Welcome to Esato.com


Pages:
Previous  123 ... 192021 ... 347348349  Next

News Articles:

Technical details:
• Ericsson R380
• Ericsson R520
• Ericsson R600
• Ericsson T29s
• Ericsson T39
• Ericsson T60d
• Sony Xperia A
• Sony Xperia Acro S
• Sony Xperia Advance
• Sony Xperia C
• Sony Xperia E
• Sony Xperia E Dual
• Sony Xperia E1
• Sony Xperia E1 Dual
• Sony Xperia Ion LT28at
• Sony Xperia J
• Sony Xperia L
• Sony Xperia M2
• Sony Xperia Miro
• Sony Xperia Neo L
• Sony Xperia P
• Sony Xperia S
• Sony Xperia SL
• Sony Xperia Sola
• Sony Xperia SP
• Sony Xperia SX
• Sony Xperia T
• Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
• Sony Xperia Tipo
• Sony Xperia Tipo Dual
• Sony Xperia TL
• Sony Xperia TX
• Sony Xperia U
• Sony Xperia V
• Sony Xperia VL
• Sony Xperia Z
• Sony Xperia Z Ultra
• Sony Xperia Z1
• Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
• Sony Xperia Z2
• Sony Xperia ZL
• Sony Xperia ZQ
• Sony Xperia ZR

The All New Sony Ericsson Portfolio for 2008


Click to view updated thread with images




Posted by Mizzle

On 2007-12-29 13:57:34, nneo wrote:
this clamshell keeps on looking worst and worst its uglier than it was


Awww come on, it's not bad at all


Posted by Maximys

On 2007-12-29 13:57:34, nneo wrote:
this clamshell keeps on looking worst and worst its uglier than it was


When you see official pics, you change your opinion.

Posted by nneo
i sure hope so
when will S.E start making clamshells that looks and feels like samsungs clamshells ????!!!!!!

Posted by domipost
Never i hope. Samsung sucks!

Posted by JC08
When will we see a se walkman phone with sound quality equal or better than n91?

Posted by nneo
samsung sucks in SOFTWARE but they ROCK in hardware let alone STYLE

Posted by driftmania

On 2007-12-29 15:10:13, nneo wrote:
i sure hope so
when will S.E start making clamshells that looks and feels like samsungs clamshells ????!!!!!!


or at least a phone that's a successor to the Z800i/V800i.

Posted by domipost

On 2007-12-29 18:38:49, nneo wrote:
samsung sucks in SOFTWARE but they ROCK in hardware let alone STYLE


Maybe the hardware is good (excluding the screens in thin phones ), but style allso sucks imho. All near the same, and allmost all sliders.

Posted by NightBlade
Ditto.

Posted by nneo
i dont know in my opinion elegant shiny black works fine for me on all their products

S.E has a lot of different style choices which is good yet samsung is stuck on the black or metallic elegant style to all their phones

i agree that all their products has a lot of similarities hell in every form factor the product looks like duplicates still it doesn't stop them from looking stylish all of their clams looks approximately the same but they look good excluding the thin ones i HATE thin phones (and light ones)

S.E should do a real successor to the z710 keeping the form and add a 2.2" screen (240x320) and the external display should start boasting some colors (i don't recall S.E clams with external color capable displays )
that would make a real bomb !!!!

Posted by Bambino
Quote:

On 2007-12-29 23:46:19, nneo wrote:

(i don't recall S.E clams with external color capable displays )
that would make a real bomb !!!!



Old Z520 does

Posted by prototype_bo
i don't understand the big fuss about this middle entry level phone !!!

Posted by driftmania

On 2007-12-30 04:51:00, Bambino wrote:
Quote:


On 2007-12-29 23:46:19, nneo wrote:



(i don't recall S.E clams with external color capable displays )

that would make a real bomb !!!!






Old Z520 does



and i'm sure the Z800i/V800i did as well.

Posted by nneo
aaahhhhhhhh good old days with the z520 i loved that device (it lacked more colores in screen and most importantly memory expansion )

agree with the z520 but z800 and v800 i hope SE will never do these mistakes ever again the external screens there looked so tiny because of the gigantic size of the devices though they were rather good phones (not looks-wise)

Posted by Mizzle
Please stay on topic.

Posted by nneo
sorry i got swifted away

Posted by m-one
What the hell is that?


Source: JAMPB

[ This Message was edited by: m-one on 2007-12-30 14:46 ]

Posted by Mizzle

On 2007-12-30 15:44:43, m-one wrote:
What the hell is that?



[ This Message was edited by: m-one on 2007-12-30 14:46 ]


Same question I asked on my blog yesterday

Posted by nneo
probably a photoshop
numeric keys reminds the ones on W580 (gray version) but bigger
or could be a modified M600


[ This Message was edited by: nneo on 2007-12-30 14:53 ]

Posted by Bambino
Yikes! No front cam!

Posted by albero23
it's fake to me

anyway there is a cam on the right near the speaker

Posted by Mizzle

On 2007-12-30 17:11:00, Bambino wrote:
Yikes! No front cam!



I guess that thing on the upper right between the call speaker and blue button, would be the front cam.

Posted by cristiano
will where's the joy stick or D-pad


Posted by nneo
i believe w950 and m600 does not have a d-pad (except for the wheel on the side)

Posted by NightBlade
Looks ugly... big time..

Posted by nneo
is there going to be a cyber-shot slider ???
(big fan of S.e sliders never -- disappointed me )


Posted by razec

On 2007-12-30 15:44:43, m-one wrote:
What the hell is that?


Source: JAMPB

[ This Message was edited by: m-one on 2007-12-30 14:46 ]


sorry

Posted by nneo
why are you judging it by this pic "in real life it could change and look better"


Posted by razec

On 2007-12-31 00:37:15, nneo wrote:
why are you judging it by this pic "in real life it could change and look better"



It could look better but the unorthodox keypad position will drive away standard keypad design users to it's peak for sure, no wonder why K850/P1 failed to become at least a good hit here in my place just like what P990 and K800 did.

Posted by Mizzle
OK, I've been told that the phone on this picture - photoshopped or not - looks somewhat like a phone in the experimental stages, some time back. Whether or not this has been cancelled, I don't know.

Posted by SE4NICK

On 2007-12-31 00:37:15, nneo wrote:
why are you judging it by this pic "in real life it could change and look better"



LOL.....remember when you said that the Z660 looked bad and people told you it couldlook different in reall life....LOL.....hypocrite

Posted by razec
^^ That's why he put " " and " " on his post

Posted by bronxdude

On 2007-12-31 00:54:31, Mizzle wrote:
OK, I've been told that the phone on this picture - photoshopped or not - looks somewhat like a phone in the experimental stages, some time back. Whether or not this has been cancelled, I don't know.



but that is a good-looking phone!

Posted by cellpassion
the device looks good... but i agree, the keypad could be its weak point... the keypad reminds me of the samsung P310...

Posted by razec
I like any of the next UIQ to have an M600 like body in black front/back cover finish and silver interior between them, keyboard like P990/P910, and at least 2.8" Display. so far M600's candybar form factor seemed to be the best for a compact smartphone

_________________
"Our Greatest glory is not in never failing - but in rising everytime we fall"

[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2007-12-31 10:12 ]

Posted by nneo
@SE4NICK
i think your not familiar with sarcastic quotes or sentences

i think razec answered you.


Posted by Mizzle
And yet another one came in...



This one is definitely photoshopped, but could actually look like "P5"!

Posted by tranced
1-2-3-4?????????

please, not like that. we're used to 1-2-3.

@mizzle: i guess it got cancelled i guess.

Posted by Myuueren


Posted by nneo
if the body was shiny piano black (PSP-Like) i wouldn't mind having one actually
a 3.2 mega pixel camera (AF) 3.4" touch-screen stereo speakers and a touch UI
should make the trick

Posted by Mizzle
I do actually like this one very much.


And here goes another one...




Am going to be pissed if I find out that someone is creating these as fakes and spamming my blog with them... like some other user here at the forum has done.

Posted by razec
Looks better than the first. but still i think it's fake

or perhaps it's the K850 sucessor with UIQ



Posted by Mizzle
Yeah, I'm not too sure about these pictures either. Something tells me that it could go both ways, and the fact that I had been told something very exciting a few days ago, that could have something to do with this, definitely doesn't make these pictures more fake.

But I'd give both pictures a 35-40% chance of being real. And sorry for posting them here, if they turn out to be fakes. They don't look like obvious photoshops, so...

Posted by razec

On 2008-01-01 01:43:27, Mizzle wrote:
Yeah, I'm not too sure about these pictures either. Something tells me that it could go both ways, and the fact that I had been told something very exciting a few days ago, that could have something to do with this, definitely doesn't make these pictures more fake.

But I'd give both pictures a 35-40% chance of being real. And sorry for posting them here, if they turn out to be fakes. They don't look like obvious photoshops, so...



But if this is real, then i can see a very bright future for the K-series camfone(maybe) division as well as the chance that we could discern the new UIQ to be incorporated on the next K-series phone - UIQ in K-series is what i really yearn for so long, i hope SE did it

Posted by kenoby
@razec: neat! Looks cool! But I wasn't thinking of that one. I have found something but it's of poor quality (I'll take few more after):




And here is a link to video:
I just make short googling..


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Kx7gY3wqc0



Posted by Myuueren



Posted by bodeh6
2008 better be the return of the old SE. Innovation and first features.

Posted by SilveR.
More highend phones please

that would be very nice

Posted by m-one
Sure to come more this year

Posted by razec
UIQ should bloom at 2008, i mean we should now have a high-end UIQ cybershot, walkman and enterprise(P) series and of course a mid range UIQ(maybe K6xx, Z or M) - it's now time to increase the UIQ penetration i think


Pages:
Previous  123 ... 192021 ... 347348349  Next
Click to view updated thread with images


© Esato.com - From the Esato mobile phone discussion forum