Posted by petrutms
so, what driver is the best? i`ll answer myself after half a day of changing drivers !
the best for pictures is kopritis 2.9
for video doesnt matter because of bestpic and zoom bug and i cant live with that bugs...
so i`m waiting for kopritis 3.2.
[ This Message was edited by: petrutms on 2007-09-08 17:47 ]
Posted by centur
I mod kopritis camdriver 2,7 with other camdriver and result is camdriver v. 2,7 ( 35 fps video ) , no bug when use zoom .
Download :
http://www.sendspace.com/file/4i8xtq
Posted by petrutms
still zoom bug, but no best pic bug, very small delay. looks good.
i`m still waiting for a 30 or 35 fps video driver, without bugs ( zoom and best pic), without crashes and with improved details when taking pictures.
[ This Message was edited by: petrutms on 2007-09-08 20:20 ]
Posted by centur
@petrutms only zoom speed is slow , but no bug when use zoom in / out .
I like camdriver 2,7 and mix with other driver and now I have detail pictures + good video without bug when use Best pic .
Posted by petrutms
slow = bug
. doesnt matter because not many people uses zoom on 176/144 video !!!! great job. koprits 2.9 is better than 2.7, you could try modding that one. Thanks.
Posted by amarsidhu
2.9 is on which page friendz???
Posted by centur
I test 2.9 , but AF when use macro is bad and pictures have more noise.
4 me 2,7 is best !
Posted by MEGAGHOST
On 2007-09-08 21:02:49, centur wrote:
I mod kopritis camdriver 2,7 with other camdriver and result is camdriver v. 2,7 ( 35 fps video ) , no bug when use zoom .
Download :
http://www.sendspace.com/file/4i8xtq
please you can upload file with other link
Posted by whatsucka
anyone got the link for Kopritis 3.0 with 20FPS or 30 FPS??
Posted by fraseyboy
On 2007-09-08 22:55:15, whatsucka wrote:
anyone got the link for Kopritis 3.0 with 20FPS or 30 FPS??
LEARN TO READ. This was asked allready about 4 posts back.
PAGE 24
Posted by milan91
On 2007-09-08 21:58:13, centur wrote:
I test 2.9 , but AF when use macro is bad and pictures have more noise.
4 me 2,7 is best !
For me 2.8 is best
Posted by juming
On 2007-09-08 16:05:47, limzm wrote:
hey juming, would u mind reading my post in the previous page? and what fixes does this currently have?
It's fix some bug, but not giving any feature or performance difference.
For anyone that need force flash and 25 FPS video record just try below.
http://www.icefile.com/index.[....]p;name=camdriver0_25FPS_FF.zip
Posted by genus
I think 2.8 is better than 2.9, it take more sharper picture when i tested it ( flash on ), since 2.9 ISO reduce to 320, more noise and darker. But 2.8 give cold color balance, 2.9 do give warm color balance in my opinion.
Posted by juming
On 2007-09-09 03:52:55, genus wrote:
I think 2.8 is better than 2.9, it take more sharper picture when i tested it ( flash on ), since 2.9 ISO reduce to 320, more noise and darker. But 2.8 give cold color balance, 2.9 do give warm color balance in my opinion.
Remember, just see the picture on your PC, not on your phone display, cause over sharpening makes picture not natural, if you prefer to enhance sharpening, better go with image editing tools on PC, cause it can enhanced as required, but if you get picture already over processed, you cannot undo it by any PC without degradatingimage quality.
Reduce ISO will reduce noise, default using flash is ISO 400, and lowering will result slightly darker picture but more clear image, now I'm running with ISO 250 that far more clearer noise compared 320, but drawback is it slight darker in some occasion, anyway using Exposure setting that already available on K800i, I think we can compensate the darkness of picture
Posted by genus
Really??? Could u give me the driver with ISO250 setting??? I want to try it.
Posted by juming
On 2007-09-09 06:54:09, genus wrote:
Really??? Could u give me the driver with ISO250 setting??? I want to try it.
Here they are:
http://www.icefile.com/index.[....]camdriver0_25FPS_FF_ISO250.zip
Posted by KTCY
On 2007-09-09 07:09:26, juming wrote:
On 2007-09-09 06:54:09, genus wrote:
Really??? Could u give me the driver with ISO250 setting??? I want to try it.
Here they are:
http://www.icefile.com/index.[....]camdriver0_25FPS_FF_ISO250.zip
Mind to share some photo taken ?
Posted by genus
Yes, thx Juming, the ISO250 do give more better effect !!!
But some of my picture having little blur...since it was not clear, could u change the setting so that it can make more sharper photo ( as much as 2.8 ) then i can compare it with the current one.
It was found that the 2.8 was too sharp when taking scenary photo. What is the sharpness of the driver u post it (ISO250)?
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-09-09 09:57 ]
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-09-09 09:57 ]
Posted by limzm
ISO 250 only works when u uses flash.
Posted by genus
This driver is i use Juming 25FPS video record with ISO250 driver re-edit by just only changing the sharpness to more higher a bit ( sharpness 06 ). But it is stil same version - 2.7
Finally, i can get more sharper picture as i like. But sometimes it may cause more noise.
http://www.geocities.com/ltg8[....]ver0_25FPS_FF_ISO250_Genus.zip
Posted by centur
On 2007-09-08 22:46:52, MEGAGHOST wrote:
please you can upload file with other link
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=PYS9439A
or
http://www.bigupload.com/d=8D150RWWQX
Posted by petrutms
just compared p990 and k800 shots. K800 sucks at colour reproduction, p990 have more natural colors... but more noise... maybe is the problem from k800 driver... 2.6 from number 1...
Posted by amarsidhu
click a landscape pic and then see what P990 clicks
i have both P990 and K800 and K800 is any day better.
no hard feelings
Posted by milan91
First pic with number1 2.68 and second with Kop 2.8(for me best, after this pic number1 is better
)
Pics taken with twilight landscape with image stabilizer, and cloudy
http://img127.imagevenue.com/[....]e=58979_DSC00568_123_942lo.JPG
http://img125.imagevenue.com/[....]e=58985_DSC00569_123_904lo.JPG
_________________
K750i>>nokia 6630>>w810i>>Sony Ericsson K800i+1GB SanDisk M2+k810i sw+w880i acoustic+kopritis 2.9+ EQHalmer
[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2007-09-09 18:34 ]
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-09-09 19:32:32, milan91 wrote:
First pic with number1 2.68 and second with Kop 2.8(for me best, after this pic number1 is better
)
Pics taken with twilight landscape with image stabilizer, and cloudy
http://img127.imagevenue.com/[....]e=58979_DSC00568_123_942lo.JPG
http://img125.imagevenue.com/[....]e=58985_DSC00569_123_904lo.JPG
_________________
K750i>>nokia 6630>>w810i>>Sony Ericsson K800i+1GB SanDisk M2+k810i sw+w880i acoustic+kopritis 2.9+ EQHalmer
[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2007-09-09 18:34 ]
The second link with my mod your photo is shaked...
take a look from 2.8 driver...
http://img151.imagevenue.com/[....]e=63249_DSC01400_122_789lo.JPG
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-09-09 19:40 ]
Posted by milan91
yes little shaked
because is in twilight landscape but look noise 
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-09-09 20:56:13, milan91 wrote:
yes little shaked
because is in twilight landscape but look noise
Yea i see the noise... I know where it comes! from compression 95% i don't know why! The new mod that i worked has the default compression...
With default compression i don't have so much noise
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-09-09 20:02 ]
Posted by milan91
tomorrow i compare number1 driver, your 2.8, and your 2.9(3.0)
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-09-09 21:06:14, milan91 wrote:
tomorrow i compare number1 driver, your 2.8, and your 2.9(3.0)
That will be great!!!
Posted by testuser9
@kpris: can us end me some beta driver u are working on kopris?
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-09-09 23:15:30, testuser9 wrote:
@kpris: can us end me some beta driver u are working on kopris?
Not yet!
Posted by genus
Kopritis, i'm waiting to test ur new driver, hope it will coming soon. From many driver i do like the 2.8 driver, it is sharp, but it do take the photo which having a little bit cold in color, hope there will be more better color balance driver.
Posted by juming
On 2007-09-10 07:51:41, genus wrote:
Kopritis, i'm waiting to test ur new driver, hope it will coming soon. From many driver i do like the 2.8 driver, it is sharp, but it do take the photo which having a little bit cold in color, hope there will be more better color balance driver.
If I'm right, increasing sharpness will make color more imbalance...
Posted by genus
Yes, i also think like that...
So, what is the better driver we need to change???
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-09-10 07:30 ]
Posted by juming
On 2007-09-10 08:24:49, genus wrote:
Yes, i also think like that...
So, what is the better driver we need to change???
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-09-10 07:30 ]
You should do trial and error, there is 3 driver around this thread, Kopritis, number 1 and mine
you can try one by one, since color is somthing that usually personal taste, so there is no best driver for everyone, but surely there is a driver that meet someone taste.
Posted by pedrops
till now?
Can't really say
=P
nobody has done a good comparison test yet...
Kop's is good, Juming's is good and Number1 cam driver is good too..
just wait for Kop 3.2 and Number1 2.7.. They are doing a great job!
Thanks Kop
Posted by milan91
Here is comparison Kop 2.8, and 2.9(3.0) and number1 2.68
Pics are resized on 600x800, my connection its not good
This 3 pics:
no flash, twilight portrait, and white balance on AUTO
This 3 pics:
with flash, twilight portrait, and white balance on AUTO
if you dont see pics, click on New Window
_________________
K750i>>nokia 6630>>w810i>>Sony Ericsson K800i+1GB SanDisk M2+k810i SW
[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2007-09-10 15:48 ]
Posted by testuser9
so kopris is better...no wonder, number1 are just like the same just copied some stuff out of kopris ones
Posted by Prodigal Me
Thanks
Posted by genus
i see, 2.9 better.
Posted by w0ng
You can't make these comparisons unless they're identical shots with each driver.
I'll take pix later, all taken from the same spot, with the phone placed on a flat surface (to remove possibilities of the hand shaking)
Posted by genus
On 2007-09-10 08:54:09, juming wrote:
On 2007-09-10 08:24:49, genus wrote:
Yes, i also think like that...
So, what is the better driver we need to change???
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-09-10 07:30 ]
You should do trial and error, there is 3 driver around this thread, Kopritis, number 1 and mine
you can try one by one, since color is somthing that usually personal taste, so there is no best driver for everyone, but surely there is a driver that meet someone taste.
I have tried each of the driver, i found that each almost give the same color balance at different condition. It is quite hard to differentiate it, just one thing the same.. that is each driver do give not colorful picture compare to n73, but at night it do beter than n73 (^.^)
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-09-12 11:41 ]
Posted by Raiderski
N73 pics are oversaturated but you can guys try to add below line into NORM_MODE macro:
#COM_EVENT(58,xx)
where (for example) xx:
ec = desaturation
00 = default saturation
35 = big oversaturation
command 58 is known from 2mpx models
Posted by genus
// Normal (non-document) mode settings
NORM_MODE = #COM_EVENT(55,00) // Reset contrast
#COM_EVENT(56,05) // Reset sharpness
#COM_EVENT(06,00) // Reset exposure
which line?
is that the contrast setting?
i didnt found any saturation setting....
Actually, i think the color for k800i is quite ok already, but it may due to the contrast & exposure, this will also contribute to the incorrect color when the picture is taken.
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-09-12 16:07 ]
Posted by Raiderski
genius
do not modify existing lines but add this line
some dudes like a bit oversaturated photos, why not to give them such possibility? let they will be satisfied
Posted by genus
oic
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-09-13 06:53 ]
Posted by genus
On 2007-09-12 20:38:00, Raiderski wrote:
genius
do not modify existing lines but add this line
some dudes like a bit oversaturated photos, why not to give them such possibility? let they will be satisfied
Hmmm...it seem that increase the saturation will cause the color imbalance ( yellow or blue ) appear more, still need more test on it, i just increase saturation to 02, later try 01, because to much saturation make the photo too colorful.
Actually i dont know whether it got change the saturation setting...mayb it change the constrast....but i just add in the line:
// Normal (non-document) mode settings
NORM_MODE = #COM_EVENT(55,02) // Reset saturation
#COM_EVENT(55,00) // Reset contrast
#COM_EVENT(56,06) // Reset sharpness
#COM_EVENT(06,00) // Reset exposure
Here is the picture
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-09-13 06:35 ]
Posted by genus
This is taken wif saturation 01, seem no different with the default setting
Weather not good..sori about that
Posted by IceCarpediem
Is that Bandar Menjalara genus?
Posted by genus
Not, it is Sungai Dua