Posted by drhigh5
I have installed intellihance pro as a photoshop plug-in. I have checked it has gone into the plug-ins folder but when I run photoshop there is no enhance button or anything to do with intellihance pro except in the help file it shows intellihance as a plugin.
Any ideas why I am not seeing the enhance button? Where should it be?
:scratch:
Posted by drhigh5
I have installed intellihance pro as a photoshop plug-in. I have checked it has gone into the plug-ins folder but when I run photoshop there is no enhance button or anything to do with intellihance pro except in the help file it shows intellihance as a plugin.
Any ideas why I am not seeing the enhance button? Where should it be?
[ This Message was edited by: drhigh5 on 2002-10-22 21:13 ]
Posted by drhigh5
Oops my browser had a fit and put the post in 4 times!!
Posted by all8
| Quote: |
|
Intellihance button is located at Filter>Extensis>Intellihance Pro....
Posted by drhigh5
Thanks All8. I am going blind! Follwing your steps the pics come out pretty good.
Posted by jcpsad
are there any other graphic tips?
Posted by svkhtn
Hey, any 1 know how to enter the menu without your sim. I remember it was already posted but i could not find it,
Thanks a lot
Posted by all8
>svkhtn
I think u r in wrong thread, anyhow try >*>>*> without sim
Posted by lvv_77
do you have any similar settings to use with CorelDraw 9.0?
Posted by all8
>lvv_77
I'm not so sure with CorelDraw 9.0, someone claimed that he had successfully enhanced pic with paintshop pro following steps described in this thread. Try it out with Coreldraw, it may work. Don't forget to finish off your picture with "unsharp Mask" filter.
Posted by jcpsad
what does unsharp mask do?
Posted by all8
Unsharp masking, or USM, is a traditional film compositing technique used to sharpen edges in an image. The Unsharp Mask filter corrects blurring introduced during photographing, scanning, resampling, or printing. It is useful for images intended for both print and online viewing.
Unsharp Mask locates pixels that differ from surrounding pixels by the threshold you specify and increases the pixels' contrast by the amount you specify. In addition, you specify the radius of the region to which each pixel is compared. The effects of the Unsharp Mask filter are far more pronounced on-screen than in high-resolution output.
Posted by 2tangy
I just wanna say a big thanks to All8 for all the pic enhancing tips! My images come out MUCH better than they way I used to do it, thanks again
~Tangy
Posted by jcpsad
thanks all8
Posted by egg378
i go try now with my brand new MCA-25
Posted by Gutteguttegut
Ok..i created a pallet for Micrografx Picture Publisher, i don't if it works correctly cause i don't have a t68i yet (coming next week).
Maybe someone can try it out for me?
Just copy the file in your "pallets" directory and then in PP go to image->convert->pallet color: there select custom and scattered and then select the "t68i Pallet".
t68iPall.pl3
(be sure to do the pallet conversion as the last step)
Posted by Pajas
Aha, very nice. This'll help my imagecreating alot!
Thx!!!
Posted by wjiji
THANKS~
Posted by GREK
nm
[ This Message was edited by: GREK on 2003-01-04 09:37 ]
Posted by aalaap
Aah!
I got the .act file, and loaded it up into my favorite imaging program - Macromedia Fireworks - and I have here what may probably be the fastest way to get good results on the T68i:
1) Take a pic into Fireworks...
If you want to make any changes to the pic etc, do them now.
If you put this file as-is into your T68i, it will look like this:
So ...
2) In the Optimise tab, under the gif type choose Custom and load the .act file mentioned in the posts above.
3) Set the "dither" percentage slider all the way up to 100...
4) Export the gif.
Voila!!!
FMA it to your phone and you're done!!!!!! Yaay!
Of course you can make the pic look better with a few more steps etc but this is probably the best trade-off of ease vs. quality!
Enjoy!
- Aalaap
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2003-07-07 10:11 ]
Posted by jken8
| Quote: |
|
I tried using the t68 palette that all8 posted (thank you!) on a T300, and noticed that greens looked orange-brown. Does T300 have a different palette after all?
Posted by all8
| Quote: |
|
I've checked the T300 colour pallete again, they are the same as T68.
Your screen could be defective or your need to tweak the contrast settings.
Try loading picture below to your T300, It will display all 256 colours
[ This Message was edited by: all8 on 2003-01-29 01:08 ]
Posted by jken8
>I've checked the T300 colour pallete again, they are the same as >T68. Your screen could be defective or your need to tweak the >contrast settings.
Okay, I got that palette onto my T300 and had a look. The colors that were very bright on my computer monitor looked washed-out on the phone. Bright yellow, for example, looked to be a dull yellow-orange on the T300. Do other people find that to be the case on their phones?
New at this ... thanks for the help.
Posted by all8
CRT and/or TFT-LCD Computer screen colour does not display the exact colour as of your T68. Both may use same colour code, they can display different colour to your eyes.
The same applies to colour TVs, every other brand TV displays slight different colours.
Posted by caff
For the best enhanced female backgrounds, simply click on my signature below !!!!!! Enjoy guys !!!!!!
Posted by jr_rca
caff, you will be a big help if you share your editing techniques, what software etc?? post it and write it in details.
Posted by caff
Well, I just followed this thread in setting those photoshop to enhancing the pics quality, but make sure the original pics are in good quality for them to look good on the phone after enhancing !!!
Posted by mariolouis
great job
Posted by v2boi
great work there... now if only someone can come up with the p800 version...
Posted by virawan
| Quote: |
|
@ctchng :
how to create colur table using that picture?(256 colors fig)
can u show me the step? thanks
Posted by Ko
Yes @ jken8
Posted by maddav
Okay, i've been trying to create some backgrounds using Paint Shop Pro 5, and i've come up with the following, original on the left, conversion on the right.
Direct link to image: http://theringofpower.bravepages.com/t68psptest.gif
As you can tell, i've been having some problems with the conversion, i'm using the T68 colour palette, and following all8's guide for Contrast etc. But my images still turn out somewhat pixelated, which is especailly noticeable in the Gandalf pic (2nd from bottom) because of the light. Can anyone help me get round this problem?
[ This Message was edited by: laffen on 2003-07-07 10:09 ]
Posted by binoblaine05
good pm peeps...
Posted by simonboyes
WARNING, STOP PRESS ETC.
I use Paint Shop Pro 7, which uses .pal files as palettes instead of .act files, and so I cannot say for certain that all8's 256.act file is incorrect. However, the 'Count Colours Used' function of PSP reveals that PortfolioT68.gif (which all8 says was created using that palette file) DOES NOT FEATURE 256 COLOURS. Close inspection of the image shows that a couple of colours are duplicated in the bright area on the right.
I see that all8 has determined that the t68/t300 can display 8, distinct, equally-spaced levels for each of red and green and 4 distinct blue levels and used this information to create this (excellent) palette. Fortunately, things can be corrected easily by checking over the pattern in PortfolioT68.gif that all8 has followed and then exporting the palette again.
I apologise to all8 in advance if this anomaly does not appear in 256.act.
### You can verify for yourself that 8 levels of red and green and 4 of blue are used by these phones by drawing an image consisting of three gradients. At the top of the image create a gradient from black (RGB 0,0,0) to red (RGB 255,0,0); in the middle a gradient from black to green (RGB 0,255,0); and at the bottom a gradient from black to blue (RGB 0,0,255). When displayed on the phone's screen, the red and green gradients are split into 8 equally-spaced stripes, while the blue is split into just 4. It just so happens that 8*8*4=256. The human eye is less sensitive to variations in the luminance of blue light, which, presumably, prompted the decision to assign the '4' to blue.###
Posted by all8
oops
>simonboyes is right, there are some anomalies in the original portfolioT68.gif file. I've corrected it on 5-8-03 and reposted to esato.
>simonboyes, please double check with paint shop, thks.
For those who are using .act file for photoshop . Let me assure you it contained 256 colours coz i used a different picture to generate it
You may find the anomalies in the original portfolioT68.gif as the picture below
The corrected below
[ This Message was edited by: all8 on 2003-05-07 19:19 ]
Posted by simonboyes
@all8
You know, I created almost exactly the same numbered image as the one above, to help to prove my point! I was about to say that you missed the two duplicated tones around the middle left (7 from the right and 4&3 from the bottom), but I see that you've corrected them in the bottom image.
Thanks for checking up on what I said - I thought I'd embarrassed myself, for a minute, there...
Posted by simonboyes
Here's where I get under everybody's skin again (especially all8's):
I don't suppose anyone has tried the ActiveX Mophun emulator, at www.mophun.com ? The colours used by that are ever-so-slightly different to those in these pallettes, but I've no idea if they're what the SE screens can display or simply what Mophun works with.
Can anyone find a definitive pallette!?
Posted by simonboyes
Serious flaws in my personality (which I plan to consult my doctor about) have led me to generate this list of distinct values that are taken by red/green/blue, as seen in all8's palette and in screen grabs from the Mophun emulator:
ALL8'S PALLETTE
Red/Green: 0, 37, 73, 110, 146, 183, 219, 255
Blue: 0, 85, 170, 255
MOPHUN EMULATOR
Red/Green: 0, 33, 74, 107, 148, 181, 222, 255
Blue: 0, 82, 173, 255
Here's where I become REALLY unpopular: if the levels are meant to be distributed evenly between 0 and 255 (which would make more sense), then they ought to be as follows:
Red/Green: 0, 36, 72, 109, 145, 182, 218, 255
Blue: 0, 84, 170, 255
all8's palette differs only because the values there scale between 0 and 256 and not 255 (the difference is purely down to rounding off - talk about PEDANTIC).
Should I be proud of myself? Probably not...
Posted by ripkord
0 is a number, so there are 256, 0 to 255. ya see
Posted by lewissham
Posted by lewissham
Can someone teach me how to make a COLOUR TABLE? (.act)
I do need it urgently.
Thx in advance for those good guys!!!
I love u!
>_<
I mean I got to make one for myself, but not for that provided 256.act.
It's like I want to know how to make a colour table, dun tell me to d/l that file and use it, haha.
Becuz I am not using that for my phone.
THANKS A LOT, AND AGAIN!
[ This Message was edited by: lewissham on 2003-08-06 15:56 ]
Posted by GoH
ripkord made some good sense there
Posted by aamonster
You are totally wrong about color values in palette. At least in my t68m (firmware R8A015 - as in t68i) there are another colors.
Just make pictures with red, green and blue gradient 0-255 and you can measure color thresholds. They are:
48, 64, 88, 112, 128, 152, 168 for red and green.
64, 112, 160 for blue.
Ooops... That's not all. It looks like there is non-uniform palette in T68m. It's possible to get it (make pictures with all combinations of 5bit R,G,B, but it's a lot of work...
[ This Message was edited by: aamonster on 2003-09-12 12:23 ]
Posted by simonboyes
@ripkord
I agree with what you said, but to reiterate my point:
The first value should be 0 and the other seven should be multiples of 255/7, after rounding. The final value is going to be 255 if you do this and there will be a range of 256 from 0 to 255 -
0,36,73,109,146,182,219,255
If, however, you take 0 as the first value and get the other seven from multiples of 256/7 and round them off, the final value will end up being 256. The values will then wrongly range from 0 to 256, a range of 257! -
0,37,73,110,146,183,219,256
Try it with a calcalator yourself.
Observe the differences, then compare the second list of values with those in all8's palette -
0,37,73,110,146,183,219,255
It the same as the ever-so-slightly-wrong list, except for the 255, which appears to be a result of forcing 256 into the acceptible range.
You do know, if my mates down the pub see this display of anal-retention, I'm a dead man?
Posted by Prosody
Quick question.
When I save a .gif image in Photoshop 7 it asks if I want to save it in on of two ways. "Normal" or "Interlaced" I know that they are different ways the pic is put together (in alternating lines or not) but is any of them better than the other and do they both work on a T68i?
I have a T610 but a girl at work wants some Beckham pics (*GROAN*) and I'm the sucker who has to make them for her.
Any help is appreciated, I've already followed a load of the steps in this thread and the pics seem better on the computer... lets see how they translate to the phone tomorrow.
Posted by sonusingh27
Can anyone give me the latest pallet for the T68i? The latest correct one please!?
Posted by all8
@sonusingh27
Try this
Posted by sonusingh27
Thanks mate, but I need one for photoshop (.act file) can you get that for me, please?