Posted by sblant
Here a comparison between a SonyEricsson K850i 5MP vs a CANON IXUS 75 7MP.
K850i
http://www.imagecross.com/ima[....]ing-viewer-04.php?id=61232.JPG
CANON IXUS 75
http://www.imagecross.com/image-hosting-viewer-04.php?id=8802.JPG
[ This Message was edited by: sblant on 2008-04-26 12:10 ]
Posted by AbuBasim
Links to do not work!
Posted by sblant
thanks, now it should work....
Posted by Killfr3nzy
Good pictures, im not seeing alot of difference, only this one (too much light?):
Posted by sblant
Canon makes better shots but is a real camera...
K850 is really impressive...
Posted by AbuBasim
@Killfr3nzy,
Looks like the two shots were taken at slightly different angles. That light meter is catching a reflection from a light source above the scene so I don't think it's overexposed.
Easier to see (BIG) differences at 100 percent scale:
From the above, I would never think of making A4 prints of the K850 shot.
_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-04-26 13:05 ]
Posted by G-Izzat
AbuBasim
I really think that A4 prints wouldn't suit any pictures taken by cameraphones.
Posted by AbuBasim
No camera phone produces photos printable on A4? Have a look at these these.
_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-04-26 20:57 ]
Posted by G-Izzat
Guess I was wrong then, mate.
Nice pictures you took there.
[ This Message was edited by: G-Izzat on 2008-04-26 20:59 ]
Posted by Killfr3nzy
@AbuBasim;
Yes, you're right i guess, didn't see it.
Posted by plankgatan
wooaaah. very VERY good pic (from k850).
k850 (800 x 600)
canon (800 x 600)
_________________
I
K850, 
W810 & 
T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-26 21:37 ]
Posted by razec
^^ The colors may be similar but it's the noise that will separate the Canon and the K850 by a very wide margin. and there's no point in bragging that K850 can produce image as good as canon if we only refer to shrunked pics.
if it is imobile 902 that we compared with canon then maybe i'll change my first paragraph
Posted by AbuBasim
As long as you print only postcard-sized photos then most camera phones, even those with CMOS sensors, will do just fine. So for this purpose, scaling down the photos is OK as 800x600 will still look good at 4x6". On the other hand, you will never be able to produce good looking blow-ups of the shots that you are really proud of.
Posted by dentoters07
a "camera phone" is verry different from a "stand-alone camera" and of course, th stand-alone camera always, always, will win over the camera phone.. there is no point of comparing those two.. k850 is out of it's league being compared to a stand-alone camera.. it's just like comparing a cat from a lion..
Posted by boom13
Please let people have the rights to post stuff they want. Dont tell them theyre wrong. Leave them alone. Seriously people here have been flaming to peoples thread saying that the thread is a total mistake. Especially the guy "Prom1"
Posted by plankgatan
On 2008-04-27 00:18:42, razec wrote:
^^ The colors may be similar but it's the noise that will separate the Canon and the K850 by a very wide margin. and there's no point in bragging that K850 can produce image as good as canon if we only refer to shrunked pics.
if it is imobile 902 that we compared with canon then maybe i'll change my first paragraph
cant understand why you praise i-mobile ???
i look at some of the pics on the photo section, and im not impressed.(and ive never been)
they looks grainy & kind of blurry, no great colors, no super sharpness.. njjaaaaa. i-mobile can produce awesome night pics, but the rest have never been some special...many of this pics looks quite bad. just see yourself:
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]ke=SAMART&model=i-mobile%20902
_________________
I
K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-27 08:21 ]
Posted by QVGA
On 2008-04-27 09:17:02, plankgatan wrote:
On 2008-04-27 00:18:42, razec wrote:
^^ The colors may be similar but it's the noise that will separate the Canon and the K850 by a very wide margin. and there's no point in bragging that K850 can produce image as good as canon if we only refer to shrunked pics.
if it is imobile 902 that we compared with canon then maybe i'll change my first paragraph
cant understand why you praise i-mobile ???
i look at some of the pics on the photo section, and im not impressed.(and ive never been)
they looks grainy, blurry, etc, no great colors, no super sharpness.. njjaaaaa. i-mobile can produce awesome night pics, but the rest have never been some special...many of this pics looks really bad. just see yourself:
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]ke=SAMART&model=i-mobile%20902
_________________
I
K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-27 08:20 ]
those are all flawless pics.
Posted by plankgatan
ha ha ha.. flawless. i understand why you like them !
is this flawless (my a##). bad sharpness, grainy, etc. and when i look at them in larger size, ?? hell no. i-mobile have no super-good allround camera.
can show many many more. but why should i ? i have seen enough.
_________________
I
K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-27 08:29 ]
Posted by QVGA
On 2008-04-27 09:26:30, plankgatan wrote:
ha ha ha.. flawless. i understand why you like them, because of your old k750 who is sooooo best.
is this flawless (my a##). bad sharpness, grainy, etc. and when i look at them in larger size, ?? hell no. i-mobile have no super-good allround camera.
can show many many more. but why should i ? i have seen anough.
_________________
I
K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-27 08:28 ]
First of all i dont own a K750. Secondly, are you sure you're not blind? I dont see any grain over there. I've seen more pathetic pics taken from K850. imobile has a better camera, just make peace with that go on with your life. you're comparing a CCD with a minute CMOS crap sensor in K850.
Posted by AbuBasim
On 2008-04-27 09:26:30, plankgatan wrote:
ha ha ha.. flawless. i understand why you like them !
is this flawless (my a##). bad sharpness, grainy, etc. and when i look at them in larger size, ?? hell no. i-mobile have no super-good allround camera.
can show many many more. but why should i ? i have seen enough.
To me this sounds like the ranting of someone jealous...
"bad sharpness, grainy"? And if we compare with your K850 shots? And don't come dragging with your tiny scaled-down shots again! Let's see at full size which one has problems with with poor sharpness and noise!
Full size.
Full size.
Full size.
_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-04-27 09:10 ]
Posted by QVGA
haha, he edited his post to remove what he said about me having a K750