Posted by sprinkles
I found out about the v300 today - beats t610 in my opinion by miles - cheaper too!
Posted by decoy7
for what it is the T610 is already under priced.....why would you want something cheaper?
ah, your on about the Motorola....only thing good about Moto's are their adverts.
[ This Message was edited by: decoy7 on 2003-09-21 21:57 ]
Posted by sprinkles
I know the t610 is a bargain, but I like clamshells, so this will be my next phone
this is my opinion!
Posted by Andrew21
T610 is much better that v300. That phone hasn't IR and is just for t-mobile.
Posted by fijbert
no BT, no IR
nuff said
if u like clams so much, get a Z600
Posted by decoy7
my opinion? ...motorola havent made a good phone since the analog 'beam me up scottie' startac.
i bought the moto Wings when it came out and it was a miniature dinky handset that, for the 6 days i had it caused my phone bill to go up as i couldnt be bothered trying to use their sms even to reply.
then again, they had the Motorola 150 a few years back....that had 1 feature i would have kept the phone for but not quite, a built in answerphone so you could listen while people left messages and answer if you wanted to....still wasnt enough to make me keep the handset.
poor old Moto, only North America still has faith in them and thats partly due to thier strong presence in CB radio's with North America still using analog cellphone technology in places.
nah, i'm not sold, my first mobile was a Motorola 8500x going back nearly 15 years and it was the best phone they ever made...possibly the best mobile phone ever made.....these days they dont even enter into the Nokia vs SonyEricsson debates...i'd sooner try a Siemens...just my opinion.
Posted by sprinkles
| Quote: |
|
how much is that going to cost - the main reason id get this over t610 i the price
its going to be £170 when its released