Posted by @l+3r 3g0
@wei8in
the last pic is nice, great colour.
@ H_rY
if i'm not mistaken, slow sync means high exposure time or also called slow shutter speed. correct me if i'm wrong.
Posted by Rezk
thanks Vudu for replaying
but i noticed that the possibility of catching a blurry picture is very high i have to take the same pic several times to insure there's no blur
with the original driver catching a blur pic with is rare unless you r really shacking
is that has any thing to do with permanent EM thing which i dont fully understand?
Posted by @l+3r 3g0
On 2008-12-18 08:21:57, Rezk wrote:
thanks Vudu for replaying
but i noticed that the possibility of catching a blurry picture is very high i have to take the same pic several times to insure there's no blur
with the original driver catching a blur pic with is rare unless you r really shacking
is that has any thing to do with permanent EM thing which i dont fully understand?
EM and SEM actually have slower shutter speed (longer exposure time), which increases its' possibility for pics to get blurred. but at the same time, you will be able to capture brighter and more detailed (less noise) pics in low light. if you don't want the pics to get blurred, use auto or faster shutter speed.
Posted by Cayman
Mixed settings.
Auto, fix focus:
Cloudy WB:
Incandescent WB, EM @ 0.6 sec:
Auto WB, EM @ 1/2 sec:
Macro with manual focus, flash fired:
[ This Message was edited by: Cayman on 2008-12-18 19:26 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Cayman on 2008-12-18 19:47 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Cayman on 2008-12-18 22:46 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Cayman on 2008-12-18 23:11 ]
Posted by @l+3r 3g0
@ raiderski
your drivers were great, i really love the customizations you've done. picture quality is also great. just one thing i noticed lately, when taking pics in low light using slow shutter (EM or SEM), the pics produced sometimes have somewhat vertical lines which is visible when viewing close up. even your photos in your flickr have that if you look real close. could it be that it is caused by your driver? this lines didn't show up in the original cam driver. hope you would kindly look forward to this problem, because if it didn't have this problem, your drivers are perfect. the best cam driver i've used.
Posted by tphg
On 2008-12-18 08:21:57, Rezk wrote:
thanks Vudu for replaying
but i noticed that the possibility of catching a blurry picture is very high i have to take the same pic several times to insure there's no blur
with the original driver catching a blur pic with is rare unless you r really shacking
is that has any thing to do with permanent EM thing which i dont fully understand?
I also found same problem as yours. Formerly, i took photos in convention with original camdriver and most of them has good sharpness. Recently, i went to convention again and used Supermode camdriver, and half of them are blurred. And same as u, i always take a few photos with one scene and then choose the best one with acceptable sharpness.
Besides that, Supermode camdriver is really a great one which we can customise many parameters as we like.
Posted by Residentevil
After photo fix.
Before photo fix.
Posted by cyber-shoter
Posted by Goldmen
cyber-shoter
Awesome landscapes!
Posted by cyber-shoter
Thanks Goldmen.....
but look at the pic, some of them ruins by vertical lines whic is very anoyying me....
Posted by Goldmen
On 2008-12-23 00:57:43, cyber-shoter wrote:
Thanks Goldmen.....
but look at the pic, some of them ruins by vertical lines whic is very anoyying me....
In this case,there is something to read...
Posted by @l+3r 3g0
On 2008-12-23 07:13:45, Goldmen wrote:
On 2008-12-23 00:57:43, cyber-shoter wrote:
Thanks Goldmen.....
but look at the pic, some of them ruins by vertical lines whic is very anoyying me....
In this case,there is something to read...
not sure wether that was true, as i'm still experiencing that eventhough i'm using EM, which used ISO 100. it could be a hardware issue, but i didn't experience any of that vertical lines on original or other modded cam driver. this driver was great, only this issue is stopping it from being perfect.
Posted by Raiderski
@l+3r 3g0
i didn't experience any of that vertical lines on original or other modded cam driver
visit Flickr.com or Esato gallery they are full of pictures with lines. most of these pictures were taken with original driver and it's not either dependent on K phone model. lines were, are and will be, because it never was a problem caused by any driver
i'm still experiencing that eventhough i'm using EM, which used ISO 100
1. ISO100 can pretty well minimize lines but not eliminate them completely in some rare cases. why? I don't know
2. SEM/EM used in not quite low amount of light won't work. seriously, I don't remember any of my SEM/EM shots with lines
this driver was great, only this issue is stopping it from being perfect
sorry but I really don't like to be blamed for something which I did not. this is a dark side of modding
cyber-shoter
for sunrise and sunlight shots force ISO100 to avoid lines
BTW. very nice shots
Posted by recl
can't there be anything done to the flash? it's rubbish really, even with the original driver i can take better flash pics
can't the flash be improved, for example firing multiple times..like the k850, 3-4 times
Posted by Raiderski
Rezk & tphg
no problems with autofocus accuracy on my phone in low light (tested many times and compared with original settings). maybe there's something wrong behind different firmware versions? it's still fine on my R1KG001. I don't know but you can try this:
in seq_set_prop_9_5= and seq_set_prop_9_6= change #SET(32,04) to #SET(32,00)
compare results before and after change and let us know. good luck
recl
even with the original driver i can take better flash pics
3 things...
1. there are no differences in xenon power settings between original and modded (except of lower ISO in macro mode)
2. read point #1
3. read point #2
if you like original driver then go and have a lot of fun with it. I did quick examples of "really rubbish" xenon in total darkness, look how awful they are:
words are getting more and more ridiculous, not only on Esato. my work is being trodden and I'm blamed for things completely independent from me. it's good time to say goodbye. no more comments from me about this driver - officialy it's dead
Posted by cyber-shoter
Thanks Rider
BTW
It's good time to say goodbye.
its means you will leave this thread???
oh please..... dont hear what they say......
your works very great Rider! your Camdriver Makes alot of K800 more great!!!!
sorry being OOT
Chers Rider!!!!!
we love your Driver!!!!!!!!!
Posted by mauquit
Hey raider your driver is the BEST.
Posted by recl
sorry but i'm not impressed by the flash pics..don't get me wrong, i like the camdriver overall but the flash pics are a drawback
Posted by kmzoltan
Raider ,man don t get upset by things that some f**kers think about you.You know that you we had done a very good camdriver,you we did everything you we could done,so f**k them.They are some idiots who are gealous ,why didn t they do the camdriver if they've don t like it?,it;s simple :THEY CAN'T.I wish you all a Joyfull Christmas.
RECL man if you've don't like it ,get yourself a DSLr then you will have a flash that will get you blind,then maybe you will be happy
[ This Message was edited by: kmzoltan on 2008-12-24 17:14 ]
Posted by recl
dear kmzoltan you seem to be very angry (dunno why) and it seems you make great efforts in expressing yourself [ "man if you we don't like it"..]
who's "we" you dumb fu*k? hope you get sh*t from santa this year/ have a merry f**ked up christmas
ps1:fuc*er is your dad
ps2:maybe you're the one that needs to get fuc*ed
[ This Message was edited by: recl on 2008-12-24 14:11 ]
Posted by kmzoltan
ma,in primul rand nu te am unjurat ce am zis de tine era legat doar de flash,si prima parte era legat de ce au zis ceilalati pe alte forumuri.Asa ca te rog frumos editezati postu ala al tau ca eu nu te am injurat .Ok?
RECL man if you we don't like it ,get yourself a DSLr then you will have a flash that will get you blind,then maybe you will be happy -- asta am zis de tine restu nik ok?
[ This Message was edited by: kmzoltan on 2008-12-25 06:59 ]
Posted by chickm
On 2008-12-24 12:27:25, recl wrote:
sorry but i'm not impressed by the flash pics..don't get me wrong, i like the camdriver overall but the flash pics are a drawback
Hi recl, Merry christmas!
Those pics by raider were shot in "total darkness", that's pretty impressive by my camphone standards.
But of course when compared to digi-cams at far range in total darkness you can't expect much
Btw, why do you think its a drawback ? , the flash really helps me during low light conditions + Raiders enhancements (EM, SEM) \m/
[ This Message was edited by: chickm on 2008-12-24 19:20 ]
Posted by Rezk
@Raiderski
thanks a lot for your respond I'll try what u suggest
and thanks for your most impressive driver you EM ans SEM is quite amazing
i enjoyed reading every post in 145 pages of your topic
it's sad to hear u decided to quite
any way good luck with your life
[ This Message was edited by: Rezk on 2008-12-25 08:48 ]
Posted by Domecot
hey stop fighting. You are gonna get the thread closed temporarily and masseur is gonna simply delete your stupid posts.And stop destroying this wonderfull thread.
Posted by recl
On 2008-12-24 20:19:37, chickm wrote:
On 2008-12-24 12:27:25, recl wrote:
sorry but i'm not impressed by the flash pics..don't get me wrong, i like the camdriver overall but the flash pics are a drawback
Hi recl, Merry christmas!
Those pics by raider were shot in "total darkness", that's pretty impressive by my camphone standards.
But of course when compared to digi-cams at far range in total darkness you can't expect much
Btw, why do you think its a drawback ? , the flash really helps me during low light conditions + Raiders enhancements (EM, SEM) m/
[ This Message was edited by: chickm on 2008-12-24 19:20 ]
Merry Xmas to you too
what i don't like about the flash pics is that some areas get brighten when they should be dark, the only driver that managed to improve the flash pics was the withan driver. that's all i had to say. i'm sorry if somenone was offended, it wasn't my intention.
--------------------------
cum adica nu m-ai injurat? ma acuzi indirect cum ca din cauza mea nu s-ar mai lucra la driveru asta, desi omul a zis demult ca a renuntat in a mai lucra la el. desigur toate acuzele tale s-au limitat la "da-i in plm si mai ales pe bouu ala fmm" cam asa te-ai exprimat.acum vii si faci pe amnezicu cu mn.
[ This Message was edited by: recl on 2008-12-24 22:00 ]
Posted by Raiderski
some areas get brighten when they should be dark
think instead of criticize. lower xenon ISO value in driver code and you get your effect. besides, 'improved' only because pics are darker? not for me but this is one from many reasons why I created customization.txt
Posted by Cayman
Boldog vagyok, hogy már itt is a magyar román utálat megy... :S
Posted by kmzoltan
hat akkor mert nem mondsz te is egyet neki?
mert ugy latszik az ember nem ert.
Posted by Rezk
On 2008-12-25 08:01:21, kmzoltan wrote:
hat akkor mert nem mondsz te is egyet neki?
mert ugy latszik az ember nem ert.
???
what lang. is this?
Posted by @l+3r 3g0
Raiderski
don't get me wrong. i didn't blame you. sorry if i made things messed up. i didn't know it wasn't caused by the driver. i was just hoping that you could do something with the lines. but if nothing could be done, then it's fine. maybe i'll have to find a way to reduce it. anyway, your driver was great. way better than the original, even better than other modded driver. i really appreciate your effort. keep up the good work.
Posted by vudu70
Rezk:in seq_set_prop_9_5 the #SET(32,00) (Use one AF window, normal range) work better and faster with R8BA024 firmware.
seq_set_prop_9_5=
#MFP_GET
$c1 01
#MFP_OFF
$cl
#RESET_SHARPNESS
$cx
#GET(32,$r2 0 0)
$b0 00 1 7
$c0 00
#SET(32,00)
$cl
#SET(32,01)
$cx;
seq_set_prop_9_6=
#GET(32,$r2 0 0)
$b0 00 1 7
$c0 00
#SET(32,04)
$cl
#SET(32,05)
$cx;
Autofocus testing:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8A 8B
what lang. is this?
-Hungarian.
Azért az előző trágár és gusztustalan csatáról annyit, hogy azt talán nem karácsonykor kellett volna meglépni, sőt egyáltalán nem. Én bennem alapból semmi gyűlölet nincs a románok iránt, recl "jókívánságai" azért elárulnak némi egyéni színvonalat.
Békés karácsonyt mindenkinek! (románnak és magyarnak is)
Merry Xmas to every man!
_________________
K810i Golden Ivory+Raiderski Supermode camdriver v6.5.2 + Robie™ v1.1 ZAPFmix acoustic->Pics[ This Message was edited by: vudu70 on 2008-12-25 13:54 ]
Posted by kmzoltan
Bekes Karacsonyt neked is vudu70.
Posted by chickm
Auto Mode/Landscape/2MP/All other settings Auto
Posted by tphg
On 2008-12-26 14:35:13, chickm wrote:
Auto Mode/Landscape/2MP/All other settings Auto
@chickm
Where did u sit in airplane and take this photo? How could u take the airplane body in this photo?
Posted by 679
To all.
Well brothers, I've just opened one extra feature in our lovely camera!
If you set Turkish language in your telephone - you will get an exelent pictures in all condition!
Just look in thread
http://forum.donanimhaber.com/m_22913325/mpage_29/key_/tm.htm
i am so regretful of don't know Turkish...
Have a Very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Posted by vudu70
Where did u sit in airplane and take this photo? How could u take the airplane body in this photo?
Likely is she hang on wing
Posted by andreifm
EM
EM+Incandescent+ISO600
AUTO+flash
Macro+Flash
I love this driver, it's the best for my k810.
Thanks Raider, happy new year!!!
Posted by Cayman
vudu, lejjebb ott a sorokban az AF-en mit állítottál?
Posted by vudu70
A seq_set_prop_9_5 -ben az autofókuszálási módot átllítottam a többablakos módból egyablakos módba mind normál, mind teljestartományú lencsemozgás esetén, mivel a többablakos AF mód néhány firmware esetén lassabb/pontatlanabb, makrónál pedig a lehetséges ráközelítési táv növekedhet.
(sry for hungarian lang.)
_________________
K810i Golden Ivory+Raiderski Supermode camdriver v6.5.2 + Robie™ v1.1 ZAPFmix acoustic->Pics[ This Message was edited by: vudu70 on 2008-12-27 12:35 ]
Posted by Cayman
Értem... És pontosan mi a különbség a több és egyablakos módok közt? Csak azért tudakolom hogy nekem érdemes-e megcsinálni. A manuális fókusztól közelebb gondolom sehogy nem kerülhet a makró távolság, igaz?
Remélem nem baj hogy pár szót magyarul beszélünk, én sajna nem tudok ennyire angolul
Posted by vudu70
Többablakos módnál változik az AF algoritmus és nem csak az 1 célzókereten belüli részt veszi figyelembe de ez bonyolultabb művelet révén lassabb, macronál meg úgy vettem észre hogy kifejezetten hátrányos lehet, főleg bizonyos firmware-knél és talán nem is elég kiforrott. Manuáls fókusz elvileg a teljes tartományban működik, de erről a szerzőt lenne érdemes kérdezni.
A magyar miatt pedig lehet hogy kapunk az arcunkra, de elfér
.
Posted by Cayman
Világos mint a nap! Úgy gondolom megér egy próbát, átírom én is
Köszi!
Feltettem, egy esetben van ennek hátránya, ha sötétben tárgyakat a vörös segédfénnyel makrózol, mert ha kigyullad a fény, pont a kisablakban ég be a kép, ezért az AF nem tudja bemérni a távot, mert a csak fehérből nem megy neki. Bár én tárgyakra csak manuálissal mérek, illetve ha nappali fényben kipróbálom pl virágokon, biztos vagyok benne hogy előnye lesz!
[ This Message was edited by: Cayman on 2008-12-27 14:32 ]
Posted by Goldmen
Hey,guys,can you write in english,please...?
Thank you!
Posted by Cayman
I'm not, because I can't speak english, only speak a little bit... This dialogue is very difficult for me to translate to english
We are talking about the one use AF window setting.
[ This Message was edited by: Cayman on 2008-12-27 16:39 ]
Posted by 640kenough
Posted by Cayman
Some pics...
[ This Message was edited by: Cayman on 2008-12-27 17:50 ]
Posted by vudu70
vudu pics:
_________________
K810i Golden Ivory+Raiderski Supermode camdriver v6.5.2 + Robie™ v1.1 ZAPFmix acoustic->Pics[ This Message was edited by: vudu70 on 2008-12-27 18:28 ]
Posted by milan91
On 2008-12-27 17:37:22, 640kenough wrote:
Great!!!
Greetings to Eastern Orthodox brothers
Posted by 640kenough
Posted by fulger06