Posted by genus
Thx Pedrops!!! I now testing the HPM70 V2.
Posted by genus
The HPM70 seem better than the High5 one when i tested on speaker.
The HPM70 for electronic guitar sound seem a bit higher, but overall, bass done better and voice sound are clear.
Posted by morpheus78
for hpm62 what i shall use?
Posted by zirkie101
Splendid! Good handiwork Pedrops. I used ur EQ settings w/ headphones and musac sounds awesome. Almost like I'm listening to a CD @ some music shop before buying it. As for the good ol' backspeaker, I think that's about as much juice as one can squeeze through it - sounds good. Call quality - excellent. FM Radio also good (more bass). Thx man!
Posted by norbi_nw
they sound good, but nout as loud as the v2 beta megabass.
Posted by xan K
nice! trying them right now!
Posted by kuratinja
wow v2...thanks pete....i will try it ....
Posted by number1
i tryed v2 for HPM70 users [more bass, bit more treble] on my hpm-70
5/10 quality: disorted on max volume, not really a high quality sound, was ok on the 7th bar but nothing speacial w880i oringals still better, the sound didn't even sound very well balanced.
7/10 bass: what happened to megabass???, just increasing the bass on the bass eq is rubbish it seems to reck the quality and causes disortion, yea there more bass than standard acoustics but the bass on the bass eq is seriously crap it needs megabass, megabass doesn't have to be powerful it provides nice flowing bass, unlike the bass eq.
8/10 loudness: lounder than most zapf acoustics but not as loud as 1, overall loundness was fine.
8/10 clearness: not as clear as 1.1, it's still clearer than the standard w880i acoustics which is good.
overall: what happened to megabass, don't enchance the bass on the bass eq cause it provides more bass but u lose quality.
i did try all 3 packs on the first post, my favourite was the beta.
backspeaker
quality:10/10, nothing wrong with the quality it sounded nice no disortion very balanced.
bass: 7/10, don't expect much but the oringal w880i had more
loudness 6/10, not as loud as the w880i oringals
clearness 8/10, it was very clear sound for the speaker
Posted by ginryu
well i try the 1st two pack's i have a k550 flashed to w610 and i'm also using hpm-62 and the hi-fi one sounds better to me well of course the backspeker sound's better with the v1.1 the call's sounds a little less louder but sounds more clear it's good but still neds work to do it
anyway it's good
Posted by grafyman_se
thank's pedrops ....you are the best...
Posted by TehKek
EP 630 Headphones, Hifi V2 version, latest firmware :
9/10 Quality: Awesome! I can hear everything clearly and instruments are easy to separate, very pleasant to listen to!
8/10 Bass: I like the bass but it seems to be lacking a bit of resolution, then again I haven't listened to any bass heavy album.
10/10 Loudness: I turned it up 2 dots in the train today and discovered it was only at 3 dots and blocking all outside sound, much better than the W880i Acoustics
10/10 Clearness: See Quality
Haven't tried any audio books yet though.
I will compare it to my Laptop (Intel HDA audio) and iPod soon
Back speaker :
Quality:10/10 : nothing wrong with the quality it sounded nice no distortion very balanced.
Bass: 9/10 : can't expect any bass from a speaker of that size
Loudness 8/10 : Pretty dam good, however ring tones are very soft, perhaps you can make those a bit louder, I couldn't care any less about the quality of my ring tones as long as I can hear them
Clearness 10/10 : Pretty Dam Good
Posted by gprsman
Thanks pedrops great work
regards.
[ This Message was edited by: gprsman on 2007-11-03 19:40 ]
Posted by mauasca
On 2007-11-03 20:39:52, gprsman wrote:
Thanks pedrops great work
regards.
[ This Message was edited by: gprsman on 2007-11-03 19:40 ]
Yes, Thanks pedrops great work
regards.
Posted by pedrops
On 2007-11-03 03:30:37, RevoWution wrote:
Haha icic. Of all the poles he could've hit, he had to hit the one connecting all the electrical wires haha.
I'm liking your v2 acoustics pedrops! Awesome work!!!
Yep! just like a bowl strike!
Thanks man!
On 2007-11-03 03:45:13, masterjp wrote:
Thanks dude!
one word... AWESOME!
Thanks bro!
On 2007-11-03 03:58:39, tranced wrote:
shall try this on my friend's k790. he will get happy as his still virgin.
He will surely like it =]
On 2007-11-03 07:22:48, genus wrote:
The HPM70 seem better than the High5 one when i tested on speaker.
The HPM70 for electronic guitar sound seem a bit higher, but overall, bass done better and voice sound are clear.
Whats High5? [beside the drink]
On 2007-11-03 08:40:12, morpheus78 wrote:
for hpm62 what i shall use?
Try the one for HPM70 and the HiFi one! And see which one is better with hpm62!
On 2007-11-03 08:43:28, zirkie101 wrote:
Splendid! Good handiwork Pedrops. I used ur EQ settings w/ headphones and musac sounds awesome. Almost like I'm listening to a CD @ some music shop before buying it. As for the good ol' backspeaker, I think that's about as much juice as one can squeeze through it - sounds good. Call quality - excellent. FM Radio also good (more bass). Thx man!
I'm glad you like it!
On 2007-11-03 10:37:41, norbi_nw wrote:
they sound good, but nout as loud as the v2 beta megabass.
Yep! you're right, I have lowered very little bit the volume. Its just raise one notch and its the same =]
Maybe I can raise again...
On 2007-11-03 16:15:40, number1 wrote:
i did try all 3 packs on the first post, my favourite was the beta.
I can't get how we listen to complete diff sounds with same phone and same acoustics!
On 2007-11-03 18:11:51, ginryu wrote:
well i try the 1st two pack's i have a k550 flashed to w610 and i'm also using hpm-62 and the hi-fi one sounds better to me well of course the backspeker sound's better with the v1.1 the call's sounds a little less louder but sounds more clear it's good but still neds work to do it
anyway it's good
Hmmm, you can use v1.1 farfield than...
On 2007-11-03 19:15:59, TehKek wrote:
EP 630 Headphones, Hifi V2 version, latest firmware :
9/10 Quality: Awesome! I can hear everything clearly and instruments are easy to separate, very pleasant to listen to!
8/10 Bass: I like the bass but it seems to be lacking a bit of resolution, then again I haven't listened to any bass heavy album.
10/10 Loudness: I turned it up 2 dots in the train today and discovered it was only at 3 dots and blocking all outside sound, much better than the W880i Acoustics
10/10 Clearness: See Quality
Haven't tried any audio books yet though.
I will compare it to my Laptop (Intel HDA audio) and iPod soon
Back speaker :
Quality:10/10 : nothing wrong with the quality it sounded nice no distortion very balanced.
Bass: 9/10 : can't expect any bass from a speaker of that size
Loudness 8/10 : Pretty dam good, however ring tones are very soft, perhaps you can make those a bit louder, I couldn't care any less about the quality of my ring tones as long as I can hear them
Clearness 10/10 : Pretty Dam Good
Thanks man!
I can hear the same as you!
=]
On 2007-11-03 20:39:52, gprsman wrote:
Thanks pedrops great work
regards.
Thanks dude =]
On 2007-11-03 21:46:43, mauasca wrote:
Yes, Thanks pedrops great work
regards.
Posted by ginryu
hey i just use it more i figure out what is the problem jejeje i just needed to use the w880 far_play (wich i finally find) with the hpm-70 pack and it's now perfect well maybe has a little too treble....
any suggestion???
everything else is perfect now even if i use the megabass preset!!!!
thanks man and sorry for the previous post i think that maybe need to get use to the new quality
Posted by notoryuz
oh man i didnt see that the 2nd version is out now ... damn thats nice .. i have to try that .....hmmmmmmm
Posted by zirkie101
So, Pedrops. Having received all this feedback, what's the future of Peter's acoustic (what can one expect), or do the future versions (if any) depend mainly on the feedback you get from us?
Posted by burner8
@Perdrops: i wanna give the biggest respect, for your invested time and work.
Your drivers are all great.
It is a good idea to give us 3 drivers to choose.
So everybody of us can choose the best for him.
Ererybody has an other hear and listen another music.
And so you give everybody a chance to get the best.
Keep On.
I use a sony InEar and i prefer your U-Bass Beta. The Bass is clear and the rest of the sound is clear too in the same time.
Now i can let my ipod at home. Thank you.
The HIFI driver is good for big HIFI headers or CAR HIFI
burner8
[ This Message was edited by: burner8 on 2007-11-03 23:46 ]
Posted by tphg
@pedrops
I've tried many acoustic driver before, and found your V2 acoustic is undreamed-of-acoustic driver for my K800.
Now when listen to any song, i can feel my earphone (i'm using Victor ear clip phone which has much bass) is full with instruments and i can distinguish each kind of instrument due to V2's excellent clearness.
The treble in V2 is at very high frequency (called super treble), so it won't make my ear annoyed even when i raise the 5th column of equalizer to max. V2's treble is very nice to me.
But i prefer your Ultrabass beta, hope that you can develop it to become final Ultrabass. Now using Ultrabass, i have to raise 3 bars for the mid column (3rd one) in equalizer to make the sound suit my taste.
Thanks very much for your great work.
Posted by genus
I do see the HPM70 is better than the high5 one, i test on my surround speaker....
THe ultrabass, in my opinion, got bass but the sound not so good like in HPM70.
Posted by xan K
I can say I like this one. I've tried the HPM70 version and it's so clear and detailed. Only problem is that it kinda distort when blasted at full volume. It isn't as neutral as v1.1 (I liked that), but this version suits little HMP-70 very well. Thank you for your great effort! and... keep it up!
Posted by notoryuz
can anyone upload the original w880i r8ba024 acoustic ?
Posted by rockygali
hi there pedrops!
ive been away for too long and its nice to see you finalized the V2.
i congratulate you for these.... anyway, can BT acoustics also be altered.. i mean does it have a very dramatic change if you do that?! or these all depends on the BT gadget?!
Posted by jommarn
@notoryuz
I search at 4shared.com
w880_R8BA024_ACOUSTIC
Posted by rockiran_25
eagerly waiting to try out Peter's V2(at office).....n guys which one do u all like among the 3...........
Posted by masterjp
i like the HPM-70 Edition
Posted by notoryuz
thanks mate
Posted by rockiran_25
i like "v2 for Hifi Headphones [soft equalization]" more than d other drivers..........
m using HPM-75 headphone.........
Posted by burner8
i like the ultrabass edition. Good bass with clear sound
Posted by heara
On 2007-10-31 10:18:43, notoryuz wrote:
@heara
here: http://rapidshare.com/files/6[....]r_s_Loud_Call____IFS___FIX.zip
thank you!!!!
Posted by flatulence
my phone is much more louder and clearer sounding, this is very awesome!
Many thanks, Peter!
Posted by zirkie101
Testing Hi-fi edition @ moment. So far I'm impressed.
Posted by kuratinja
i try your acoustic driver pete...it sounds good...how to make the backspeaker louder ? just copy your v1.1 fairfield_play or anything else ??
Posted by masterjp
On 2007-11-06 04:27:15, kuratinja wrote:
i try your acoustic driver pete...it sounds good...how to make the backspeaker louder ? just copy your v1.1 fairfield_play or anything else ??
if you like a very LOUD backspeaker sound, use ego's farfield.
you can read and download here:
http://forums.se-nse.net/index.php?showtopic=16789
Posted by kimot01
i've tried ego_farfield very loud but it produce crackling sound..too bad that the loudspeaker cant handle the acoustic.
edit: now i'm uploading version 2
edit: great acoustic.,
_________________
you can always find one when you know where to look
[ This Message was edited by: kimot01 on 2007-11-06 13:36 ]
[ This Message was edited by: kimot01 on 2007-11-06 14:02 ]
Posted by notoryuz
i use the hpm edition and its really nice for the headphone or headset the sounds is crispy
@all
can anyone explain me the .zapf files included in the acoustic
cause i wanna replace some .zapf file there
but i have no idea which .zapf file ist for back speaker or for radio or for back speaker when speaking with some one ... and etc ....
Posted by rockygali
ei there notoryuz!
its the farfield_play.* is i think the files you are looking for...
there is a set of file that has farfield names written, those are the acoustics responsible for your back speaker.
ciao!
Posted by zirkie101
@ PedroPs
Would be nice if you could put in some hard yards where the back speaker is concerned. I've mixed some files into ur v2 @ the backspeaker now kicks more ass.
Posted by pedrops
Hey guys.
Sorry for dissapearing, wasn't my will.. but I had some personal problems and had to be away for some days.
Gonna catch up here and answer as soon as possible.
thanks for the support, complements and understaning.
Posted by kcng
On 2007-11-07 19:14:41, zirkie101 wrote:
@ PedroPs
Would be nice if you could put in some hard yards where the back speaker is concerned. I've mixed some files into ur v2 @ the backspeaker now kicks more ass.
Zirkie101, a little more kick into v2? That is great. Backspeaker is lacking in out right volume compared to v1.1. Acoustics is crisp and treble is perfect. Using the music player to play songs on the backspeaker yielded greater volume with excellent acoustics compared to V1.1. Only if V.1.1 volume was integrated with V.2 clear distortion free acoustics for backspeaker then it would be great. Pedrops have you analyzed aforementioned before? Pedrops, the call volume for earpiece on phone is lower then your previous "Loud" version. I'm use to the Loud version.
Thanks in advance.
[ This Message was edited by: kcng on 2007-11-07 18:55 ]
Posted by burner8
@zirkie101:
can you post your driver?
Posted by genus
After i try for a much long period, in my opinion, i choose the Hifi acoustic pack, i think it is much better and soft bass as compare to HPM70 as using the flat equilizer ( normal )
HPM70 is less bass and the sound quite noisy. Where the Hifi not as "clean" as the HPM70 ( maybe due to speaker or little broken background sound that hard to detect ), but overall it give like high5 sound when i test using this:
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-11-08 04:03 ]
Posted by zirkie101
@ Burner8
I'm yet to go through the troubles of getting online storage, so I'll tell you what & where. Where: Look through threads in "Customising" @ Sense - MasterJP started a thread there in which he posted an acoustic mix. What: I've used 2 of Ego's farfield files in Peter's v2 (HPM70) mod and the backspeaker is now literally screaming! Go ahead and see what you think. I hope PedroPS will give this issue some attention in future versions (hopefully) to come. If you can't find the acoustics, Burner 8, then I shall gladly go through the troubles of uploading it. Now I've gotta go work. Doh!!!
Posted by xan K
On 2007-11-08 05:00:04, genus wrote:
After i try for a much long period, in my opinion, i choose the Hifi acoustic pack, i think it is much better and soft bass as compare to HPM70 as using the flat equilizer ( normal )
HPM70 is less bass and the sound quite noisy. Where the Hifi not as "clean" as the HPM70 ( maybe due to speaker or little broken background sound that hard to detect ), but overall it give like high5 sound when i test using this:
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-11-08 04:03 ]
Thanks for the review. How do would you compare them (HiFi vs HPM70) when played on our beloved HPM70 earphones?
Posted by zirkie101
Here's the link to the acoustic I was referring to in my previous post "http://forums.se-nse.net/index.php?showtopic=16789&st=0&start=0".
Posted by genus
Hifi not as clear as HPM70 when using earphone, but when using speaker or woofer to play, it is louder than HMP70 because it has more bass.
Posted by xan K
ok, just what I suspected.
Posted by pedrops
On 2007-11-03 23:32:47, ginryu wrote:
hey i just use it more i figure out what is the problem jejeje i just needed to use the w880 far_play (wich i finally find) with the hpm-70 pack and it's now perfect well maybe has a little too treble....
any suggestion???
everything else is perfect now even if i use the megabass preset!!!!
thanks man and sorry for the previous post i think that maybe need to get use to the new quality
you mean too much treble on backspeakr with W880 farfield_play?
I'm glad you liked it
On 2007-11-03 23:38:55, zirkie101 wrote:
So, Pedrops. Having received all this feedback, what's the future of Peter's acoustic (what can one expect), or do the future versions (if any) depend mainly on the feedback you get from us?
What I'm doing a great research is about acoustics compensations strings... there might be the secrect to get a perfect sound... but only SE knows how that string works!
On 2007-11-04 00:44:23, burner8 wrote:
@Perdrops: i wanna give the biggest respect, for your invested time and work.
Your drivers are all great.
It is a good idea to give us 3 drivers to choose.
So everybody of us can choose the best for him.
Ererybody has an other hear and listen another music.
And so you give everybody a chance to get the best.
Keep On.
I use a sony InEar and i prefer your U-Bass Beta. The Bass is clear and the rest of the sound is clear too in the same time.
Now i can let my ipod at home. Thank you.
The HIFI driver is good for big HIFI headers or CAR HIFI
burner8
On 2007-11-04 03:29:13, tphg wrote:
@pedrops
I've tried many acoustic driver before, and found your V2 acoustic is undreamed-of-acoustic driver for my K800.
Now when listen to any song, i can feel my earphone (i'm using Victor ear clip phone which has much bass) is full with instruments and i can distinguish each kind of instrument due to V2's excellent clearness.
The treble in V2 is at very high frequency (called super treble), so it won't make my ear annoyed even when i raise the 5th column of equalizer to max. V2's treble is very nice to me.
But i prefer your Ultrabass beta, hope that you can develop it to become final Ultrabass. Now using Ultrabass, i have to raise 3 bars for the mid column (3rd one) in equalizer to make the sound suit my taste.
Thanks very much for your great work.
Maybe I can do more with that.. but till now I'm stuck!
Cause now we have R8 firmware, wich produce a diff sound with my acoustics!
which FW are you using?
On 2007-11-04 03:58:33, genus wrote:
I do see the HPM70 is better than the high5 one, i test on my surround speaker....
THe ultrabass, in my opinion, got bass but the sound not so good like in HPM70.
HPM70 and HiFi are the final ones
I'm waiting to fully flash my K800 to R8.. cause I think everybody will use R8.. so I'll have to start from scratch my acoustics....
On 2007-11-04 07:05:23, xan K wrote:
I can say I like this one. I've tried the HPM70 version and it's so clear and detailed. Only problem is that it kinda distort when blasted at full volume. It isn't as neutral as v1.1 (I liked that), but this version suits little HMP-70 very well. Thank you for your great effort! and... keep it up!
but its just lower 2 notches and it will be fine
V1.1 is a little bit more balanced, like HiFi version
Thanks man!
On 2007-11-05 02:59:18, rockygali wrote:
hi there pedrops!
ive been away for too long and its nice to see you finalized the V2.
i congratulate you for these.... anyway, can BT acoustics also be altered.. i mean does it have a very dramatic change if you do that?! or these all depends on the BT gadget?!
Yep it surely deppends on BT gadget you're using... as PHF's sound deppends on the quality of the headphones...
What kind of BT gadget you use? Earphones? Headphones? Handsfree?
On 2007-11-05 23:07:12, flatulence wrote:
my phone is much more louder and clearer sounding, this is very awesome!
Many thanks, Peter!
On 2007-11-06 00:09:44, zirkie101 wrote:
Testing Hi-fi edition @ moment. So far I'm impressed.
On 2007-11-07 02:37:07, notoryuz wrote:
i use the hpm edition and its really nice for the headphone or headset the sounds is crispy
@all
can anyone explain me the .zapf files included in the acoustic
cause i wanna replace some .zapf file there
but i have no idea which .zapf file ist for back speaker or for radio or for back speaker when speaking with some one ... and etc ....
What kind of changes are you looking for?
On 2007-11-07 19:14:41, zirkie101 wrote:
@ PedroPs
Would be nice if you could put in some hard yards where the back speaker is concerned. I've mixed some files into ur v2 @ the backspeaker now kicks more ass.
On 2007-11-07 19:53:05, kcng wrote:
Zirkie101, a little more kick into v2? That is great. Backspeaker is lacking in out right volume compared to v1.1. Acoustics is crisp and treble is perfect. Using the music player to play songs on the backspeaker yielded greater volume with excellent acoustics compared to V1.1. Only if V.1.1 volume was integrated with V.2 clear distortion free acoustics for backspeaker then it would be great. Pedrops have you analyzed aforementioned before? Pedrops, the call volume for earpiece on phone is lower then your previous "Loud" version. I'm use to the Loud version.
Thanks in advance.
Yes I have lowered a bit the call volume! but just a bit!
you can always use Loud and Extreme Loud if they fit you necessities better =]
On 2007-11-08 05:00:04, genus wrote:
After i try for a much long period, in my opinion, i choose the Hifi acoustic pack, i think it is much better and soft bass as compare to HPM70 as using the flat equilizer ( normal )
HPM70 is less bass and the sound quite noisy. Where the Hifi not as "clean" as the HPM70 ( maybe due to speaker or little broken background sound that hard to detect ), but overall it give like high5 sound when i test using this:
HPM70 is especific for HPM70 earbuds
hmmm, so when you plug to your home system sound the HiFi version has more bass than HPM70?
It should be otherwise... strange!
HiFi is softer and better equalized for high definitions systems.. while HPM70 can produce more bass and treble to fit HPM70 characteristics
On 2007-11-08 06:11:16, zirkie101 wrote:
@ Burner8
I'm yet to go through the troubles of getting online storage, so I'll tell you what & where. Where: Look through threads in "Customising" @ Sense - MasterJP started a thread there in which he posted an acoustic mix. What: I've used 2 of Ego's farfield files in Peter's v2 (HPM70) mod and the backspeaker is now literally screaming! Go ahead and see what you think. I hope PedroPS will give this issue some attention in future versions (hopefully) to come. If you can't find the acoustics, Burner 8, then I shall gladly go through the troubles of uploading it. Now I've gotta go work. Doh!!!
Posted by ginryu
i mean treble it sounds a little bad when i put the vol to full
Posted by rockygali
@pedroPS
im using a Stereo BT headsets from i-tech BlueBand R
yea i can notice changes on the gadget.... i hate too much treble on a Stereo BT headset, but V2 has a nice smooth effect even at max volume.
impressive.... ill try it out with other stereo BT.
ciao!