Posted by augustborn9917
-2phones
-one is R1a, the other is R1j
-no nightmode, poor lighting
-both macro on
-same focuspoint:HP
-self timer on
choice#1:
choice#2:
*limited study only, my friend is leaving on sunday. will try to take more tomorrow in daylight. hopefully the results are consistent......
_________________
my k750 themes
[ This Message was edited by: augustborn9917 on 2005-07-04 11:14 ]
Posted by gr3gg0
2nd...
btw how is one tht much bigger than the other
[ This Message was edited by: gr3gg0 on 2005-07-03 06:17 ]
Posted by mrao
The 1st pic seems to be much better than the 2nd one
Posted by EastCoastStar
i believe the 1st is more clear.
Posted by anay
Think 1st 1 is better.
Posted by Curve
They both suck.
Lighting? go take pictures with light!
Posted by Carlsb3rg
It's hard to tell, but i think the 1st image is "slightly" sharper, and not "much" better.
Posted by shizznah
1st but only by a smidgen.
Posted by shizznah
1st but only by a smidgen.
Posted by augustborn9917
2 phones
-one is R1a, the other is R1j
-full automatic everything
-both default settings
-same focuspoint
-self timer on
R1J:
R1A:
*poorer pic on R1J is NOT true
[ This Message was edited by: augustborn9917 on 2005-07-04 11:15 ]
Posted by manilabynight
How about the quality on the R1L002 release which is newer and supposedly more reliable than the R1J version? What's the performance?
Posted by silie
@augustborn
are you sure about your headings? because i think R1A should have the bigger file size than R1J?
Posted by riffola
R1J looks nicer if the titles are right.
Posted by c0rn7
yea..they are correct..just checked the EXIF data with ACDSee...also anyone using Opera can check it..right click on image --> image properties
using opera...this is from the 2nd pic for R1J002..
Image input equipment: Sony Ericsson
Image input equipment model: K750i
File change date and time: 2005:07:03 16:14:04
Software: R1J002 prgCXC125955_HONG_KONG_ 0.0
edit: augustborn, just noticed that you stated both are taken using default settings, meaning both pics are taken using Normal picture quality? how about taking both with Fine Quality? i think that would be a better comparison, considering most would take pics with Fine Quality
[ This Message was edited by: c0rn7 on 2005-07-04 07:05 ]
Posted by vd0t
awesome test!
proves alot of ppl wrong about the new cam software..
btw.. the titles r rite.. the firmware version can be found in the properties of each picture (in mac anyways)
just waitin for SE to fix the video prob then ill update from r1a
Posted by vd0t
bummer.. c0rn7 beat me to it by a few seconds!
anyways.. quick question regarding the new firmware..
is the cam software faster than on r1a?
i find it a lil on the slow side when takin quick shots (takes a good second to focus n then another second to save.. not to mention its about a half second delay AFTER pressing the shutter button to save).
Posted by augustborn9917
nope, folks. THE TEST IS FLAWED (thanks to corn7 pointing it out to me)
my phone(R1J) is set to FINE. I did not check my friends' R1A, chances are it's on "normal".
*sorry, but folks look at it this way: if R1J takes crappier pics than R1A, then i am perfectly happy with my crappy R1J photos
**bottom line is, there will probably be minimal discernible difference on both FW photo quality. not like the video quality**
Posted by numb
| Quote: |
|
They look quite the opposite on my K750
My R1A pictures looks like the R1J pictures you post and my R1J pictures looks like the R1A pictures you post that are generally more exposed. I need to turn down exposurecompensation 2 notches on every pictures I take to get the same.
Posted by raw_knee
Looking at the pictures, the only difference I could see is that one is a bit washed out than the other.
This, as one poster commented, may be adjusted through exposure compensation. Maybe the developers changed some settings in the latest firmware.
My K750i present firmware is R1L... I haven't had any problems with it, and am quite happy that I updated my phone's firmware from R1A...
Posted by blair777
I have definatly noticed a reduction in picture quality look at these pictures; i know they are of slightly different scenes so it is not totaly fair but i would expect with the "same" camera they would come out near enough as sharp as each other. This though is not the case.
[the size on both had to be reduced so i dont know if it will be as clear to see]
Picture taken with Firmware i got the phone with R1A...
www.ImageShack.us" />
Picture taken with new firmware:
http://www.ImageShack.us" />
[ This Message was edited by: blair777 on 2005-07-07 11:16 ]
[ This Message was edited by: blair777 on 2005-07-07 11:18 ]
Posted by Arne Anka
blair777,
with those small pictures I realy can't see any difference in quality.
Posted by Carlsb3rg
R1J seems to have lighter colours, but i guess this can be adjusted with the brightness.
Posted by Paulino2
Well i thought that R1J and R1L had the exakt same camera FW 4.4 so the pics would be of same quality. The second pic is also taken with bright windows in backgound this usually doesn't help if you wan't to take good shoots but it seem to be much worse almost as if taken in normal mode and not fine.
Posted by Residentevil
Looks like R1A makes a sharper picture.
Posted by vd0t
i agree r1a is better quality.. but then again i have to state the obvious.. its not a true comparison because theyre both different shots of different objects at different angles.
Posted by Arne Anka
The R1J/R1L picture reminds of one taken with 2 x zoom or something similar. Strange.
Posted by kingmobilephone
| Quote: |
|
Very GOOD point !!
Btw, I have spent a couple of hr making a review on picture / vedio quality on
(a) R1J - K750
(b) R1L - K750
(c) R1K - W800
http://www.kingmobilephone.co[....]%20Ericsson%20W800%20W800i.htm
(ALL PICTURES ARE TAKEN ON THE PHOTOS SHOWING ON THE LCD SCREEN)
so same angle & same distance
Posted by admad
Man.... All fine but, R1L and R1J it's almost the same frimware, fixes only GPRS issue:/ If You could compare it with R1A then... there could be a diffrence.
Posted by max_wedge
yeah, as far as I can see there is no significant difference, and if their is it's splitting hairs. My K750 came with R1J anyway (I just updated to R1L), so it's a mute issue for me. Damn, missed out on the R1A video bitrate.....
Posted by adrianoliv
i have upgraded my k750 to w800i with R1K001 but is a downgrade because R1A044 had the best video and pictures, 3.8 camera is the best till now , 4.4 sucks