a teenager.

CCTV cameras filmed them smiling and chatting at King’s Cross station just 30 minutes before Thursday’s devastating attacks.

Then they split up — each carrying up to 10lbs of explosives and a timing device in his rucksack.

_________________
8Mbps of Pure Speed

[ This Message was edited by: themarques on 2005-07-13 13:27 ]

Posted by JK
So now Id like to know who said that AL-Quieda took responsibility??

Puts things into perspective doesnt it... a bomb goes off, lets blame al quieda even if we dont have proof!!!

The guy who released that statement should be shot!!!!

Posted by themarques
@786KBR A group calling itself “The Secret Organization of al-Qaida in Europe” posted a claim of responsibility for Thursday’s blasts in London, saying they were in retaliation for Britain’s involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I guess you missed the the al-Qaida part...



“Rejoice, Islamic nation. Rejoice, Arab world. The time has come for vengeance against the Zionist crusader government of Britain in response to the massacres Britain committed in Iraq and Afghanistan,”

Posted by JK
So these guys were part of that group then?

ps: why do they have secret groups??

Posted by themarques
Quote:

On 2005-07-13 14:42:57, 786KBR wrote:
So these guys were part of that group then?



We have to wait on MI5 and 6 to give us more info as it comes through..

Quote:

ps: why do they have secret groups??



Well I dont think they can go about advertising there service on Google now...

Posted by Cornholio_666
these people say that the attacks were in response to the massacres Britain committed in Iraq and Afghanistan, as if everyone went to iraq and afghanistan and killed someone. when are they going to learn that its a few politicians who make the decisions, and not the whole country? if i remeber correctly a shit load of people were against the war in the first place.

Posted by JK
Quote:

On 2005-07-13 15:31:35, Cornholio_666 wrote:
these people say that the attacks were in response to the massacres Britain committed in Iraq and Afghanistan, as if everyone went to iraq and afghanistan and killed someone. when are they going to learn that its a few politicians who make the decisions, and not the whole country? if i remeber correctly a shit load of people were against the war in the first place.




Its a point they making to the politicians!

Posted by peeta
Its a point they making to the politicians!

I'm sorry but that is the biggest load of bs i've heard. they have no point except maybe all they wanted to do was be martered and remembered by the world as dying for some cause to give their meaningless little lives some short term aim. we should treat them like the man who shot Lennon, so their real motive becomes meaningless. Did Blair suddenly say sh*t what was i thinking of course invading Iraq was wrong...sorry. NO i don't quite remember that.

Posted by absinthebri
Quote:

On 2005-07-13 21:34:36, peeta wrote:
Its a point they making to the politicians!

I'm sorry but that is the biggest load of bs i've heard. they have no point except maybe all they wanted to do was be martered and remembered by the world as dying for some cause to give their meaningless little lives some short term aim. we should treat them like the man who shot Lennon, so their real motive becomes meaningless. Did Blair suddenly say sh*t what was i thinking of course invading Iraq was wrong...sorry. NO i don't quite remember that.




What's the point of the war in Iraq?

How should we treat Blair, the murderer of 20,000 innocent Iraqis? What is/was his motive?


Posted by absinthebri
I note the whole of the European Union will hold two minutes' silence at noon (BST) tomorrow in response to last week's terrorist atrocities in London. (http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/articles/PA_NEWA11761221121270173A0?source=PA%20Feed)

I note some other countries the other side of the Atlantic won't.


Posted by Vlammetje
I remember one day is sept 2001 when we held 3 mins of silence for that one country across the atlantic........
Strange how it seems a lifetime ago already

Posted by absinthebri
Quote:

On 2005-07-13 21:43:03, Vlammetje wrote:
I remember one day is sept 2001 when we held 3 mins of silence for that one country across the atlantic........
Strange how it seems a lifetime ago already




It does seem such a long time ago.

Things don't seem to be improving.


Posted by peeta
"What's the point of the war in Iraq?
What is/was his motive?"

Politics and Greed both of which have explanations far too long to go into here but reading Chomskys Understanding Power will go a long way to answering some, but not all, questions.

"How should we treat Blair,..."

With the contempt he deserves

"the murderer of 20,000 innocent Iraqis?"

20 000's an understatement, but anyhow.

None of that merits the bombing of random people who happen to be in the same city at that time, but i'm sure no one here disagrees with that.


_________________
cheap thing no good, good thing no cheap

[ This Message was edited by: peeta on 2005-07-13 21:07 ]

Posted by absinthebri
Ooh, Chomsky. I like Chomsky but I often find him quite difficult (but worth the effort).

I use the figure of 20,000 as it's not disputed. The 'real' figure is, as we know, over 100,000.


Posted by london-uk
Quote:

On 2005-07-13 21:37:35, absinthebri wrote:

What's the point of the war in Iraq?

How should we treat Blair, the murderer of 20,000 innocent Iraqis? What is/was his motive?





Saddam was killing people daily. Although the premise at the time was that Saddam's regime had WMD's (which was later found to be untrue), I believe that the right decision was made, when it was decided to invade. You say that Blair is the murderer of 20,000 people. Incidentally, based on figures from the U.N. this would in fact be a smaller number of fatalities than that of a similar period of time during Saddam's regime. Additionally, may I note that the vast majority of people killed in Iraq now are in fact killed by suicide bombers, who are obviously not affiliated with the US or the UK.

The choice was made to remove the previous Iraqi regime, and the country is now going through a difficult time. However, this is in large part due to the disgusting actions of insurgents of Iraqi and other origin. If they could just accept that their country is in a time of transition. Moving from dictatorship to democracy will take time, and the only hindrance is that of the suicide bombers. I just can't understand why they can't stand back for six months, and they'll have their country fully back in their control.

Posted by absinthebri
Quote:

On 2005-07-14 00:20:31, london-uk wrote:
Quote:

On 2005-07-13 21:37:35, absinthebri wrote:

What's the point of the war in Iraq?

How should we treat Blair, the murderer of 20,000 innocent Iraqis? What is/was his motive?





Saddam was killing people daily.



Really?

Quote:

Although the premise at the time was that Saddam's regime had WMD's (which was later found to be untrue), I believe that the right decision was made, when it was decided to invade.



So you support committing war crimes? You appear to admit guilt to the first two counts at the Nuremburg trials.

Quote:

You say that Blair is the murderer of 20,000 people.



That's a generally accepted figure (accepted by the UK Government)

Quote:

Incidentally, based on figures from the U.N. this would in fact be a smaller number of fatalities than that of a similar period of time during Saddam's regime.



Your point? Does that make it okay? Is there a moral differnece between Bush/Blair murdering Iraqi civillians and Saddam doing it?

Quote:

Additionally, may I note that the vast majority of people killed in Iraq now are in fact killed by suicide bombers, who are obviously not affiliated with the US or the UK.



Who destabilised the country to such an extent that there is a civil war there now?

Quote:

The choice was made to remove the previous Iraqi regime,



Which is a crime in International Law.

[quote]

[...snip...]

Posted by gelfen
i think it would do everyone some good to read the opinion of someone who actually knows what he's talking about.

Quote:

On 2004-05-19 08:13:26, gelfen wrote:
finally, i would like to attach the text of an interview on Australian television with Salam Pax, aka "The Baghdad Blogger", who maintained an online diary throughout much of the Coalition incursion into iraq and for several months preceeding the invasion. Salam Pax has much to say about the current situation in Iraq, and it is refreshing to hear the opinion of an Iraqi rather than the biased and self-serving commentary provided by most media outlets (both left- and right-wing). i urge you all to read this interview and absorb what Salam Pax has to say, and not try to colour it with your own prejudices and (deliberate) misinterpretations.

Salam Pax appeared on the ABC television show Enough Rope with Andrew Denton which is an interview/chat style show hosted by (funnily enough) Andrew Denton, an Australian presenter/commedian/radio announcer. The interview was pre-recorded in front of a live audience on Monday, before the assassination of Governing Council President Izzedin Salim.

Salam Pax
When he began keeping a diary, he had no idea that the world would read it. An Iraqi living in Baghdad before the invasion of last year, he was typing his thoughts and observations onto the Internet just to keep his friends up to date. But as the coalition of the willing closed in, word of his writing spread. At great risk he became an accidental journalist more embedded and often more truthful than many of the Western press could hope to be. Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome Salam Pax.

Andrew Denton: If I could just give a bit of background first, Salam. You're an architecture student. You come from a reasonably well-off Iraqi family. You've lived several years in the West, including Vienna. Your mum's a Shia Muslim, your dad's a Sunni, you're an atheist…

Salam Pax: Yeah, but don't say that.

Andrew Denton: OK. I won't mention… And you're gay.

Salam Pax: Er, yeah. Don't say that as well.

Andrew Denton: OK, I won't say that. Am I wrong, or is this not a typical Iraqi profile?

Salam Pax: No, it's very typical. No. The problem, you see, um, you have so many things that you want to say and coming from such background my mother is Shia, my father is Sunni, and I being different. It's just that there is so much you really want to say, and in Iraq before the war there was no way you could really express any of these opinions or feelings. And this diary was great when I found out there was a place I could express all these feelings and say these things.

Andrew Denton: Nonetheless, I would have thought, a risky thing to do because on the Internet you are public.

Salam Pax: Yeah. You see, when I first started it, just trying to get in touch with my friend, it was supposed to be a very small personal thing and it was really two people at most reading it and then just slowly building up. I didn't think of the risks, I didn't see it as a risk because it wasn't supposed to be that big any way. It attracted too much attention at the point where I had to stop. Only just before the war started thinking of the risks, really, it was a bit foolish.

Andrew Denton: Absolutely. You were chronicling a country that was about to be invaded. A scary, scary prospect. Why did you stay in Baghdad? You didn't have to.

Salam Pax: Actually, you do have to. It is your country going through really one of the most important changes. There was at a point a discussion within the family. What do you do, do you stay? Do you leave? Do you at least go out of Baghdad into some other city? I think we all decided… We got all together, my uncles and aunts, we stayed together, like, my aunt's house and ours was close together. Everybody was there. You have your family, your loved ones, stay together, let's stay here. In the end you want to see what happens. You cannot leave when something like this happens to your country. You need to know.

Andrew Denton: The benevolent West was coming to save your country from a despotic tyrant. You weren't too happy about that, were you?

Salam Pax: There is this one problem, is that when they come with this idea that "Let's teach those backward brown people over there how it's supposed to be done." It's a problem with who thinks is superior to us. And coming over to Iraq telling you what you're supposed to be doing without understanding your own culture is a problem. But of course we all realised there was no way to get rid of Saddam without foreign intervention. You are standing in the middle not knowing whether to invite them in or to kick them out. You don't know what to do. You have to wait. I am still hoping and trying to be optimistic with all the problems, just looking forward and hoping that some time in the future things will get better. The 'benevolent West'. Well, they're trying. They are not listening enough to Iraqis, but they're kind of trying.

Andrew Denton: Sorry, I didn't hear a thing you just said then.

(Pax laughs)

Andrew Denton: It is something very few of us have been through. How do you prepare for an invasion when it's your country that's about to be invaded?

Salam Pax: I can give you a long list. Dig a well, water will get cut off. Buy a little generator, lots of candles. Buy alcohol, the shops will close. Food, I don't know. Just get whatever. But to prepare… I guess the important thing is having your family and loved ones close to you. Keeping in touch is very difficult after the war. The problem was always in Iraq that we never had information. When you don't know what's coming… People just needed to know what's going to happen, what's the situation. Is it going to happen tomorrow? In a month? The slack of knowledge and information was actually the most difficult part. We had to smuggle a tiny little satellite dish every couple of hours to check the news because satellite dishes, you get 6 months in prison for having a satellite dish. The most important thing is you need to know what is going to happen. At least we know something bad is happening in this city. Then we just didn't know. Suddenly the bombs would start falling.

Andrew Denton: What was the city like in the last few days before the war started?

Salam Pax: Very strange. I've never seen Baghdad like that. People just didn't close their shops, they actually built their shops. You'd see people just building all the windows and doors of shops and houses and there were lots of people trying to leave Baghdad. But then the neighbouring countries, they were very friendly. They kind of cut us off. You were not allowed to go out Jordan, Syria, of course not Kuwait, Turkey, Iran — they closed the doors and you Iraqis stay here, wait to get bombed. The decision to stay in Baghdad was not just a decision we made. It was made for us. "You're staying."

Andrew Denton: You chronicled all this, and your web diary, which started with a readership of one — your friend in Jordan — suddenly was being read by hundreds of thousands all around the world. What sort of reactions were you getting?

Salam Pax: All sorts. Most were kind of not believing that someone in Baghdad would be writing this. There was so much doubt and thinking, "No, no, no." Then came the period when everybody was saying, "He's definitely either CIA or the secret police," which was fun. Then came the part where people started asking questions. It went slowly into building up this readership, which is good, because in the beginning you tend to almost know the people who are reading what you are writing. At one point it get out of proportion. By then I didn't know what was happening because we didn't have any Internet. Apparently the 'Guardian' published huge chunks of the weblog. When I came back online much later I was very amazed at how much attention it got. It was almost scary.

Andrew Denton: I am going to show you footage of what you would be familiar with. This is what we saw on our TV screens at the start of the war, Operation Shock and Awe, which, from where we sat, was extraordinary television. What was it like from where you were?

Salam Pax: It was very strange war, to be watching this while you were getting bombed. It was very strange. We had this small room, the safest room in the house, and we'd be like 15, 16 people sitting in there with a tiny TV and watching this while it was happening. It was very strange.

Andrew Denton: You said your family were all together. You had 30 people waiting out the war in your house. How did you pass your days?

Salam Pax: It is good to have everyone around you. You talk. When we'd have electricity we'd watch a movie on video, and everybody of course would be sitting in front of the TV or the radio trying to figure out what's happening where.

Andrew Denton: What sort of movies would you watch?

Salam Pax: For some reason 'Ice Age' was a favourite. I don't know why. We sat there once watching… What that film was called? It's about an American President who gets in love…

Andrew Denton: 'The American President'. You were watching 'The American President'?

Salam Pax: So strange. It was really weird. Besides, you get all these shots of the White House and you are thinking, "Why are they complaining about Saddam's palaces? The White House was really nice." It was very, very strange watching these things. I think it was for some reason a favourite.

Andrew Denton: You're an architecture student, but first and foremost, Baghdad is your home. Is it painful to watch your city being bombed?

Salam Pax: Of course. I remember watching… Inside the palace complex there's a building that looks almost like a pyramid with its head chopped off. And it's scary how precise the bombs are. It fell right in the middle, and it was spectacular, how it just exploded and everything went boof! And you go there thinking, "My God." It… Yeah, the first couple of days was very difficult. It was very difficult to watch this. But then, I guess it's, you know, human nature — you kind of get used to it. You wake up, another bomb there, explosions there. It just goes on.

Andrew Denton: Another building gone, another day.

Salam Pax: Yeah. The good thing is that every day, while we were able to do it, before the troops went in, we could go during the day, very early on, and look at the sites that were bombed. I just needed to do that. I just needed to go. Me and my cousin would sit in his car and we would go and try to find, you know, from the pictures, to see what happened to these buildings. I just needed to see what happened. What really hurts is that it's been a year now and the buildings are still there, you know, bombed, and it doesn't give you good feeling about your city. It looks like it's just been in a war. We don't need to see this anymore, we need to see change.

Andrew Denton: You, on your online diary, were very critical of the way the Western media covered the war. What did they get wrong?

Salam Pax: I don't know. I don't think it's… It's not exactly the way… Before the war they had a problem, they had a real problem with reporting. There was no way they could move around without secret police around them. I got really annoyed every time I read someone interviewing "the man on the street", an Iraqi. You knew that there's secret policeman standing right beside him and he would never be able to tell you anything but "We love Saddam." So it was kind of…that was really frustrating. During the war, I don't know, it was just seeing all these explosions and the way the troops moved. You'd never get an idea what was really happening. What was really scary is that you'd see, for example, on Western media, the side of the…the coalition army moving in. You'd see them bombing. You'd never see what happens when the bomb falls. Then comes something like 'Jazeera'. They would show, right in the beginning of the war, in Basra, really horrible images, because hospitals were never capable to deal with…

If something serious happened, they were never able to deal with it. They went into a hospital and I just remember thinking, "This will never be good. You have one opinion here and another opinion there and you can't try to find where the middle is."

Andrew Denton: You… As you said, people were speculating as to who you were — were you Secret Service, were you Israeli, were you Iraqi, who were you and did you exist? One man found out eventually. That was your father. How did he find out and what was his reaction?

Salam Pax: (Laughs) Oh, that wasn't a good day.

LAUGHTER

Salam Pax: You see, at one point, I think it was BBC or 'Voice of America', they…for some reason… Why did they do it? They just went on air and said, "There's an Iraqi who is writing all about the war," and he comes down from upstairs, going, "Salam?" I go, "Uh-oh, that's no good." And, um, he's saying to me, "There is an architect called Salam writing stuff about the war." I'm going… (Innocently) "Mmm?"

LAUGHTER

Salam Pax: Yeah, it was… You know, when you think of it, it was really foolish. We sat down later, much later on, and had this talk. I had to admit that it was foolish and it could have gotten us all into real, real serious trouble. But at the time when I was doing it, it became so important to me, it became such an outlet, and people were reacting. I could talk. We were just, you know, getting…exchanging opinions, which was so important. I didn't think about the problems. But then it was lucky. I was really lucky that nothing happened.

Andrew Denton: I'm going to show you another piece of footage now we all saw, which was the pulling down of the statue of Saddam Hussein. Was this a good day?

Salam Pax: It was a very good five hours. We…we… Oh, God. We sat there and electricity was out. We had a generator. Many of the family was in my aunt's house. So we ran over, called them just to watch this. It took forever. Of course, the whole thing about the Americans coming and pulling it down with the cows, it's like, "Oh, God, no we don't want this to happen bad," you know. But still, pulled down, and then just half an hour after that, 'Jazeera' started showing reports of looting in the city and everybody went crazy, everybody wanted to go back to their house. It was a very good five hours just watching this happen. Of course I am not really sure this wasn't just done for the benefit of the reporters who were around the hotels. Why choose this place out of the other places? I don't know. But still, it was a good day, it was a good day. But then we were hoping things would get better. They didn't. It just went up and down and up and down.

Andrew Denton: Your dad was optimistic, wasn't he, about…

Salam Pax: He still is. Kind of to a point where I sometimes think, "Please, get real." He still is so very optimistic. He was kind of all up and happy about the governing council, which I was thinking, "Come on, they don't know Iraqis." He goes, "No, no, no, they'll do something." Now he is very excited about the next interim government, which, again, I don't think they'll have much to do, but he's going, "Oh yes, they'll bring us to good points." I don't know.

Andrew Denton: It's not just the Americans you're ambivalent about, though, because you write about the freedom fighters that have come from other countries to fight the Americans. You don't seem to have a great deal of time for them?

Salam Pax: Uh… I was once in Jordan, in a taxi, and talking to the taxi driver, and he said something which got me really angry. He said, "Look, we want to, you know, we want to be jihadis and we want to fight the infidel, and Iraq now is the place." Fight your wars somewhere else. That's the problem. We ended up being a battlefield. Not only… We have enough problems in Iraq — you know, the Kurds, the Sunni the Shiah — everybody has its own agendas. And now, you know, other people seem to be fighting their wars inside our country, which is even more frustrating. I mean, you can't even deal with your own problems. Now you have to deal with these people who are coming in. It is very strange. Um, I don't know… We were never expecting something like this to happen — that we've become a battleground for all this. Everybody is trying to, you know, settle their problems inside our country.

Andrew Denton: Your name, 'Salam Pax', means 'peace' in Arabic and 'peace' in Latin. Do you see any peace for Iraq?

Salam Pax: Um…as I said, I always try… The now is difficult. It's always difficult to watch what's happening now. I'm always amazed at how things can get worse and worse. Every time I think, "This is really as bad as it gets," it gets just a bit worse. So I'm kind of always… It's nice to have little milestones in front of you. The next interim government with its preparations for elections and everything — I'm looking at that, I'm hoping that this is something that can get us out of the slump here and now. Oh, yes, peace. We'll get peace some day. We'll just have to learn. It's a learning process.

Andrew Denton: After what we've learnt from the torturing of prisoners, would it be better if the coalition withdrew? Would that help?

Salam Pax: No. Um…that was very unfortunate. Bad timing. It shouldn't have happened. Part of the war the West is fighting is a moral war, showing what's wrong to the ignorant people in the Middle East. That was not good for your moral. It's…you're losing that battle. This shouldn't have happened. But still it doesn't mean that everybody should go, "OK, 'bye," because it will plunge us deeper into chaos. People are using this to drive away the coalition. It's very unfortunate. It shouldn't have happened. It's horrible, but nobody should just lose hope. They just need to listen more to Iraqis. They just need to understand Iraqis more. They have been trying to communicate.

Andrew Denton: It is fantastic to have an Iraqi voice on Australian television. Salam Pax, may your name be true. Thank you very much.

Salam Pax: Thank you very much.

the transcript of an online forum chat with Salam Pax and Andrew Denton can be read here




Posted by upper
Quote:

On 2005-07-14 00:20:31, london-uk wrote:
Quote:

On 2005-07-13 21:37:35, absinthebri wrote:

What's the point of the war in Iraq?

How should we treat Blair, the murderer of 20,000 innocent Iraqis? What is/was his motive?





Saddam was killing people daily. Although the premise at the time was that Saddam's regime had WMD's (which was later found to be untrue), I believe that the right decision was made, when it was decided to invade. You say that Blair is the murderer of 20,000 people. Incidentally, based on figures from the U.N. this would in fact be a smaller number of fatalities than that of a similar period of time during Saddam's regime.

Additionally, may I note that the vast majority of people killed in Iraq now are in fact killed by suicide bombers, who are obviously not affiliated with the US or the UK.



yes it is affiliated with us and the uk, everyone did say that this war will create more terrorists, you dont need to be a scientist to work that out. now they have bough terror on our hameland. now that the prime minster is protected by his police force its us now that are getting blown up to bits . i ride a motorbike and when i stop at a traffic light in london i always say if there would be a bomb in the bus behind me or the one next to me that thought is always in my head all the time since 7/7/05, now i cant feel safe in my city where i was born and raised. blair can go to hell!!!

_________________
PLEASE POST PICTURES THAT HAVE BEEN TAKEN WITH A PPC OR PPC PHONE & MICROSOFT SMARTPHONE.
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=87720#post1181684
LET ME SHOW YOU: http://www.prisonplanet.net http://www.infowars.com

[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2005-07-14 19:14 ]

[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2005-07-14 19:14 ]

Posted by Kryptik
Having grown up in apartheid era S.Africa i've seen extreme violence and cold-blooded murder committed to keep a handful of power-mad bureacrats on top. It's made me realize one thing- war for any reason is downright stupid.

Posted by absinthebri
"The reality was neatly summed up this week in a radio exchange between the BBC's political editor, Andrew Marr, and its security correspondent, Frank Gardner, who was left disabled by an al-Qaida attack in Saudi Arabia last year. Was it the "very diversity, that melting pot aspect of London" that Islamist extremists found so offensive that they wanted to kill innocent civilians in Britain's capital, Marr wondered. "No, it's not that," replied Gardner briskly, who is better acquainted with al-Qaida thinking than most. "What they find offensive are the policies of western governments and specifically the presence of western troops in Muslim lands, notably Iraq and Afghanistan.""

Read the full, excellent, article from Thursday's Guardian:
It is an insult to the dead to deny the link with Iraq


Posted by JK
Quote:

On 2005-07-13 14:29:54, 786KBR wrote:
So now Id like to know who said that AL-Quieda took responsibility??

Puts things into perspective doesnt it... a bomb goes off, lets blame al quieda even if we dont have proof!!!

The guy who released that statement should be shot!!!!



I still dont believe the whole al quida involvement... the bombers were twisted british citizens, with no real motive... maybe just bored!!!




Posted by Sammy_boy
Quote:

On 2005-07-16 08:39:13, 786KBR wrote:
Quote:

On 2005-07-13 14:29:54, 786KBR wrote:
So now Id like to know who said that AL-Quieda took responsibility??

Puts things into perspective doesnt it... a bomb goes off, lets blame al quieda even if we dont have proof!!!

The guy who released that statement should be shot!!!!



I still dont believe the whole al quida involvement... the bombers were twisted british citizens, with no real motive... maybe just bored!!!




You've quoted yourself here!

Bored British citizens..... hmmm! Most Bored youngsters in this country usually steal cars, terrorise old ladies, mug each other for mobile phones or fim each other twatting somone, but they generally don't get together, and say 'Sod this for a lark, let's make a bomb, catch a train down to London and blow ourselves and loads of innocent civilans to smithereens! Oh, and take your mobile so we can film it and show off to our mates!!"

"Oh, hold on a sec...."

The evidence seems to be pointing to 'Islamic' terrorists, I can't see who else would want to do it, certainly not bored kids wanting to up the ante on the happy slapping craze or because they're bored of watching Big Brother!

Posted by JK
i seems to be poiting to islamic terrorists but theres still no proof, its brittish citizens... just islamic!!

guess we just have to wait...

Posted by axxxr
Here is a excellent Article by John Pilger.

John Pilger: It's Nothing To Do With Hating Our Way Of life

In all the coverage of last week's bombing of London, a basic truth is struggling to be heard. It is this: no one doubts the atrocious inhumanity of those who planted the bombs, but no one should also doubt that this has been coming since the day Tony Blair joined George Bush in their bloody invasion and occupation of Iraq. They are "Blair's bombs", and he ought not be allowed to evade culpability with yet another unctuous speech about "our way of life", which his own rapacious violence in other countries has despoiled.

Indeed, the only reliable warning from British intelligence in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq was that which predicted a sharp increase in terrorism "with Britain and Britons a target". A House of Commons committee has since verified this warning. Had Blair heeded it instead of conspiring to deceive the nation that Iraq offered a threat the Londoners who died on Thursday might be alive today, along with tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis.

Three weeks ago, a classified CIA report revealed that the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq had turned that country into a focal point of terrorism. None of the intelligence agencies regarded Iraq as such a flashpoint before the invasion, however tyrannical the regime. On the contrary, in 2003, the CIA reported that Iraq "exported no terrorist threat to his neighbours" and that Saddam Hussein was "implacably hostile to Al-Qaeda".

Blair's and Bush's invasion changed all that. In invading a stricken and defenceless country at the heart of the Islamic and Arab world, their adventure became self-fulfilling; Blair's epic irresponsibility has brought the daily horrors of Iraq home to Britain. For more than a year, he has urged the British to "move on" from Iraq, and last week it seemed that his spinmeisters and good fortune had joined hands. The awarding of the 2012 Olympics to London created the fleeting illusion that all was well, regardless of messy events in a faraway country.

Moreover, the G8 meeting in Scotland and its accompanying "Make Poverty History" campaign and circus of celebrities served as a temporary cover for what is arguably the greatest political scandal of modern times: an illegal, brutal and craven invasion conceived in lies and which, under the system of international law established at Nuremberg, represented a "paramount war crime".

Over the past two weeks, the contrast between the coverage of the G8, its marches and pop concerts, and another "global" event has been striking. The World Tribunal on Iraq in Istanbul has had virtually no coverage, yet the evidence it has produced, the most damning to date, has been the silent spectre at the Geldoff extravaganzas.

The tribunal is a serious international public inquiry into the invasion and occupation, the kind governments dare not hold. Its expert, eyewitness testimonies, said the author Arundathi Roy, a tribunal jury member, "demonstrate that even those of us who have tried to follow the war closely are not aware of a fraction of the horrors that have been unleashed in Iraq." The most shocking was given by Dahr Jamail, one of the best un-embedded reporters working in Iraq. He described how the hospitals of besieged Fallujah had been subjected to an American tactic of collective punishment, with US marines assaulting staff and stopping the wounded entering, and American snipers firing at the doors and windows, and medicines and emergency blood prevented from reaching them. Children, the elderly, were shot dead in front of their families, in cold blood.

Imagine for a moment the same appalling state of affairs imposed on the London hospitals that received the victims of Thursday's bombing. Unimaginable? Well, it happens, in our name, regardless of whether the BBC reports it, which is rare. When will someone ask about this at one of the staged "press conferences" at which Blair is allowed to emote for the cameras stuff about "our values outlast [ing] theirs"? Silence is not journalism. In Fallujah, they know "our values" only too well.

While the two men responsible for the carnage in Iraq, Bush and Blair, were side by side at Gleneagles, why wasn't the connection of their fraudulent "war on terror" made with the bombing in London? And when will someone in the political class say that Blair's smoke-and-mirrors "debt cancellation" at best amounts to less than the money the government spent in a week brutalising Iraq, where British and American violence is the cause of the doubling of child poverty and malnutrition since Saddam Hussein was overthrown (Unicef).

The truth is that the debt relief the G8 is offering is lethal because its ruthless "conditionalities" of captive economies far outweigh any tenuous benefit. This was taboo during the G8 week, whose theme was not so much making poverty history as the silencing and pacifying and co-opting dissent and truth. The mawkish images on giant screens behind the pop stars in Hyde Park included no pictures of murdered Iraqi doctors with the blood streaming from their heads, cut down by Bush's snipers. Real life became more satirical than satire could ever be.

There was Bob Geldoff on the front pages resting his smiling face on smiling Blair's shoulder, the war criminal and his knighted jester. There was an heroically silhouetted Bono, who celebrates men like Jeffrey Sachs as saviours of the world's poor while lauding "compassionate" George Bush's "war on terror" as one of his generation's greatest achievements; and there was Paul Wolfowitz, beaming and promising to make poverty history: this is the man who, before he was handed control of the World Bank, was an apologist for Suharto's genocidal regime in Indonesia, who was one of the architects of Bush's "neo-con" putsch and of the bloodfest in Iraq and the notion of "endless war".For the politicians and pop stars and church leaders and polite people who believed Blair and Gordon Brown when they declared their "great moral crusade" against poverty, Iraq was an embarrassment. The killing of more than 100,000 Iraqis mostly by American gunfire and bombs -- a figure reported in a comprehensive peer-reviewed study in The Lancet -- was airbrushed from mainstream debate.

In our free societies, the unmentionable is that "the state has lost its mind and is punishing so many innocent people", as Arthur Miller once wrote, "and so the evidence has to be internally denied." Not only denied, but distracted by an entire court: Geldoff, Bono, Madonna, McCartney et al, whose "Live 8" was the very antithesis of 15 February 2003 when two million people brought their hearts and brains and anger to the streets of London. Blair will almost certainly use last week's atrocity and tragedy to further deplete basic human rights in Britain, as Bush has done in America. The goal is not security, but greater control. Above all this, the memory of their victims, "our" victims, in Iraq demands the return of our anger. And nothing less is owed to those who died and suffered in London last week, unnecessarily.

Posted by absinthebri
In Russell Square at 2.00pm on today Muslims and non-Muslims will gather together to remember those killed by the London bombings and those killed every day by George Bush’s “war on terror”, and to show that we are united in opposing the racism and anti-Islamic hysteria which is being generated with the aim of scapegoating a whole community for the actions of the London bombers.

VIGIL AND SOLIDARITY GATHERING
Remember and Unite
17 JULY 2005 2PM
Russell Square WC1

Please bring flowers and to wear something white or black.

Called jointly by the Stop the War Coalition and the Muslim Association of Britain.


Posted by Dj Boyi
@axxxr,ur such a boring git,do u know anything about phones? Or u just like to copy and paste other ppls shit! Man,Esato made a mistake enrolling u in the team,all u ever post is anti-bush/blair comments. Just remember that it wasnt bush or blair that killed 24 iraqi children in baghdad the other day,it wuz the TERRORISTS! Time i went to mobile9 or somewhere so i can read about PHONES! Ciao!

Posted by absinthebri
Quote:

On 2005-07-17 08:52:21, boyi wrote:

[snip]

remember that it wasnt bush or blair that killed 24 iraqi children in baghdad the other day,it wuz the TERRORISTS! Time i went to mobile9 or somewhere so i can read about PHONES! Ciao!



This message was posted from a K700i




Would that be the terrorist who didn't exist until well after the US/UK invasion totally destabilised Iraq.

I agree, primary responsibility for any atrocity is the perpetrator of that atrocity but unless one understands the motivation for such actions the preconditions will continue.


Posted by absinthebri
Quote:

On 2005-07-15 16:49:23, absinthebri wrote:
"The reality was neatly summed up this week in a radio exchange between the BBC's political editor, Andrew Marr, and its security correspondent, Frank Gardner, who was left disabled by an al-Qaida attack in Saudi Arabia last year. Was it the "very diversity, that melting pot aspect of London" that Islamist extremists found so offensive that they wanted to kill innocent civilians in Britain's capital, Marr wondered. "No, it's not that," replied Gardner briskly, who is better acquainted with al-Qaida thinking than most. "What they find offensive are the policies of western governments and specifically the presence of western troops in Muslim lands, notably Iraq and Afghanistan.""

Read the full, excellent, article from Thursday's Guardian:
It is an insult to the dead to deny the link with Iraq





And if you want to listen to the radio programme I'm quoting from, you can find it at Start the Week (programme of 11 July 2005). Mr. Gardner comes in at about 6min 15secs but the whole programme is interesting (talks about the Olympics, etc.).


Posted by axxxr
Quote:

On 2005-07-17 08:52:21, boyi wrote:
@axxxr,ur such a boring git,do u know anything about phones? Or u just like to copy and paste other ppls shit! Man,Esato made a mistake enrolling u in the team,all u ever post is anti-bush/blair comments. Just remember that it wasnt bush or blair that killed 24 iraqi children in baghdad the other day,it wuz the TERRORISTS! Time i went to mobile9 or somewhere so i can read about PHONES! Ciao!




99% of my news is mobile related so if i do post just that 1% of non-mobile related stuff is what i like to do in my spare time;then i don't think its such a big deal...

_________________
WARNING TO JAMBA
ONLY IF LIFE WAS THIS PERFECT

[ This Message was edited by: axxxr on 2005-07-17 11:52 ]

Posted by peeta
this is also the "MOBILE FREE THREAD" so suprise suprise...
that article is why real disscusion about US/UK foriegn policy is never had. its too horiffic and truthful.
the people must be kept dumb, watch big brother and switch off is Blairs real aim.

Posted by axxxr
Thankyou peeta....This is the Mobile Free Thread so we talk about things other than mobiles...why is that a problem for some i don't quite get it?...its just that a so called member has been stirring up things against me and now suddenly this is happening....

Lets just all please now try and get back on topic!


Posted by upper
Quote:

On 2005-07-17 08:52:21, boyi wrote:
! Time i went to mobile9 or somewhere so i can read about PHONES! Ciao!



This message was posted from a K700i


yh mate you do that, and dont turn your back no more no more, you fool, if it bothers you that much then get lost, simple innit? if you dont like him moaning about bush n blair and so i dont like you, is that fair? or why dont we just hate everyone bcoz we dont like somethink about them huh? you need to use your nut nut before you chat cr*p.

_________________
PLEASE POST PICTURES THAT HAVE BEEN TAKEN WITH A PPC OR PPC PHONE & MICROSOFT SMARTPHONE.
www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=87720#post1181684
LET ME SHOW YOU: www.prisonplanet.net www.infowars.com

[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2005-07-17 22:23 ]

Posted by Dj Boyi
@upper,shut up noob!

Posted by absinthebri
Iraq war support 'put UK at risk'

Supporting the US-led invasion of Iraq put the UK more at risk from terrorist attack, a report has said.

The Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Economic and Social Research Council report also said the invasion boosted al-Qaeda.


Posted by Dj Boyi
Well u dont need to be a genius to work that one out. Italy next then?

Posted by absinthebri
Quote:

On 2005-07-17 08:22:27, absinthebri wrote:
In Russell Square at 2.00pm on today Muslims and non-Muslims will gather together to remember those killed by the London bombings and those killed every day by George Bush’s “war on terror”, and to show that we are united in opposing the racism and anti-Islamic hysteria which is being generated with the aim of scapegoating a whole community for the actions of the London bombers.




I was there stewarding. There were some good speakers. George Galloway MP (someone I don't usually have much time for) suggested that rather than there being too much politics in mosques, there wasn't enough and that perhaps, if young Muslims were more engaged in the political process and felt more included, the sort of alienation that leads people to blow up trains would be diminished.

It gave me food for thought.




Posted by absinthebri
Quote:

On 2005-07-18 07:22:52, absinthebri wrote:
Iraq war support 'put UK at risk'

Supporting the US-led invasion of Iraq put the UK more at risk from terrorist attack, a report has said.

The Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Economic and Social Research Council report also said the invasion boosted al-Qaeda.





Read the report here.

----------

Defence Secretary Dr John Reid reacts to a report released today which claims that Britain's involvement in Iraq has made us a target for terroist attack.

Listen to it here
_________________
We are not afraid.

[ This Message was edited by: absinthebri on 2005-07-18 18:29 ]

Posted by peeta
Quote:

On 2005-07-18 07:34:07, boyi wrote:
Well u dont need to be a genius to work that one out. Italy next then?



This message was posted from a K700i




a lot of people, mainly in newspapers, did say that it had nothing to do with Iraq and that they were just intent on killing for the sake of it. a naive attitude at best and a very dangerous one at worst. it's attitudes like that that will mean this situation gets worse.

Posted by absinthebri
June Report Led Britain to Lower Its Terror Alert

"Less than a month before the London bombings, Britain's top intelligence and law enforcement officials concluded that "at present there is not a group with both the current intent and the capability to attack the U.K.""

Read the full article in today's New York Times here.


Posted by upper
Quote:

On 2005-07-18 06:54:49, boyi wrote:
@upper,shut up noob!



This message was posted from a K700i


is that all you can say? shows your a fool lol cant justify what an idiot you have been for typing crap ta ta, fair enough d**k HEAD!!!

anyways what you doing here? i though you was crying off to mobile9 the other day? now that your here it shows ur even more of an idiot, oh man your just an embarrasement.

_________________
PLEASE POST PICTURES THAT HAVE BEEN TAKEN WITH A PPC OR PPC PHONE & MICROSOFT SMARTPHONE.
www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=87720#post1181684
LET ME SHOW YOU: www.prisonplanet.net www.infowars.com

[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2005-07-19 21:01 ]

Posted by upper
A confidential report by the Joint Terrorist Analysis Centre, a group of Britain's top security experts, claimed there was no group poised or able to perpetrate a terrorist attack on the UK.

source: http://www.itn.co.uk/news/2049758.html

if anyone asks me, i think its a INSIDE job.

Posted by gelfen
just because they didn't believe there was a credible threat doesn't mean they were right.

originally posted in the religious thread:
Quote:

On 2005-07-20 05:12:53, gelfen wrote:
A letter to the terrorists
Hassan, a young Muslim born and raised in Yorkshire, offers a heartfelt response to last week's attacks on London

Dear dead or alive terrorists (As Salaam Alaikum doesn't apply to you),

Just wanted you to know I'm a young Muslim and I heard about you on the news again today. We all did. It's so painful to know I've grown up so close to the same Leeds streets as you. I was born in the same hospital as one of you, St Luke's, but we took different routes in life. Somehow ... life will go on. And in my heart, I really believe that one day London and all of us will be stronger. But never because of you and what you have done.

I can confirm that since that morning of Thursday July 7, you have not saved one single Muslim's life in your phoney war for freedom....


article continued at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/att[....]/story/0,16132,1529150,00.html

UK Muslims issue bombings fatwa
More than 500 British Muslim religious leaders and scholars have issued a fatwa in response to the London bombs.

The religious decree expresses condolences to the families of the victims of the atrocity and wishes the injured a speedy recovery.

It states Islam condemns the use of violence and the destruction of innocent lives and says suicide bombings are "vehemently prohibited".

The fatwa was issued by the British Muslim Forum (BMF) outside Parliament.

article continued at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4694441.stm



_________________
Whomsoever you see in distress, recognize in him a fellow man

Gelfen's special place where people talk to him

[ This Message was edited by: gelfen on 2005-07-20 05:59 ]

Posted by Dj Boyi
He'll say anything to get the last word in.

My gripe was people moan about spamming the forums,when axxxr is doing it himself,all over the place,new topics about how Bush this and Blair that,yea take the piss by all means but a joke is only funny for so long.
Maybe im wasting my time writing this as im talkin to people who prolly think the twins towers were brought down by planted demo charges,or maybe the 4 suicide bombers were paid by the british and american goverments,for some strange reason keepin us on our toes?

So if u wanna waste ur life away sitting in front of a computer calling people a 'dickhead' and 'fool' because he executed his right to 'freedom of speech',then i'll leave u to it...

Later noob.

Posted by gelfen
"if anyone asks me, i think its a INSIDE job."

@upper: what do you mean by that?

Posted by peeta
i guess he's right in the sense that it was british bombing british.
any other way and he's talking nonsense.


Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Click to view updated thread with images


© Esato.com - From the Esato mobile phone discussion forum