Posted by bryanjay420
latest image i shot with ultimate camdriver 2.1 vivid
Posted by toyds
@jomateixa and All
i think DOC_MODE problem is fixed when Force Flash is deleted and change to its original code,right now I try to delete the Force Flash command
2.1 Vivid driver
--------------------------------
seq_set_prop_e_2 = $sb 04 // Forced ON, for service menu and production tests
$c9 08 // R5 camera version?
#COM_EVENT(5a,83) // Forced xenon 0b10000011, slow sync at beginning
$cl
#COM_EVENT(51,00) // Sensor scene "Auto 00"
#COM_EVENT(5a,8b) // FLASH_MODE 0b10001011: Flash on, RER off, sync on beginning.
$cx;
--------------------------------
change I made
just put the auto code from 2.5 original cam driver
seq_set_prop_e_2 = $sb 02; // Auto
and so far the ISO for DOC_MODE is always 100
@jomateixa
try check your driver under this property
seq_set_prop_e_3 = $sb 03 // Auto, red-eye
in original driver after "$sb 03" their is a semicolon(;) but in your driver their is no semicolon(;) so i put semicolon when i modify your driver.
what is did is right or wrong?
thanks a lot
_________________
SE K810i(R8BA024) , CUSTOM made MENU and ICONS , 2.91 camera driver by Number1, VISTA startup/shutdown sound
[ This Message was edited by: toyds on 2008-01-28 12:25 ]
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-01-28 13:22:51, toyds wrote:
@jomateixa and All
i think DOC_MODE problem is fixed when Force Flash is deleted and change to its original code,right now I try to delete the Force Flash command
2.1 Vivid driver
--------------------------------
seq_set_prop_e_2 = $sb 04 // Forced ON, for service menu and production tests
$c9 08 // R5 camera version?
#COM_EVENT(5a,83) // Forced xenon 0b10000011, slow sync at beginning
$cl
#COM_EVENT(51,00) // Sensor scene "Auto 00"
#COM_EVENT(5a,8b) // FLASH_MODE 0b10001011: Flash on, RER off, sync on beginning.
$cx;
--------------------------------
change I made
just put the auto code from 2.5 original cam driver
seq_set_prop_e_2 = $sb 02; // Auto
and so far the ISO for DOC_MODE is always 100
@jomateixa
try check your driver under this property
seq_set_prop_e_3 = $sb 03 // Auto, red-eye
in original driver after "$sb 03" their is a semicolon(;) but in your driver their is no semicolon(;) so i put semicolon when i modify your driver.
what is did is right or wrong?
thanks a lot
_________________
SE K810i(R8BA024) , CUSTOM made MENU and ICONS , 2.91 camera driver by Number1, VISTA startup/shutdown sound
[ This Message was edited by: toyds on 2008-01-28 12:25 ]
Yea I know that the problem is with the FF, If you do that you won't have that bug, and won't have FF too. You can add that semicolon without problem. Tomorrow I'll try to fix the FF bug keeping the FF
, wait a little
Posted by toyds
@jomateixa : okies,thanks a lot
waiting for your new cam driver
Posted by BundyRRR
Ultimate camera Driver 2.1 Vivid
Colours are f... good:)
Macro mode is sharp (as always in UltimateCD
)
And the landscape- real colours, and sharp
Thanks jomateixa again and again
This is the best driver for now. Has a good macro, good landscape photos, good night mode and good colours:)
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/12005930@N07/
[ This Message was edited by: BundyRRR on 2008-01-28 19:17 ]
Posted by jomateixa
I absolutely love your pics, you catch the moment and you know how to play very good with the settings
Posted by BundyRRR
Thank you. Sometimes photos are good, sometimes not;) - but I learned a lot how to take a photo using cell phone (Sony ericsson
) (many photos, over 8000 I think I made, so It's easy but not too easy, cell phone is only cell phone, but I don't want proffesional camera:)
Colours was only thing I expected from this driver, now Ultimate has everything (maybe too dark flash photos, but I don't need this). Next step is Raiderski supermode I think:) - manual focus or sth but until Raider won't release his supermode driver I won't change this driver for other.
to number1- you are very hard-working man, but you want to create too many camdrivers, camdrivers for any SE phone. Better focus on one driver. Photos you showed from your last k800i driver looks like k550i photos. But keep working:)
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/12005930@N07/
[ This Message was edited by: BundyRRR on 2008-01-28 20:05 ]
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-01-28 20:58:27, BundyRRR wrote:
Thank you. Sometimes photos are good, sometimes not;)
Colours was only thing I expected from this driver, now Ultimate has everything (maybe too dark flash photos, but I don't need this). Next step is Raiderski supermode I think:) - manual focus or sth but until Raider won't release his supermode driver I won't change this driver for other.
to number1- you are very hard-working man, but you want to create too many camdrivers, camdrivers for any SE phone. Better focus on one driver. Photos you showed from your last k800i driver looks like k550i photos. But keep working:)
It would be cool if Raider takes the Ultimate for build his supermode driver...
There's good reasons for do that,
- It's not OVERMODDED
- Does not have unuseful macros and fuctions
- It's coded in the simplest way (that's very important
) And...
- The quality is HOLY SHIT
But if he makes his own it will be awesome we can say it loud
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-01-28 20:10 ]
Posted by BundyRRR
On 2008-01-28 21:07:56, jomateixa wrote:
It would be cool if Raider takes the Ultimate for build his supermode driver...
There's good reasons for do that,
- It's not OVERMODDED
- Does not have unuseful macros and fuctions
- It's coded in the simplest way (that's very important
) And...
- The quality is HOLY SHIT
But if he makes his own it will be awesome we can say it loud
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-01-28 20:10 ]
I agree with you completely!:)
Ultimate is the best way to start new modding
But last word has Raider
Posted by Rodrigop
Hey Guys, Bundy your photos are the best!
Jomateixeira i will try your driver now, i was using number1 and i can say is a great driver, so let´s see if i can take pictures like bundy whit yours, ehehe.
only one thing, the bug on document with FF is ok with 2.1 vivid ?
tks for the good word.
Posted by jomateixa
Fixed the bug in first pic of doc mode (bad ISO). Very easy to implement FF in a different way... Check 2.11 at first post
Regards
Posted by toyds
@jomateixa
thanks a lot for the fix
Posted by Arfi-Gorgona
First i want to congratulate you for this excellent cam driver!And second i want to ask something.How can i change drivers?they just simply overwritten?Or do i need to do something else?
Posted by mindshifter
@Arfi-Gorgona
just overwrite file, you don't even need to restart phone
Posted by Arfi-Gorgona
Thanks for the response
Thats with every camera driver?Lets say i want to change later to another camera driver,all i do is overnight the files with Setool2lite and thats it?I hope my questions aren't to silly lol.I just started to make modifications to my phones and i don't know much about whats happening
Oh two photos with the 2.1 driver.
_________________
Zhto h Arfes-gorgones
[ This Message was edited by: Arfi-Gorgona on 2008-01-29 12:56 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Arfi-Gorgona on 2008-01-29 13:07 ]
[ This Message was edited by: Arfi-Gorgona on 2008-01-29 13:24 ]
Posted by mindshifter
yes, it will work for every camdriver
even better - do this:
apply this patch:
| Code: |
|
note - it's for R8BA024 k800 (not k800@k810) - search for other sw and model if you have different
This patch will change location of camdriver0.dat and camdriver1.dat - so you don't need to plug it to pc just to copy camdriver.
After patching make folder "other/se/camera" in phone memory (not card) and place there camdriver0.dat and camdriver1.dat (second one is for videocall camera - you can extract it from FS using main2raw.exe and SEFStool4.exe)
make another folders (phone mem) let's say:
other/se/camdrivers/standard
other/se/camdrivers/ultimate
other/se/camdrivers/genus
etc.
and place different camdrivers in that folders (camdriver0.dat).
When you need to change driver delete other/se/camera/camdriver0.dat
and copy/paste camdriver0.dat from other/se/camdrivers/xxxxxx to other/se/camera (using buidin phone file explorer)
Posted by Arfi-Gorgona
Thanks for the help xD i didn't tried other drivers but for now im VERY pleased with this one.Great quality overall and great colors.
Posted by yorulezkos
there is a problem .. the focus in portrait mode is not done correct ... i am using v2.1 (ff code replaced) r8ba024
this is landscape
auto with focus on auto
portrait
you can see that the focus is incorrect ..... and it does this at all my pictures done in portrait mode
the pictures were made one after another .. no time delay
vivid colors driver version
[ This Message was edited by: yorulezkos on 2008-01-29 18:37 ]
Posted by mindshifter
On 2008-01-29 19:32:50, yorulezkos wrote:
there is a problem .. the focus in portrait mode is not done correct ... i am using v2.1 (ff code replaced) r8ba024
I think portrait mode is not for long distance (up to few meters) - that's why landscape should be used
try standard drivers - I bet it will be the same
Posted by jomateixa
yep portrait is for middle distances, to make a landscape pic use auto with focus to infinity or just landscape mode
Posted by yorulezkos
oooh .. ok then
10x ... i was trying to make a color comparison between the scenes when i noticed the focus thing .. .. vivid insane colors are great :D
Posted by Arfi-Gorgona
I was wondering about something.I saw that in portrait and landscape mode the available settings are different.Its not easy to expose all settings to all modes?Or is it unnecessary?
Posted by DeKosta
On 2008-01-29 22:41:13, Arfi-Gorgona wrote:
I was wondering about something.I saw that in portrait and landscape mode the available settings are different.Its not easy to expose all settings to all modes?Or is it unnecessary?
Well "macro-mode" is the only setting you cant choose in any other scene than "normal and document(by default),
other than that there is no difference in settings?
Other than image-stabilisator in landscape scenes..
What settings are you thinking about?
Posted by Arfi-Gorgona
Flash,white balance,focus,etc.But i guess that the profiles are that way cause the "missing" settings aren't needed in those mods...
Posted by disizthesnak
I've install the vivid 2.1, and it's my first camdriver. It look to be great, then I'll test it, I've just a question, is it possible to check somewhere in the phone or by any way else, that there is ultimate vivid 2.1 in the phone ?
With se tool, it says it's OK, but is it possible to see the confirmation in the phone ?
Thanks, and thanks alot for your great work jomateixa
Posted by milan91
In Service menu
>*<<*<*
Posted by disizthesnak
That's what I've try, and there written I've got photo 2.1, and visio cam 2.3. Is it OK ? I've flash with 2.1 vivid, then I guess it's OK, but I want to be sure
But it looks better than before for me
But is there a way to have less noise indoor with flash ? And colors are really good, I like great colors like this 2.1 vivid color Great job again jomateixa
Posted by Rodrigop
Twilight Landscape - very good!
Landscape
i have only these ones at now, but will take more later
thanks agains Jomateixeira for the good work!
Posted by Arfi-Gorgona
On 2008-01-30 01:10:57, milan91 wrote:
In Service menu
>*<<*<*
Can i ask something too?I did that too but the camera driver says 2.5 and not 2.1.IS it supposed to say 2.1 inside the service menu?
Posted by yorulezkos
yes ......camera 2.1 and video call camera 2.3
Posted by jomateixa
I did experiments drastically changing the xenon ISO and shutter speed and is quite impossible to remove the noise. For example I tested with ISO 640 and shutter 1/5000 and results was bad (a lot of noise and looking blurred). The less noisy pics are made with lower ISO, but are too dark. Also colour saturation makes it more noticeable.
Posted by Arfi-Gorgona
Then what i did wrong?
I used Setool2lite V1.11 and then i used the rar file in misc and pressed Flash.Can someone pls direct me again how to do it...I did that again and it still says 2.5 :/
Posted by milan91
Use far or xs++
Posted by Arfi-Gorgona
On 2008-01-30 11:43:20, milan91 wrote:
Use far or xs++
Ok i did it with Xs++ but my camera is still reported as 2.5 inside the firmware...i have a k800i>k810i.I wonder if its just the reporting only..
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-01-30 12:05:05, Arfi-Gorgona wrote:
On 2008-01-30 11:43:20, milan91 wrote:
Use far or xs++
Ok i did it with Xs++ but my camera is still reported as 2.5 inside the firmware...i have a k800i>k810i.I wonder if its just the reporting only..
Read tutorials before doing that, you're not doing it well. Service menu should report 2.11
Posted by milan91
My phone is k800i with k810i sw and in service menu camera version is ok
Posted by bryanjay420
@milan
wats the font youre using???
i havent changed my font since i begun modding my unit....
Posted by jomateixa
Added another 2.11 flavour to first post ...
Posted by milan91
On 2008-01-30 12:42:12, bryanjay420 wrote:
@milan
wats the font youre using???
i havent changed my font since i begun modding my unit....
Last week i change my font, and put this:
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=163795
This is real original SE font
its good, only problem is Clock on screen(BIG) in some hours its not real big...
Posted by Rodrigop
Ultimate v2.11 Withan™ - what´s the main diference between the Vivid Colour and the Standard to this new one.
tks!!!!!!!
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-01-30 13:30:57, Rodrigop wrote:
Ultimate v2.11 Withan™ - what´s the main diference between the Vivid Colour and the Standard to this new one.
tks!!!!!!!
Read first post carefully. (And when installing/compiling software, you must ever read the Readmes)
Posted by Rodrigop
My bad! i has this page bookmarked and always go to the last page, now i saw the differences there.
tks again.
Posted by Arfi-Gorgona
I finally made it
Thanks guys and sorry for the trouble.
Edit:I took some photos and they had a lot of noise...I wonder why
_________________
Zhto h Arfes-gorgones
[ This Message was edited by: Arfi-Gorgona on 2008-01-30 12:58 ]
Posted by theshadow03
@jomateixa
can u make a version of the vividcolour without the FF?? please??
and is the new version "withan" better then the vividcolour??
thx
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-01-30 13:57:53, theshadow03 wrote:
@jomateixa
can u make a version of the vividcolour without the FF?? please??
and is the new version "withan" better then the vividcolour??
thx
You can do it yourself very easily searching the code for "Force flash" and remove the whole lines containing that (all are in property 23)
Posted by theshadow03
thx...and the difference is just that the "Withan" version has no noise and the rest is just like the VividColour...am i right??
Posted by theshadow03
On 2008-01-30 15:43:46, jomateixa wrote:
On 2008-01-30 13:57:53, theshadow03 wrote:
@jomateixa
can u make a version of the vividcolour without the FF?? please??
and is the new version "withan" better then the vividcolour??
thx
You can do it yourself very easily searching the code for "Force flash" and remove the whole lines containing that (all are in property 23)
in the "Withan" version i had found 4 lines with force flash and in "VividColour" just 2..i have deleted them all...is that allright??
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-01-30 16:49:37, theshadow03 wrote:
On 2008-01-30 15:43:46, jomateixa wrote:
On 2008-01-30 13:57:53, theshadow03 wrote:
@jomateixa
can u make a version of the vividcolour without the FF?? please??
and is the new version "withan" better then the vividcolour??
thx
You can do it yourself very easily searching the code for "Force flash" and remove the whole lines containing that (all are in property 23)
in the "Withan" version i had found 4 lines with force flash and in "VividColour" just 2..i have deleted them all...is that allright??
Yes.
I decided to force the flash RER in VividColour and put 00 mode in Twilight portrait of the Withan so please re-download the 2.11 VividColour and Withan the ones who have downloaded them
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-01-30 16:53 ]
Posted by yorulezkos
here are some pictures
vivid 2.1 auto flash
vivid 2.1 flash off
withan auto flash
withan flash off
vivid vs withan
are there other differences between vivid 2.1 and 2.11 besides the flash problem ... i mean "VividColour™ version has really insane" and " *VividColour™ ~> Colour gain to insanity (0x0b) " .. its the same thing ?
[ This Message was edited by: yorulezkos on 2008-01-30 18:31 ]
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-01-30 19:13:34, yorulezkos wrote:
here are some pictures
vivid 2.1 auto flash
vivid 2.1 flash off
withan auto flash
withan flash off
vivid vs withan
are there other differences between vivid 2.1 and 2.11 besides the flash problem ... i mean "VividColour™ version has really insane" and " *VividColour™ ~> Colour gain to insanity (0x0b) " .. its the same thing ?
[ This Message was edited by: yorulezkos on 2008-01-30 18:31 ]
Yes in 2.11 the only change is the FF fix.