Welcome to Esato.com


Pages:
Previous  123 ... 353637 ... 979899  Next

News Articles:

Related

Technical details:
• Ericsson R380
• Ericsson R520
• Ericsson R600
• Ericsson T29s
• Ericsson T39
• Ericsson T60d
• Sony Xperia A
• Sony Xperia Acro S
• Sony Xperia Advance
• Sony Xperia C
• Sony Xperia E
• Sony Xperia E Dual
• Sony Xperia E1
• Sony Xperia E1 Dual
• Sony Xperia Ion LT28at
• Sony Xperia J
• Sony Xperia L
• Sony Xperia M2
• Sony Xperia Miro
• Sony Xperia Neo L
• Sony Xperia P
• Sony Xperia S
• Sony Xperia SL
• Sony Xperia Sola
• Sony Xperia SP
• Sony Xperia SX
• Sony Xperia T
• Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
• Sony Xperia Tipo
• Sony Xperia Tipo Dual
• Sony Xperia TL
• Sony Xperia TX
• Sony Xperia U
• Sony Xperia V
• Sony Xperia VL
• Sony Xperia Z
• Sony Xperia Z Ultra
• Sony Xperia Z1
• Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
• Sony Xperia Z2
• Sony Xperia ZL
• Sony Xperia ZQ
• Sony Xperia ZR
• Sony Ericsson K850

Wallpapers:

post pictures taken with your: sony ericsson K850


Click to view updated thread with images




Posted by n4d3r

On 2008-01-02 14:50:38, plankgatan wrote:
k850..old firmware 029





I kind of find it hard to believe that this picture was taken with k850i. sorry. Unless you took his picture while holding the phone upside down then rotating the image later on,,, there is no way you can produce the shadow of the flash on the right side of the cat. With k850's the close up pictures that are taken with flash should produce a shadow on the left side of the object since the flash is located on the right of the camera lens.

Unless there was a stronger source of light than the camera flash shining at a different angle, i have to call this picture a fake. Sorry

Here is an example of what im talking about. you can check other pictures too posted by many users on this forum, they all follow...
this is how it should turn out with k850


[ This Message was edited by: n4d3r on 2008-01-03 16:59 ]

[ This Message was edited by: n4d3r on 2008-01-03 17:02 ]


Posted by ronasanz
I think plangkatan is correct. Learn to set the camera to the environment.

Posted by Rookwise




Posted by Ridahz
Heres a short video taken on my K850i a few months ago, uploaded to youtube a min ago

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4hDkgDDSVw

My dads supra

Posted by mauasca











Posted by holeinone




Posted by DonJuan
guys when you have took your pic, go to camera album then choose a pic then go to options then click on photofix, a few of the pics here look like they need some contrast. once the k850 has finished just save the pic and upload both pics onto your comp, youll see the difference that small thing can do to your pics. Its kinda like auto level on photoshop

here is my cat



document setting, daylight white balance and exposure down to -0.7

Posted by plankgatan

On 2008-01-03 17:56:37, n4d3r wrote:

On 2008-01-02 14:50:38, plankgatan wrote:
k850..old firmware 029





I kind of find it hard to believe that this picture was taken with k850i. sorry. Unless you took his picture while holding the phone upside down then rotating the image later on,,, there is no way you can produce the shadow of the flash on the right side of the cat. With k850's the close up pictures that are taken with flash should produce a shadow on the left side of the object since the flash is located on the right of the camera lens.

Unless there was a stronger source of light than the camera flash shining at a different angle, i have to call this picture a fake. Sorry


[ This Message was edited by: n4d3r on 2008-01-03 16:59 ]

[ This Message was edited by: n4d3r on 2008-01-03 17:02 ]


WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT ???????????????

OF COURSE ITS TAKEN WITH MY K850...I TOOK THIS PIC NEARLY UPPSIDE DOWN...THE CAT WAS LAYING IN THE BED AND WAS PLAYING AROUND, I JUST TOOK A FLASH PIC..AND VOILA.

_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-03 23:09 ]

Posted by DonJuan
I believe its a k850 pic. I dont see why he would lie anyway. There might have been better light but who cares if there was. Its a good pic and thats all it comes down to

Posted by plankgatan
im stunned.......check this sharpness...(looks nearly better in full size

indoor...no flash...no photo dj...no color editing...no auto level

EV +0.3


http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/972/dsc07767nj5.jpg


EV +0.7


http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/8771/dsc07766yw4.jpg

EV 0.0


http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/7284/dsc07760fz6.jpg

_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-03 23:40 ]

Posted by Mizzle

On 2008-01-04 00:36:24, plankgatan wrote:
im stunned.......check this sharpness...


Honestly, the two first pictures are not good. Best seen in the background and around the edges of things.

Third one is above average

_________________
I'm an expert

The Unofficial Sony Ericsson Blog | FORUM
Best dedicated blog ever!

[ This Message was edited by: Mizzle on 2008-01-03 23:44 ]

Posted by plankgatan
eeehhhhh..its a ordinary camera...and a small ordinary camera CANT make the background sharp....you need a system camera for that job..

when you focus on a object with a ordinary cam, IT MAKE THE OBJECT SHARP...NOT THE BACKGROUND...

i think this low light indoor-pics are awesome for a cell phone...

EV +0.3


http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/972/dsc07767nj5.jpg


EV +0.7


http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/8771/dsc07766yw4.jpg

EV 0.0


http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/7284/dsc07760fz6.jpg

_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-03 23:52 ]

Posted by Coquito

On 2008-01-03 14:45:46, vojta66 wrote:
So.....K850i......finally....could not resist the temptation.....another one.....
First random pictures.....




Another ones from my office window...






i remember this pictures from the k750 pictures thread

and p1 Pictures thread

k750 is only 2mpx and the pictures are better


Posted by plankgatan
k850 can produce good pics to...but its camera is realy sensitive, thats why you need to use the profiles properley

found some nice ones




http://img148.imageshack.us/i[....]4/2150007780409f120d04oth0.jpg



_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-04 01:35 ]

Posted by Mizzle

On 2008-01-04 00:44:30, plankgatan wrote:
eeehhhhh..its a ordinary camera...and a small ordinary camera CANT make the background sharp....you need a system camera for that job..

when you focus on a object with a ordinary cam, IT MAKE THE OBJECT SHARP...NOT THE BACKGROUND...


You do know that celluar phone cameras can't make use of their focusing abilities on items further away than a few meters, right? Then you should know that both the foreground and background should be equally sharp on those pictures.

And one more thing, most system cameras are capable of doing this, so they'd focus on the foreground and blur out the background - even if the object is several metres away. Exact opposite of what you're saying.


(and why were you posting the same pictures again )

Posted by plankgatan
why are you complaining ?????

dont you have some pics from your own cell phone to show...

and yes..i think this indoor pics are realy good..actually one of the best indoor pics ive taken with my k850.

replay...for the third time:

EV +0.3


http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/972/dsc07767nj5.jpg


EV +0.7


http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/8771/dsc07766yw4.jpg


_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-04 01:39 ]

Posted by Mizzle
OK, now you've gone over the top with these pictures. Dude, you've just posted three of the exact same pictures and links THREE times! (edit: OK, you've removed one of them from your last post)

And I'm not complaining, merely correcting you and commenting on the quality of those "really good" shots. K850's camera is not bad, but I had expected more.

_________________
I'm an expert

The Unofficial Sony Ericsson Blog | FORUM
Best dedicated blog ever!

[ This Message was edited by: Mizzle on 2008-01-04 01:41 ]

Posted by DonJuan
Lol at plank. He sure does support his k850. This phone struggles in low light conditions when taking pictures of ppl. I was looking at some pic's i took when my friends had came out and the quality of our skin was really bad. It looked like we all had make up on. I'll post them so you can see what i mean. I dont think the camera is amazing tho. I take a lot of pictures with it and they look really bad. So much noise. But as a camera phone it'll do

Posted by davidsic
Try documents scene and decrease the exposure a bit in daylight, for many shots it work well

Posted by AbuBasim

On 2008-01-04 02:37:00, plankgatan wrote:
why are you complaining ?????

dont you have some pics from your own cell phone to show...

and yes..i think this indoor pics are realy good..actually one of the best indoor pics ive taken with my k850.

replay...for the third time:

EV +0.3


http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/972/dsc07767nj5.jpg


EV +0.7


http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/8771/dsc07766yw4.jpg


_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-04 01:39 ]

@plankgatan,

I was confused why the second photo with EV +0.7 is darker than the first with EV +0.3. With a higher EV the second should be brighter. But I downloaded your photos and checked. The EV is actually negative.


Posted by plankgatan

On 2008-01-04 08:25:27, AbuBasim wrote:

On 2008-01-04 02:37:00, plankgatan wrote:
why are you complaining ?????

dont you have some pics from your own cell phone to show...

and yes..i think this indoor pics are realy good..actually one of the best indoor pics ive taken with my k850.

replay...for the third time:

EV +0.3


http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/972/dsc07767nj5.jpg


EV +0.7


http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/8771/dsc07766yw4.jpg


_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-04 01:39 ]

@plankgatan,

I was confused why the second photo with EV +0.7 is darker than the first with EV +0.3. With a higher EV the second should be brighter. But I downloaded your photos and checked. The EV is actually negative.




he he..i of course mean the opposite...(i wrote wrong data..i mean -0.3 & -0.7)

_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-04 09:46 ]

Posted by yaniv84
plankgatan

in my opinion the quality of this 2 pic is very pitiable
i mean the pictures looks like they with digital zoom with tons of noise
all arround not talking on the washed colors.
face it the K850 camera quality SUCKS!!!!

Posted by DCUK7
Yikes! That second one is pretty bad, but on occasion it manages to take ok indoor pics (although my S700i still owns the K850i in general quality). I do feel that the phone isn't really worthy of the Cyber-shot branding.

Feature-wise, good camera but lacking in final quality.

Posted by vojta66
Just upgraded to R1DA038 and here we go: (comapre it with the previously posted same picture before upgrade...) it is my fault like a very bad photographer....still learning how to squeeze the best pics out of k850....


Also here is another one pic taken in total darkness in my room....also before fw upgrade.... no settings
By the way, do you have stabilization of picture off or on? Dafault is off.....






[ This Message was edited by: vojta66 on 2008-01-04 11:51 ]

Posted by franique


thoroughly, i think the camera performance is moderate. Same goes to Samsung's line ups.

Posted by Fredricx
Stop re-post the same pic. !
The last 2 pages here the same pictures is shown 5 times !!!!


Posted by vojta66
objects are the same, in my contributions, but taken with different firmware of k850 (for comparsion). but will not post any more in my life this office view again...promise!

Posted by Fredricx
@vojta66
I was not aiming at your posts....

the ppl here that has to quote previous posts ( with the pics ) everytime they say something...

... or is it just me that find that annoying ?

Posted by franique




[ This Message was edited by: franique on 2008-01-04 17:24 ]

Posted by sadeghi85
@Mizzle:

K850 aperture is f/2.8 and is fixed so has a shallow depth of field.


@Fredricx:

I agree that's annoying.

[ This Message was edited by: sadeghi85 on 2008-01-04 17:46 ]

Posted by sadeghi85
This level of noise at ISO125 is strange, but again NoiseWare helped:










Posted by plankgatan




Posted by AbuBasim

On 2008-01-04 20:20:55, sadeghi85 wrote:
This level of noise at ISO125 is strange, . . . [snip!]

Actually not! With the tiny lenses you have on most camera phones you can't expect much more than this. Even with the i-mobile 902 with it's 1/2.5" CCD digicam sensor, you get lots of noise if you chose ISO 100 or more. The 902's ISO 50 is a real lifesaver and gives almost noise free photos, but on the other hand slows down the shutter speeds so much that it makes shooting hand-held impossible anywhere except outdoors with clear sunny skies.

Posted by Laxen
Question: Can anyone tell me how to get sharp pictures when using bestpic? I tried to take a picture on a moving drop but its just dont sharp. I tried to do what plankis did on the picture on the drop, can somebody tell me how to do that?

Sorry for my bad English, I'm from sweden

Posted by plankgatan
to create a pic like this , use macro + flash.
http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/3371/dsc00567vx2.jpg


here you have awesome bestpic k850





found some nice old k850 pics i took some months ago with great colors






_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)

[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-04 23:40 ]

Posted by carkitter
Nice pics as usual Plankgatan

@franique
Loved those b&w's! Post some more!

Posted by DonJuan
Yeah they are nice black and white pic's. You do realise those pic's plank just posted are not his

Posted by plankgatan

On 2008-01-05 03:07:01, DonJuan wrote:
Yeah they are nice black and white pic's. You do realise those pic's plank just posted are not his



?????????

everyone pictures on previous page, (except for this 3 "car-bestpics") is mine.....(maybe that what you mean...i dont know).

_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-05 02:31 ]

Posted by n4d3r
pics are taken straight from the camera and shrunk by esato...

,
,

,
,

,
,


[ This Message was edited by: n4d3r on 2008-01-05 03:01 ]

[ This Message was edited by: n4d3r on 2008-01-05 03:39 ]

Posted by lshirase








Posted by Laxen
YES I did it pretty good, Thanks plangatan



Posted by Laxen
Yippie, i did it again, This time even better:



Posted by The Lostprophet
got me wanting to take water pictures, here you go two different taps




Posted by JaffaTB
my cat


cactus


Posted by plankgatan

On 2008-01-05 03:59:30, n4d3r wrote:
pics are taken straight from the camera and shrunk by esato...



,
,





he he he...and some people say k850 take bad indoor pics..

AWESOME INDOOR...K850 IS EASILY THE INDOOR KING
---------------------------------------------------

@Laxen...try this..macro + iso.100 + zoom 2-3 clicks...(and keep the phone steady)..then you will catch the waterdrop closer & sharper.
you get little bleached colors because you little to close.
good pics anyway

_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)



[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-05 16:24 ]

Posted by Laxen
I will try that plankgatan, Thanks anyway

Posted by franique
hey people. feeling a lil bit angry right now after reading a few statements on some websites regarding the K850i's camera quality. i mean, really. i dont think it's all that bad and besides, some of em surveyers didnt even consider comparing the pics taken indoor and night shots on N82,N95 and K850i. and at the end of the shootout article, all they could come up with is "the Sony Ericsson K850 simply doesn't cut it with image quality this year. All of our recent shootouts confirmed that the Sony Ericsson K850 is inferior in camera quality"- (wont specify the site url. lolz)
and i really, really disagree with this short and vague conclusion.

Posted by DonJuan

On 2008-01-04 02:25:20, plankgatan wrote:
k850 can produce good pics to...but its camera is realy sensitive, thats why you need to use the profiles properley

found some nice ones




http://img148.imageshack.us/i[....]4/2150007780409f120d04oth0.jpg


_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)


[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-04 01:35 ]


i have seen you post a few times on here saying.... 'found some nice ones'
these arent your pics, they are someone elses, then someone gives you credit and you dont say oh they arent mine, apart from that one time when you got out of it cus the guy came on the site and caught you posting his pics.

Posted by bavlondon2
Some nice pics.

Any chance of some pics inside clubs?

Posted by vojta66
Another one to "bathroom" collection here:




Pages:
Previous  123 ... 353637 ... 979899  Next
Click to view updated thread with images


© Esato.com - From the Esato mobile phone discussion forum