Welcome to Esato.com


Pages:
Previous  123 ... 282930 ... 195196197  Next

News Articles:

Related

Technical details:
• Ericsson R380
• Ericsson R520
• Ericsson R600
• Ericsson T29s
• Ericsson T39
• Ericsson T60d
• Sony Xperia A
• Sony Xperia Acro S
• Sony Xperia Advance
• Sony Xperia C
• Sony Xperia E
• Sony Xperia E Dual
• Sony Xperia E1
• Sony Xperia E1 Dual
• Sony Xperia Ion LT28at
• Sony Xperia J
• Sony Xperia L
• Sony Xperia M2
• Sony Xperia Miro
• Sony Xperia Neo L
• Sony Xperia P
• Sony Xperia S
• Sony Xperia SL
• Sony Xperia Sola
• Sony Xperia SP
• Sony Xperia SX
• Sony Xperia T
• Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
• Sony Xperia Tipo
• Sony Xperia Tipo Dual
• Sony Xperia TL
• Sony Xperia TX
• Sony Xperia U
• Sony Xperia V
• Sony Xperia VL
• Sony Xperia Z
• Sony Xperia Z Ultra
• Sony Xperia Z1
• Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
• Sony Xperia Z2
• Sony Xperia ZL
• Sony Xperia ZQ
• Sony Xperia ZR
• Sony Ericsson Xperia X10
• Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini
• Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro

Sony Ericsson X10 Official Thread


Click to view updated thread with images




Posted by se_dude
5 mp camera with pathetic optics.Well, lets not go into the multimedia part, we all know what HTC is capable of.


Posted by sealover94

On 2009-12-11 18:19:17, se_dude wrote:
5 mp camera with pathetic optics.Well, lets not go into the multimedia part, we all know what HTC is capable of.


i know what HTC means and i will never buy an HTC... but i am not talking as sealover or esato member... How many customers are looking at the optics of the camera lenses.... I'am talking about better sales for SE..!

SE's phones have UNIQUE designs and x10 is the epitome of beauty! But when a customers see in specs ... ANDROID 1,6 and 65k vs 2.0 and 16M.... which do you think he will choose??

Posted by se_dude
@sealover.i thought it was confirmed that the X10 will have android 2. Mizzle confirmed it from the product manager.Btw, how many consumers do you think actually care about the numerals it ships with? 2 and 1.6? lol.



Posted by moogoo
unfortunately most customers won't know the difference and as a result they will ask the sales person. The sales person will likely be uneducated and simply say that 2.0 is better and persuade the customer to HTC. Granted there are exceptions out there, but I think for the most part this is true. At least in the US.

Posted by se_dude
I am sure most salespersons will tell them that the X10 has a 8 mp camera is thus better.


Posted by se_dude
Btw, guys.

http://www.play.com/Mobiles/M[....]ixel-Mobile-Phone/Product.html

Due for release on 18/01/2010

Posted by anonymuser

On 2009-12-11 20:40:08, se_dude wrote:
Btw, guys.

http://www.play.com/Mobiles/M[....]ixel-Mobile-Phone/Product.html

Due for release on 18/01/2010


PLEASE tell me you don't really set any store by that date, or I'll seriously lose all hope for you..
[ This Message was edited by: Boinng on 2009-12-11 19:59 ]


Posted by se_dude
What? I did not get you. btw, its up for pre order and play is the most dependable site in the UK.

Posted by TJMonkey15

On 2009-12-11 09:00:28, moogoo wrote:
I also don't want to see ATT's new data plan requirement for it if it does offer the x10. It's bad enough they're attempting to give incentives for users NOT to use so much data bandwidth on their networks.


This is exactly why I don't want ATT to get this phone. A subsidized price would be glorious, but not if we have to pay out the butt for data usage. I wonder if ATT would make us get the expensive data plan if we had unlocked X10s...guess it depends if they change their version of the X10 and call it something different (a la e71x).

Posted by McKinley

On 2009-12-11 20:57:40, Boinng wrote:

On 2009-12-11 20:40:08, se_dude wrote:
Btw, guys.

http://www.play.com/Mobiles/M[....]ixel-Mobile-Phone/Product.html

Due for release on 18/01/2010


PLEASE tell me you don't really set any store by that date, or I'll seriously lose all hope for you..
[ This Message was edited by: Boinng on 2009-12-11 19:59 ]



It's good to take things with a pinch of salt but in your case you got objections to everything written in here.

Posted by Saka

On 2009-12-11 13:35:32, sealover94 wrote:
all the "missing" specs of x10 : radio,HD recording,AMOLED,dual led,divx support,16gb memory,Android 2.0 in package ...

Video call, 16M colors, multitouch support, flash... the list is long.
[ This Message was edited by: Saka on 2009-12-12 07:19 ]


Posted by se_dude
^^Half the things there will be available with the Android 2 update.
btw, it does have flash.

Posted by mediar
16GB?! You have 1GB built in and 8GB memory card. And you need more?! Are you going to download 15 HD movies? That's not your computer! It's your phone/PDA, not your computer.

Posted by masseur
you can never have enough memory

The 32gb in my iphone is almost full and I'm already hoping that they up it to 64gb with the next release!

yes, its not your computer but when you are out and about you want the full choice of entertainment (music, videos etc) that is available at home. I don't want to be restricted to some subset of that, especially when I'm travelling alot

Posted by >500

On 2009-12-11 13:35:32, sealover94 wrote:
I was looking at HTC bravo's specs last night and saw all the "missing" specs of x10 : radio,HD recording,AMOLED,dual led,divx support,16gb memory,Android 2.0 in package ... All these features i was talking about that x10 should have... knowing how the market works after all these years!
Plus any possible delay can make x10 to fail, once again
[ This Message was edited by: sealover94 on 2009-12-11 12:37 ]



sorry but i dont really see what the excitement is over hd video, amoled or divx support.

hd video - just one more thing to drain my battery. More so than other features might i add. (I) dont need it. and you arent gonna tell me your going to film some ones wedding, for example, on your mobile? For on the spot quick videos, vga is fine. For other important things, id say a video camera is much better suited.

amoled - slightly more vivid colours and brighter, a deal breaker for people? For the every day consumer, definately not. I dont get any customers in at work and say, o i want a brighter screen with richer colours. A standard tft is sufficient for most, and the picture quality of a tft is definately more than sufficient. If you think otherwise, your lying to your self! Im sure you dont look at your current NON amoled screened phone and say, o i cant bare to use this, the quality is just terrible! Its not like your doing any design work on your phone, for example, where you could use 'richer colours'. Thats why we have computers (Macs in particular for artists etc) And the crap about amoled improving battery life? Lol please, the samsung jet and ultra touch batteries are will below par imho. (yes i have hands on experiences with them, work daily with them)

divx - what, people are ditching their home tv's now and watching movies on their phones? ive downloaded heaps of full movies, short videos, and i think maybe only 1 or 2 have been divx. And converting into divx? no thanks.

i dont get some people here, we complain about battery life every day, but yet we want these battery sucking features?

and it seems some are too consumed in mobiles. i mean, theres only so much we can want/complain about etc etc, but the way some people carry on is as if they lose sleep at night over mobile phones! plenty of other more important things to fight for!

not entirely directed at you sealover, just people in general!

ps. SE have confirmed a 2.0 update. And id say more than likely, SE will provide updates to 2.1 and so on.
[ This Message was edited by: >500 on 2009-12-12 10:25 ]


Posted by moogoo

On 2009-12-12 01:37:07, TJMonkey15 wrote:

On 2009-12-11 09:00:28, moogoo wrote:
I also don't want to see ATT's new data plan requirement for it if it does offer the x10. It's bad enough they're attempting to give incentives for users NOT to use so much data bandwidth on their networks.


This is exactly why I don't want ATT to get this phone. A subsidized price would be glorious, but not if we have to pay out the butt for data usage. I wonder if ATT would make us get the expensive data plan if we had unlocked X10s...guess it depends if they change their version of the X10 and call it something different (a la e71x).


I don't know about you, but I currently have unlimited 3G data on my phone for $20/month on top of my voice plan. I'm guessing w/ an unlocked X10, I would still be able to use my current data plan without having to change anything even IF they were to get one and modify it. But, I guess time will tell. definitely don't want to be paying $75+ for a plan like iphone users!

Posted by mediar
Three good file managers for Android ( and X10 of course ) - http://mobile-review.com/soft/2009/android-soft-digest-9.shtml

Posted by sealover94

sorry but i dont really see what the excitement is over hd video, amoled or divx support.

hd video - just one more thing to drain my battery. More so than other features might i add. (I) dont need it. and you arent gonna tell me your going to film some ones wedding, for example, on your mobile? For on the spot quick videos, vga is fine. For other important things, id say a video camera is much better suited.



HD recording is important for making short clips of sth you want to remember and see on your HD TV in the future and not on a 4 inches screen..And anyway.. having this choice you don't mean that you have to record in hd all the time...


amoled - slightly more vivid colours and brighter, a deal breaker for people? For the every day consumer, definately not. I dont get any customers in at work and say, o i want a brighter screen with richer colours. A standard tft is sufficient for most, and the picture quality of a tft is definately more than sufficient. If you think otherwise, your lying to your self! Im sure you dont look at your current NON amoled screened phone and say, o i cant bare to use this, the quality is just terrible! Its not like your doing any design work on your phone, for example, where you could use 'richer colours'. Thats why we have computers (Macs in particular for artists etc) And the crap about amoled improving battery life? Lol please, the samsung jet and ultra touch batteries are will below par imho. (yes i have hands on experiences with them, work daily with them)



amoled screens are thiner , do improve battery life , bright/vivid colors. Means thiner devices and more standby time..


divx - what, people are ditching their home tv's now and watching movies on their phones? ive downloaded heaps of full movies, short videos, and i think maybe only 1 or 2 have been divx. And converting into divx? no thanks.


So whats the point having 4 inches screen? Browsing facebook ???? Movies , tv series,videoclips .... all in divx format .. Subtitles is also an important feature if you don't speak english.. and i am tired all these years converting movies into mp4 format ...



ps. SE have confirmed a 2.0 update. And id say more than likely, SE will provide updates to 2.1 and so on.

How many people that want to buy a high-end phone know that??? This is called marketing.Future update and features like 16m colors / multitouch etc. won't be on the specs when the phone comes out.
For you and for me.. this is ok.. but this won't make the phone to be successful...

By the way.. you want one ??

[ This Message was edited by: sealover94 on 2009-12-12 12:45 ]


Posted by chenmartin
Tutorial: desktop, widgets etc on X10

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbcBq8vhSz8

Posted by sealover94
is it true that there is a built in radio.. but the software (a 1.6) does not support it ??

Posted by 513
The HTC Tattoo on 1.6 has a radio too.

Posted by captainsm
X10 lovers seems to go down the road of the iPhone talibans.

If it's not in the phone it's absolutely not needed. No matter what's missing it's never a big deal.

Iphone:
3Mp cam>> I NEVER take pics
Multitasking: NOBODY uses that
MMS: Old Tech, E-mail is the shit
Flash: NO need, drains battery
Exhangeable battery: i'm NEVER away from an outlet.
No Radio: I NEVER use FM, i'd rather drain my battery with streamed radio.


X10:
No Radio: I NEVER use FM, i'd rather drain my battery with streamed radio.
No AMOLED: No need, slightly better, but i don't like it.
No 2.0: It will come, i like it, but for some reason it's good that it doeasn't ship with it...
No Built in memory: It's a feature, NOBODY needs more than 1+8GB (or was that 640k)
No HD recording: Never gonna use it, drains battery.
No Multitouch: Nobody ever use this, it's good it's not there.


I like the X10 and i will get one, but if a competiton comes up with something better i'm not going to bury my head in the sand and pretend it's crap because it's something else than an SE.


I for one say put it all in if you have the knowhow. it's not going to HURT me to have an extra feature even if i never use it.




Posted by Eurico
http://www.phonearena.com/htm[....]8th-launch-article-a_8275.html

X10 ready for January, is that true guys? I might considered it, I was going to buy Satio this christmas...

Posted by Saka
LOL. I totally agree. Can't believe people are taking their wishes for fact. Even if it has been confirmed officially (which it hasn't clearly) that there will be an upgrade to 2.0 it will take months after the release (if ever). Hell, it took 2 months for them to release a minor update for Satio without any new features. How long do you think it will take before they convert their signature apps to Android 2.0, put it in firmware and test everything together? By that time (May-June?) there will come a new device, possibly with hardware that we miss here too.

I want to believe there will be an update to 2.0 for X10, but I won't buy it before it's out, that's for sure.
[ This Message was edited by: Saka on 2009-12-13 00:10 ]


Posted by snoFlake
Looks like they better crack on if the rumour mill is to be believed:

Google handing out the Google phone to employees, will launch in January 2010?

Hardware partners be damned, Google is pursuing world domination and is doing so with its new Google phone. Plastered all over Twitter are enthusiastic tweets from Google employees and their friends expounding the awesomeness of a hot new HTC phone handed out to the them by mothership Google. The full touchscreen handset runs Android 2.1 and is supposedly slightly thinner than the Hero with a sexiness that “rivals the iPhone.” Did we mention it has a Snapdragon processor, high resolution OLED display and dual mics for noise reduction and advanced voice-to-text features? The Google phone will be built by HTC, customized to Google’s specifications and sold unlocked in early 2010 by Google. It has been suggested but not confirmed that the phone will support both T-Mobile and AT&T bands UMTS. According to Google, the phone has been handed out to employees so they can be the guinea pigs, testing out the new and exciting capabilities of this phone. If you’ve got one or have shots of it, you know where to head!

Read [TechCrunch]


Posted by titus1



amoled - slightly more vivid colours and brighter, a deal breaker for people? For the every day consumer, definately not. I dont get any customers in at work and say, o i want a brighter screen with richer colours. A standard tft is sufficient for most, and the picture quality of a tft is definately more than sufficient. If you think otherwise, your lying to your self! Im sure you dont look at your current NON amoled screened phone and say, o i cant bare to use this, the quality is just terrible! Its not like your doing any design work on your phone, for example, where you could use 'richer colours'. Thats why we have computers (Macs in particular for artists etc) And the crap about amoled improving battery life? Lol please, the samsung jet and ultra touch batteries are will below par imho. (yes i have hands on experiences with them, work daily with them)



amoled screens are thiner , do improve battery life , bright/vivid colors. Means thiner devices and more standby time..




Then shield it under the bright light of the sun just to have a better view? If TFT's wouldn't hamper me to use my device in any kind of lighting condition..then TFT it is.


Posted by sealover94

On 2009-12-13 01:05:59, Saka wrote:
LOL. I totally agree. Can't believe people are taking their wishes for fact. Even if it has been confirmed officially (which it hasn't clearly) that there will be an upgrade to 2.0 it will take months after the release (if ever). Hell, it took 2 months for them to release a minor update for Satio without any new features. How long do you think it will take before they convert their signature apps to Android 2.0, put it in firmware and test everything together? By that time (May-June?) there will come a new device, possibly with hardware that we miss here too.

I want to believe there will be an update to 2.0 for X10, but I won't buy it before it's out, that's for sure.
[ This Message was edited by: Saka on 2009-12-13 00:10 ]



+1

Posted by se_dude
What improvements does Android 2 have over the 1.6?

Posted by tranced
@se_dude: this is one.

Posted by se_dude
I dont get it, everything thats more in the 2.0,V is already supplied to with the X10, why the hype?

Posted by XPHCTOC

On 2009-12-13 05:24:30, se_dude wrote:
I dont get it, everything thats more in the 2.0,V is already supplied to with the X10, why the hype?

2.0 brings multitouch and 16M color screen.
2.1 brings animated and interactive wall papers

Posted by se_dude
16 million screen is already supported. its for SE to implement. All reviews have said that the screen is fantastic, why are you so bent on losing your battery?

As we mentioned, the display measures 4 inches and has native resolution of 480x854 pixels, just like the Motorola MILESTONE (DROID). The image quality is very good with really saturated colours.


God!!Some people are never satisfied.
[ This Message was edited by: se_dude on 2009-12-13 05:52 ]


Posted by vilde


Size comparison vs iPhone

Posted by moogoo
man that white x10 looks too awesome... iphone can't compete in sexiness at all!

Posted by sealover94

On 2009-12-13 18:58:43, moogoo wrote:
man that white x10 looks too awesome... iphone can't compete in sexiness at all!



this is the most dirty / scratched iphone i've ever seen

Posted by volume100

On 2009-12-13 20:51:18, sealover94 wrote:

On 2009-12-13 18:58:43, moogoo wrote:
man that white x10 looks too awesome... iphone can't compete in sexiness at all!



this is the most dirty / scratched iphone i've ever seen



No, it just seems so when it's next to X10.

Posted by mediar
I X10!

I'd like to see a comparison between T100 and X10 - the first SE phone VS the best SE phone ever made or the difference between 2001 and 2010.

Posted by vilde


Who cares about a size comparison between T100 and X10. The battle is between X10 vs Omnia HD vs iPhone 3GS

Posted by se_dude
Oh shit!!Its smaller than the HD!!

Posted by -16-
i can hardly believe that. i was yesterday in electro store and said to my friend: the X10 will be between this(showing on the Omnia HD) and this (showing on the TG01). But this is great, that its smaller than Omina HD.

Posted by TJMonkey15
Well, it's smaller in one of three dimensions. What about the others?

Posted by clobar

On 2009-12-15 01:55:14, TJMonkey15 wrote:
Well, it's smaller in one of three dimensions. What about the others?

X10 :119x63x13mm
Omnia HD: 123x58x12.9mm

Check Phonearena for all your comparison needs:
http://www.phonearena.com/htmls/Sony-Ericsson-Xperia-X10-phone-size-compare-pc_3841.html



Posted by masseur
there is no need to leave Esato for such comparisons

Posted by anonymuser
So anyway, Nexus One anyone? http://www.crunchbase.com/product/nexus-one

This is the official "Google phone", will be in shops in January, runs a Snapdragon chip with an OLED screen, features a mic for noise cancelling, and is going to be - well - big. Oh, and it'll be running Android 2.1 out of the box, natch.

Is February still looking good for the X10?
[ This Message was edited by: Boinng on 2009-12-15 09:49 ]


Posted by se_dude
LOL!!Let this phone be announced first.Dont think the partners would take it too lightly to Google developing a phone ATM!!
If its a google phone, it would kill all partners regarding Android!! Not just SE. And I still say, the 8 mp will be a switching factor for many.

Posted by Indiandawg
I doubt X10 will survive in such heavy competiton. no dount it's a great phone but it's got a long way to go.

Posted by anonymuser

On 2009-12-15 11:23:00, se_dude wrote:
LOL!!Let this phone be announced first.Dont think the partners would take it too lightly to Google developing a phone ATM!!
If its a google phone, it would kill all partners regarding Android!! Not just SE. And I still say, the 8 mp will be a switching factor for many.


Sorry, there's no question that it exists, the FCC have even approved it already - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/te[....]hone-granted-FCC-approval.html - have they done that for the X10?

Google have also given handsets out to many of their employees for testing - there are pictures and videos all over Twitter etc. All very viral, clever marketing really.

You have to forget this SE way of thinking, where nothing can come to market without an announcement of an announcement, an announcement, a product blog, and at least a six month wait while they build the thing - it's quite common for other companies not to announce anything until they're actually ready to ship.
[ This Message was edited by: Boinng on 2009-12-15 10:44 ]


Posted by snoFlake
Google to release on 5th January according to phone arena

Posted by McKinley
@Boinng, I still would pick the X10. That Nexus looks awfully much like a regular bland looking HTC.
If Sony Ericsson intend to release Android 2.0 support it will all be fine. For now it inclines pretty much to that.

Posted by anonymuser
I agree it looks a bit bland in the pics, but apparently it's "slimmer than the iPhone", and forget an update to 2.0 - this will have 2.1 out of the box. More importantly, it's going to have an almighty Google marketing push behind it, so frankly, the X10 will be left to the SE fans around here only - forget about the mass market. They just bought the Nexus One.


Pages:
Previous  123 ... 282930 ... 195196197  Next
Click to view updated thread with images


© Esato.com - From the Esato mobile phone discussion forum