Posted by Ayush
I've to make a phone decision for someone. Is this phone good? It costs a lil more than the k508i but has around 2mb lesser memory. How is the battery? Can it be recommended over the k508i?
Posted by Pradhika
It has a talk time of just 220 minutes.
Posted by whizkidd
Why samsung??
Posted by Mrb 18
Featurevise the Samsung loses to the SE, no mp3-ringsignals, no videorecording. When it comes to batteryperformance past experienses says the Samsung fares fairly bad when compared to the SE!
Posted by Rifqi_Aziz
Why not you just by K508 and forget other phones?
K508 is a good choice.
Posted by whizkidd
Because ayush's had a bad experience with a k508.
Posted by Ayush
It doesn't have vid rec? !
Posted by Mrb 18
| Quote: |
|
According to this test (in Swedish) it doesnt http://www.mobilforum.se/default_display.aspx?id=1508
Posted by Sammy_boy
I had an E330 as a free upgrade for a while, I have to admit I wasn't a big fan of the phone, I ended up selling it. From what I can remember, texting was tricky, battery didn't last very long, and wap browsing was slow and tricky too. Transferring pictures and things to and from the phone was a pain too, as it has no connectivity whatsoever, and you have to use a data cable (which wasn't supplied with my phone) using Samsung's software, which was unreliable at best. It did look and feel nice, though!
Personally, I'd go for the K508. I know you've had a bad experience, but that may just have been a dud phone. Save your money and get the K508, or perhaps a K700i if your budget will stretch to it
Posted by Pradhika
@Sammy. There you are. K700i stands taller at that price.
Posted by Ayush
Thanks one and all . . Guess the samsung's off the list