Posted by peeta
i was one of the people saying there will be thousands of bin ladins but that is a whole world away to your neighbours seeing the same things as me on television and deciding to blow themselves and lots of other innocent people (poss even me) up. did they forget most of us were against the war yet its us they went after and not bush and blair (not that i'm advocating that nor would it solve anything as theirs lots more of the b*****ds who would replace them). What they've done is going to divide society even more and make things WORSE.
Just like Bush created thousands of bin ladins this will create thousands of Bushes.
Posted by absinthebri
| Quote: |
|
Agreed. And I will not attempt to justify the kiling of innocent civillians in London, Madrid, New York, Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine or Israel. Innocent civillians are innocent civillians where ever they are.
| Quote: |
|
Is this a different sort of lunacy to the one that advocates that the London bombings are random and totally unconnected with any other world events? I have *no idea* what the motivation of the London bombers was; all I know is that *nothing* happens in a vacuum.
| Quote: |
|
But we KNOW that the Government's own security services staed that there would be LESS security if we attacked Iraq. Your statement is simply untrue.
| Quote: |
|
Yeah, 'causes' that spring to mind are 'democracy', 'WMD'. No, wait, that's the other insane rampage.
Posted by themarques
Guess Who?????????
Posted by axxxr
Is he one of the bombers?
Posted by JiggyJaggy
Supposedly so...
Posted by themarques
Shehzad Tanweer, 22, blew up a Tube train at Aldgate, East London.
Two other killers were 19 and 30.
The fourth member of the Yorkshire gang, who all wore backpacks, is thought to be a teenager.
CCTV cameras filmed them smiling and chatting at King’s Cross station just 30 minutes before Thursday’s devastating attacks.
Then they split up — each carrying up to 10lbs of explosives and a timing device in his rucksack.
_________________
8Mbps of Pure Speed
[ This Message was edited by: themarques on 2005-07-13 13:27 ]
Posted by JK
So now Id like to know who said that AL-Quieda took responsibility??
Puts things into perspective doesnt it... a bomb goes off, lets blame al quieda even if we dont have proof!!!
The guy who released that statement should be shot!!!!
Posted by themarques
@786KBR A group calling itself “The Secret Organization of al-Qaida in Europe” posted a claim of responsibility for Thursday’s blasts in London, saying they were in retaliation for Britain’s involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan.
I guess you missed the the al-Qaida part...
“Rejoice, Islamic nation. Rejoice, Arab world. The time has come for vengeance against the Zionist crusader government of Britain in response to the massacres Britain committed in Iraq and Afghanistan,”
Posted by JK
So these guys were part of that group then?
ps: why do they have secret groups??
Posted by themarques
| Quote: |
|
We have to wait on MI5 and 6 to give us more info as it comes through..
| Quote: |
|
Well I dont think they can go about advertising there service on Google now...
Posted by Cornholio_666
these people say that the attacks were in response to the massacres Britain committed in Iraq and Afghanistan, as if everyone went to iraq and afghanistan and killed someone. when are they going to learn that its a few politicians who make the decisions, and not the whole country? if i remeber correctly a shit load of people were against the war in the first place.
Posted by JK
| Quote: |
|
Its a point they making to the politicians!
Posted by peeta
Its a point they making to the politicians!
I'm sorry but that is the biggest load of bs i've heard. they have no point except maybe all they wanted to do was be martered and remembered by the world as dying for some cause to give their meaningless little lives some short term aim. we should treat them like the man who shot Lennon, so their real motive becomes meaningless. Did Blair suddenly say sh*t what was i thinking of course invading Iraq was wrong...sorry. NO i don't quite remember that.
Posted by absinthebri
| Quote: |
|
What's the point of the war in Iraq?
How should we treat Blair, the murderer of 20,000 innocent Iraqis? What is/was his motive?
Posted by absinthebri
I note the whole of the European Union will hold two minutes' silence at noon (BST) tomorrow in response to last week's terrorist atrocities in London. (http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/articles/PA_NEWA11761221121270173A0?source=PA%20Feed)
I note some other countries the other side of the Atlantic won't.
Posted by Vlammetje
I remember one day is sept 2001 when we held 3 mins of silence for that one country across the atlantic........
Strange how it seems a lifetime ago already
Posted by absinthebri
| Quote: |
|
It does seem such a long time ago.
Things don't seem to be improving.
Posted by peeta
"What's the point of the war in Iraq?
What is/was his motive?"
Politics and Greed both of which have explanations far too long to go into here but reading Chomskys Understanding Power will go a long way to answering some, but not all, questions.
"How should we treat Blair,..."
With the contempt he deserves
"the murderer of 20,000 innocent Iraqis?"
20 000's an understatement, but anyhow.
None of that merits the bombing of random people who happen to be in the same city at that time, but i'm sure no one here disagrees with that.
_________________
cheap thing no good, good thing no cheap
[ This Message was edited by: peeta on 2005-07-13 21:07 ]
Posted by absinthebri
Ooh, Chomsky. I like Chomsky but I often find him quite difficult (but worth the effort).
I use the figure of 20,000 as it's not disputed. The 'real' figure is, as we know, over 100,000.
Posted by london-uk
| Quote: |
|
Saddam was killing people daily. Although the premise at the time was that Saddam's regime had WMD's (which was later found to be untrue), I believe that the right decision was made, when it was decided to invade. You say that Blair is the murderer of 20,000 people. Incidentally, based on figures from the U.N. this would in fact be a smaller number of fatalities than that of a similar period of time during Saddam's regime. Additionally, may I note that the vast majority of people killed in Iraq now are in fact killed by suicide bombers, who are obviously not affiliated with the US or the UK.
The choice was made to remove the previous Iraqi regime, and the country is now going through a difficult time. However, this is in large part due to the disgusting actions of insurgents of Iraqi and other origin. If they could just accept that their country is in a time of transition. Moving from dictatorship to democracy will take time, and the only hindrance is that of the suicide bombers. I just can't understand why they can't stand back for six months, and they'll have their country fully back in their control.
Posted by absinthebri
| Quote: | |||
| |||
Really?
| Quote: |
|
So you support committing war crimes? You appear to admit guilt to the first two counts at the Nuremburg trials.
| Quote: |
|
That's a generally accepted figure (accepted by the UK Government)
| Quote: |
|
Your point? Does that make it okay? Is there a moral differnece between Bush/Blair murdering Iraqi civillians and Saddam doing it?
| Quote: |
|
Who destabilised the country to such an extent that there is a civil war there now?
| Quote: |
|
Which is a crime in International Law.
[quote]
[...snip...]
Posted by gelfen
i think it would do everyone some good to read the opinion of someone who actually knows what he's talking about.
| Quote: |
|
Posted by upper
| Quote: | |||
| |||
_________________
PLEASE POST PICTURES THAT HAVE BEEN TAKEN WITH A PPC OR PPC PHONE & MICROSOFT SMARTPHONE.
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=87720#post1181684
LET ME SHOW YOU: http://www.prisonplanet.net http://www.infowars.com
[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2005-07-14 19:14 ]
[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2005-07-14 19:14 ]
Posted by Kryptik
Having grown up in apartheid era S.Africa i've seen extreme violence and cold-blooded murder committed to keep a handful of power-mad bureacrats on top. It's made me realize one thing- war for any reason is downright stupid.
Posted by absinthebri
"The reality was neatly summed up this week in a radio exchange between the BBC's political editor, Andrew Marr, and its security correspondent, Frank Gardner, who was left disabled by an al-Qaida attack in Saudi Arabia last year. Was it the "very diversity, that melting pot aspect of London" that Islamist extremists found so offensive that they wanted to kill innocent civilians in Britain's capital, Marr wondered. "No, it's not that," replied Gardner briskly, who is better acquainted with al-Qaida thinking than most. "What they find offensive are the policies of western governments and specifically the presence of western troops in Muslim lands, notably Iraq and Afghanistan.""
Read the full, excellent, article from Thursday's Guardian:
It is an insult to the dead to deny the link with Iraq
Posted by JK
| Quote: |
|
I still dont believe the whole al quida involvement... the bombers were twisted british citizens, with no real motive... maybe just bored!!!
Posted by Sammy_boy
| Quote: | |||
| |||
You've quoted yourself here!
Bored British citizens..... hmmm!
"Oh, hold on a sec...."
The evidence seems to be pointing to 'Islamic' terrorists, I can't see who else would want to do it, certainly not bored kids wanting to up the ante on the happy slapping craze or because they're bored of watching Big Brother!
Posted by JK
i seems to be poiting to islamic terrorists but theres still no proof, its brittish citizens... just islamic!!
guess we just have to wait...
Posted by axxxr
Here is a excellent Article by John Pilger.
John Pilger: It's Nothing To Do With Hating Our Way Of life
In all the coverage of last week's bombing of London, a basic truth is struggling to be heard. It is this: no one doubts the atrocious inhumanity of those who planted the bombs, but no one should also doubt that this has been coming since the day Tony Blair joined George Bush in their bloody invasion and occupation of Iraq. They are "Blair's bombs", and he ought not be allowed to evade culpability with yet another unctuous speech about "our way of life", which his own rapacious violence in other countries has despoiled.
Indeed, the only reliable warning from British intelligence in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq was that which predicted a sharp increase in terrorism "with Britain and Britons a target". A House of Commons committee has since verified this warning. Had Blair heeded it instead of conspiring to deceive the nation that Iraq offered a threat the Londoners who died on Thursday might be alive today, along with tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis.
Three weeks ago, a classified CIA report revealed that the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq had turned that country into a focal point of terrorism. None of the intelligence agencies regarded Iraq as such a flashpoint before the invasion, however tyrannical the regime. On the contrary, in 2003, the CIA reported that Iraq "exported no terrorist threat to his neighbours" and that Saddam Hussein was "implacably hostile to Al-Qaeda".
Blair's and Bush's invasion changed all that. In invading a stricken and defenceless country at the heart of the Islamic and Arab world, their adventure became self-fulfilling; Blair's epic irresponsibility has brought the daily horrors of Iraq home to Britain. For more than a year, he has urged the British to "move on" from Iraq, and last week it seemed that his spinmeisters and good fortune had joined hands. The awarding of the 2012 Olympics to London created the fleeting illusion that all was well, regardless of messy events in a faraway country.
Moreover, the G8 meeting in Scotland and its accompanying "Make Poverty History" campaign and circus of celebrities served as a temporary cover for what is arguably the greatest political scandal of modern times: an illegal, brutal and craven invasion conceived in lies and which, under the system of international law established at Nuremberg, represented a "paramount war crime".
Over the past two weeks, the contrast between the coverage of the G8, its marches and pop concerts, and another "global" event has been striking. The World Tribunal on Iraq in Istanbul has had virtually no coverage, yet the evidence it has produced, the most damning to date, has been the silent spectre at the Geldoff extravaganzas.
The tribunal is a serious international public inquiry into the invasion and occupation, the kind governments dare not hold. Its expert, eyewitness testimonies, said the author Arundathi Roy, a tribunal jury member, "demonstrate that even those of us who have tried to follow the war closely are not aware of a fraction of the horrors that have been unleashed in Iraq." The most shocking was given by Dahr Jamail, one of the best un-embedded reporters working in Iraq. He described how the hospitals of besieged Fallujah had been subjected to an American tactic of collective punishment, with US marines assaulting staff and stopping the wounded entering, and American snipers firing at the doors and windows, and medicines and emergency blood prevented from reaching them. Children, the elderly, were shot dead in front of their families, in cold blood.
Imagine for a moment the same appalling state of affairs imposed on the London hospitals that received the victims of Thursday's bombing. Unimaginable? Well, it happens, in our name, regardless of whether the BBC reports it, which is rare. When will someone ask about this at one of the staged "press conferences" at which Blair is allowed to emote for the cameras stuff about "our values outlast [ing] theirs"? Silence is not journalism. In Fallujah, they know "our values" only too well.
While the two men responsible for the carnage in Iraq, Bush and Blair, were side by side at Gleneagles, why wasn't the connection of their fraudulent "war on terror" made with the bombing in London? And when will someone in the political class say that Blair's smoke-and-mirrors "debt cancellation" at best amounts to less than the money the government spent in a week brutalising Iraq, where British and American violence is the cause of the doubling of child poverty and malnutrition since Saddam Hussein was overthrown (Unicef).
The truth is that the debt relief the G8 is offering is lethal because its ruthless "conditionalities" of captive economies far outweigh any tenuous benefit. This was taboo during the G8 week, whose theme was not so much making poverty history as the silencing and pacifying and co-opting dissent and truth. The mawkish images on giant screens behind the pop stars in Hyde Park included no pictures of murdered Iraqi doctors with the blood streaming from their heads, cut down by Bush's snipers. Real life became more satirical than satire could ever be.
There was Bob Geldoff on the front pages resting his smiling face on smiling Blair's shoulder, the war criminal and his knighted jester. There was an heroically silhouetted Bono, who celebrates men like Jeffrey Sachs as saviours of the world's poor while lauding "compassionate" George Bush's "war on terror" as one of his generation's greatest achievements; and there was Paul Wolfowitz, beaming and promising to make poverty history: this is the man who, before he was handed control of the World Bank, was an apologist for Suharto's genocidal regime in Indonesia, who was one of the architects of Bush's "neo-con" putsch and of the bloodfest in Iraq and the notion of "endless war".For the politicians and pop stars and church leaders and polite people who believed Blair and Gordon Brown when they declared their "great moral crusade" against poverty, Iraq was an embarrassment. The killing of more than 100,000 Iraqis mostly by American gunfire and bombs -- a figure reported in a comprehensive peer-reviewed study in The Lancet -- was airbrushed from mainstream debate.
In our free societies, the unmentionable is that "the state has lost its mind and is punishing so many innocent people", as Arthur Miller once wrote, "and so the evidence has to be internally denied." Not only denied, but distracted by an entire court: Geldoff, Bono, Madonna, McCartney et al, whose "Live 8" was the very antithesis of 15 February 2003 when two million people brought their hearts and brains and anger to the streets of London. Blair will almost certainly use last week's atrocity and tragedy to further deplete basic human rights in Britain, as Bush has done in America. The goal is not security, but greater control. Above all this, the memory of their victims, "our" victims, in Iraq demands the return of our anger. And nothing less is owed to those who died and suffered in London last week, unnecessarily.
Posted by absinthebri
In Russell Square at 2.00pm on today Muslims and non-Muslims will gather together to remember those killed by the London bombings and those killed every day by George Bush’s “war on terror”, and to show that we are united in opposing the racism and anti-Islamic hysteria which is being generated with the aim of scapegoating a whole community for the actions of the London bombers.
VIGIL AND SOLIDARITY GATHERING
Remember and Unite
17 JULY 2005 2PM
Russell Square WC1
Please bring flowers and to wear something white or black.
Called jointly by the Stop the War Coalition and the Muslim Association of Britain.
Posted by Dj Boyi
@axxxr,ur such a boring git,do u know anything about phones? Or u just like to copy and paste other ppls shit! Man,Esato made a mistake enrolling u in the team,all u ever post is anti-bush/blair comments. Just remember that it wasnt bush or blair that killed 24 iraqi children in baghdad the other day,it wuz the TERRORISTS! Time i went to mobile9 or somewhere so i can read about PHONES! Ciao!
Posted by absinthebri
| Quote: |
|
Would that be the terrorist who didn't exist until well after the US/UK invasion totally destabilised Iraq.
I agree, primary responsibility for any atrocity is the perpetrator of that atrocity but unless one understands the motivation for such actions the preconditions will continue.
Posted by absinthebri
| Quote: |
|
And if you want to listen to the radio programme I'm quoting from, you can find it at Start the Week (programme of 11 July 2005). Mr. Gardner comes in at about 6min 15secs but the whole programme is interesting (talks about the Olympics, etc.).
Posted by axxxr
| Quote: |
|
99% of my news is mobile related so if i do post just that 1% of non-mobile related stuff is what i like to do in my spare time;then i don't think its such a big deal...
_________________
WARNING TO JAMBA
ONLY IF LIFE WAS THIS PERFECT
[ This Message was edited by: axxxr on 2005-07-17 11:52 ]
Posted by peeta
this is also the "MOBILE FREE THREAD" so suprise suprise...
that article is why real disscusion about US/UK foriegn policy is never had. its too horiffic and truthful.
the people must be kept dumb, watch big brother and switch off is Blairs real aim.
Posted by axxxr
Thankyou peeta....This is the Mobile Free Thread so we talk about things other than mobiles...why is that a problem for some i don't quite get it?...its just that a so called member has been stirring up things against me and now suddenly this is happening....
Lets just all please now try and get back on topic!
Posted by upper
| Quote: |
|
_________________
PLEASE POST PICTURES THAT HAVE BEEN TAKEN WITH A PPC OR PPC PHONE & MICROSOFT SMARTPHONE.
www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=87720#post1181684
LET ME SHOW YOU: www.prisonplanet.net www.infowars.com
[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2005-07-17 22:23 ]
Posted by Dj Boyi
@upper,shut up noob!
Posted by absinthebri
Iraq war support 'put UK at risk'
Supporting the US-led invasion of Iraq put the UK more at risk from terrorist attack, a report has said.
The Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Economic and Social Research Council report also said the invasion boosted al-Qaeda.
Posted by Dj Boyi
Well u dont need to be a genius to work that one out. Italy next then?
Posted by absinthebri
| Quote: |
|
I was there stewarding. There were some good speakers. George Galloway MP (someone I don't usually have much time for) suggested that rather than there being too much politics in mosques, there wasn't enough and that perhaps, if young Muslims were more engaged in the political process and felt more included, the sort of alienation that leads people to blow up trains would be diminished.
It gave me food for thought.
Posted by absinthebri
| Quote: |
|
Read the report here.
----------
Defence Secretary Dr John Reid reacts to a report released today which claims that Britain's involvement in Iraq has made us a target for terroist attack.
Listen to it here
_________________
We are not afraid.
[ This Message was edited by: absinthebri on 2005-07-18 18:29 ]
Posted by peeta
| Quote: |
|
a lot of people, mainly in newspapers, did say that it had nothing to do with Iraq and that they were just intent on killing for the sake of it. a naive attitude at best and a very dangerous one at worst. it's attitudes like that that will mean this situation gets worse.
Posted by absinthebri
June Report Led Britain to Lower Its Terror Alert
"Less than a month before the London bombings, Britain's top intelligence and law enforcement officials concluded that "at present there is not a group with both the current intent and the capability to attack the U.K.""
Read the full article in today's New York Times here.
Posted by upper
| Quote: |
|
anyways what you doing here? i though you was crying off to mobile9 the other day? now that your here it shows ur even more of an idiot, oh man your just an embarrasement.
_________________
PLEASE POST PICTURES THAT HAVE BEEN TAKEN WITH A PPC OR PPC PHONE & MICROSOFT SMARTPHONE.
www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=87720#post1181684
LET ME SHOW YOU: www.prisonplanet.net www.infowars.com
[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2005-07-19 21:01 ]
Posted by upper
A confidential report by the Joint Terrorist Analysis Centre, a group of Britain's top security experts, claimed there was no group poised or able to perpetrate a terrorist attack on the UK.
source: http://www.itn.co.uk/news/2049758.html
if anyone asks me, i think its a INSIDE job.
Posted by gelfen
just because they didn't believe there was a credible threat doesn't mean they were right.
originally posted in the religious thread:
| Quote: |
|
_________________
Whomsoever you see in distress, recognize in him a fellow man
Gelfen's special place where people talk to him
[ This Message was edited by: gelfen on 2005-07-20 05:59 ]
Posted by Dj Boyi
He'll say anything to get the last word in.
My gripe was people moan about spamming the forums,when axxxr is doing it himself,all over the place,new topics about how Bush this and Blair that,yea take the piss by all means but a joke is only funny for so long.
Maybe im wasting my time writing this as im talkin to people who prolly think the twins towers were brought down by planted demo charges,or maybe the 4 suicide bombers were paid by the british and american goverments,for some strange reason
So if u wanna waste ur life away sitting in front of a computer calling people a 'dickhead' and 'fool' because he executed his right to 'freedom of speech',then i'll leave u to it...
Later noob.
Posted by gelfen
"if anyone asks me, i think its a INSIDE job."
@upper: what do you mean by that?
Posted by peeta
i guess he's right in the sense that it was british bombing british.
any other way and he's talking nonsense.