Posted by eeeyaaan
hey guys
zootzoot, darkmagician, or anyone there willing to test darkmagician's camdriver.. can you please post some pictures of people taken with flash? like you and a friend where you're just taking the picture with the phone in your hand in an extend arm? thank you ü
Posted by barareklam
Yes please. Try to take som photos of faces indoors with flash of course.
The Yellow part is allways there somewhere, usually some dark side that is somehow changed to yellow. Look att the left side of the face on this c905 picture
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=183711#post2629159
It looks like the face is lit with some yellow lamp from the side?
Any of drivers that do not take "yellowish" pictures?
Posted by zootzoot
On 2009-04-13 12:06:59, barareklam wrote:
Yes please. Try to take som photos of faces indoors with flash of course.
The Yellow part is allways there somewhere, usually some dark side that is somehow changed to yellow. Look att the left side of the face on this c905 picture
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=183711#post2629159
It looks like the face is lit with some yellow lamp from the side?
Any of drivers that do not take "yellowish" pictures?
Here you go.
Posted by DarKMaGiCiaN
@masada1971
thanks ^_^ MATE
@People who are asking about the night portrait pics
depending on your view you have to setup the setting
and Night portrait selection sometimes is not the proper setting if you want to take night pirtrate shots !!
at the end C905 is just a mobile phone ( not a real camera )
Posted by panonski
yes,
it's definitely yellow peeking out from darker sides of his face.
Little advice Darky .....
To avoid red eyes :
Change the strongness of preflashing in RED EYE option.... If that preFLASH will be a little bit stronger,
I believe the eyes of persons would be tinier, and RED from inside would be
less visible.
Posted by DarKMaGiCiaN
@panonski
good point and it may be " I believe the eyes of persons would be tinier, and RED from inside would be
less visible."
but dont you think this action will harm the eyes !!!
Posted by eeeyaaan
thanks zootzoot for the pic
i think the c905 is a great phone with a good enough camera compared to the older phones, it's still way better ü i'm buying a phone tomorrow and i was down to choosing between the c905 and innov8.. i know the innov8 has a better camera and better video.. but c905 will do just fine btw, the innov8 seems.. unstable? wobbly? i think the screen is too big for the phone.. but maybe that's just me with new camdrivers, especially the ones made by darkmagician, the phone will even do a better job so we'll be counting on you darkmagician and other people who know how to mod i'm new to this site but i've found that it can be really helpful.. thanks guys keep it all up [ This Message was edited by: eeeyaaan on 2009-04-13 12:13 ]
Posted by andybno1
could anyone point me in the direction of a guide to put the custom mod cam files onto my phone?
Posted by barareklam
@zootzoot: thanx
It is about the same result that I get with original camdriver 2.7
IMHO c905 is great phone and it take really great pictures, specially outside when weather is nice. I returned my first one just because that yellow part in the dark parts of image. They send me a new one and when I asked service about phone they told me that phone was completele worthless. But my second c905 was even worse. flash was too strong and I returned it. They changed camera and now it is the same like first one. Upgrade in the end of februari did make the difference
Reading this forum I realized that c905 just can't make better pictures. I am satisfied with the phone, do not get me wrong, but I hade K850i before and there was no yellow part so I was thinking something is wrong here. I compared c905 with real camera like canon or nikon, and I am satisfied with result. Both tests showed that real camera is better but result I can get from my phone is enough for me
Anyhow if I see some camdriver that take portrait pictures without yellow parts with normal skin color I will put it on my phone. So is anyone of modded camdrivers that take portraits without yellow color in dark parts?
Is there
Posted by zootzoot
Posted by zootzoot
Posted by panonski
On 2009-04-13 13:04:21, DarKMaGiCiaN wrote:
@panonski
good point and it may be " I believe the eyes of persons would be tinier, and RED from inside would be
less visible."
but dont you think this action will harm the eyes !!!
NO.
YOU CAN DO THAT
Posted by DarKMaGiCiaN
@panonski
I went for other solution
the flash will start 5 times befor it take the shot ^_^
mmmmm was playing with the flash color and here is the result
I think the 2 pic is the best but one of my frinds brefer the first one
so I want your opinions users ^_^
[ This Message was edited by: darkmagician on 2009-04-14 11:37 ]
Posted by eeeyaaan
@ darkmagician, i think the second pic the best among the three
but the levels can be edited a little better though.. but if you leave it the way it is, i wouldn't mind having that as part of my modded camdriver
Posted by zootzoot
I like pic number 2, its looks nicer and sharper.
Posted by Radu_91
the 2nd pic is definately the best
Posted by panonski
I think the second one,
but you must try it on different distances, in dark
and with people.
.
[ This Message was edited by: panonski on 2009-04-14 15:28 ]
Posted by masada1971
second pic wins for me between the 3,but must be tested on other enviroments..why dont you post the camdriver to test it alltogether??
Posted by Luhccas-U1a
If you need beta testers PM me.
I have a c905 now too.
Posted by barareklam
Nr 2 looks best. But who know how it really looks like. Can You take picture of the same thing in daylight? So we can compare it right? I want that picture is that good (same color) as real thing.
Can You take some portrait pictures?
I think that c905 take great pictures and one thing that can be improved is skin color (indoors portrait flash pictures). Somehow there is too much yellow color in dark part of the faces?
Posted by eeeyaaan
hey guys
i just bought my very own c905 last night and it rocks! there's only one problem i had with it.. the first few times i used the camera, three copies of each picture were saved in the media gallery but only one of them could be deleted.. the other two couldn't be opened nor deleted for some reason.. why is that?
and another thing, can a new camdriver fix the macro problem? i can't seem to focus on really near objects, you have to back-up a few inches for it to focus in macro mode
Posted by DarKMaGiCiaN
thanks All
so I'll stuck on the secound option ^_^
@barareklam
here is my outdoor test
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/7841/dsc05019c.jpg
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/9458/dsc05013l.jpg
@eeeyaaan
I have no idea about this !!!!
Posted by eeeyaaan
@darkmagician, ok thanks
please inform us when you upload your final camdriver for c905 i'm really looking forward to using it thank you
Posted by barareklam
@DarkMagician
Thanx but my idea was that you take the picture of your keys somewhere near window when the keys were lit with daylight, and you choose dayligt as white balance, then leave keys on same spot, wait the dark and take same pictures with flash settings as You have in picture Nr.2 (BTW what white balance did you have in pic. Nr2?)
Than we can really compare and judge if pic nr 2 (settings) are the best
thanks
p.s how about portrait? are there still too much yellow in dark parts?
Posted by lucasschimdt
luhccas-k790
Hey Mr.luhccas-k790 about your acoustics?? any new?
I'm back
DarKMaGiCiaN good job!!! more pics
Any possibility to control the shutter speed and iso for c905?
Posted by Luhccas-U1a
On 2009-04-16 15:03:03, lucasschimdt wrote:
luhccas-k790
Hey Mr.luhccas-k790 about your acoustics?? any new?
I'm back
Off topic:
Sabia que não iria passar muito tempo longe
Quanto aos acoustics estão "prontos" há um bom tempo,não foram divulgados prq estou sem o k850 pra testá-los com os fones mais comuns(os originais,hpm-64 e os hpm-70).
Eu relacionei os valores e as respectivas funções dos wbxml,agora é só "brincar"...
Ex:
HK.AUX01 e HK.AUX02 = Volume
Ex.: Entre eles você irá encontrar letras(J e G normalmente se o drive não for modificado).
HK.BEARN e HK.BEARP = Responsáveis pelo playback(mexer aqui altera a forma que você reproduz o arquivo de audio... Melhor deixar quieto)
HK.SPKRN e HK.SPKRP = Responsável pela intensidade do som e pelo reforço de graves.(o HK.SPKRP necessita de outros valores)
GK.NoiseReduction = Como o nome quase se identifica,redução de ruído ou post processing de frequencia.
GK.DRS e HK.RX = O primeiro é o maldito DRC e o segundo é o que complica toda a historia ¬¬'(precisa fazer uma combinação "mágica" pra conseguir anular toda a compressão de frequencias)
HK.RXFILTER = Filtro,influencia na qualidade principalmente em arquivos de bitrate baixa.
HK.RXDPGA = Outro volume,mas aqui o noise começa a dar as caras literalmente se exagerar.
HK.RXDPGA34 e HK.RXFILTER = Influencia na qualidade tambem mas pode produzir "hoarseness",quanto mais valor mais aparente...
Sabendo desses valores tudo pode ser feito mas nos novos Sony's a pasta acoustic da tpa/preset/custom é a "mão-na-roda" do som.
Obs.:Sou capixaba,moro em Fortaleza prq me pagam melhor aqui(deveria pesquisar sobre o ramo imobiliário desta cidade antes de chamar de pequena.Ah!E que por acaso é destaque no setor têxtil,apiculturista,frutos do mar,turismo,agricultura e várias outras áreas),nunca trabalhei em operadora e tenho absoluta certeza de que você não faz idéia do tamanho do meu conhecimento na área... Não é exposto feito quadro por se tratar de um mundo nocivo,a exemplo dos seus ataques sem sentido no orkut.(ou vai me dizer que você falou aquilo pra ajudar?Menosprezo não é ajuda... Críticas apontando o que está errado,sim)
Pois bem,eu ajudo como posso e quando o tempo deixa.Afinal não sou nenhum desocupado procurando confusão na internet
======================================================
Welcome back,hope you calm down now...
With a Westone um2 and a Fiio e5 head-amp who need to change acoustics?:D
For k850 i've finished the v2 but i don't have it in my hands now for test with default headphones.(broken display)
And now looking at vol_emp_eq_on.csv and vol_eq_off.csv...
This is basically volume control but make a big difference.
Posted by zootzoot
Posted by masada1971
ela mwrh Elladaraaaaaa!!
Posted by eeeyaaan
Darkmagician.. will you be uploading your latest c905 camdriver soon? i'm excited to try it out ü
Posted by DarKMaGiCiaN
mmmmmmm
sorry I have a
bad news and good news
bad news It's been three days after I dropped my phone so no more test untill I get it back
good news
I have to upload the driver for you all ^_^ it is still beta so I want to hear from you
-----
sorry wrong driver
I'll post the correct one soon ^_^
-------
[ This Message was edited by: DarKMaGiCiaN on 2009-04-19 18:52 ]
Posted by eeeyaaan
darkmagician, your 1.5 version is way better than the latest one.. it may be clearer but the colors are less natural.. and the major difference that i noticed was everything became darker which wasn't really pleasing to the eye.. i suggest you go back to your 1.5 version and work from there again
keep up the good work
Posted by eeeyaaan
i'd just like to add.. the darker colors seem to have a shade of blue and skin colors come out darker than normal.. hope you can do something about that
(im talking about the latest camdriver of darkmagician)
Posted by masada1971
the image is clearer with latest darkmagicians camdriver,colours are better than ever before, but they re darker.. if you could bring back brightness of 1.5 version it would be the best...anyway thanks for your efforts whatsoever...
[ This Message was edited by: masada1971 on 2009-04-19 18:22 ]
Posted by Luhccas-U1a
Try to remove just #COM_EVENT(57,xx),colors are ok without "HUE"...
Posted by masada1971
On 2009-04-19 19:34:39, luhccas-k790 wrote:
Try to remove just #COM_EVENT(57,xx),colors are ok without "HUE"...
where's that?
Posted by DarKMaGiCiaN
sorry @ll this was the regestry testing driver like HUE , Red , Blue .....
when I have time I'll upload the correct driver ^_^
sorry again
Posted by Luhccas-U1a
Here(in other scenes too):
// Property 16, Scenes
//----------------------------------------------------
seq_set_prop_10_0 = // Normal
$sa 09
#TO_DRAFT
#NOT_DOC_MODE
#SET_REG(22,0A)
#SET_REG(64,20)
#COM_EVENT(57,20) <-----
#COM_EVENT(51,00)
#UPDATE_WB
#UPDATE_PHOTO
#CHANGE_MODE(34,00)
#COM_EVENT(5A,01)
$cf.00 1
#CHANGE_MODE(35,00)
$cl
$cx;
Posted by DarKMaGiCiaN
here we go ^_^
so you dont like the HUE mmmmmm Ok I deleted that
that driver was my tested to know which setting is good for the C905
here is the correct driver
have fun
any comments please tell me
as I saied this is not the final one ^_^
HERE:
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=Q7YRRJCB
and
HERE as will :
http://www.mediafire.com/?sha[....]a4fc82078ae6c8e04e75f6e8ebb871
^_^
Posted by eeeyaaan
hey guys, i'm using darkmagician's 1.5 camdriver for my c905.. i noticed some pictures taken can't be opened with photoDJ and can't be "photo fixed".. is that a problem or is it normal? can the new driver be causing this?
Posted by mauasca
On 2009-04-20 11:30:02, DarKMaGiCiaN wrote:
here we go ^_^
so you dont like the HUE mmmmmm Ok I deleted that
that driver was my tested to know which setting is good for the C905
here is the correct driver
have fun
any comments please tell me
as I saied this is not the final one ^_^
HERE:
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=Q7YRRJCB
and
HERE as will :
http://www.mediafire.com/?sha[....]a4fc82078ae6c8e04e75f6e8ebb871
^_^
Through 1000, the text and you say so
Thanks for the great work you do for us all o_o
Posted by eeeyaaan
hey guys, i'm using darkmagician's 1.5 camdriver for my c905.. i noticed some pictures taken can't be opened with photoDJ and can't be "photo fixed".. is that a problem or is it normal? can the new driver be causing this?
Posted by DarKMaGiCiaN
@eeeyaaan
you cant edit big size Pics in Photo Dj
that why ^_^
@mauasca
mmmmm hope you like the driver
Posted by mauasca
DarKMaGiCiaN 1.6
Crop:
less noise, bright colors, excellent macro .......
Excellent CamDriver
[ This Message was edited by: mauasca on 2009-04-20 12:23 ]
Posted by eeeyaaan
ohh.. that's why
thanks darkmagician 
the quality is great and if ever i want to edit it.. i can just use photoshop i downloaded your latest driver again and currently im testing it.. i'll let you know what i think in a while
Posted by eeeyaaan
i think darkmagician's 1.6 has more realistic colors than the last 1.5.. excellent macro and i think it is sharper a bit
the only thin I don't like about it is that when taking indoor pics of people or yourself, skin colors seems to come out darker than normal.. i compared it again to the 1.5 and found the 1.5 to have less color but it produced more flattering pictures when it comes to people.. is it possible to bring in a little more brightness to the skin tone pics when taken indoor with flash? pictures of faces when close-up seem a little burnt.. and when taking pictures of rooms.. the light doesn't seem to bounce off as much in the 1.6 when compared to the 1.5.. in other words.. the 1.5 was brighter which brought more objects into the picture..
that's my opinion darkmagician
if there was only an easy way to switch between camdrivers using only your phone.. i'd use the 1.5 for indoor shots.. and the 1.6 for the rest for now.. i still prefer the 1.5 and i'll be waiting for your next update thanks dark
oh btw, the light balance effects.. like the flourescent, cloudy, etc.. did you modify that in the 1.5 or 1.6?
Posted by 4ever09
yes,when i use automatic setting, picture is more dark in this cam driver 1.6
Posted by DarKMaGiCiaN
@mauasca
nice shots ^_^
@eeeyaaan
it was Ok with me
I cant test your comment untill I get my phone back
is the problem appear just in pics of people or all indoor shots?
can you tell me the ISO of the shots ^_^ and is it with flash or not
and last request is that with Auto scenes or what !!
@4ever09
indoor or outdoor!!
Posted by 4ever09
indoor
Posted by masada1971
thanks for your efforts darkmagician,i am always a big fan of your camdrivers,but i just cannot stand indoor pics with 1.6 camdriver..way too dark.wish you could modify it a little to boost it with some extra brightness.i am back to trustworthy 1.5
sample pic attached to see the false brightness...first with 1.6
second with 1.5 camdriver
minor change in brightness,but still visible enough if you shoot a face pic indoors...
[ This Message was edited by: masada1971 on 2009-04-20 20:28 ]
Posted by sowbran
thank so much for the camdriver im gonna try it greetings