Posted by tennisguy
What do you think about it? if compare it with SE T610 or other SE phones....
Property
Triband (GSM 900/1800/1900)
Weight: 122g
Talk time: 4 hours, Standby time: 10 days
65K colour screen
Integrated camera with 640x480 resolution and 2x digital zoom
Symbian 7.0s Operating System
GPRS and MMS functionality with XHTML browser
SSL and VPN (Virtual Private Networking)
Nokia Wallet
Bluetooth and Infra-red
Java MIDP 2.0 Technology
Polyphonic ringtones
6MB internal memory and 32MB MMC card
The following webpage contains info about 6600
http://mobile.burn.com/review.jsp?Id=363
_________________
T68i Rules
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2003-06-17 11:35 ]
Posted by chungagoring
it beats t610 but not p800 in some features (memory, processor, screen...). it does beat p800 in other aspects (video recording, themes...).
however the competitor of 6600 will be p200 and p200 will beat 6600 because it will have almost the same features BUT it will most probably be touch screen.
_________________
lux lisbon
luis gonzalez-camino calleja
avantglance'com
visuality.ekei.com
clubsonyericsson.com
[ This Message was edited by: chungagoring on 2003-06-17 02:19 ]
Posted by Miss UK
Its a brick 125g OMG
Posted by crowing
it luks like the xelibri...
Posted by d' fuhrer
the T610 has a form like a brick and the 6600 is a soap bar shape which is actually better in form and functionality. the T610 hits the dirt with this phone, has a stable symbian OS which is better than the T610's or anything from SE. like the 3650's little brother and having a flimsy, fragile touchscreen is really not a big deal. the other new accessories that is coming out from nokia like the fun cam is way cool too. this may be the only reason i may go back to nokia. another best seller for nokia yes it is and it will forever cement nokia's lead in the industry.
_______________
if you don't have something nice to say, don't say something nice.
FUEHRER MEANS "LEADER" IN GERMAN STUPID.
[ This Message was edited by: d' fuhrer on 2003-06-17 03:10 ]
Posted by Lars
of course SE can compete with this grenade like phone. the old p800 long ago has these features, i doubt you have known p800. nokia is slow in technology, real slow. SE-Z1010 is already going 3G, what about nokia? wake up, boy!
Posted by malinda
Nokia finally copy the Sony Ericsson interface
Posted by c96sthl
6600 and T610 cannot be compete
6600 is like 7650 and 3650 ...so we can compare using P800.
Ya no doubt it have better camera(based on what it claimed) and it have better colour screen but P800 is already one yr ahead and it still have a touch screen which Nokia still lack of one.
Just make me wonder, since they said Nokia contribution to Symbian is enormous but how come they don't get a phone with Symbian v6 or v7 out? (P800 is Symbian v6)
Posted by FRiC
@Lars
Nokia 6650 is GSM/WCDMA/UMTS, and it's available in some parts of the world...
@c96sthl
Nokia 9210, 3650, and 7650 are all Symbian OS 6.x. P800 is Symbian OS 7.
Posted by d' fuhrer
don't worry boy. nokia has a 3G phone in it's arsenal. it will blow the competition away like the 6600. can a brick do that much damage? i think not.
Posted by Super G
@ malinda
| Quote: |
|
Huh?!?
Series 60 is entirely from Nokia
It's also the world leading OS for smart phones.
Posted by B@RTje
But then again.. T610 is out yet, and 6600 in Q4..! so it should beat the t610, cauze then SE is gonna make a phone with more featurs and things.. keeps on going and going and...
Posted by sam12
Not as good as the P800
To beat the P800, it needs a bigger Processor and bigger memory and definately a bigger screen.
Posted by wirrum
d'fuhrer:
do you really mean that the Nokia 3G phone whips all other manufacturers asses? I don't think so. It's a BIG phone, with an external antenna! It doesn't even have the opportunity of video calls... It doesn't have memory extension.
But it's out now (Austria as the only place in Europe), but who cares? So far I haven't seen or heard about a single 3G phone here in Vienna. There are some, but not many. It's too expensive for most people. We have to wait till fall before the 3G rush starts. But then again; it will be a slow start, as the phones will be very expensive, and so also the prices of the operators. And this fall SE will have their Z1010 on the market, and Siemens will have their, as well as other manufacturers.
And I also see that you write that SE doesn't have Symbianbased phones? Well, that is not true at all. P800 is based on Symbian OS v7, while Nokia and Siemens stick to v6.
Btw, you can't compare 6600 to P800, as those phones head for different targets. P800 heads for business men, while 6600 heads for teenagers. Can 6600 read pdf-files? Excel-files? Powerpoint presentations? And why only GPRS class 6?!? Even though 6600 hits the shelves a year after the P800, it still hasn't got faster internet! Thought you said "P800-killer"...
And you can't say that 6600 rules the market! It isn't on the market yet! And you still have to wait half a year for it... Maybe you can get one as a Christmas present? If you're lucky...
Posted by c96sthl
| Quote: |
|
well sorry for the mistaken
but just dont compare 6600 with T610....they are uncomparable
Compare T610 with 7250 or 7250i
Compare P800 with 7650, 3650 and 6600.
this only makes sense....because the four phone are symbian based.
No doubt 3650 and 6600 is more towards fun and teenager group...but
they still can do a lot of business function given you put in the right
software/add on
[ This Message was edited by: c96sthl on 2003-06-17 10:57 ]
Posted by boysaint
poor nokia fans.... still desperately seeking the illusive nokia product to topple down SE. and everytime they try to compare something to SE products... they just show their inferiority, sensitive underbelly, and desperate attitude.
Posted by orange
| Quote: |
|
And this means...??? Basicly SE don't have a smartphone to compare with N 6600. So, you right, there's isn't much comparison to do. Some might compare it to P800, since it comes closest to the smartphone category, being PDA/phone. Both of these phones has a lot features, some not included in the P800 and some not in N 6600.
Posted by geo2k
@orange: nokia dont even have the 6600 to compete with yet so your point is invalid. Wait until it comes out then compare to what se have out then
Posted by orange
| Quote: |
|
Same goes for 7650 and 3650. SE still don't have smartphone to compare with those. No matter how hard you try, there isn't any SE smartphones available at the moment and therefore not much comparison to do.
Posted by Super G
Well P800 *is* a smartphone, no doubt about it, and its pricetage is really (read "too") high.
Nokia has a couple of smartphones out which are half or less than half half the price of P800, namely 7650 and 3650. 3650 and P800 are rather comparable in term of functionality. Market shows which sell best...
Now 6600 is offered which undoubtedly will have a lower price than P800 when launched. Both SE and Nokia make comparable smartphones, but SE challenge is to provide an affordable mass-market smartphone at the moment. Many would certainly like a P800, but certainly not at 900€.
Posted by geo2k
Orange, can you define what a smartphone is because, like the previous post said, the P800 is a smartphone
Posted by dandevil
P800?
3650 and 7650 are not even there with it they are semi retarded symbian based phone compared to P800 they are not smart phones.
SE came up with a phone the technology is way above Nokia which Nokia have to take 3-5 years to come up with.
Hey look it's a new nokia phone just grab it then after using it for a while hey look it's the same phone I having before but with more BUGS!!!!!
Posted by Super G
@ dandevil
How old are you?!!!
Posted by orange
| Quote: |
|
I was just referring to discussion around this forum that P800 is more like two-hand-operated PDA type of phone than smartphone.
Posted by wirrum
Orange:
think I have to correct you a little;
SE already has a phone competing with the 7650: T610
But none competing directly with the 3650. 7650 is just an ordinary phone now, with nothing special but the size; which is extraordinary big when thinking about how outdated the specs are (but it WAS once a "great" phone...)
Posted by Flying Finn
I don't think 6600 is really targeted at young users like someone said earlier...the appearance & price (its a classic series phone afterall) tell it's more business oriented. I wouldn't say it's directly competing with P800 (wait for the new Communicator, yesterday Nokia said "something wonderful is cooking") but with something SE doesn't even have. My guess: Nokia will make more money with these kind of phones than SE will with P800.
[ This Message was edited by: Flying Finn on 2003-06-17 13:17 ]
Posted by orange
| Quote: |
|
ööö...Not. 7650 is smartphone based on Series 60 platform. You can hardly call T610 as a smartphone.
Posted by wirrum
Orange:
So what does the 7650 do that makes it more of a smartphone than the T610? More mem?
Posted by Super G
Multitasking
Posted by wirrum
Multitasking..
Yeah, well, but how in practice can you get the advantage of this in the 7650 versus the T610?
Posted by Super G
Well, I do use that very frequently without even noticing it.
E.g. you get a phone call in the middle of a game, and you can continue the game afterwards. I can change profiles etc while doing something. I can start writing an sms in the middle of something else or whatever. I can leave my browser open, go check something in the notes, calendar, take a picture and come back to the browser. Etc. You name it
Posted by Syd
nice to know you guys liked my article
Posted by FRiC
I can think of some things that distinguish smartphones from regular phones...
- Ability to customize te menus and user interface.
- Integration of PDA functions with phone.
- Availabitily of third party software that add additional functions to the phone.
...
Posted by fijbert
well, we dont hv much specs on the 6600
but I think it is aimed at the same market as the 7650
it's the new 7650
and someone mentionned the P200? guys, seriously.. give that rumor a rest!
Posted by dandevil
@ Super G
How old am I? 31 does that make me too old to dislike Nokia phones is that what you mean??? Anyway I do own a number of Nokia phones just that found out they sucks after I started using T68i not to mention P800 and now T610.
Anyway it cost just 100+ more here to get a P800 rather than the oddly shape 3650 without touch screen so which one you would prefer?
And please guys stop comparing T610 with Symbian based Phones they are not even close and totally different.
[ This Message was edited by: dandevil on 2003-06-17 17:47 ]
Posted by dandevil
Definitely prices will drop and competitors keep coming up with more superior phones. But till then who knows what and this will be endless someday you find yourself implanted with phone in your brain then you start comparing brains. If you like it buy it and be contented with it cos it's your choice it may suit you but it doesn't suit others
Posted by sunjivas
i know its a bit off-topic but duz ne1 know wen its 2 b released?
Posted by wirrum
SuperG:
Just some comments to the multitasking things you mentioned:
I have a T39. On that I can start writing an SMS. Then I can go out of it, do something else on the phone (or even get a phonecall), and it's stored in the "unsent"-folder.
The same thing about surfing on the wap. I can leave the browser, do something else, and later continue where I left it...
And my girlfriend has a 3510i. On that there is a game, Skydiver. When I play it, and there is an incoming call, the game exits, and later on I can resume right where I left...
Isn't that quite much like the 7650 and others?
Posted by dragontrumpetare
Hey I can do stuff like that too with my T300. I can call someone, and in the same time play games or write MMS, SMS you name it, but the webbrowser isnt in that way though.
Posted by d' fuhrer
[quote]
On 2003-06-17 11:54:00, wirrum wrote:
d'fuhrer:
do you really mean that the Nokia 3G phone whips all other manufacturers asses? I don't think so. It's a BIG phone, with an external antenna! It doesn't even have the opportunity of video calls... It doesn't have memory extension.
NOPE I DID NOT MEAN THAT AND FULLY READ THE 6600'S SPECS.
But it's out now (Austria as the only place in Europe), but who cares? So far I haven't seen or heard about a single 3G phone here in Vienna. There are some, but not many. It's too expensive for most people. We have to wait till fall before the 3G rush starts. But then again; it will be a slow start, as the phones will be very expensive, and so also the prices of the operators. And this fall SE will have their Z1010 on the market, and Siemens will have their, as well as other manufacturers.
YUP LIKE NOKIA. YOU ALL THINK THAT NOKIA IS FAR BEHIND BUT WHAT I SEE IS NOKIA HAS WHAT se HAS. AS I HAVE STATED BEFORE, I HAD A FEELING NOKIA HAS A PHONE LIKE THIS IN THEIR ARSENAL. THEY KNOW THE FORMULA TO BE NO.1 AND TO STAY ON TOP. THEY EVEN INCREASED THEIR MARKET SHARE AND WIDENED THEIR LEAD FROM THE 2ND SPOT CO.
And I also see that you write that SE doesn't have Symbianbased phones? Well, that is not true at all. P800 is based on Symbian OS v7, while Nokia and Siemens stick to v6.
I DID NOT WRITE THAT AND I KNOW THAT P800 USES SYMBIAN BUT MOST HERE SAY THAT SYMBIAN IS FULLY MADE BY NOKIA.
Btw, you can't compare 6600 to P800, as those phones head for different targets. P800 heads for business men, while 6600 heads for teenagers.
WRONG AGAIN BUB, GO TO THE NOKIA WEBSITE AND SEE WHAT THE PHONE IS TARGETED FOR.
Can 6600 read pdf-files? Excel-files? Powerpoint presentations? And why only GPRS class 6?!? Even though 6600 hits the shelves a year after the P800, it still hasn't got faster internet! Thought you said "P800-killer"...
I DID NOT SAY P800 KILLER, I SAID THAT THE PHONE HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED BY NOKIA YET. HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THE PHONE DOES NOT DO ALL THESE THINGS (PDF,EXCEL ETC.)HAVE YOU TESTED ONE ALREADY. WHAT IF IT'S CLASS 6 ONLY? THE SPEED OF CONNECTION ALSO DEPENDS ON THE NETWORK, SERVERS ETC.
And you can't say that 6600 rules the market! It isn't on the market yet! And you still have to wait half a year for it... Maybe you can get one as a Christmas present? If you're lucky...
OH YES IT WILL. MY SIMPLE READON IS NOKIA WILL STAY NO.1 DUE TO THIS PHONE AND I DO NOT NEED LUCK LIKE TO GET THIS PHONE. DON'T CARE IF IT'S CHRISTMAS OR NEXT YEAR. I CAN BUY IT EVEN IF IT COSTS A LOT AND I CAN ALSO BUY A 3G PHONE EVEN IF IT COSTS A LOT.
SYMBIAN OS BUGGY? YEAH RIGHT. THE P800 HAS SYMBIAN BUT IT'S STILL BUGGY SO IT MEANS THAT THE HARDWARE IS THE PROBLEM.
Posted by Super G
@ dandevil
| Quote: |
|
I was referring to your comments below which are understandable if you'd be 15 or so... they are just complete non-sense.
| Quote: |
|
Posted by Super G
@ wirrum
You're right, Non smart phones (which may be smart anyhow
) may have some sort of multitask ability (e.g. SMS while on a phone call: this is thanks to GSM technology) but it certainly is not like on a smart phone.
On series 60 for instance you can monitor all opened applications (e.g. contacts, calendar, to-do, services etc) by keeping the menu key pressed for a few seconds, and you can switch between any of them freely. In a traditional phone, most applications/phone functions need to be closed before you can go to some other one. Multitasking *is* a main characteristic of Symbian OS.
Anyway, you can find more on this on www.symbian.com, e.g. at http://www.symbian.com/developer/techlib/papers/SymbianOS_for_Palm/Symbian_OS_for_Palm_Developers.html for instance.