All about camdriver modding (for modders)

Posted by pietropizzi
Maybe it's totally foolish waht I say, but maybe it helps...

Raider can:
... put anything he wants to set on zoom keys
... do good calculations with bits and mask out bits - I think he can...

Raider wants:
... display values of unknown REG's to learn what these REG's are good for - I think...

Isn't it posible to put these ReadOut-Values on the Zoom-Keys and with a Slider-GUI (like mine) you just dont get the values but the slider position.
Just thinking of triggering the READREG on an Effect and the readout value=Zoom Value=Slider position ?
OK you get a max of 30 positions (maybe 60 by smallest step). I didn't say it would be easy, just an idea...

EDIT:
Sorry to hear that you'll not release public.
But I can't help much with REG's or coding. I'm just good at ideas....

Man, you're the first on world that made manual settings possible on Kxx!
And I made first alternative GUI - I also think worldwide (because patching was not available before)
I know that proto-v2 is at early stage for you - for me it's the greatest discovery since I got my K800

So I'll try to create my beloved PARTY mode(s) with v2.
Thank you for giving us control over K8xx !

[ This Message was edited by: pietropizzi on 2008-02-29 11:40 ]

Posted by number1

On 2008-02-29 12:25:25, Raiderski wrote:

i hope that some of you are going much deeper into modding than just simple code changes

it doesn't look like it lol

and that's why 3MP modding have no chances to evolve at very high level of old 2MP modding. there will be no chengrong2...

i did make a advance compression system

oh come one! you didn't created anything new! you did nothing more than increased file size rules and decreased compression level - it's not 'advanced'! by the way... your simple changes in compression are based on my prototype code template. sorry number1 but you aren't so 'big star' as you want to be

what your are saying is...

i wrote that as simple as possible, nevermind, forget about this

in one thing i must agree with you: i'm on my own, that's why all my work will stay my own only. it's time to close chapter 'do something for others' - it's useless

i have made a advance compression system it's not in any drivers i have posted up, i'm still making sure it doesn't crash and it hasn't done so far and thats it all i have done so far can't think of nothing else i'm not sony ericsson nor a computer programmer i'm a unemployed 17 year old mechanical enginner, you sound like some grumpy 60 year old pensioner, i am trying to do other things aswell like mod the display driver at the moment so far so good i have made a display driver thats clearer with deeper colour, i also modded the front vga camdriver not a big improvement but the colour is alot better.

Posted by sadeghi85
in between these pointless arguments, may i ask a question?

i touched the exposure section to use manual ISO, like this:

Code:


//************************************************ 

//		Exposure property 0        *****

//************************************************



//  3 => -2 EV,   9 => -(0) EV ....    f => 2 EV

//---------------------------------------------------



seq_set_prop_0_0 = ;

seq_set_prop_0_1 = ;

seq_set_prop_0_2 = ;

seq_set_prop_0_3 = #COM_EVENT(06,FA);

seq_set_prop_0_4 = #COM_EVENT(06,FB);

seq_set_prop_0_5 = #COM_EVENT(06,FC); 

seq_set_prop_0_6 = #COM_EVENT(06,FD); 

seq_set_prop_0_7 = #COM_EVENT(06,FE); 

seq_set_prop_0_8 = #COM_EVENT(06,FF); 

seq_set_prop_0_9 = #COM_EVENT(06,00);

seq_set_prop_0_a = #COM_EVENT(05,01);

seq_set_prop_0_b = #COM_EVENT(05,02); 

seq_set_prop_0_c = #COM_EVENT(05,03); 

seq_set_prop_0_d = #COM_EVENT(05,04); 

seq_set_prop_0_e = #COM_EVENT(05,05);

seq_set_prop_0_f = #COM_EVENT(05,06);

now when i use EV0.3-2.0 (manual ISO) and then changing whitebalance e.g to cloudy, it won't work, i should select whitebalance two or three times to work properly. i didn't change other sections. what should i do now?

Posted by brazuka
You have not made any compression or record in resolution vga number1
Compression that u made? I think you should pass information safe correct for people and it is not enough only hypothesis or assumptions.
I really don´t understand its review and do not understand what you interpret number1.
Because time ago you said things wrong on overlock that work with high frequencies damage the phone, because in fact you say that each chip has its datsheet and each chip supports the limit.
Because we want to increase the speed of recording video without stimulating the electrical impulses?
You can not generalize to all mobile phones the functions it does not work does not work well and this proved that.
To generate a video recording of 30fps in order vga in high resolution full resolution at least the hardware has to work with the frequency of 18mhz to 27mhz is the maximum that supports the resolution vga.
How try applying changes in ownership purposes, if the property effect blocks or does not respond to any of the functions stimulis because if it were true it would have to do effects for all drivers and this is not true.
Even chip equals who will determine the final composition of the answers is the same hardware in cameras vga whose changes are small "minimus" in my opinion is so.
Off course that the sensor, lens and chip are very important and it is visible that we can not do miracles because each component such limits the actions.The registers will be answered by the ability of each set must interpret then not every record will respond to all driver .
As well Raider said still exists many register to be found and for which functions will serve.
I think that the idea here is that everyone is helping and with real information and not just say i did this or i did that.
You help everyone real consistent information based on fundamentals would be a great help to all... no offence number1 it is just a opinion nothing more.
I hope that with your information can help everyone to leave all winning

Good job to all and good luck need sometimes

Posted by number1
i don't start the arguments
and like this to have working whitebalance

Code:


//************************************************ 

//		Exposure property 0        *****

//************************************************



//  3 => -2 EV,   9 => -(0) EV ....    f => 2 EV

//---------------------------------------------------



seq_set_prop_0_0 = ;

seq_set_prop_0_1 = ;

seq_set_prop_0_2 = ;

seq_set_prop_0_3 = #COM_EVENT(06,FA);

seq_set_prop_0_4 = #COM_EVENT(06,FB);

seq_set_prop_0_5 = #COM_EVENT(06,FC); 

seq_set_prop_0_6 = #COM_EVENT(06,FD); 

seq_set_prop_0_7 = #COM_EVENT(06,FE); 

seq_set_prop_0_8 = #COM_EVENT(06,FF); 

seq_set_prop_0_9 = #COM_EVENT(06,00);

seq_set_prop_0_a = #COM_EVENT(05,01) #UPDATE_WB;

seq_set_prop_0_b = #COM_EVENT(05,02) #UPDATE_WB; 

seq_set_prop_0_c = #COM_EVENT(05,03) #UPDATE_WB;

seq_set_prop_0_d = #COM_EVENT(05,04) #UPDATE_WB;

seq_set_prop_0_e = #COM_EVENT(05,05) #UPDATE_WB;

seq_set_prop_0_f = #COM_EVENT(05,06) #UPDATE_WB;

@brazuka
i can get uncompressed vga pictures from my k800i i'll prove it if you want, how can you comment on my new compression system when you havn't even seen it because it's not in any of my uploaded drivers, why are you telling me about overclocking i havn't overclocked any drivers or commented on overclocking you don't make much sense.

Posted by Raiderski
number1 you don't have to say nothing more. your age doesn't interest me. i don't want to stress you but all i can see that you are more 'superstar' than 'modder', if you don't agree then maybe you can explain something for us. your flagship theory is saying:

"
whitebalance on the k800i is awful, it adds yellow to compersate for blue sky etc, also the picture is slighty over exposured, the whitebalance is in the main but it can be turned off in the driver

i turned the whitebalance off in the driver
"

so, i uploaded your 2.99 to my phone and then on all auto settings i did small test. my conclusion:
1. you or me have f****d up camera
2. you don't know what are you talking about or i don't know
3. in worst case you or me have problems with eyes

left: just after camera open, right: some seconds later

as you can see your 'turned off' WB is working fine as typical auto WB

my last post about number1 unless i'll have to answer on his post

_________________
K800 R1KG001 (camdriver 6.1)
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek

[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-02-29 13:11 ]

Posted by Raiderski
sadeghi85

from where was suggestion to use #COM_EVENT(05,..)? K750? as for me it doesn't work on K800 (at least not on mine). use this:

#SET_REG(2a,..)
#COM_EVENT(02,04)

Posted by number1
i fought you picked on me because i am alot younger than you maybe i am wrong???.
About the whitebalance no having the whitebalance off on indoor pics won't reallly make any difference it's outdoors in sunlight it makes a huge difference the sky will actually be a more natural shade of blue, the grass will green not a mix of yellow & green and the pictures won't be misty.
some1 comaparaed my camdriver with the oringal camdriver here a few posts down http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=161159&start=225, notice the first pic with oringal camdriver no colours,misty,unclear,
the second pic of the plant you have to look carefully but noticed how it's a more natural green colour with my driver.

Posted by sadeghi85
I found that that problem is also in original camdriver and not related to those changes. maybe i should live with it.

@Raiderski, #COM_EVENT(05,..) works fine on K550i/W610i.

Posted by brazuka
What does it mean to you overclock to mobile phone for u number1?
The model can work k800 with two schedules, one for chip high resolutions MCB881 Sony for the other Micron MT9V112 VGA resolutions that I think that everybody knows.But the key is the set-chip sensor-lens-hardware as I said many times, this system is the collection to all programming is answered by this collection.
More once you say you can not generalize the duties all models, each model will respond as i have described this collection.

Here we are not to prove anything but to improve and help the little we know in my opinion.

Good job and relaxes u walk a little stressed

joking

Posted by number1
overclock is to increase the MHZ, the front vga camera with the micron cam module runs 24MHZ by default look at the oringal 2.3 driver.

//=========================================================
//Power on sequence
//=========================================================

cam_power_on_2=5, 0, 0, 1, 0; // Set reset low
cam_power_on_0=5, 1, 26, 1, 0; // Set GPIO26 (CAMDIR)as output
cam_power_on_1=5, 2, 26, 0, 0; // Set GPIO26 (CAMDIR) as low (open bus to VGA camera)
cam_power_on_3=5, 1, 35, 1, 0; // Set GPIO35 (CAM27_EN) output
cam_power_on_4=5, 2, 35, 1, 0; // Set GPIO35 (CAM27_EN) as high (2.7 V on)
cam_power_on_5=5, 3, 4, 5dc0, 64; // Enable 24 MHz APLL clock wait 100 ms
cam_power_on_6=5, 0, 0, 0, 5; // Set reset high; wait for 5 ms

//=========================================================
//Power off sequence
//=========================================================

cam_power_off_0=5, 3, 4, 1, 0; // Disable clock and set low
cam_power_off_1=5, 0, 0, 1, 0; // Set reset low
cam_power_off_2=5, 1, 35, 1, 0; // Set GPIO35 (CAM27_EN) as output
cam_power_off_3=5, 2, 35, 0, 0; // Set GPIO35 (CAM27_EN) as low (2.7 V Off)
cam_power_off_4=5, 1, 26, 1, 0; // Set GPIO26 (CAMDIR) as output
cam_power_off_5=5, 2, 26, 1, 5; // Set GPIO26 (CAMDIR) as high (close bus to VGA camera); wait for 5 ms

cam_i2c_address=5d;

cam_vf_clock_freq=4, 5dc0; 24MHZ
cam_ss_clock_freq=4, 5dc0; 24MHZ
cam_init_result=;

cam_ss_format=B100;
cam_vf_format=B100;

could the MHZ be increased further or is 24MHZ the limit?????

Posted by brazuka
[quote]
On 2008-02-29 18:28:01, number1 wrote:
overclock is to increase the MHZ, the front vga camera with the micron cam module runs 24MHZ by default look at the oringal 2.3 driver.

cam_power_on_5=5, 3, 4, 5dc0, 64; // Enable 24 MHz APLL clock wait 100 ms

cam_vf_clock_freq=[4], 5dc0; 24MHZ=>*div Table Block Diagram
cam_ss_clock_freq=[4], 5dc0; 24MHZ=>*div Table Block Diagram

*Divided the frequency

cam_init_result=;

cam_ss_format=B100;
cam_vf_format=B100;

could the MHZ be increased further or is 24MHZ the limit?????

@Number1

Do you read the comments, information or posts from other modders?
I don´t think so

For mobile phones overclock is not only increase the frequency, but by the hardware at risk to changes in voltage and other things
Not number1 the limit to work with 30fps recording of video in a camera of sony with these sensors is 27mhz this to these models of chip-sensor.Have models that support up to 48mhz in the two frequencies synchronized as the model k510.

Each model has its master clock

Micron-MT9... series

sensor block

You can sustain its ideas number1 but not everyone agrees with his view
Again everyone is to help, not to prove anything to nobody number1
Continue with your work and good job!

[ This Message was edited by: brazuka on 2008-02-29 19:34 ]

Posted by Raiderski
sadeghi85
yep, but they have old 2MP DSP architecture 7xx. 3MP is 8xx and any changes to cmd05 have no effects

number1

it makes a huge difference the sky will actually be a more natural shade of blue, the grass will green not a mix of yellow & green and the pictures won't be misty

sweet marketing. there is a reality, thin line and then illusion where your brain plays tricks. outdoor reality is much better balanced than false (artificial lights) indoors. if WB doesn't work as 'turned off' in indoors then in outdoors situation is this same. as for me there is no differences

_________________
K800 R1KG001 (camdriver 6.1)
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek

[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-02-29 19:41 ]

Posted by number1

number1

it makes a huge difference the sky will actually be a more natural shade of blue, the grass will green not a mix of yellow & green and the pictures won't be misty

sweet marketing, why would i market a free camdriver i'm not making money off it lol, i do notice improvements in outdoor pictures in colour & clearness indoors there isn't really much difference.
see the comparasion between the k800i & k770
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=164926&start=0
notice the k770 pics colours are correct and no mist effect like the k800i,
i get the same results in colours with my k800i by turning the whitebalance off not the same quality as the k770 but pictures are slighty clearer without the mist ,the k800 still has it's awful post-processing.

[ This Message was edited by: number1 on 2008-02-29 20:03 ]

Posted by Raiderski
why should i pay attention on comparision between 2 cameras with different sensors each from other vendor? once again you used "whitebalance off" - do you want more pictures from 2.99 which show you that auto WB is working fine and it's not off?

code: set WB value 0x80 for auto
interpreter: let it be
camera: what the hell?! 0x80? i don't know this! i will use auto mode instead

ok, maybe small explanation. i'm software engineer, testing procedures are huge part of my work. there are no 'slightly', 'probably', 'maybe' - everything must be checked, verified and explained

Posted by jomateixa
Please guys stop...Disabling WB is a stupidity itself. JPEG compression mods too.

One question: What does mean the values #COM_EVENT(11,05) (one push) and #COM_EVENT(11,06) (hold) ?

Posted by jomateixa
OK one push=shade, but if we set it to 'hold', first it applies Auto WB and then holds it? Or simply holds the previous setting?

Posted by Raiderski
'hold' will just lock your current WB settings. for 99.99% of users WB lock is useless, especially in camphone. it is very useful if you want to play with gray card as white balance reference and then hold settings. another trick from advanced photography

_________________
K800 R1KG001 (camdriver 6.1)
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek

[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-02-29 22:56 ]

Posted by alvink83
Hi all, what does AE_MSHUT_LONG mean? Thanks..

Posted by Raiderski
it's value corresponding to maximum exposure time of snapshot with used flash

Posted by alvink83

On 2008-03-01 13:36:12, Raiderski wrote:
it's value corresponding to maximum exposure time of snapshot with used flash

So, it's useless when the flash is disabled. Right?
What is the best value for taking a portrait?

Posted by sadeghi85

On 2008-02-29 23:19:46, jomateixa wrote:
Please guys stop...Disabling WB is a stupidity itself. JPEG compression mods too.

Agree 100%, especially with the compression part.

[ This Message was edited by: sadeghi85 on 2008-03-01 13:48 ]

Posted by number1
whitebalance off does make a difference so i will always use whitebalance off don't bother arguing with me i ain't changing my mind.
there is some point to modding the jpeg compression it really only makes a difference on vga & 1mp mode arcording to jpeg snoop my pictures are uncompressed. 2mp mode i can get 98% compression & 3mp mode max seems to be 97% same as standard driver. increasing file sizes makes no noticeable difference but i just prefer 800kb-900kb rather than 600kb-900kb.

Posted by Raiderski
sorry guys but i just can't read nonsenses... can you?

LOL number1 you just roxx - i'm a fan of you!

1.
whitebalance off - do you understand what are you talking about? i don't think so. i can only repeat: auto white balance in your driver is ON! you're blind or you don't know what is auto white balance. do you feel that white balance is off in your bones or what?

2.

arcording to jpeg snoop my pictures are uncompressed

OMG! you really don't understand what you're talking about! you have RAW pictures, you re truly genius! especially for you: even jpeg with 100% quality is still COMPRESSED file

man, please stop this nonsense! you completely don't know what you are talking about! people, someone please explain this to him

Posted by jomateixa

On 2008-03-02 19:02:30, Raiderski wrote:
sorry guys but i just can't read nonsenses... can you?

LOL number1 you just roxx - i'm a fan of you!

1.
whitebalance off - do you understand what are you talking about? i don't think so. i can only repeat: auto white balance in your driver is ON! you're blind or you don't know what is auto white balance. do you feel that white balance is off in your bones or what?

2.

arcording to jpeg snoop my pictures are uncompressed

Number1 I agree with Raiderski, you showed to us several times that you don't have the knowledge, STOP saying stupidities. You showed us too that you have 17 years old. You don't have to be right in everything, Raiderski already showed you that your WB OFF is not WB OFF...what do you want more?

P.D.- JPEG compression mod is the greatest stupidity that we can do, as our eyes can't see it.

[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-03-02 18:17 ]

[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-03-02 18:19 ]

Posted by number1
From VGA
*** Marker: DQT ***
Define a Quantization Table.
OFFSET: 0x000016B4
Table length = 132
----
Precision=8 bits
Destination ID=0 (Luminance)
DQT, Row #0: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #1: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #2: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #3: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #4: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #5: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #6: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #7: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Approx quality factor = 100.00 (scaling=2.99 variance=6.13)
----
Precision=8 bits
Destination ID=1 (Chrominance)
DQT, Row #0: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #1: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #2: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #3: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #4: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #5: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #6: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
DQT, Row #7: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Approx quality factor = 100.00 (scaling=1.54 variance=1.58)

does say ASSESSMENT: Image is very likely processed/edited at the bottom though.

whitebalance came from k770
seq_set_prop_1_0 = #WR_REG(14, 80) //Auto WB

also from k770 to prove 80 means off

//**************************************************
// Digital Sharpening, property 21
//
// 0 => Off 1 => +1 1 => +2 1 => +3
// 4 => +4 5 => +5 6 => Auto
//**************************************************
seq_set_prop_15_0 = #WR_REG(21, 80);
seq_set_prop_15_1 = #WR_REG(21, 00);
seq_set_prop_15_2 = #WR_REG(21, 01);
seq_set_prop_15_3 = #WR_REG(21, 02);
seq_set_prop_15_4 = #WR_REG(21, 03);
seq_set_prop_15_5 = #WR_REG(21, 04);
seq_set_prop_15_6 = #WR_REG(21, 40);

@jomateixa you say i don't have the knowledge, look at the colour saturation in your driver it doesn't work at least i can do something as simple as working colour saturation. i was the first to use colour saturation in the k800i, first driver with working colour satuaraton was my 2.86 at least i archieved something new and useful i am not always right maybe i'm not right about the jpeg compression but i stand by my whitebalance off.

Posted by jomateixa
AHAHAHAHAHA... So the colour saturation in my driver is not working? LOL and LOL

Actually you're a spammer

[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-03-02 18:46 ]

Posted by number1

On 2008-03-02 19:38:43, jomateixa wrote:
AHAHAHAHAHA... So the colour saturation in my driver is not working? LOL and LOL

Actually you're a spammer

[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-03-02 18:40 ]

no it's not and yes it is funny

so now you want to start trying to insult me & call me childish names over the internet, how sad i think you need to grow up.

Posted by jomateixa
Now I understand Raiderski, you're really annoying...You're saying that colour saturation is not working on my driver, twice (LOL). Install it and use it, cuz your driver is PATHETIC

Posted by number1

On 2008-03-02 19:49:45, jomateixa wrote:
Now I understand Raiderski, you're really annoying...You're saying that colour saturation is not working on my driver, twice (LOL). Install it and use it, cuz your driver is PATHETIC

you think i'm annoying for telling you something twice two months was the first time i told you so did genus, try having some twat with every new camdriver you spend alot of your free time making & testing always finding something negative to say about it then always trying to start a argument with you about it thats annoying.

cuz your driver is PATHETIC<<< thats even more childish than trying to insult me.

Posted by jomateixa

On 2008-03-02 19:57:56, number1 wrote:

My last answer to you about this.

1) Genus is another SUPER STAR like you.
2) Command 58 IS WORKING on NORM_MODE macro.
3) I repeat install and check VividColour or Withan.

P.D.- If you say a stupidity then I'll try to explain it, but if you say a stupidity several times then I'm glad to insult you for making us lose time. Don't spam.

[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-03-02 19:08 ]

Posted by milan91
fight, fight, fight

joma, number1 chill

Posted by Raiderski

Approx quality factor = 100.00 (scaling=2.99 variance=6.13)

quality is not equivalent of compression (at least you can say: 100% quality = very low compression). you don't understand what exactly compression means in JPEG, maybe you should google it?

whitebalance came from k770

K770: vendor = Samsung Techwin
K800: vendor = Sony

values for K770 don't have to match in K800. once again especially for you:

1 line: quick after camera open, some seconds later (my driver) whitebalance on
2 line: quick after camera open, some seconds later (your driver) "whitebalance off"

why are you so stubborn? we are not against you, we are against your stupid theories which we can easily blow up while you cannot prove their truth

_________________
K800 R1KG001 (camdriver 6.1)
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek

[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-03-02 19:15 ]

Posted by brazuka
Number1
Please stop pay attention bro and try to at least understand what others are saying you and a little engineering could help you

Thanks Number1

But in my opinion the limit file size or buffer size Jpeg is not determined by firmware but is determined by hardware featured by tests and studies but for each model based on the table of JPEG compression

Register MT9V series Micron VGA
[R37]:1—0x125 – Color Saturation Control (R/W)
Default 0x0005=>Values
0x1[25]=>25

Color Saturation Control
#WRITE_IFP(25 0005) // AWB_SPEED_SATURATION (auto)
#WRITE_IFP(25 0055) // AWB_SPEED_SATURATION (125%)
#WRITE_IFP(25 002D) // AWB_SPEED_SATURATION (137,5%)
#WRITE_IFP(25 XXXX) // AWB_SPEED_SATURATION (X%)
Description This register specifies the color saturation control settings.
Bit 5:3 Specify overall attenuation of the color saturation.
000: Full color saturation
001: 75% of full saturation
010: 50% of full saturation
011: 37.5% of full saturation
100: 25% of full saturation
101: 150% of full saturation
110: Black and white

Bit 2:0 Specify color saturation attenuation at high luminance (linearly increasing attenuation from no
attenuation to monochrome at luminance of 224).
000: No attenuation.
001: Attenuation starts at luminance of 216.
010: Attenuation starts at luminance of 208.
011: Attenuation starts at luminance of 192.
100: Attenuation starts at luminance of 160.
101: Attenuation starts at luminance of 96.

Do u read in my post about series MT9V... Micron
Table and Register for VGA series MT9 Micron

post#8
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=159467&start=105

[ This Message was edited by: brazuka on 2008-03-02 19:42 ]

Posted by brazuka
[quote]
On 2008-03-02 20:05:03, milan91 wrote:
fight, fight, fight

joma, number1 chill

No figth!!! Milan Milan

Posted by number1

i know the k770 & k800i are very different but there both still hex values.

maybe this proves the whitebalance off thing
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=152275&start=2505
look at danekro's post,
both mine & gprsman 2.2 fix live color have the whitebalance turned
gprsman 2.2 fix live color uses different saturation & contrast values,
genus 5.7 the whitebalance is on and saturation is 07 my driver is almost the same just saturation is 08, and look which driver produces the warmest colours.

Posted by Raiderski

i know the k770 & k800i are very different but there both still hex values.

they can be even binary or octal values which doesn't change anything. k770 can accept 0x80 but not k800 as you can see on my pictures

this is idiotic, why i'm trying to prove you my rights? didn't i showed you pictures with nice comparision with my driver and your driver? didn't you noticed that after some seconds white balance is adding blue color to correct too much of yellow color on both drivers? that's the best prove that white balance is ON. now it's your turn - show us your proofs

i don't have strength to continue this discussion. i'm stupid and blind, joma is stupid and blind, you are smart and you have eyesight as the eagle...

Posted by milan91

Lol

Posted by number1
your right you should give up trying to prove me wrong, but 1 last thing
if 80 isn't whitebalance off then what is?????

Posted by jomateixa
It's really amazing and funny to view how is defending his "theory" with the REAL PROOF just up to his words. It's for me amazing. I don't have the words.

Posted by agentreza
hey Radierski, when are you gonna release your own driver for the k800i?

Posted by number1
just too annoy raiderski i'm gonna come up with a new theory next week lol

Posted by Raiderski
number1 you are ignorant, you don't know what you're talking about, you're not even trying to protect your theory in front of other clear proofs, you don't know how to interpret this what you can see, you have no humility and you cannot respect other bad opinions about your work. as i told before you are only superstar with desire of being adored - you have big ego and very small knowledge

WB value 0x80 in K800 do NOTHING

if you think that i'm wrong then show us... nah... you will not do this (you had many chances) because you don't know how and you don't want to be ridiculous (but you are)

Posted by Raiderski

i'm gonna come up with a new theory next week lol

i beleve you... but not because you want to annoy me but because you don't know what you're doing in modding - that's why we must look at this cr/\\p

Posted by number1
@Raiderski, you take the camdriver modding far too seriously, i only do it to pass some free time if theres nothing else to do, i don't have to prove nothing to you and i can't be bothed wasting my time doing so, so i have big ego and small knowledge this means nothing coming from you, you don't even know me, whether WB value 0x80 does do something or doesn't i don't care theres more important things than what a value does in a camdriver lol you need to get a life.

Posted by Raiderski
do you think that i'm spending more than 5% of my free time for modding? poor you

for me this is strictly fun and additonal small training for my programming skills. i don't want to show for who this is highly addictive job... i'm not an author of many drivers for K800, K550, K770, K850 or even dispdriver. if you like this - fine, but this doesn't mean that you can tell bullshits and negate uncomfortable for you facts like posted pics. once again you had chance to kick my ass with irrefutable proofs for your "theory" and once again you prefer to not show how smart is your code

Posted by BundyRRR
Guys stop fighting!!
Raider do your job, do your best (you are very good modder, I remember k750i and your drivers

)
number1 stop writing stupid posts, be man and proof your right or tell that you don't have right. Don't act like a child. This is boring...
As Raider said, you create many drivers so how can you think that Raider spent a lot of time to create his own driver? But the diffrence is huge- Raider is a very good modder, you are only "star", stop upgrade you drivers and start doing something new (not olny a little changes is code), like Raider doe's

_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/12005930@N07/

[ This Message was edited by: BundyRRR on 2008-03-03 18:13 ]

[ This Message was edited by: BundyRRR on 2008-03-03 20:21 ]

Posted by Raiderski
as you wish

Posted by number1
it's easy too make many drivers i'm only doing simple code changes, yes the display driver took a while but was worth it, at 1 point i did do something new and got colour saturation working in the k800i, if it saves me alot of hassle then maybe i should keep my k800 camdriver to myself.

Posted by BundyRRR
Can't you try to cooperate? Raider has a lot of knowledge and experience, you know something. Try to establish cooperation with him, not fight with him