Posted by HxH
Z4 BMW
Posted by Acelew
Posted by max_wedge
More Infrared examples
Posted by Acelew
i nvr knw infared pic can be so nice
..good job max wedge..
Posted by max_wedge
Thanks! If we get a supermode driver for Satio, and if I can find a better quality filter, I should be able to improve those results and get sharper and clearer pictures.
Posted by max_wedge
Night shots, no flash. Edited to black and white, lighting enhanced:
Night shots, no flash. Edited to black and white, red in the tail lights preserved:
Posted by Acelew
it's nice because u kept the tail lights..
Posted by davidsic
Posted by Acelew
the pictures were taken with flash?
Posted by norbi_nw
dude you can CLEARLY see the light reflected by the waterdrops... and no casted shadow... and darker background.. so no offense, observe a bit.
Posted by etaab
@ max_wedge - yeah Corona is my favourite beer. With a BBQ its perfect !
Posted by max_wedge
Yep, Corona and BBQ, nothing better!
Posted by etaab
Lets change the subject, its the end of summer and i wont be having anymore BBQ and Coronas anytime soon. So sad to live in the UK where we only get 2 months of sun, if we're lucky ! Me and my girlfriend were meant to be going camping again today for a couple of days, i was looking forward to taking some great scenic pictures with my Satio before i sell it on for my N8. Unfortunately, we have heavy rain forcast for the next 72 hours and really strong winds which would break the tent before we would have chance to pitch it. So, sadly my only pictures today are from last week, Hartsholme park in Lincoln, UK.
It was a overcast hazey day, no sun.
Posted by davidsic
Posted by Acelew
nice..
Posted by davidsic
Thanks.
Posted by eltoffer
click for full size
Posted by Acelew
Posted by davidsic
Posted by zide
Have you (Satio users) completely lost your hope in a new firmware update? Sony Ericsson sucks.
Posted by etaab
I thought this thread was for posting pictures taken with the Satio ? Zide, you really need to grow up a bit.
Posted by zide
Oh my goodness etaab. Please stop whining! You must stop taking everything that is said about satio so seriously. Yes, this is a thread for photos but is there a problem if we lightly debate other Satio related things? Jeez.
I'm asking that because I'm thinking about getting a silver satio and I was wondering if you know anything new about an incoming firmware upgrade. If you don't have anything new to say, just shut up. ;>
Posted by tai020381
On 2010-09-22 03:07:49, zide wrote:
Oh my goodness etaab. Please stop whining! You must stop taking everything that is said about satio so seriously. Yes, this is a thread for photos but is there a problem if we lightly debate other Satio related things? Jeez.
I'm asking that because I'm thinking about getting a silver satio and I was wondering if you know anything new about an incoming firmware upgrade. If you don't have anything new to say, just shut up. ;>
This is way rude!~ This is not the way you speak to forumers. I suggest you think properly before you make comment.
Posted by etaab
Its ok, im thick skinned. Zide rarely has anything of weight or value to say so its easier to ignore him. Just remember people this thread is for posting pictures, not discussion on how great or bad Satio or SE is.
@ zide - its irrelevant what you say, the problem is you just come in the post a pictures thread to say it. Start a thread to slag off SE or the Satio, not in this thread thanks !
[ This Message was edited by: etaab on 2010-09-22 14:16 ]
Posted by Acelew
Posted by davidsic
Posted by Acelew
very nice picture..tomato?
Posted by etaab
Heh, made me giggle, no those are berries.
Posted by Acelew
hahaha...sorry,as they look so big in size..but now i realized it is because of the macro shot,so they look so big..
Posted by zide
@ Etaab - I think you should be awarded as Esato's pseudo-moderator of the year! Please, start to ignore me from now on.
Nice greens and reds on those berries davicsic. The reds really stand out!
Posted by etaab
zide, its nothing to do with me being horrible towards you (i would never intentionally do that to any forum dweller) or trying to make you look stupid, its just sometimes i feel you dont realise people dont want to hear that kind of thing, especially in this thread.
If you want to slag off the Satio, or SE in general, start a thread about it and i'll happily join in ~!
Posted by Caseiro
My first upload @ Esato.
Original
Posted by Acelew
Posted by Caseiro
@Acelew, nice pic!!!!
It was shot in "panorama" mode?
Posted by Acelew
thanks..ya,it was a panorama shot..but the light condition was poor when i took this picture..for me i think Satio works moderately in poor light condition...
Posted by Caseiro
On 2010-09-23 18:49:19, Acelew wrote:
thanks..ya,it was a panorama shot..but the light condition was poor when i took this picture..for me i think Satio works moderately in poor light condition...
Ok, but I still think it's a very good photo!
Posted by etaab
From inside my car, rainy Thursday afternoon
Posted by HxH
Though it quite not good shot
Posted by Acelew
Posted by max_wedge
On 2010-09-21 20:08:57, zide wrote:
Have you (Satio users) completely lost your hope in a new firmware update? Sony Ericsson sucks.
Posted by max_wedge
My catXena found the perfect place to snooze!
Posted by hanky
How cute
Posted by Acelew
Posted by zide
On 2010-09-25 00:14:14, max_wedge wrote:
wtf... if you are talking about photos this thread proves Satio is a more than capable digicam. If you are not talking about photos then wtf are you doing here?
Satio's camera is really below expectations and is really outperformed by some 5/8/12 mp camera phones, such in the camera interface (options (away too limited for the "ultimate camera phone") and speed (laggy and slow)) or image quality (specifically on noise levels (high noise even in daylight shots), captured detail (quite low when cropped) and it's high tendency to burn highlights (just check it for yourselves) So, stop throwing rocks at me when I criticize Satio's camera performance because it was meant to impress instead of disappoint.
And no, I have nothing against Satio or SE, in fact, I'm actually using a C902 along with my E72 and I am thinking about buying a silver Satio. But yeah, if you can't stand negative critiques I'll be out of here.
Posted by Acelew
Posted by HxH
Daylight & high noise level what are you talking 'bout
If put mark with (low light...neon.....dusk time.....sunset...etc..limited light) then It's okay because of sucks small aperture.
Posted by Acelew
Posted by max_wedge
On 2010-09-25 22:39:43, zide wrote:
Satio's camera is really below expectations and is really outperformed by some 5/8/12 mp camera phones, such in the camera interface (options (away too limited for the "ultimate camera phone") and speed (laggy and slow)) or image quality (specifically on noise levels (high noise even in daylight shots), captured detail (quite low when cropped) and it's high tendency to burn highlights (just check it for yourselves) So, stop throwing rocks at me when I criticize Satio's camera performance because it was meant to impress instead of disappoint.
There is not a single 5MP camera phone on the market that comes anywhere near the detail of the Satio. Saying so is just plain ignorance. And when it comes to 8MP, I would agree the i8910 has slightly better detail than Satio, UNTIL you resize the Satio image down to 8MP, then what do you know? Turns out the Satio actually captures more detail than even the best 8MP camera phones. I haven't done direct comparison to 12MP pixon, but going by the i8910 you may be right. But the colour, low light performance is better on the Satio in my view. Also, the Satio has a much better lens (less distortion) and better ergonomics. And the best flash on any camera phone to date. So against Pixon it still holds it's own.
Camera options, yes it is a shame that Satio didn't include more options, iso support and fixed flash for example. But nothing is perfect. Overall it still ranks up there as one of the better cameraphones on the market, in the top two. That's nothing to be disappointed about.
And no, I have nothing against Satio or SE, in fact, I'm actually using a C902 along with my E72 and I am thinking about buying a silver Satio. But yeah, if you can't stand negative critiques I'll be out of here.
Let me quote you: "Have you (Satio users) completely lost your hope in a new firmware update? Sony Ericsson sucks." That hardly counts as a critique - that's plain out inflamatory and non-constructive.
Posted by zide
Okay, I guess I did not express myself well on that post you quoted. Sorry about that.
Now, let me show an example. I know that some of you don't like comparisons in this thread but this is an analysis of a Satio's photo, so I believe it should be tolerated here. Oh, and no, I am not trying to flame Satio and praise the other phone. I'm just sharing some of my experiences with you.
Both photos were taken with auto settings and are not post-processed.
So, what is visible here, is that the 5mp phone (not the best 5mp phone on the market), cropped at 160% (I zoomed it in 60% so it could be at the same size of Satio's), has still more captured detail (inevitable more noise of course) than the Satio at a 100% crop.
You can see the full photos here:
http://img836.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=e14l.jpg
[ This Message was edited by: zide on 2010-09-27 03:45 ]
Posted by max_wedge
I have to admit that's pretty impressive. If that's standard fare for the E72 then it's light years ahead of the N95 8GB 5MP, and any others that I've tried.
Nevertheless there are still symptoms of a smaller censor and smaller lens ie: blurring towards the edges compared to the Satio shot which is evenly focussed throughout the image. Also, the Satio image is darker, but yet has selected a settings combination that should make the image slightly brighter not darker (iso64 and 1/385 shutter speed versus e72 100ISO and 1/192 shutter speed). This leaves me wondering if there were clouds in the sky or some external factor that made the Satio image darker. In any digital camera brightness makes a big difference to detail. In my experience with the Satio, it takes quite bright photos.
Nevertheless that's a good result for the E72. I resized the Satio image to 5mp using mitchel re-sampling and sharpened it - but while I got a closer comparison than you did it's still not as good as the e72. If you agree I will post the result on flickr, (and credit you for the photography of course).
But that's ONE picture, not a definitive study, and it still focusses on only one aspect of image quality.