Posted by number1
i tryed to explain how the sharpness in sony cam modules actually works in the first post because you won't find it on wiki or yahoo.
Posted by Guto_ViP
On 2008-03-16 00:25:38, Massey17 wrote:
Your camdrivers are sucks!!
I don't like them. UCD versions are the best, your camdrivers must go to the trash! Make a good camdriver. If You want ballyhoo make some interest not sh*t!!!
F*ck oFF!!!
All camdrivers are goods.... Congratulation for Number1 and Jomateixa...
Massey... only 9 mensage on forum??? GET OUT IDIOT!
_________________
K800/K810 R8BA024: Extreme zapf II v2 / Number1's v2.99 and UCD 2.44 Withan / Menu Felix Cat (BR by me) / Walkman Right Button and Torch Internet Button / Sony Skecht font / Custom Layout / Number1's Display v1 / Custom Splash/Logout/Startup / Patchs
[ This Message was edited by: Guto_ViP on 2008-03-16 23:52 ]
Posted by bryanjay420
right now im contented to use number1 in many situations specially without flash pics...but still number1 cannot make with a force flash version of 2.99.5
Posted by toyds
i think both cam driver are good
it depends on what you want
please don't criticize the work of others mate
Posted by stat5bot
show some appreciation, if number1 & the other cam modders isnt around creating customized cam drivers. we would have to stick with the default camdrivers which sux0rz a lot compared to drivers they made.
Posted by ghostweb
number 2.99.5 speacial
Posted by pd_trash
thx number1 your the one haha ^^
Posted by number1
here you can find loads of fullsize pics taken with this driver
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]y+ericsson&model=K800i+special
i can't remember what driver took what picture but there all taken using some version of 2.9X, the lastest pics of corse taken with 2.99.5.
Posted by Lo-couk
On 2008-03-16 00:25:38, Massey17 wrote:
Your camdrivers are sucks!!
I don't like them. UCD versions are the best, your camdrivers must go to the trash! Make a good camdriver. If You want ballyhoo make some interest not sh*t!!!
Great, you don't like the drivers. Message received and point made, can you post some example photo's of photo's you taken with the cam drivers you've created?
Posted by bryanjay420
another sample shots:
document modes
Posted by rockygali
photobucket is jammed... i think...
Posted by bryanjay420
On 2008-03-19 08:29:32, rockygali wrote:
photobucket is jammed... i think...
but its easier to upload rather than uploading with esato...
Posted by ellyb3ar
I'm getting a K800i for my birthday which is in about 25 days.
I will be getting it for $0 AUD monthly repayments on a $29 AUD per month plan for 24 months, from Three.
I am aware this will have its own firmware customized for the three network in Australia.
1) Can I still mod the camera driver even though this firmware will be slightly modified for the three network?
and
2) What advantages does this driver offer over the original, and will all the modes be modified?
By modes I mean...for example:
Say I select twilight, will it still be the mode I should use in that condition or will it be best used in something completely different to its mode's description...
I hope that made sense xD
Basically what I'm saying is, if I mod the driver straight away before getting used to the original driver will I be confused with all the selections such as different lighting conditions etc., or will they all just be refined versions of what each mode was originally meant to be used for.
Thanks in advance,
EllyB3ar
Posted by norbi_nw
I say use the original for 2-5 days, then start to mod, and you will see. I saw some other firmware k800 and it took very good pictures with stock camdriver.
Posted by ellyb3ar
I have decided that I will be definitely using XS++ or WotanServer to flash the K800i to the generic firmware, as I plan on buying an 8GB SanDisk M2 and the HPM-75 (mainly because it matches the colour scheme of the phone, and lacks the walkman branding which all the other HPM-XX have) and the three network disables the media player and replaces it with a crapware 3 version of it. I am mainly buying this phone for its combination of excellent camera and good expandable MP3 player, so reflashing is a must.
That way also I will have the latest firmware available so the stock camera driver will be as refined as it can get at that point in time which is necessary to make a final comparison between the two drivers.
[ This Message was edited by: ellyb3ar on 2008-03-21 09:12 ]
[ This Message was edited by: ellyb3ar on 2008-03-21 11:43 ]
Posted by ellyb3ar
I have just seen the ultimate™ 2.44 driver for the K800i and am wondering what the advantages and disadvantages of it are compared to this driver.
Thanks
Posted by bryanjay420
_________________
Here I have compiled some usefull thread and tutorials i found on some sites and forums.Credits to all modders and site owners.I hope this helps you too.
k800/k810 modding thread
[ This Message was edited by: bryanjay420 on 2008-03-22 17:00 ]
Posted by milan91
bryanjay420, is that 2.99 5pecial??
Posted by bryanjay420
ooopsss...sori....2 pics have mixed.....i should be posted it in the UCD thread lolz
Posted by milan91
Can you say me what version you use for that pics??
Posted by bryanjay420
2.99.5 special edition...picture taken the past 2 days...
Posted by milan91
Thanks
Number1 why doc.mode have 1/2 exposure??
[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-03-22 19:43 ]
Posted by chickm
Hi Number1,
Currently testing your 2.995pecial driver, great as expected
Question:
I've noticed that during FINE picture quality, pictures I have taken in 3MP, 2MP & 1MP are all around 800kb~
But when I choose NORMAL picture quality, it goes back to normal.
Is this done on purpose?
How big a difference in quality NORMAL~FINE?
Thank you
Posted by number1
On 2008-03-22 20:00:12, milan91 wrote:
Thanks
Number1 why doc.mode have 1/2 exposure??
[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-03-22 19:43 ]
it doesn't it has 1/6 max shutter speed it's impossible to get 1/2 sec on document.
On 2008-03-23 18:25:17, chickm wrote:
Hi Number1,
Currently testing your 2.995pecial driver, great as expected
Question:
I've noticed that during FINE picture quality, pictures I have taken in 3MP, 2MP & 1MP are all around 800kb~
But when I choose NORMAL picture quality, it goes back to normal.
Is this done on purpose?
How big a difference in quality NORMAL~FINE?
Thank you
yea it's done on purpose it's to get better compression on 1mp & 2mp pics
1mp compression will be about 98%-100%
2mp compression will be about 96%-98%
bigger file sizes seem to make no difference on 3mp mode,
the fine mode is all my file sizes and settings, normal mode is from standard driver but with 95% compression.
Posted by chickm
thanks for the reply & thank you for this driver
Posted by wayne_rooney
what faults in Number1 mixed 7.56 driver.... ny bugs in it.... ? i m using currently...
Posted by number1
that 7.56 is a very old driver it's outdated, i recommend updating to my lastest one.
Posted by ja@mx
can you use this driver with a k850, because compare to my old k790 the pics with the k850 suck!
Posted by number1
i could have told you that the k800 takes better pics than the k850 before you brought the phone and wasted your money,
no there is no k850 drivers also there is no way to install drivers on the k850 yet and i will not make drivers for the k850i unless i buy the phone but at the moment i want the c702.
Posted by sadeghi85
On 2008-03-27 16:54:01, number1 wrote:
... and i will not make drivers for the k850i unless i buy the phone but at the moment i want the c702.
Wise decision
Posted by bryanjay420
On 2008-03-27 16:54:01, number1 wrote:
i could have told you that the k800 takes better pics than the k850 before you brought the phone and wasted your money,
no there is no k850 drivers also there is no way to install drivers on the k850 yet and i will not make drivers for the k850i unless i buy the phone but at the moment i want the c702.
i also like the c702
Posted by toyds
i think the only lacking in C702 is the XENON FLASH
Posted by number1
old 2.99.5 SE
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10272
new 2.99.9 SE2
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10779
Posted by bryanjay420
wer is the link on 2.99.5 SE2???
Posted by number1
no where yet.
Posted by igorluk
On 2008-03-28 15:04:01, number1 wrote:
old 2.99.5 SE
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10272
new 2.99.9 SE2
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10779
wer is the link on 2.99.9 SE2???
Posted by number1
link is no where yet, i posted up some sort of comparasion between them to see which 1 is better.
Posted by pietropizzi
Hmm..difficult because of different weather condition
1) sharp (shadow of fence), bright, good sky stucture
2) more color, sky is grey (ok its rainy), but color noise on wet floor !
don't know what you changed, maybe color
try driver quickchange for getting almost same shutter
Posted by number1
i can't help the british weather lol i was gonna take more pics but it was rain heavily and my camera lens got soaked,and no i havn't changed the colour.
these were also taken with the newer driver a while ago
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10704
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10703
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10702
Posted by minhxeom
@Number1: according to you, what cam driver should I install? I saw that a lot use 2.9. Now I use 2.995. What is better?
Sorry for my English
Posted by bryanjay420
of course u install the latest...
Posted by number1
N1 2.99.9 SE2 (almost complete)
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10820
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10819
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=10818
Posted by norbi_nw
man is UK beautiful. i like the landscapes and houses.
Posted by milan91
number1 great job for 2.99 5pecial
Great photos with flash, and in low light cond.
Daylight pics are little darker, but its good...
Posted by number1
it's called correct exposure time because i'm fed up of the k800i getting it wrong very rarely is it too dark, a underexposed photo can be saved the details are all still there but with a overexposed photo the details are lost and can't be saved. actually the flash on 2.99.5 are a little off the smear effect that you spotted a while ago is still there but i have found out what it is causing it now and fixed it in the version.
[ This Message was edited by: number1 on 2008-03-31 20:57 ]
Posted by BadBoyTC
On 2008-03-31 18:43:44, norbi_nw wrote:
man is UK beautiful. i like the landscapes and houses.
If you come to the UK at the right time, yes. That is the typical landscape you see in the UK. The bad thing is that it's always raining.
Posted by rockygali
nice efforts number1... as always...
by the way, the picture at the lot... theres this tree on the left...
are the branches really colored green?!
Posted by bryanjay420
r u going to upload the 2.99.5 SE2???
Posted by rockygali
not with you around of course....
*lol*
just dizzin... sorry!
Posted by number1
On 2008-04-01 03:46:38, rockygali wrote:
nice efforts number1... as always...
by the way, the picture at the lot... theres this tree on the left...
are the branches really colored green?!
yes it's mold i think cause the weather is normally really shit thats the first time i've seen the sun in a while.