Modded Camera Driver for k800i/k810i

On 2008-02-13 02:55:56, Guto_ViP wrote:
My phone now:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvia15a9EFs

On 2008-02-09 22:28:27, DeKosta wrote:


Use SeTool2 (lite edition) v1.11

On 2008-02-13 02:55:56, Guto_ViP wrote:
My phone now:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvia15a9EFs

On 2008-02-13 17:44:45, DeKosta wrote:
^^ And you have the right FW on your K800? "R8BA024"

Then maybe its something wrong with the patch? I dont know i havent used R8BA024 FW so i havent tried the patch.

I have a cam to other patch on my comp but that also moves acoustics to other, tell me if you want the code..

By the way have you done the "quick access patch"? You have to do that before you add any other patches.

On 2008-02-13 09:55:15, whitehackker wrote:


wow nice.... care to share your menu?? thanks

On 2008-02-13 21:26:51, stevvie wrote:

Did you apply the quick access patch the right way? You have to make a patch with qmaker and your present FW.
This is easy guide:
http://forums.se-nse.net/index.php?showtopic=20984

But you maybe allready figured this out by now..
As far as your pics i dont know why they look like that.. did the original camdriver produce pics like that too?
Or is this something that happened recently?

---

Posted by ukaszek



Maybe Your camera is damaged... I've the same problem. I sold my k800i and I bought new k800 The difference is incredible.

---

Posted by stevvie
I might see my son's mate who has a K800i and see the difference as my phone is only 6-7 months old it will go back and I'll get a new one.

PS
One thing I have noticed now I have patched my phone to put drivers in others/se/camera is that although the driver was on the phone and showing the different driver version in the software menu, is that the extra slow sync functions from ultimate's 2.20 driver wern't working correctly. If I took a night show using twilight landscape it would look almost black, now it looks like it should with a slow shutter speed. This was taken in the freezing cold about 2AM in my Tshirt shaking, hence the slight blur from shaking

and this is document mode in the total darkness


I just have to wait to take the dog for a walk to see if them pictures are any better.



[ This Message was edited by: stevvie on 2008-02-17 14:43 ]

---

Posted by Nakoruru


I have the same problem as stevvie does! Did anyone find any solution to it yet?

---

Posted by stevvie
I think I have found why I had the problem. Although I installed the camdriver and it showed a version change I don't think it was using the new version as when I installed ultimate 2.20 driver and tried the slow shutter speed night shot it was just like normal. I then patched the phone to use other/se/camdriver as the defualt driver location and voila the ultimate functions are there and the picture improved drastically.

---

Posted by DeKosta
I think i have asked this question before but i dont think i got any good answer.

How come there is no custom camdriver that has ISO-80 on flash?
The phone clearly can shoot ISO-80 because it does that every time(i think) you shoot outside in light conditions.

I think it would be interesting too test this out, but i dont know how to set ISO 80 on flash;
I believe this code sets flash iso:
#SET_REG(40,01) and "01" is ISO-100.

Isnt it possible to set ISO-80? I mean the phone can shoot iso 80... some pro input please.

---

Posted by wirkstoff
waht driver is the best?!

i´m good driver for me iss the ultima 2.3 whitin

have yours goodest driver or is this the best driver (ultima)

---

Posted by Raiderski
DeKosta
simply because it will be very dark photo

wirkstoff
there is no answer for your question - everyone will tell you something else

---

Posted by Guto_ViP
Where is Kopritis???

---

Posted by kopritis


...I'm here man but i don't have anything to say! i'm using my 2.7mod and I'm happy! Olso I buyed a nokia n73 for comparison with k800. So far K800/k810 have a much better quality from n73... I don't have a new mods and I don't thing to make another one. BUT! if i will make, i will post it

---

Posted by milan91
Hi kopritis Yes i saw pics from your n73, and pics are good
Greetings to you and all Greek brothers

---

Posted by kopritis


Olso Greetings to you!!

---

Posted by SPiTFiREgr
Token with Kopritis 2.7_flash settings 3.7_fix 100 compressions @ Document Mode



I have a question for you. Which I should prefer between Kopritis 2.7 with fixes and Kopritis 3.71? [consider that im thinking that these are the best 2 camdrivers available. correct me if i'm wrong]

Also, συγχαρητίρια Κοπρίτη για την δουλειά σου (; Θα ήμουν χαρούμενος να με βοηθήσεις εσύ ο ίδιος για την επιλογή μου!:D

And at last but not least. What is the best sharpness setting? The best-giving-result i mean. 4? 5? 6?

Thnx for your help in advance (:

---

Posted by milan91
Today i again tryed kopritis 2.7, and this driver is so goood
Flash pics are sharper, and color is better...
Day pics are with good shar and with good color



[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-02-23 18:21 ]

---

Posted by jomateixa


Kopritis 2.7? Let's say Sharp08-Wilma ...

---

Posted by milan91
If you can wait some minutes, i will put 100% crop picture with your ultimate 2.3 withan and kopritis 2.7

---

Posted by jomateixa


I'm not saying if it's better or not, simply that Kopritis 2.7 is EXACTLY Wilma 2.5, with the only change of sharp 08.

---

---

Posted by milan91
Ok
But for me, pics with flash, are much sharper, i can read some text, but with your driver its too hard to read...

First kopritis 2.7

Second ultimate 2.3 withan




And this 2




[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-02-23 18:47 ]

---

Posted by number1
@milan91-
could you add my lastest 2.99 driver to that comparasion please it would be very interesting to see the results my driver has lower sharpness setting of 01, while 2.7 & withan2.3 use very high sharpness 06.

[ This Message was edited by: number1 on 2008-02-23 18:53 ]

---

Posted by milan91
Ok
But when i start comparasion i search your 2.99 driver, but only find 2.8

---

Posted by number1
here http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=161159
first post

[ This Message was edited by: number1 on 2008-02-23 19:01 ]

---

Posted by milan91
Thx
Before i found your old topic with 2.8

---

Posted by jomateixa
What mode do you used? You are using original 2.7 or the modified one?

Only with pics I can't explain why are different

Original kop2.7 -> Sharp 08, xen ISO 400 (doc mode with higher contrast/exposure too, 02)

Modified kop2.7 -> Sharp 08, xen ISO 250

Ultimate 2.3 -> Sharp 06, xen ISO 320

[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-02-23 19:11 ]

---

Posted by milan91
Number1 2.99





Using original 2.7, full auto mode

EXIF kop original 2.7
Image Type: jpeg (The JPEG image format)
Width: 2048 pixels
Height: 1536 pixels
Camera Brand: Sony Ericsson
Camera Model: K800i
Date Taken: 2008:02:23 17:34:31
Exposure Time: 1/249 sec.
ISO Speed Rating: 400
Flash Fired: Flash fired, auto mode.
Metering Mode: Center-Weighted Average
Software: R8BF003 prgCXC1250210_GENERIC_W 0.0

Ultimate 2.3

Image Type: jpeg (The JPEG image format)
Width: 2048 pixels
Height: 1536 pixels
Camera Brand: Sony Ericsson
Camera Model: K800i
Date Taken: 2008:02:23 17:35:14
Exposure Time: 1/79 sec.
ISO Speed Rating: 320
Flash Fired: Flash fired, auto mode.
Metering Mode: Center-Weighted Average
Software: R8BF003 prgCXC1250210_GENERIC_W 0.0

Number1 2.99

Image Type: jpeg (The JPEG image format)
Width: 2048 pixels
Height: 1536 pixels
Camera Brand: Sony Ericsson
Camera Model: K800i
Date Taken: 2008:02:23 20:09:33
Exposure Time: 1/39 sec.
ISO Speed Rating: 400
Flash Fired: Flash fired, auto mode.
Metering Mode: Center-Weighted Average
Software: R8BF003 prgCXC1250210_GENERIC_W 0.0

jomateixa, no hard feelings your driver is good I love that vivid colors... Only i comparasion your and other drivers(today i comparasion and genus 6.0) to see what driver have better color, sharp, and other things.


[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-02-23 19:20 ]

---

Posted by jomateixa
milan91 we are just talking...I'm not angried!

Assuming it's not the ISO, the soft difference between 06 and 08 is doing hard work...but it seems like contrast/exposure is increased too.

Can you copy & paste the #NORM_MODE macro from your kop2.7 for me here?

---

Posted by number1
it's possibly the flash shutter speed, or the slow_shutter viewfinder fps

---

Posted by milan91

Ok
Did you mean this??

// Normal (non-document) mode settings

NORM_MODE = #COM_EVENT(55,00) // Reset contrast

#COM_EVENT(56,06) // Reset sharpness

#COM_EVENT(06,00) // Reset exposure

#SET_REG(40,07) // AE_XENON_ISO = 400

#SET_REG(43,2A) // CC_R_FLASH = 0x2A (colour temperature of 6800 K for flash)

#SET_REG(44,70); // CC_B_FLASH = 0x70 (colour temperature of 6800 K for flash)

---

Posted by jomateixa


Flash shutter speed is possible but I think it isn't cause in DOC mode pics are good and sharp. Viewfinder fps can't be cuz in flash pics SET37 does the work. I see more contrast and sharpness IMO

---

Posted by jomateixa


Yes but that is from kop2.7? It has sharp 06 man...

---

Posted by milan91
Yes, kop2.7
That driver i have in my phone...


[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-02-23 20:51 ]

---

Posted by jomateixa


Are you completely sure? Strange... All kop2.7 that I have are with sharp 08, can you upload yours?

---

Posted by milan91
100%
Now i send that driver from my phone to check...
I dont know, that driver is old, today i found on my hdd and put in my phone to try again.

http://rapidshare.com/files/94351891/camdriver0.dat.html

---

Posted by jomateixa
@milan91

That driver does not have anything special, it's basically Wilma 2.5. So I have to ask you something:

1) There was light in the room when you toke that pics? (no totally dark?)
If there was some light, a slower shutter speed could make it blur (diffuse radiation)

2) You were holding the phone on your hand?
If yes, a slower shutter speed could make the pic blur because of hand micro-vibrations in 1/80s

So maybe with 1/250 the pic is static and with 1/80 is a little shaked

These should be the reasons!

---

Posted by milan91

1. no, in room total dark
2. yes hand, next time i will try to hold on leg lol
I dont know, maybe...
Now i am using your 2.35

[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-02-23 23:42 ]

---

Posted by chrisgestapo
Hi. Just want to add one point.
Original Kopritis 2.7 didn't come with a sharpness of 08. Later many people (including Kopritis) tried and said that sharpness 08 gives good results. I think the discussion about this issue is still in the earlier pages of this thread.
Maybe because of this reason most Kopritis 2.7 circulating around have been modified in this way.

_________________


[ This Message was edited by: chrisgestapo on 2008-02-24 03:46 ]

---

Posted by kopritis


Keep the 2.7 with shrp 06... also make the compression 95%

[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2008-02-24 08:17 ]

---

Posted by kopritis



is not only that look carefully the driver...
maybe did you not see the:
#SET_REG(19,50) // JPEG_INIT_QUALITY = 0x4B = 75d
#SET_REG(20,5a) // JPEG_BURST_QUALITY = 0x50 = 80d => 700kB images -

And the orginal of my 2.7mod is with shrp 06



[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2008-02-24 08:18 ]

---

Posted by jomateixa


That does nothing on image quality ... the slight JPEG compression changes that we made are not obsevable by human eye, and ...

- JPEG_INIT_QUALITY does nothing if you don't change property5
- JPEG_BURST_QUALITY is used for BestPic only

Cheers

---

Posted by danekro
hi!i have installed kopritis 2.7 35 fps,is the same driver in all 2.7 versions?or...which is the best 2.7 version?i seen that there are too much versions...
thanks.
with the 2.7 35fps,could be the possibility of damage camera or video?(recording video,because is a bit forced to record in 35fps)thanks!

[ This Message was edited by: danekro on 2008-02-24 16:05 ]

---

Posted by arnipas
have you tried comparing the pic qualities from ultimate withan latest version to kopritis 2.7? which is much better? @ danekro

---

Posted by Goldmen


[ This Message was edited by: Goldmen on 2008-04-01 20:29 ]