Posted by rockygali
but the jiggles... its hard to keep a steady hands... there will always be blurry while using twilight mode.
but then again, what i luv about this 3.6 is that natural colors it produces on shooting outdoors.
Posted by whitehackker
still.. can't wait for the final 3.6 to test......
Posted by genus
Jiggles dont know why... but i can really say that it is due to increase the sharpness.
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-10-05 08:17 ]
Posted by mauasca
Camdriver kopritis 3.6 beta
Auto:
Macro:
Zoom:
Posted by whitehackker
nice photos you got.
Posted by MEGAGHOST
yes its real color
Posted by whitehackker
On 2007-10-05 11:35:39, mauasca wrote:
Camdriver kopritis 3.6 beta
Auto:
Macro:
Zoom:
Got natural color... you didn't change any lines in kopritis 3.6 beta??
Posted by ossiriss
Pls, when you make tests do not take macro pictures. It's not concludent, i repeat. Take landscape photos and indoor photos!
Posted by genus
On 2007-10-05 04:28:48, rockygali wrote:
i would also like to comment on the 3.6 driver.
the grass foliage below the pic seems sharper.. i can notice that it is grass... not moss or sumthin... the leaves are well colored... not too artificial.
and about the darkness... again... we can play on the exposure settings.. well done KOP!
_________________
:: EDIT ::
a shot from 3.6, INDOORS.
camphone is set to WB:Daylight, NO FLASH. +3 exposure
[img=http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/257/dsc01054pr4.th.jpg]
as you can see, or i hope you see this...
notice the horizontal lines appearing on the resulting image.
Those were present in the viewfinder.
Tho this can be prevented with some tweak adjustments, and with flash of course. but what if i want to use the setting ive stated above...
hope this minute bug be addressed in the final driver..
more power!
[ This Message was edited by: rockygali on 2007-10-05 05:51 ]
I agree also, i also found such things horizontal line occur. But the 3.6 produce good color as wat i wan.
Posted by deadman4168
3.6 beta
Auto Mode with Flash
twilight potrait with Flash
Twilight potrait....No Flash
Twilight Potrait With Flash
And I also noticed those lines with no Flash
Posted by mauasca
On 2007-10-05 13:12:05, whitehackker wrote:
On 2007-10-05 11:35:39, mauasca wrote:
Camdriver kopritis 3.6 beta
Auto:
Macro:
Zoom:
Got natural color... you didn't change any lines in kopritis 3.6 beta??
yes,natural color,
kopritis 3.6 beta +0,3 brightness
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-10-05 04:28:48, rockygali wrote:
i would also like to comment on the 3.6 driver.
the grass foliage below the pic seems sharper.. i can notice that it is grass... not moss or sumthin... the leaves are well colored... not too artificial.
and about the darkness... again... we can play on the exposure settings.. well done KOP!
_________________
:: EDIT ::
a shot from 3.6, INDOORS.
camphone is set to WB:Daylight, NO FLASH. +3 exposure
[img=http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/257/dsc01054pr4.th.jpg]
as you can see, or i hope you see this...
notice the horizontal lines appearing on the resulting image.
Those were present in the viewfinder.
Tho this can be prevented with some tweak adjustments, and with flash of course. but what if i want to use the setting ive stated above...
hope this minute bug be addressed in the final driver..
more power!
[ This Message was edited by: rockygali on 2007-10-05 05:51 ]
what light lamps do you have at your office??? do you choose the from settings light source flourescent??? those vertical lines is from the refresh rate of the sensor. stock2.5 driver make tha same....
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-10-05 15:59 ]
Posted by deadman4168
so when kopritis u r gonna release 3.6 final
Posted by kopritis
infinity focus... no macro shot!
do you see the airplane in the sky?????
3.6b mod automod
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-10-05 16:23 ]
Posted by mauasca
On 2007-10-05 17:20:21, kopritis wrote:
infinity focus... no macro shot!
do you see the airplane in the sky?????
3.6b mod
LOL.......LOL.........LOL
yes, is looked at the airplane, you are the "number one" ops LOL LOL LOL to when the 3,6 end?
Posted by whitehackker
cool!!! the plane is still visible..!!
Posted by deadman4168
Kopritis
3.6b mod automod
what does that mean
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-10-05 17:26:39, mauasca wrote:
LOL.......LOL.........LOL
yes, is looked at the airplane, you are the "number one" ops LOL LOL LOL to when the 3,6 end?
no free time guys!!! sorry! But soon.........
Posted by whitehackker
take your time mate..
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-10-05 17:30:15, deadman4168 wrote:
Kopritis
3.6b mod automod
what does that mean
that means... 3,6 beta modify and the picture was taken in automode
Posted by deadman4168
take ur time Kop and make a really good driver which will be highly improved than the 3.5
by the way i notyiced that u changed the contrast property back to original....May i know why?????????????????
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-10-05 17:50:01, deadman4168 wrote:
take ur time Kop and make a really good driver which will be highly improved than the 3.5
by the way i notyiced that u changed the contrast property back to original....May i know why?????????????????
i'm searching for the noise and i changed! but nothing... and always you tell me that 3.5 it's too dark driver! so, thats the reason!
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-10-05 17:02 ]
Posted by rockygali
for me no argue about the darkness matey...
ill adjust exposure... for that will do... but with indoors..
the flickering is visible... and after taking a picture the flickers are also visible in the resulting image...
Posted by wakeyme
kop's 3.6 beta
macro
auto
Posted by number1
the horizontal lines r the result of less exposure i think the standard 2.5 camdriver does it if u turn down the exposure to -2.0.
u can find the exposure property that suits u by changing
seq_set_prop_0 = $s5 %0
$-5 09 <<<< change to 0a or 0b or to increase it 10
#COM_EVENT(06,$w5);
Posted by mo0os
i dont know i think its pretty nice but u be the judge !
Posted by genus
sometimes it seem that too low of the exposure will cause the cool color of the picture when the light is not enough.
Posted by toyds
how can you say about the new cam driver? 3.6b?
thanks a lot
Posted by mauasca
Camdriver kopritis 3.6 beta
Sun_Macro
beautiful
Posted by genus
On 2007-10-06 14:39:25, mauasca wrote:
Camdriver kopritis 3.6 beta
Sun_Macro
beautiful
Quite dark and dull.
Posted by HeXacTa
@kopritis
what is ur latest k750/w800 cam driver? can i use ur k800 driver to w800? thx..
Posted by mario06
yep!!! dark and dull
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-10-06 17:59:45, HeXacTa wrote:
@kopritis
what is ur latest k750/w800 cam driver? can i use ur k800 driver to w800? thx..
i don't remember.
No you can't use the driver of k810/800 at k750/w800.
Posted by norbi_nw
plz! this is a k800/810 topic! KEEP THE K750/W800 OUT OF IT!! Thx
Posted by ppt
does this modded camera driver allows forced flash?
Posted by Goldmen
Hi,guys!
Where I can find the K 800i CamDriver 2.4 from Firmware R1CB001...?
Thanks!
[ This Message was edited by: Goldmen on 2007-10-07 01:00 ]
Posted by Guto_ViP
^
|
|
|
|
Only shit question... Here is about camdrive for k790/K800/k810
If your wanna information about other camdrive, use SEARCH!!!
P.S: And have google for this!
Dammit....
[ This Message was edited by: Guto_ViP on 2007-10-07 00:56 ]
Posted by Goldmen
It is better, proffesor Guto_ViP...?
Posted by TheNerd
On 2007-10-07 02:03:56, Goldmen wrote:
It is better, proffesor Guto_ViP...?
2.4 stock driver is better than the 2.5 stock driver?
can you show a comparison?
Posted by Goldmen
2.4 stock driver is better than the 2.5 stock driver?
can you show a comparison?
I can`t now show a comparison...sorry...!
[ This Message was edited by: Goldmen on 2007-10-07 01:20 ]
Posted by Guto_ViP
I like modded camdrive... im happy with kopritis camdrive, he have a good work...
PS: sorry, about my english.. im brazilian.
Posted by mo0os
aiiiiii meu tranquilo ?
Posted by mo0os
oh
Posted by senter
Camdriver 2,7
Camdriver 3,5
Camdriver 2,7
Camdriver 3,5
Original pic's:
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=7493
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=7494
[ This Message was edited by: senter on 2007-10-07 12:54 ]
Posted by mauasca
CamDriver 3.3_they are little dark ones, but they seem + clear of the 3.6b
Posted by demonlover
Center, I can't understand you! Just in yours pics, 2.7 is 'better". This driver is old like my grandma and see, all other pics 3.5 are exelent exept yours!
[ This Message was edited by: demonlover on 2007-10-07 15:48 ]
Posted by senter
On 2007-10-07 16:47:26, demonlover wrote:
Center, I can't understand you! Just in yours pics, 2.7 is 'better". This driver is old like my grandma and see, all other pics 3.5 are exelent exept yours!
[ This Message was edited by: demonlover on 2007-10-07 15:48 ]
I just take pic befor change driver , then change driver with 3,5 .
Crop photo and post here.
@demonlover why you don't try 2,7 and take pic , then change with 3,5 and take pic and post here original photos ?
Posted by whitehackker
hi there kopritis.. just wanna ask if i can put number1's 24fps VR settings to your camdrive 3.6?? i find 24fps VR setting smooth with a very minimal zoom bug...
Or can you give me the values to put in your camdrive 3.6 to make the VR 24fps...
thanks and more power to you..
i like all of your camdrive mods...
Posted by amarsidhu
i have tried all drivers
but i am still finding 2.7 the best
Posted by norbi_nw
well post some more samples with 2.7 vs 3.5/3.6 ! AND NOT MACROS plz
