Posted by xo4ox
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2004-01-21 12:35 ]
Posted by lexus
I think that that`s actually 6620...
Posted by energetic
Generally that Nokia model looks like a grenade. And like all Nokia's its going to explode(all Nokia's stop working properly after a while dont they?).
Its big, I mean P900 looks more "elegant".
Posted by PeterKay
sent u a PM
Posted by xo4ox
@lexus no it's not 6620 it's a well painted 6600
@energetic your r8
@peterkay check your Pm
[ This Message was edited by: xo4ox on 2004-01-21 16:29 ]
Posted by 50Cent
| Quote: |
|
HAHAHA
its funny cos its true
_________________
hmmm....SE T630 or Nokia 6230???
[ This Message was edited by: Twista on 2004-01-23 22:44 ]
Posted by xo4ox
Posted by Scally_cadet
Nokia's dont stop working after a while. They tend to come out f**ked up and stay that way. But I still prefer Nokia to SE.
Posted by xo4ox
@Scally_cadet lol , but SE is better than nokia
Posted by o0xskaterx0o
very true, nokia phones are just for mass production and being sh*t.
on other hand are almost all very well made, even the t310 despite looking quite 'bricky' feels nice. why 55 million nokia's were sold shows how many people dont put in any good research into phones
Posted by energetic
Have you notice that all Nokia mobile phones have similar design on the top part?
Posted by orange
| Quote: |
|
Yes, in every Nokia phone it says "NOKIA" above the display...
Yes, very similar indeed.
Posted by The Good Guy
What's the phone on the 2nd from the right?
I think I like it.
Posted by orange
| Quote: |
|
Nokia 6800.
Posted by Flying Finn
Hehe slightly off topic but hey it's a 6600
Posted by xo4ox
| Quote: |
On 2004-01-26 18:03:08, energetic wrote: |
lol it's tru
[ This Message was edited by: xo4ox on 2004-01-27 11:15 ]
Posted by Ddongmuri
No matter wat model the nokia is 6610, 6600, 7210, and all the other models, they all have similar designs. Juss different software and different features.
nokias are for children! they make like 10 models like every 3 months... eg. nokia 3310 then 3315, 3350, and all the other 33XX models...
Nokia SUX
se is so much better.... i also think samsung is pretty good...
Posted by xo4ox
@Ddongmuri you'r r8, but nokia is still better than samsung
Posted by energetic
@Flying Finn
Schumacher is thinking: "What the h... is this!
Posted by Flying Finn
lol the phones in the picture above (9210, 7650, 3650 etc) don't look very similar to me
I can see a lot more similarity between T600/10/30/P900 for example.
Posted by Ddongmuri
the only reason y nokia is better is because it has been in the australian market for ages!
samsung mobiles havent. anyways if you goto other countries samsung mobiles are really good...like better than any sort of phone....
Posted by djk
I really can't agree if you say that SE phones are well made.
Even with the same model, different phones have very different quality, especially the screen and the keypad.
Everytime I buy a SE phone, I must be very careful to find out all differences with other phone of the same model. However, I do not have to be worried when I get a Nokia phone. Yes, Nokia phones are designed to be mass produced but don't Sony Ericsson do the same thing?
Also, my funny T68i's joystick is out of control, software becomes very unstable and always hang itself after a month I haven't used it. It cannot even charge the battery normally. It still works normally before I stop using it.
In terms of software failures, I can find much more bugs or errors in Sony Ericsson phones than Nokia phones. The level of quality control of Sony Ericsson phones are very well known in Hong Kong. They give Hong Kong users a big surprise nearly everytime they launch a new phone.
However, to be honest, I still like Sony Ericsson. I just want to tell the true and what I'm thinking. As I see that there are too many people just complain, complain, complain, blame on, blame on, blame on Nokia for what what what. Yet, don't Sony Ericsson has something bad too?
Also, Nokia phone users do not surely haven't made research before they buying their phones. Many SE fans just say "P900 is the best! Nokia su**s!" Then do you give me money to buy? Do you buy for me? Also, I still always hear many others complaining that their P900s were so unstable. Then should I just bear in mind and tell others "P900 is so unstable! Don't buy! Sony Ericsson su**s! All P900 users haven't made good research!"?
Posted by energetic
@djk
I must say you have a point there.
But still I believe that SE mobile are more reliable than Nokia from my personal experience and friends.
Posted by DragonEye
besides the slow o/s the 6600 IMO is the best smartphone out there and with the third party support gives the p900 a run for its money at have the cost.
p900 good if you need pda functions, music player and phone
n6600 if you like phone with a little pda function, lots of games and third party apps (that are mostly useless toys but fun) mono music and movies. really depends on needs..i found the n6600 to be very stable as well but just slow