Welcome to Esato.com


Pages:
Previous  123 ... 678 ... 979899  Next

News Articles:

Related

Technical details:
• Ericsson R380
• Ericsson R520
• Ericsson R600
• Ericsson T29s
• Ericsson T39
• Ericsson T60d
• Sony Xperia A
• Sony Xperia Acro S
• Sony Xperia Advance
• Sony Xperia C
• Sony Xperia E
• Sony Xperia E Dual
• Sony Xperia E1
• Sony Xperia E1 Dual
• Sony Xperia Ion LT28at
• Sony Xperia J
• Sony Xperia L
• Sony Xperia M2
• Sony Xperia Miro
• Sony Xperia Neo L
• Sony Xperia P
• Sony Xperia S
• Sony Xperia SL
• Sony Xperia Sola
• Sony Xperia SP
• Sony Xperia SX
• Sony Xperia T
• Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
• Sony Xperia Tipo
• Sony Xperia Tipo Dual
• Sony Xperia TL
• Sony Xperia TX
• Sony Xperia U
• Sony Xperia V
• Sony Xperia VL
• Sony Xperia Z
• Sony Xperia Z Ultra
• Sony Xperia Z1
• Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
• Sony Xperia Z2
• Sony Xperia ZL
• Sony Xperia ZQ
• Sony Xperia ZR
• Sony Ericsson K850

Wallpapers:

post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850


Click to view updated thread with images




Posted by plankgatan
if a camera can produce pictures like this,(full size or not)...it mean it has a good camera....(not the opposite).....



_________________
I k850i, w810i & T28


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-10-17 14:47 ]


Posted by soane28
my biggest concern is the out of control purple fringing and the pinkish red colour. Everything else is not bad, sharpness and detail is there.

Posted by Ridahz
Few comparing pics between K850i and K810i... Im not very good at photos sorry...

K850i...

K810i...

K850i...

K810i...


And yes my project 8800 is battered lol

Please feel free to comment

Posted by gola
@plankgatan-nice one

Posted by aledemo
please Ridahz,you can post one or two photo with flash from 2 o 3 meters from the subject?
i want see the power of the flash..
please!

Posted by Ridahz

On 2007-10-17 16:05:58, aledemo wrote:
please Ridahz,you can post one or two photo with flash from 2 o 3 meters from the subject?
i want see the power of the flash..
please!



Hi mate ill get some more pics up later outside, still getting to grips with it lol not even had it 3 hours lol

Posted by gola
is it just me or do those k810i photos look better?

Posted by minxymears

On 2007-10-17 16:21:13, gola wrote:
is it just me or do those k810i photos look better?



i was thinking the same thing :-|

Posted by Ridahz
Hmmm i think the K850is look better bud but there not great photos by me

Posted by Pitzon
Have used the phone for 2 days now and im still amazed

The main thing is that the cam seems stabile. With my old K800 and my K810i there where about 2 pictures of 10 that went out nice but with my K850 almost every picture gets really nice. Thats nice to notice

And comparing them on the computer through my galleries i can really say that the cam works much better.

Im very happy, just wish the sun could come so i can go out and take some pictures

Posted by Arne Anka

On 2007-10-17 15:27:55, AbuBasim wrote:
Full size is important when printing the photos.


Depends on what size you are printing in. Here are some recomendations that can be found around on the net:

- To print on 4x6", 1MP is required for good quality and 2 MP for outstanding quality.

- To print on 5x7", 1.5 MP is required for good quality and 3.3 MP for outstanding quality.

- To print on 8x12" (which is smaller than A3), 3.8 MP is required for good quality and 5 MP for outstanding quality.

As one can see, a 3 MP cam is all most people need. Anything above 5 MP is just rediculous unless you are a professional IMO.




Posted by aledemo
please...i want see same picture with flash!!!!!
i want buy but before i need to see if the flash work for 3 meters...


Posted by max_wedge

On 2007-10-17 15:27:55, AbuBasim wrote:
Full size is important when printing the photos. If you have a photo you are really satisfied with and want to print it, to hang it on the wall in your living room, then which file would you print: the 800x600 scaled down image you posted at Esato, or the 2592x1944 full size? (Hint: 800x600 printed on A3 paper makes each pixel visible without using a magnifying glass.)

Plankgatan I'm sure doesn't care that WE can only print his pictures at 800x600, but he has the original so he doesn't have that limitation.

I have seen a few full-sized K850 pics that I'd be happy to print at A3, and many more that I'd happily print at 8x10. As far as printing in A3 goes, I've got many 5MP photos (from quality digicams) and never really felt the need to print anything larger than 8x10.

Posted by AbuBasim
David Pogue at NY Times posted a test here where he asked people on the street if they could see the difference between 5MP and 13MP when printed blown up to 16x24 inches. Interesting reading indeed.

I don't think the 5MP camera in the test was the K850i

Posted by dcuk
The only time more than 5-6 megapixels are needed is if the original photo composition wasn't very good and a user wants to crop the image a little to improve the picture without degrading it.

Here's a couple of macro shots from today (hope JoJo doesn't mind flies since (kinda) liked the rose!)





_________________
Hope this helps!
Cheers,
Dcuk


[ This Message was edited by: dcuk on 2007-10-21 03:35 ]

Posted by plankgatan

On 2007-10-17 16:05:58, aledemo wrote:
please Ridahz,you can post one or two photo with flash from 2 o 3 meters from the subject?
i want see the power of the flash..
please!


+3 meters is little to far for a small flash...(you need a real flash for that distance) IF YOU WANT REAL SHARPNESS. (otherwise it dosent mathers)

anyway....here is with flash

(for a small flash, its realy good...the light sensor doing a good job)
here is with ~2 meters,





Posted by jmcomms
If you want to double the quality from 5MP then you need to go up to 20MP (double X and Y), so we've got a way to go before the average person will see a major improvement. In the professional market, we're already there - but who needs to print such large images at home? (who CAN print such large images at home?!).

We need larger sensors so we can get noise-free images in low-light, we need optical zoom, we need better video recording.. All of these things will happen, but the inevitable updates to 6, 7, 8... megapixels that will happen next year are just to encourage people to keep upgrading for the most part.

Posted by rockerZ
@AbuBasim ,
The link you posted for NY times ,may i ask then that why are 10 MP Cameras more expensive then 5MP ones ?

I mean then what is the point of having a better megapixel if the Pictures are same ?

Posted by Arne Anka
@rockerZ

If you print on paper, there is no point to have more than 5 MP (or even 3 MP) for the sizes most people are printing pictures in. The human eye cannot distinguish more than 120 pixels per centimeter anyway (I guess that's why shrinked pictures look so good).


[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2007-10-17 20:12 ]

Posted by indup
basic/normal settings



macro




Posted by plankgatan
the first pic have good sharpness & colors...very good

_________________
I k850i, w810i & T28



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-10-17 21:10 ]

Posted by plankgatan
check this out...the power of Macro..k850





Posted by tk338
WOW

Posted by Sobo
haha,nice one...

Posted by Coquito
fantastic pictures plankgatan, you are a very good photographer and k850i have a really good cam

_________________


[ This Message was edited by: coquito on 2007-10-17 21:38 ]

Posted by gola
that's amazing,ima try it out with my w900i...*sighs*...


Posted by abbafan1972

On 2007-10-13 00:10:38, plankgatan wrote:

my daughters Cat.


_________________
k850i w810i T28


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2007-10-12 23:14 ]


Your daughters cat is like mine....

Here is a pic (not taken with K850i)





Posted by Pitzon
Small comparison of K850i and my old K810i

Same light conditions.


K810i


K850i

Think this could kill the discussion that the K850i doesent take better pics than K800/K810i

Posted by ghostfreak
omg, they're some great pictures!

Posted by indup
superb pics plankgatan,
k850i may be powerful but most of us dont know how to harness the power, unlike plankgatan.

nice pic pitzon.

[ This Message was edited by: indup on 2007-10-17 21:34 ]

Posted by abbafan1972
I agree, plankgatan takes some of the best pics I have ever seen.

Posted by tk338
WOW

Posted by p!xarus
Planks pics proves the BestPic power



[ This Message was edited by: p!xarus on 2007-10-17 21:51 ]

Posted by Coxy
Just a few macro test shots from what's around me. (who can notice the odity, it's a hard one!?)













Posted by hgautam
@plank

Your pics are always great but you really showed the best pics of best pic ever!!!

@Pitzon

The best K810 and K850 comparison... K850 does takes better pics than K810...

Posted by gola
lesson of the day:appreciate your camera phone like plankgatan has and it will appreciate you back by giving you amazing timeless shots...

Posted by indup
my lesson of the day:

there is a lot of room for improvement in my pics, god willing.

Posted by hgautam
@coxy

All those phones have the best cam, the only one missing is W900... He He...

Posted by *Jojo*
@plank - the FAUCET shots are - FANTASTIC (four) ! ! ! Were those taken in - BURST mode How I wish that you SET your date-stamp option to: ON when taking images . . . for the benefit of the DOUBT !

Posted by darrengf
JoJo on the K850i, there is no date stamp. Its a option Se didnt add.

Posted by DarkKrypt
HAHAH i love these two shots the most the yellow cup is got a shocked face like its scene the most amazing cmera phone




a and nice comparison of your car with the k810and k850

_________________
aKa Chiller


[ This Message was edited by: DarkKrypt on 2007-10-18 00:25 ]

Posted by razec
What camera phone burst mode can make such a fast shooting as fast and as powerful as BestPic? it's none other than the cybershots only.

Posted by *Jojo*
Ohhhhhh, so it's 's BestPic and not BURST, sorry . . . got used with Canon-digicam's: BURST-feature !

Posted by proximo
hey quick question my photos are coming out a little rubbish plz give me a quick run down on the settings

ISO 100 Low Light or in High Light conditions?

Posted by razec

On 2007-10-18 02:08:50, *Jojo* wrote:
Ohhhhhh, so it's 's BestPic and not BURST, sorry . . . got used with Canon-digicam's: BURST-feature !




even canon digicams can't match the 100 milisecond frame shooting spped of BestPpic imho

Plagkatan: can you do us another wonderful pic using BestPic? try shooting at stopwatch's millisecond digits and i'm sure many people will be amazed

_________________
"Whatever you do today determines what you will be in future, nothing is difficult if you do your part"


[ This Message was edited by: razec on 2007-10-18 01:25 ]

Posted by *Jojo*
@razec - H m m m m . . . I don't think that I will AGREE with that ! BURST-feature of a digicam versus 's BESTpic-feature

Maybe: max wedge can expound further on this

Posted by razec

On 2007-10-18 02:32:17, *Jojo* wrote:

Maybe: max wedge can expound further on this



AGree with that, Waiting for our IT expert's response

Posted by AntonioX
my first ever picture posted on esato with my new se k850




Posted by razec
Macro shots of K850 are well detailed. as shown by the furs of this little cuttie cat.

It reminds me of GSMArena's W800 review when they have shoot the cat while sleeping

http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_w800-review-47p2.php

Posted by digdub
the best part about SE cybershot camera phones is the best pic function, which is like a burst mode. hope they can introduce long exposure mode for low light situations so that the camera do not have to resort to high iso which ruins the pics.


Pages:
Previous  123 ... 678 ... 979899  Next
Click to view updated thread with images


© Esato.com - From the Esato mobile phone discussion forum