Posted by jomateixa
New version with little improvements/fixes in first post
Posted by TmZ
jomateixa, can you add manual focus etc. ??
[ This Message was edited by: TmZ on 2008-04-08 05:45 ]
Posted by that-guy
why not twilight landscape mode, with iso 125 for "even" lesser noise?
Posted by naveedaziz83
@jomatexia
in the auto special modes
the WB is auto or daylight?
Posted by jomateixa
Check v2.6 Final at first post
Posted by rawilson91
2.60 Final Withan
Auto + marco + flash off
Auto + marco
Auto + infinite
Auto + infinite + flash off
[ This Message was edited by: rawilson91 on 2008-04-08 16:04 ]
Posted by Guto_ViP
OFFTOPIC:
Guys, what do you thing about:
Samsung G800
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_g800-reviews-2145.php
and
Samsung G810
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_g810-reviews-2257.php
BBCode Quote End -->
Guys, what do you thing about:
Samsung G800
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_g800-reviews-2145.php
and
Samsung G810
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_g810-reviews-2257.php
Maybe is better than C902?
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-04-08 17:03:45, rawilson91 wrote:
2.60 Final Withan
Auto + marco + flash off
Auto + marco
Auto + infinite
Auto + infinite + flash off
[ This Message was edited by: rawilson91 on 2008-04-08 16:04 ]
About the 3rd pic, daylight flash mode is not thinked for landscape pics, that's why it's overexposed. For macros or portraits it works fine, like in the second pic, in which we have more light/shadows detail on the flower keeping the background details too.
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-04-08 16:29 ]
Posted by yanyanyan881
Your driver has so many settings for diff scene:) But it's really complicated to recall the diff settings.
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-04-08 18:16:05, yanyanyan881 wrote:
Your driver has so many settings for diff scene:) But it's really complicated to recall the diff settings.
Give you a few days
Posted by rawilson91
* Auto scene:
1) Flash AUTO: Daylight flash special mode I. Forced flash. For use in portraits at daylight. (1/6400s, ISO 250).
can you create version with Flash auto from 2.46?
Posted by that-guy
can you put lower iso on twilight landscape mode, for less noise? maybe iso 125 (like in number ones driver) ?... just look at the sky (taken with withan 2.6)..
Posted by cooin
Hah - this would be the second time i change my camera driver today....2.5 and 2.6 released almost immediately one after another
....
Posted by io_domi
2.6 withan auto+ macro
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-04-08 22:04:58, that-guy wrote:
can you put lower iso on twilight landscape mode, for less noise? maybe iso 125 (like in number ones driver) ?... just look at the sky (taken with withan 2.6)..
Sure but 125 is too low for me at some cases, that's why I setted it to 200, I think it's better to have brighter pic and post process it to remove noise. Maybe 160 is the best value, let me test it tomorrow, but in sunrise scenes there's noise even with ISO 125...
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-04-08 23:15 ]
Posted by milan91
Ultimate 2.6
auto+macro
100% crop
Posted by jomateixa
I noticed too that with 1/6400s the flash pics are extremely sharp
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-04-08 23:21 ]
Posted by naveedaziz83
i have alwayz wondered how pics will look like in the taken in party special mode
can sum1 take em and post em
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-04-09 00:23:32, nabhatti wrote:
i have alwayz wondered how pics will look like in the taken in party special mode
can sum1 take em and post em
What party mode? I? II? III? You mean slow sync modes? There are different ways to use it. Mainly you have to use it when in very low light to get a brighter flash pic without noise.
Posted by milan91
On 2008-04-09 00:20:57, jomateixa wrote:
I noticed too that with 1/6400s the flash pics are extremely sharp
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-04-08 23:21 ]
What's funny?? I kill you
Posted by naveedaziz83
well ok let me rephrase my question
i have alwayz wondered wht does party mode do.. all three of thm
and yes i know slow sync.. they do wrk gr8 thanx jomtexia
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-04-09 00:36:26, nabhatti wrote:
well ok let me rephrase my question
i have alwayz wondered wht does party mode do.. all three of thm
and yes i know slow sync.. they do wrk gr8 thanx jomtexia
Party modes are simply for different light intensities, I, II, III, from high to low. Are not for making your parties more funny!
Posted by naveedaziz83
@jometxia..
lol.. ok
thanx
Posted by yanyanyan881
Do you still recommend doc mode for capturing macro shots?
And Auto mode + auto/macro/infinite focus + auto flash is for capturing any daylight shots but NOT landscape shots right?
And Auto mode + any focus + NO Flash is for?
sorry i have a lot of qns
[ This Message was edited by: yanyanyan881 on 2008-04-09 03:04 ]
Posted by bryanjay420
wow another version in 1 day...
Posted by bryanjay420
2.5 withan
Posted by DriftSpeed
jomateixa: what version, mode and exposure value did you use in the 2nd picture on page 1? what's the best that you recommend for night shots? thanks!!!
Posted by farukkk
k 790 wihten 2.46
n95
k790
n95
k 790
n95
k 790
n95
k 790
n 95
k 790
DAHA ÖNCE EKLEDİĞİM BİR BAŞKA KARŞILAŞTIRMA
n 95[/b]
k 790
n 95
k 790
Posted by betobm
auto + macro + rer
Posted by bryanjay420
can you compare these pics...what can you say...both in extreme darkness flash fired...
ultimate 2.60 withan [auto+macro mode]
number1 2.99.9 se2 [document mode]
_________________
Here I have compiled some usefull thread and tutorials i found on some sites and forums.Credits to all modders and site owners.I hope this helps you too.
k800/k810 modding thread
[ This Message was edited by: bryanjay420 on 2008-04-09 17:51 ]
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-04-09 18:24:09, bryanjay420 wrote:
can you compare these pics...what can you say...both in extreme darkness flash fired...
ultimate 2.60 withan [auto+macro mode]
number1 2.99.5 se [document mode]
Is not a good sample for comparison, macro pics are always good. It was taken at complete darkness so the only difference is the whitebalace (incandescent in Ultimate flash) and maybe the colour saturation (00 for withan)
Posted by bryanjay420
Is not a good sample for comparison, macro pics are always good. It was taken at complete darkness so the only difference is the whitebalace (incandescent in Ultimate flash) and maybe the colour saturation (00 for withan)
but is it correct that the modes are correct??like auto+ macro in ultimate and document on number1...coz as far as i can remember some told that never use document mode in ultimate only use it for text...
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-04-09 18:56:26, bryanjay420 wrote:
Is not a good sample for comparison, macro pics are always good. It was taken at complete darkness so the only difference is the whitebalace (incandescent in Ultimate flash) and maybe the colour saturation (00 for withan)
but is it correct that the modes are correct??like auto+ macro in ultimate and document on number1...coz as far as i can remember some told that never use document mode in ultimate only use it for text...
The only difference between Auto+macro and document is that document has more contrast and exposure (a little). You can use it too, It depends on the object.
Posted by bryanjay420
but if you can see properties are almost the same exept for the exposure time....number1 is 1/40sec and ultimate 1/30sec other than that are the same...maybe its the white balance...but do you agree that with this 2 pics number1 has gain more color coz ultimate use tungsten as default wb?
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-04-09 19:06:19, bryanjay420 wrote:
but if you can see properties are almost the same exept for the exposure time....number1 is 1/40sec and ultimate 1/30sec other than that are the same...maybe its the white balance...but do you agree that with this 2 pics number1 has gain more color coz ultimate use tungsten as default wb?
Yes it could be the wb, or the wb and the colourgain. I don't know what is tha colourgain in n1 driver. You used flash RER that's why you got 1/30. If you were used Auto + macro it should be 1/6400
Posted by bryanjay420
ok...tnx for explaining...
Posted by norbi_nw
why does portrait and twilight portrait have full range AF (macro included)??
And this 2.6 is more flexible, but i loved this part in 2.46:
when i was in a mid to 70% lighted room, i used auto+flash and it took really nice pictures, that means the flash made it a little more bright, giving it perfect light condition (in normal driver flash wouldn't fire in this condition - enough light). Now with 2.6 i can't take pictures like that anymore, only with RER, but since it's not forced, it won't fire :/ what was the difference between 2.46 auto+FF and 2.6 FF ?? ISO, exposure?
example: go into a dark room, take a pictre with auto+FF... 2.46 made the whole room look great and no dark parts, now with 2.6 the back wall of the room is in mid darkness, only close objects are iluminated by the flash. hope u understand :/
Also whats the use of this new auto+flash in daylight stuff? it's night here, so i can't test it. anyone care to explain and give samples too?
Posted by bryanjay420
.....
[ This Message was edited by: bryanjay420 on 2008-04-09 18:26 ]
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-04-09 19:24:19, norbi_nw wrote:
why does portrait and twilight portrait have full range AF (macro included)??
And this 2.6 is more flexible, but i loved this part in 2.46:
when i was in a mid to 70% lighted room, i used auto+flash and it took really nice pictures, that means the flash made it a little more bright, giving it perfect light condition (in normal driver flash wouldn't fire in this condition - enough light). Now with 2.6 i can't take pictures like that anymore, only with RER, but since it's not forced, it won't fire :/ what was the difference between 2.46 auto+FF and 2.6 FF ?? ISO, exposure?
example: go into a dark room, take a pictre with auto+FF... 2.46 made the whole room look great and no dark parts, now with 2.6 the back wall of the room is in mid darkness, only close objects are iluminated by the flash. hope u understand :/
Also whats the use of this new auto+flash in daylight stuff? it's night here, so i can't test it. anyone care to explain and give samples too?
1) For the '70% room' case (lol), you can use the Indoor special mode
2) Yes ISO is lower in 2.6 Auto, you should use Party mode I or II in a total dark room. Read first post info or the Readme
Posted by norbi_nw
kk i got it, but why does the 2 portraits have full range focus? i mean u can enable macro in auto, and go to portrait and have macro.. this way it focuses slow :/ sometimes it takes long to focus and it even causes focal error. so we can enable it any time, but this way we are stuck with it. anyway i found a use for the auto+FF
(i think).
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-04-09 19:46:53, norbi_nw wrote:
kk i got it, but why does the 2 portraits have full range focus? i mean u can enable macro in auto, and go to portrait and have macro.. this way it focuses slow :/ sometimes it takes long to focus and it even causes focal error. so we can enable it any time, but this way we are stuck with it. anyway i found a use for the auto+FF
(i think).
You don't have to enable macro in Auto, just try to focus a near object in any scene and that's all. It's another proof of the Ultimate's flexibility. And the daylight flash special modes have several uses, read some about photography techniques
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-04-09 18:51 ]
Posted by bryanjay420
You don't have to enable macro in Auto, just try to focus a near object in any scene and that's all. It's another proof of the Ultimate's flexibility
but its very hard to take pictures on near object without macro mode in auto...
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-04-09 19:52:35, bryanjay420 wrote:
You don't have to enable macro in Auto, just try to focus a near object in any scene and that's all. It's another proof of the Ultimate's flexibility
but its very hard to take pictures on near object without macro mode in auto...
Is exactly the same difficult as in Auto+macro ... The same command is enabled in the driver.
A question: why do you use the N1 driver too? what lacks do you find in Ultimate?
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-04-09 18:55 ]
Posted by bryanjay420
A question: why do you use the N1 driver too? what lacks do you find in Ultimate?
its not that i find any lack both in your camdrivers...i both respect you as a modder...i dont want to have favoritism or what...im just trying new drivers that coming out...i dont know about camera modding etc but i can see that both your camdrivers are great...hands down with respect to both of you guys...
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-04-09 20:03:05, bryanjay420 wrote:
A question: why do you use the N1 driver too? what lacks do you find in Ultimate?
its not that i find any lack both in your camdrivers...i both respect you as a modder...i dont want to have favoritism or what...im just trying new drivers that coming out...i dont know about camera modding etc but i can see that both your camdrivers are great...hands down with respect to both of you guys...
I only wanted to know if you found any lack that I can improve that's all
Posted by bryanjay420
i really dont know what...lolz...im trying hard to practise the special modes u have in your driver...im not that good in photographing so that i do not know what i really wants...
Posted by jomateixa
On 2008-04-09 20:12:19, bryanjay420 wrote:
i really dont know what...lolz...im trying hard to practise the special modes u have in your driver...im not that good in photographing so that i do not know what i really wants...
Yeah
my latest version is for pros
Posted by Guto_ViP
2.6 Withan
- Auto, FF, Macro
Posted by that-guy
jomateixa, please try that thing what i asked you yesterday... (lowering iso for twilight landscape to 160 or 125 for less noise, i already showed u a sample pic yesterday)..
Posted by bryanjay420
yup...im kinda noob at this...but sometimes i can make picture perfect...rofl