Welcome to Esato.com


Pages:
Previous  123 ... 474849 ... 979899  Next

News Articles:

Related

Technical details:
• Ericsson R380
• Ericsson R520
• Ericsson R600
• Ericsson T29s
• Ericsson T39
• Ericsson T60d
• Sony Xperia A
• Sony Xperia Acro S
• Sony Xperia Advance
• Sony Xperia C
• Sony Xperia E
• Sony Xperia E Dual
• Sony Xperia E1
• Sony Xperia E1 Dual
• Sony Xperia Ion LT28at
• Sony Xperia J
• Sony Xperia L
• Sony Xperia M2
• Sony Xperia Miro
• Sony Xperia Neo L
• Sony Xperia P
• Sony Xperia S
• Sony Xperia SL
• Sony Xperia Sola
• Sony Xperia SP
• Sony Xperia SX
• Sony Xperia T
• Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
• Sony Xperia Tipo
• Sony Xperia Tipo Dual
• Sony Xperia TL
• Sony Xperia TX
• Sony Xperia U
• Sony Xperia V
• Sony Xperia VL
• Sony Xperia Z
• Sony Xperia Z Ultra
• Sony Xperia Z1
• Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
• Sony Xperia Z2
• Sony Xperia ZL
• Sony Xperia ZQ
• Sony Xperia ZR
• Sony Ericsson K850

Wallpapers:

post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850


Click to view updated thread with images




Posted by lun4r
so i guess the best settings for outdoor will be the document + daylight with (-) EV..

any advice on the settings to take indoor pics?
coz every time i took indoor pics, the result suckz...especially in low lite condition w/o flash..


Posted by JiSm
Dunno if anyone has noticed but T650 photos with clouds and sky, actually have clouds and sky. Me (and from what I can tell, most others) with my K850 very seldom get sky rendered like the T650. Makes me sad really. :'(

Posted by e_erzan
First pic by R1EA031,the rest by R1CA037
First pic,twilight landscape setting,the rest full AUTO




_________________
K850i(R1EA031)2GB Kingston MicroSD
Sony Ericsson Camera phones evolutions for me=>S700i(1.3m)=>K750i(2.0m)=>K800i(3.2m)=>Present K850i(5.0m)
Camera phone will never replace a camera,but at least i carry lesser things with me coz i have my K850i..

[ This Message was edited by: e_erzan on 2008-02-26 03:23 ]

Posted by vojta66
s.h.o.p.p.i.n.g.



waiting for.....



Posted by plankgatan
so i installed R1EA031....havnt tried so much yet

flash, macro


http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/1305/dsc01318hy1.jpg


cloudy (rain)





_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-02-26 13:22 ]

Posted by haki
Taken a while ago at the outscirts of my hometown in northern Greece. Temperature today is a sick 19 degrees! We used to have 50cm of snow at this time of the year! Beware...DOOMSDAY is coming!



Posted by plankgatan
so far so good

i LoVe cloudy profile...gives such a good colors

auto + cloudy

document + cloudy

auto + cloudy


Posted by Duran
ah man if it goes on like this we need to use different settings for different colours..

Posted by Residentevil
very nice

Posted by darknoob

@plankgatan can you post the original pictures of the auto and documents .

I want to see the different.

Thanks



[ This Message was edited by: darknoob on 2008-02-26 16:26 ]

Posted by Vipera ammodytes

On 2008-02-26 03:43:51, JiSm wrote:
Dunno if anyone has noticed but T650 photos with clouds and sky, actually have clouds and sky. Me (and from what I can tell, most others) with my K850 very seldom get sky rendered like the T650. Makes me sad really. :'(



true....

Posted by Duran



Posted by Duran

On 2008-02-26 03:43:51, JiSm wrote:
Dunno if anyone has noticed but T650 photos with clouds and sky, actually have clouds and sky. Me (and from what I can tell, most others) with my K850 very seldom get sky rendered like the T650. Makes me sad really. :'(



Quote:
Clipped highlights or shadows are bad, as you have lost the data in those areas and can't get it back. Ever taken a shot and had a completely white sky? Thats a good example of a clipped highlight (unless of course it really was a blanket of pure-white clouds that day!)

Some scenes which go from deep shadows to bright highlights present a problem for cameras. Your camera will be unable to capture all the information in the scene (known as the dynamic range), due to limitations of the cameras sensor.

[ This Message was edited by: Duran on 2008-02-26 17:45 ]

Posted by davidsic




Posted by Radiux399

On 2008-02-25 14:26:19, -PERFECT- wrote:

On 2008-02-25 11:47:18, number1 wrote:
the t650 & k770 take better photos because the of the software, the t650 & k770 have no whitebalance which means clearer better coloured pictures also the t650 & k770i's pics aren't post-processed to hell, like with the k850 & k800


Nice pics with T650, and nice colors, but resized 1024x768 with 500.000/700.000 byte??? The original size how much was it? I should like to see an original one to compare the colors...




These pics were uploaded onto Flickr, so I have no idea how Flickr's server's resize the image and what kind of compression they use. The original 3MP images are around 600-800kb depending on the amount of detail in the shot.
I'll try to find the full sized shots for you.

Posted by shanespencer


Posted by Duran
omg its freddie

Posted by plankgatan
latest FW (031)...i feel the indoor have become sharper/better....

medium strong indoor light;






_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-02-26 21:47 ]

Posted by davidsic
Inside a Fiat Bravo





Posted by lun4r

On 2008-02-26 03:29:56, lun4r wrote:
so i guess the best settings for outdoor will be the document + daylight with (-) EV..

any advice on the settings to take indoor pics?
coz every time i took indoor pics, the result suckz...especially in low lite condition w/o flash..



advice anyone...?
i hate my indoor pics, it's like taken with a poor VGA camera with wrong colors adn noise everywhere

Posted by Radiux399

On 2008-02-25 14:26:19, -PERFECT- wrote:

On 2008-02-25 11:47:18, number1 wrote:
the t650 & k770 take better photos because the of the software, the t650 & k770 have no whitebalance which means clearer better coloured pictures also the t650 & k770i's pics aren't post-processed to hell, like with the k850 & k800


Nice pics with T650, and nice colors, but resized 1024x768 with 500.000/700.000 byte??? The original size how much was it? I should like to see an original one to compare the colors...




Alright, here are the full sized originals that you requested. Just click on the links:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3152/2290049416_9c9dcea43b_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2371/2051366179_d2d91b18b1_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2378/2052150796_6eb834013d_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2029/2051365699_b6aa62615e_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2057/2051364661_c2ac908dea_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2214/2052148438_f437495820_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3050/2289258711_085c89993a_o.jpg

Posted by plankgatan
but why post it here at the k850 thread ??????

Posted by daviep
taken with k800,all settings auto.

taken with k850,all settings auto.


Posted by Vipera ammodytes

On 2008-02-27 05:16:42, Radiux399 wrote:

On 2008-02-25 14:26:19, -PERFECT- wrote:

On 2008-02-25 11:47:18, number1 wrote:
the t650 & k770 take better photos because the of the software, the t650 & k770 have no whitebalance which means clearer better coloured pictures also the t650 & k770i's pics aren't post-processed to hell, like with the k850 & k800


Nice pics with T650, and nice colors, but resized 1024x768 with 500.000/700.000 byte??? The original size how much was it? I should like to see an original one to compare the colors...




Alright, here are the full sized originals that you requested. Just click on the links:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3152/2290049416_9c9dcea43b_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2371/2051366179_d2d91b18b1_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2378/2052150796_6eb834013d_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2029/2051365699_b6aa62615e_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2057/2051364661_c2ac908dea_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2214/2052148438_f437495820_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3050/2289258711_085c89993a_o.jpg



AWESOME quality by T650

Posted by -PERFECT-
Thanks radiux, ok...better colors (i dont know wich camdriver used), i think if change with k850 one or two notch in color balance (photodj) the colors are similar, but obviously not the details.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
By pperfectt, shot with K850i at 2008-02-27


Posted by Duran
OMG i just made a very sharp macro shot O_O
k850i

Red is still pinkish...
k850i

Random picture
k850i

Macro
k850i

Tree, edit: see how the tree is sharp but the stuff to the right is out of focus? i have this very often with the k850....
k850i

Bye


[ This Message was edited by: Duran on 2008-02-27 18:07 ]


Posted by Robot
ok here is few shots from my K850,
















here is a album by K850:

Posted by DarKMaGiCiaN
@ Duran
How did you manage to go get this shap pic
I like the Keys one^_^

by the way
for the tree Pic I think you have to clean the lens ^_^


Posted by davidsic


Posted by Duran

On 2008-02-27 19:34:04, DarKMaGiCiaN wrote:
@ Duran
How did you manage to go get this shap pic
I like the Keys one^_^

by the way
for the tree Pic I think you have to clean the lens ^_^


Dont know^^
Lens was clean..

Posted by daviep
paisley abbey


Posted by fullforce
Well how about this car!? Fits in yor pocket!




A bit discusting i know but i had to show you:

So- what symbol in star wars does this look like?



[ This Message was edited by: fullforce on 2008-02-27 20:03 ]

Posted by Duran
An anchor

Posted by plankgatan
i think quite many need to learn how to adjust the white balance.

k850 manage good color saturation if you learn to adjust whitness in a proper way.

everything is about catching the right light. morning light is allways best, (have warmest beams...evening is also ok)

http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/8671/dsc00391kq9.jpg


http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/1962/dsc00383kh9.jpg

_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-02-27 20:26 ]

Posted by fullforce

On 2008-02-27 21:14:10, Duran wrote:
An anchor


Yes it looks like an acnor but, i mean witch symbol for who? Seen in star wars 5,6 and 7 i think.

Posted by Duran

On 2008-02-27 21:17:54, plankgatan wrote:
i think quite many need to learn how to adjust the white balance.

k850 manage good color saturation if you learn to adjust whitness in a proper way.

everything is about catching the right light. morning light is allways best, (have warmest beams...evening is also ok)


you're saying that you could make my pink trafficsign into red without using photoshop etc -.-?

Posted by Luci'sPower






Posted by plankgatan

On 2008-02-27 21:37:19, Duran wrote:

On 2008-02-27 21:17:54, plankgatan wrote:
i think quite many need to learn how to adjust the white balance.

k850 manage good color saturation if you learn to adjust whitness in a proper way.

everything is about catching the right light. morning light is allways best, (have warmest beams...evening is also ok)


you're saying that you could make my pink trafficsign into red without using photoshop etc -.-?


about the pink color i dont know...my pink color vanish after i installed 037....see for yourself

im speaking more about "bleached" pictures....there we can improve our pictures a lot.

_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-02-27 21:57 ]

Posted by Luci'sPower





Posted by davidsic




Posted by jot
So what settings is everyone using for indoor pics? The ones I've been taking turn out awfully grainy and blurry when I view them at the full 5MP res.. they look pretty good scaled down, but you know.

Posted by dentoters07

On 2008-02-27 04:04:32, lun4r wrote:

On 2008-02-26 03:29:56, lun4r wrote:
so i guess the best settings for outdoor will be the document + daylight with (-) EV..

any advice on the settings to take indoor pics?
coz every time i took indoor pics, the result suckz...especially in low lite condition w/o flash..



advice anyone...?
i hate my indoor pics, it's like taken with a poor VGA camera with wrong colors adn noise everywhere



http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=157734&start=0

Posted by DarKMaGiCiaN

On 2008-02-27 21:37:19, Duran wrote:

On 2008-02-27 21:17:54, plankgatan wrote:
i think quite many need to learn how to adjust the white balance.

k850 manage good color saturation if you learn to adjust whitness in a proper way.

everything is about catching the right light. morning light is allways best, (have warmest beams...evening is also ok)


you're saying that you could make my pink trafficsign into red without using photoshop etc -.-?

I have the answer for this ^_^

see this

Auto :



EV : -0.3
Withe balance : Day light
ISO: 100

the result




[ This Message was edited by: DarKMaGiCiaN on 2008-02-28 06:08 ]

Posted by Duran
I used daylight already..so its about the ISO100? Mine was ISO-64 looking at the exif data..
-0.3 on landscape picture wont do good i think


Posted by Luci'sPower
well i use twilight portrait for more vivid color and from -0,3/+0,3 EV

Posted by plankgatan
sharpness


http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/1483/dsc01468an7.jpg



http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/1333/dsc01467qp8.jpg

spacey



_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-02-28 12:04 ]

Posted by DarKMaGiCiaN
@Duran
that was just an example
there is a simple mistake in the camera driver code (( I hope otherwise it is a hardware problem!! ))

it gives us light vivid color ( over exposuer pics ) so we have to warm it by making the pic dark (EV) or changing is ISO to 100 in indoor shots




Posted by Luci'sPower




Posted by fullforce
Well here's some shot taken with the new firmware earlier today:

Yes we have pyramids i Sweden to I went inside this one that is a combined resturant and green house shop.


And took theese shots:

Almost perfect sharpness but not quite. I wish it would be a bit easier to get those supersharp shots.


This is a small type of rose and it is actually a bit between red and pinkred in real life. So this rose-shot is just a tad too "pinkish". Also not quite that sharp that i would like.



Her we have two shots with a little fiddling with daylight profile (i think) and EV.


The darker one is quite nice but i should have kept the EV-setting somewhere in between the two shots and the it would be nicely balanced!

Theese two are not so sharps but shows that the cam handles the colours nicely in most cases.



I love cactus!!



This one is a bit more blueish in real life but turned out okey. I had a little bit of tricky light here.


I think everything is on auto here. Anyhow here we can see how the camera treats a broader spectra of colours in one motif. Off course it's not easy to get the whiter flowers not too white/overexposed since there is a whole bunch of other colours in the motifes to consider. And hey, it's just a phone-camera!


This one is the best shot from me today. Maybe it's easier to ger orange colored motifes good?

Actually this one looks better in a bit bigger size than esato permits.








[ This Message was edited by: fullforce on 2008-02-28 15:59 ]

Posted by plankgatan

full size
http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/2576/dsc01647bb7.jpg


Pages:
Previous  123 ... 474849 ... 979899  Next
Click to view updated thread with images


© Esato.com - From the Esato mobile phone discussion forum