Posted by deadman4168
@koprities
At page 53 which version took the closest pic to the original scene
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-09-29 15:07:55, deadman4168 wrote:
@koprities
At page 53 which version took the closest pic to the original scene
What you mean?? from my pictures or from the others?
Posted by demonlover
Kopritis, the sharpness of the camdriver 3.0 and the 3.5 is the same, right?
Posted by deadman4168
@ Koritis Ur pics
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-09-29 17:55:04, deadman4168 wrote:
@ Koritis Ur pics
1rst is from the original camdriver
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-09-29 17:28 ]
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-09-29 16:58:38, demonlover wrote:
Kopritis, the sharpness of the camdriver 3.0 and the 3.5 is the same, right?
3.0 = sharpness is 06
3.5 = sharpness is 05
Posted by hellvy
On 2007-09-29 15:07:55, deadman4168 wrote:
@koprities
At page 53 which version took the closest pic to the original scene
@koprities
i think he mean, comparing the result of both picture to what you saw with your eyes at the time you shot. Which picture is closer to what you saw
Posted by deadman4168
yeah exactly
Posted by hyperion1707
On 2007-09-29 14:07:16, demonlover wrote:
Kopritis, your 3.5 driver is damn good! I test him and just can say: Great work! This is the best camdriver and don't listen anybody and don't touch anything! You rulzzz!!!!:)))
I must admit 3.5 is the best camdriver i ever tested. But why "don't touch anything" ? Everybody knows "practice makes perfect"
Posted by deadman4168
kopritis 3.5
auto+macro focus+flash+auto White balance
Auto+ auto focus+ auto White Balance
[ This Message was edited by: deadman4168 on 2007-09-29 20:55 ]
Posted by Guto_ViP
Good pics!!!!
Did your changed the constract code to 0f (equal Kopritis message)?
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-09-29 18:35:25, hellvy wrote:
On 2007-09-29 15:07:55, deadman4168 wrote:
@koprities
At page 53 which version took the closest pic to the original scene
@koprities
i think he mean, comparing the result of both picture to what you saw with your eyes at the time you shot. Which picture is closer to what you saw
Oh! i see!! the second picture is near to real colors!
Posted by heara
well, līm going to try this, i tried all camdrivers actually have shecompean, from top sony wich records 16 fps, and i see no bugs
Posted by genus
i see, i also tried it, the 3.5 driver seem morecloser to the real picture as i saw using my eye.
Posted by heara
yes i think so too, good work Kopitris
Posted by hellvy
yeh, i'm glad to hear that too
How about night shots? Is there any improovement so far?
@kopritis
It'd be nice to update your 1st post so the newcomer should know what's currently going on
[ This Message was edited by: hellvy on 2007-09-30 06:36 ]
Posted by gprsman
On 2007-09-29 10:04:16, kopritis wrote:
2.5 Stock Driver Vs 3.5 Modded
1. Automode, ev0.0, focus to infinity, Daylight white balance, Stock 2.5 camdriver
2. Automode, ev0.0, focus to infinity, Daylight white balance, Modded 3.5 camdriver
Download the original photos:
http://www.megafileupload.com/en/file/12920/sample-rar.html
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-09-29 09:08 ]
Strange ,2.5 Stock Driver is better and much clear mah....
Posted by razec
On 2007-09-30 07:53:51, gprsman wrote:
On 2007-09-29 10:04:16, kopritis wrote:
2.5 Stock Driver Vs 3.5 Modded
1. Automode, ev0.0, focus to infinity, Daylight white balance, Stock 2.5 camdriver
2. Automode, ev0.0, focus to infinity, Daylight white balance, Modded 3.5 camdriver
Download the original photos:
http://www.megafileupload.com/en/file/12920/sample-rar.html
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-09-29 09:08 ]
Strange ,2.5 Stock Driver is better and much clear mah....
tend to disagree here, the 3.5 produces puchier colors than 2.5
and this was what i mostly yearn for digital cameras! 
Posted by kopritis
@ALL
Every new mod from me, from now it will be posted at 1rst page of this topic
Posted by xan K
nice decision kopritis, now people won't have to browse through the whole thread to find the latest driver.
Posted by chestertan20
im just wondering how many fps does kopritis 3.5 have
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-09-30 14:01:24, chestertan20 wrote:
im just wondering how many fps does kopritis 3.5 have
3.5 have ~16fps
Posted by chestertan20
i like the picture quality of you cam driver 3.5 but i like number1's video recorder on his 2.7 can you make it that way too becouse number1 video is smoother. thanks
Posted by genus
i think too high fps will cause the video when recording lag, not comfortable..
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-09-30 14:11:07, chestertan20 wrote:
i like the picture quality of you cam driver 3.5 but i like number1's video recorder on his 2.7 can you make it that way too becouse number1 video is smoother. thanks
I say it before, more fps more problems. stock version have 12fps.
if we put it over 16fps, will be found video zoom bug and Best pic Bug.
What you choose? a stable camdriver? or bugs with high fps video recording?
Posted by deadman4168
the 3.5 drivers sucks in taking indoor night pics without flash
anyway to fix that.
the stock diver or the other mods were good at that...i know its due to the decreased exposure but anything kopritis can do?????
Posted by milan91
Why all people want 30fps and good video??... i bought my k800 because i love good pictures, but now all want video, buy some video cam and bye
or some nokia phone...
Posted by tranced
there is a known saying here in Dominican Republic:
if you let them a finger, they will want the whole arm
Posted by milan91
hehe
and in serbian language is that saying...
Posted by kopritis
Here at greece we say:
they give him a donkey and he looks him at he's teeth...
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-09-30 23:29 ]
Posted by tranced
we have one like that too:
you shall not see the teeth of your given horse
you know what i mean? you gotta get used to the thing you were given
Posted by kopritis
Funny time
Posted by tranced
yeah, it's not always about camdrivers
btw, im planning to buy a k810 at the end of this or beginning of next year. i hope you will have a good camdriver by that time
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-10-01 00:33:02, tranced wrote:
yeah, it's not always about camdrivers
btw, im planning to buy a k810 at the end of this or beginning of next year. i hope you will have a good camdriver by that time
Yea i hope to make someday a good mod...
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-10-01 00:48 ]
Posted by tranced
so do i
what's the language these camdrivers use?
Posted by genus
not wrong is hex code.
Posted by genus
here is 3.5 driver photo, after raining
auto mode, focus infinity
auto mode, focus infinity
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-10-01 11:29 ]
Posted by norbi_nw
Nice pix. But i still hate that white sky problem. Any way to fix that (withouth decreasing EV) ?? Winter is coming, so there will be a lot of white sky..
Posted by tranced
what if you set the EV manually? wont it work?
Posted by number1
try using the landscape scene
Posted by genus
the white sky is not cause by the exposure, it is cause by where u take the focusing toward the place, here, my picture is focus on glass ( more darker place ), so it automatically cause overexposure, but the dark place can be seem. If i focus on the sky, there will no more white sky. This is not easy to solve since k800i just hv one small blank to determine the exposure of photo not as Digital Camera, which can set the exposure from many point on the photo that do not cause it overexposure.
Here is the correct focusing before raining
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-10-01 14:34 ]
Posted by genus
On 2007-10-01 14:19:57, norbi_nw wrote:
Nice pix. But i still hate that white sky problem. Any way to fix that (withouth decreasing EV) ?? Winter is coming, so there will be a lot of white sky..
This is correct, the sky is white in colour, after raining. I set the EV to 0a as told by number1. Further more, i focus at darker place.
Posted by deadman4168
what to abot the indoors pics without flash in night of 3.5 versions it sucks. there is much noise and less exposure even using twilight..Help KOPRITIS
Posted by hellvy
On 2007-10-01 18:09:13, deadman4168 wrote:
what to abot the indoors pics without flash in night of 3.5 versions it sucks. there is much noise and less exposure even using twilight..Help KOPRITIS
How could you say 'sucks' to other's work you're using it for free? And you just said it previous page ago. No matter how you feel about it. I think you'd better expess it to other (especially, the author) in more kind way.
I don't know if you feel ok if someone saying your distributed, free-of-charge work sucks. But not me for sure.
Just share pix you mention about and remove word 'sucks' from your post should be more useful..
[ This Message was edited by: hellvy on 2007-10-01 18:29 ]
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-10-01 18:09:13, deadman4168 wrote:
what to abot the indoors pics without flash in night of 3.5 versions it sucks. there is much noise and less exposure even using twilight..Help KOPRITIS
Put the original camdriver 2.5 to your phone. You can find it at 1rst page.
For you the 3.5 mod it doesn't work.
post a sample picture from both drivers. from the original 2.5 and the modded 3.5
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-10-01 18:20 ]
Posted by kimot01
On 2007-10-01 18:09:13, deadman4168 wrote:
what to abot the indoors pics without flash in night of 3.5 versions it sucks. there is much noise and less exposure even using twilight..Help KOPRITIS
if it "sucks" why made your own camera driver???
complain if kop ask you to pay him., if you dont like the driver then replace it.,
just show a little respect...ok?
Posted by norbi_nw
yeah. I think its way better than the original k810 camdriver. besides, photos are based on light, so dont use it indoors. we need good outdoor pix.
Posted by deadman4168
hey guys wait stop keep it cool.. I m not blaming KOp.,I m just frustrated with K800i. So was just.....u know.....Sorry KOpritis.
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-10-01 21:27:50, deadman4168 wrote:
hey guys wait stop keep it cool.. I m not blaming KOp.,I m just frustrated with K800i. So was just.....u know.....Sorry KOpritis.
@deadman4168
@ALL
Sorry accepted! Look man, i worked on automode for low noise but i have a few problems with the driver code! I've found something that reduse the noise at 90%. The problem is that the auto focus led and flash don't work in automode and i'm searching the code to find where is the problem!
If i made the af led and xenon flash work, then the view finder lay down at 3FPS. When i found this problems, then i'm gonna resolve the indoor noise pictures!
Posted by gprsman
On 2007-10-01 15:30:59, genus wrote:
the white sky is not cause by the exposure, it is cause by where u take the focusing toward the place, here, my picture is focus on glass ( more darker place ), so it automatically cause overexposure, but the dark place can be seem. If i focus on the sky, there will no more white sky. This is not easy to solve since k800i just hv one small blank to determine the exposure of photo not as Digital Camera, which can set the exposure from many point on the photo that do not cause it overexposure.
Here is the correct focusing before raining
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-10-01 14:34 ]
please the link your camdriver the correct focusing before raining???thanks!