Posted by DonJuan
i know, thats what i was thinking, you can see real bad fringing on mine, its weird.
For the palm tree one i used auto mode, no flash. daylight white setting. Because at the time it was kind of bright where i was.
On the old firmware i got shots like this with my K850......
now i just cant seem to get a nice low light shot. For me this is one of the reasons my next camera phone will not be a SE, im so tired of adjusting a million settings just to get the right pic. Its not even lik eits that easy either. Mine is always laggy and its really annoying.
[ This Message was edited by: DonJuan on 2008-01-18 03:48 ]
Posted by kenoby
I agree with you on that. I might wait for the infamous forthcoming fw to bring my decision. I don't know why it is so blurry. Mine, with just a bit of playing, gets quite good photos.
Posted by fullforce
@DonJuan
Was your old firmware the -29 you mean? I will wait and see what this new firmware can do and if it doesn't rectify the java bug, and/or if it makes my music player worse in any aspect or if it makes my battery last less time, i will demand that they roll back my phone to the -29 firmware OR maybe just give me my money back because then i can really say that this is a faulty product. The -29 firmware worked okay on my phone...but barely okey. Would have liked them to trim the camera so that you, as you said, can take shots without fiddeling with the settings quite that much. If they refuse to roll back the firmware and the new firmware sucks...i might just demand my money back. But in theory, and hopefully in real life, this phone has everything i want at least for the whole of 2008. I was so happy when i read about this K850 that had what is was searching for: A good camera AND a walkman player!
SE: This will not do at all! GET YOUR S**T TOGHTER NOW!
This new firmware HAS to be a good one!
A lit three
[ This Message was edited by: fullforce on 2008-01-18 04:34 ]
Posted by DonJuan
yeah my old firmware was 029
you got a good shot there cus thats a hard shot especially not getting a light trail from the lights.
Here is a shot of my house here in vegas...
i think it could be so much better with the old firmware though
[ This Message was edited by: DonJuan on 2008-01-18 06:12 ]
Posted by firdauz
Posted by plankgatan
he he he..i dont know what you have done...but both pics looks quite bad
donjuan..is it your own house or your parents ?????
(what are you working with ??? )
_________________
I
K850, 
W810 & 
T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-18 16:27 ]
Posted by firdauz
hehe, Nah .. they are not taken from a k850i definitely
Posted by maurlene
Full size
Full size
full size
Full size
Posted by milenko11
Hey guys,
I'm going to a car show next week and i was wondering what settings will give me the best results? Fluorescent? I've tried this before and I don't really like the pictures it gives me. Any tips?
Posted by Rookwise
Zoomed in a little
Posted by DonJuan
On 2008-01-18 17:25:30, plankgatan wrote:
he he he..i dont know what you have done...but both pics looks quite bad
donjuan..is it your own house or your parents ?????
(what are you working with ??? )
_________________
I
K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-18 16:27 ]
its my house, me and my wifes.
i work for Chanel
as for the cars at the car show question, i would put the white balance on incadescent, however you spell it
Posted by paul-d
Indoors, the 1st pic with the flash.
The 2nd pic without the flash
Posted by puestadelsol
I have my K850 since Cristmas. There are some things what I don't like in the phone. It collects fingerprints really easy, so I have to clean the camera glass before almost any shot. The phone is crackling in my hand when I write a message, but I can say, I get used to it -if anybody can get used to something like this.
I can say untill now I don't like its pictures. I change the profiles, so mostly I could manage the colours. The main thing what I don't like in the pictures the lack of details. So -I dont know, but-I think in the ratio of it's resolution even my sisters W580 can produce these details and sharpness too. And my K750 can make much better pictures. With some more noise, but with a software (Noiseware for example) you can remove it, and after that I like much more the k750's pictures than the k850's.
Just here is an example.
A picture with the K850 (with twilight portrait profile)
And here is one with the K750. Just check the hair of the girl from the right side. I know that in the k750's picture are more niose, but more details too. So I think in this picture you can see the details too. The K850's picture is too "plain" in my opinion, and if you chek the details, -even with 3MP resolution- it looks like you were applied an explosion filter or frosted glass effect.
I don't know is due to the phisical size o the senzor, that it is too small, or the fault of the software. In this moment I'm waiting for a major camera software upgrade. I regreted that I decided to buy it, I could have wait a better phone (with cca. 3-5Mp camera, not more), but I have to stay with this for at least a year or 1,5.
Posted by ryanchg
Posted by davidsic
Posted by puestadelsol
Generally -and mostly when I watch my pictures at low resolution (for example at 600x800)- I can make good shots too.
Just take a look at this picture (document mode):
But look the details too! I cut a part in 100% from the original photo. I know this part is out of focus, but it should be blurry, or something like that, not to look as you applied a frosted glass effect...
Posted by fullforce
@puestadelsol
It loooks, on the earlier two fotos, that you are doing something wrong with the settings or don't hold the camera still(witch is a absolute must at least for now) or that you have a faulty camera. If you look in this thread there are plenty af pics that are taken in simular circumstanses that are really good.
Posted by ryanchg
More macro shots..
Posted by DonJuan
i rented this the other day for my bday, it was a lot of fun
Posted by davidsic
Posted by vojta66
Finally, I think we are getting better with my friend/foe K850i camera
Posted by daviep
cat snoozing
Posted by ryanchg
had not much light source to snap this hence much noise.. zzz i hate noise!
where i had my supper~
Posted by paul-d
Posted by DonJuan
i always find now with the new software that this phone has soooo much npise on indoor low light shots. Its really bad imo
Posted by himlims_nl
Still looking for a phone to use on a sunday
Posted by -PERFECT-
By pperfectt, shot with K850i at 2008-01-24
Posted by plankgatan
http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/3483/dsc00193gj3.jpg
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/2610/dsc00210od1.jpg
Posted by plankgatan
I
k850
no photo dj, no color editing......pure k850 picture
_________________
I
K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-24 13:24 ]
Posted by -PERFECT-
Nice pics plank, for this outdoor have you used document mode?
Posted by plankgatan
my daughter drop her first tooth today...he he
super sharpness k850......(N82 whats that, can you eat it..he he)
http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/8567/dsc00220qm6.jpg
_________________
I
K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-24 21:32 ]
Posted by heins
This is for PLANKGATAN, and other scandinavian cameraphone users that understand Norwegian
http://www.nettavisen.no/it/article1555974.ece
Posted by plankgatan
N82 cant produce indoor pics like this...k850 have so good Details & sharpness...im satisfield
http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/8567/dsc00220qm6.jpg
even outdoor pics looks realy ok
http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/7424/dsc00210la3.jpg
_________________
I
K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-24 18:28 ]
Posted by ryanchg
shot taken with little sunlight
at the mall~
Posted by rickster2kuk
@ Plankatan
What setting was the brick building shot on, I looked at the full size photo and the quality is stunning. Are you using document mode and "cloudy setting"?
Posted by plankgatan
yeh, i know...that outdoor pic rules...
its shoot with the sun around the corner of the street, thats why the camera dosent get to much light (bleached colors, etc)..thats the whole trick you know, (you can use which settings you want nearly, the light is the most important "setting").
http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/7424/dsc00210la3.jpg
--------------------------------------------------
@Vipera, what ?? dont you have some negative to say suddenley...he he
-------------------------------------------------------------
_________________
I
K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-24 21:22 ]
Posted by -PERFECT-
The setting for plank’ s outdoor pic is certainly document mode, as GERBAN has teache in previous posts (pag.114)…right plank?
Posted by ryanchg
indoor and outdoor pictures
Posted by himlims_nl
yet another try
//edit
taken with K850 indoor iso 200
_________________
[T65/T68/T610/T630/W810/K610/K700/K750/P800/P910/P990] - [ Esato Knowledge database ]
sorry for my poor english, i paid too much attention to girl
[ This Message was edited by: himlims_nl on 2008-01-25 02:42 ]
Posted by DonJuan
here are a few.....
if anyone likes using photoshop and you find that your pic is a bit washed out, trying using the curves function it really helps
was bored at work today so took some pics outside
had to take a pics of these for someone at work today
Posted by -PERFECT-
By pperfectt, shot with K850i at 2008-01-25
Posted by JaffaTB
well i sent my 07w40 back to o2 and they sent back a 07w41 in return and i must say the camera is a LOT better on the newer one, maybe the first builds have crap cameras?
Posted by Rookwise
Somebody Killed Kenny
Posted by fullforce
@Rookwise
hehe!
Here's my exclusive and very beautyful contribution for this evening: Tadaa! My new dishwasher!!! And can't understand how i could live without it!
(yes i'm a guy)
(Poor light and i didn't use flash due to all the white colours in the motif, that's why the quality of the shot sucks)
[ This Message was edited by: fullforce on 2008-01-26 02:26 ]
Posted by plankgatan
same building, different angle
great quality..(its so strange, i feel its little sharper when i look at the pic in full size)
http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/1438/dsc00211dy4.jpg
_________________
I
K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-26 02:36 ]
Posted by toxicredcat
Posted by -PERFECT-
By pperfectt, shot with K850i at 2008-01-26
By pperfectt, shot with K850i at 2008-01-26
Posted by plankgatan
nice pic perfect....which settings did you
Posted by EddieAdams
On 2008-01-18 16:44:50, firdauz wrote:
Haven't been here for a bit of time, but this shit had me laughing.
No one gave you any credit either. Plank even commented on how bad the pictures were. Good stuff.
Posted by plankgatan
great quality k850...directley from the phone...(N82 whats that..... k850 kicks ass
sharpness full size:
http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/8671/dsc00391kq9.jpg
http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/1962/dsc00383kh9.jpg
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/2411/dsc00388ep8.jpg
_________________
I
K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-27 09:56 ]