Posted by PinUpBoy
I had a SE k700i for a few weeks, it was great, everything seems fine except for that battery thingy! But then out of a curiousity, i trade in my K700i for a samsung D410 which is currently hot on the market. USED & TRY IT , within two hours i traded the Samsung D410 back to the shop and ask for my k700i back. I regret trading my k700i in the first place, cause it the one of the best phone i ever used. The function of everything is just a click away, as for samsung, i find it so stupid to use it, you have to do so many of this click and that click to get to what you want for your menu. SE is still the best, No doubt bout it, will not get any other phone except for the SE. Anyone has that experience of trading a K700I for a D410 Samsung?
Posted by croatia
no but you know as samsung got a worst batt!and s.e. is completly in any function on device!keep it s.e. f..k samsung !if you understand me my english is bad!cheers!
Posted by Jowi
samsungs are expensive for their features
Posted by Residentevil
I had a SPH-I300, the screen's quality was so bad, that Samsung did not have any warranty on the phone at all.
Now I stay miles away from Samsung phones. Never again.
Posted by milmino
I tried a few sumsungs, and I have to say that they are quite useless, 1st lack of bluetooth, or even irda in most of their handsets, and also their ui is impossibly hard for a beginner, I have to admit they have colourful menus but why the heck do they have to put the internet button in the middle of the navi pad instead of the select key??!?
its ugly and not logical
Posted by Atlis
I would never change K700 for D410. It's big and heavy. Only one advantage is its display but that's not feature I'm really interested in. I would miss 
soooooo much!
Posted by shyam335
Yeah,i also feel that samsungs are too expensive for their features.and most lack bt and ir
Posted by Atlis
Most of them have irda shyam... Unfortunately, it's usually cripled as N***a's older irda... But I think there's no Samsung with
Posted by Andrew21
@atlis you're right no samsung has
Posted by Scorchio
Tri band is also an issue. I cant believe the e700 is only dual band and as you all say, no BT!!!!!!
Posted by Andrew21
Yeah and it's crap. I want d710 but it's hasn't
so I bought my wonderfull 
Z600 
Posted by Atlis
E700 is really nice one, but lack of
makes it uninteresting to me. But girls love it. Btw is there any asian samsung with yet?
Posted by methylated_spirit
Guy at my work had a T610, upgraded to a samsung, kept it 20 mins then got rid for a Z600! says it all really
Posted by Atlis
I love my Z600 - but new Z500 is really Samsung like phone. Others not...
Posted by sylvester
| Quote: |
|
that's true...good looking phones but no BT with locked irda ...no way ...i'm with SE!
Posted by *Jojo*
@pinupboy - You shouldn't have traded your SE K700 with that of Samsung in the very 1st place mate
At least things like that makes and gives us lessons in life, not to commit the very same mistake/dilemma again, next time 
Cheers!
Posted by Apoc
| Quote: | |||
| |||
waddya mean with "locked irda" ? o.O
Posted by mrMobile
Samsung phones are all look same, same design but I do like there buttons and silver colour. Phones are also look very hard and strong and u have to admit samsung ringtones are very good. Anyway Sonyericsson much better than Samsung, bigger screen, more functions etc. If compare SE phones and Samsung phones, u will see samsung phones have less functions but more expensive than SE.
Posted by BobaFett
I tried the c100 once. The only feature i liked to make clobk and operator logo to disappear. Well, thats the result if u just copy instead u create or develope on your own...
Posted by Andrew21
Samsung is for me only "image phone"
Posted by Miss UK
2 close ppl I know have E700's my first impressions when they let me look was nice till I opened the flip the menu system is so crap I couldnt navigate it after a few secs I gav it back what a awful phone even the camera qty is rubbish compaired with my moto v600!
Posted by mosesgath
hey i bought a samsung X-100 and trust me it is nice so guyz stop hating the maker just because you cant afford to buy a samsung
Posted by mosesgath
Another thing about samsung phones is a super big memory..unlike SE.+ how often do you hear about software upgrades and software bugs from samsung?? You will never because samsung aint in a hit and miss business where you release stuff on the market and 2 weeks later 'surprise, surprise' there is a software upgrade or something of the sort.
Posted by BobaFett
@mosesgath its not hate, just opinions and facts.
Posted by Atlis
@mosesgath - I can only support boba, but I don't understand, how can you be talkin' about money when you have the cheapest crappy Samsung??? And Samsungs have bugs...
Posted by milmino
@moses the samsung u have cant even be compared to t610, maybe the t300, which would be only a close battle coz the screen is better & there is more memory in samsung but doesnt have :bt: or irda
Posted by Atlis
@milmino - T300 lacks
to 
Posted by mosesgath
Apart from BT and irDA who wouldnt own a samsung???
Posted by Atlis
Me...
You can't say appart of this or this... If I need it.
Posted by milmino
@atlis EXACTLY!!!?!
Posted by BobaFett
We are different in taste. Think aslong sy doesnt use an se, visit esato etc hard to understand our passion.
Posted by Miss UK
Lol so whats the most expensive Samsung about then? The E700 is about 250GBP on all PAYG tariffs here I really am shocked cos it really outta be 100 less, nice housing but crap menus!
Posted by whizkidd
One thing i have to admit is that samsung screens are good.
Posted by macdid
their screen n ringtones are great but others.......
Posted by Atlis
@miss uk - I think D-410 is more expensive. Or D-710...
Posted by Andrew21
@atlis D-710 is better
Posted by Miss UK
How much is expensive? The D410 is free on contract :-)
Posted by BobaFett
How is the samsung support? Pix, apps, games etc?
Posted by sylvester
| Quote: | ||||||
| ||||||
try to send a photo from a samsung e700 to a t610 for example and you will understand what i mean....
Posted by shyam335
I heard that some samsungs support only .jad and not .jar ,is that true?
Posted by ThreeX
No that is not true as .JAD is not an executable file at all.
Itīs actually more like a .CUE/.BIN case ie. the .BIN/.JAR files are the actual binary files if you know what I mean.