Posted by lethal_cassanova
some says the only dif is the memory..... what do you think???
9210i is way expensive than the 9210... if the only dif is the memory... do you think buying 512mb mmc for 9210 is way cheaper than buying the 9210i?
Posted by sn3ipen
I think both phones are expensive
Posted by rimmer5
one has a colour screen thats why it is so expensive
Posted by Sir-SonyEricsson-man
no.. both have colour screen.. and the one off them has GPRS and is triband..
Posted by nokevin
one´s a nokia brick & the other is also a nokia brick
Posted by Sir-SonyEricsson-man
Posted by Flying Finn
Some FACTS for a change..
Both 9210 & 9210i are dual band and have the same body with a 4096-colour PDA screen. The phone screen is B/W in both. External differences are limited to the 9210i having a silver keypad on the phone portion while the 9210 and 9290 (NA version of the 9210) have black.
To the more important differences then. The 9210i added these features to the 9210:
-Bigger internal memory (40MB vs. 16MB)
-better security features (VPN and memory card locking)
-JavaScript
-HTML 4.01 and CSS support
-RealOne Player
-Flash Player
-GPS Module as an addon
The phones don't have GPRS because the 9210 was introduced back in 2000 when GPRS networks were hardly running. And since the i version is based on the 9210, it doesn't have it either.
[ This Message was edited by: Flying Finn on 2003-10-14 16:12 ]