Posted by dEaD-nErVe
Here U Go [c3] Thanks To Kriptos
http://www.4shared.com/file/23335320/e4adbb02/27camdriver0.html
Posted by mongoose3800
On 2007-09-01 15:18:51, dEaD-nErVe wrote:
Okay m8s Here is my B4& After Shots With kopritis Carnera Drivers 2.7, And 2.8
But 1st The Orignal Shot
Modded 2.7 Driver
Modded 2.8 Driver
original size download:
http://www.4shared.com/file/23332009/30d6e7c4/B4After.html
think 2.7 stands out more.... Wat do yall think ???
[ This Message was edited by: dEaD-nErVe on 2007-09-01 14:22 ]
Sorry, I don't see any real improvement apart from maybe some more sharpness. It's too hard to tell as the 3 photo's are at different angles and probably lighting conditions. BTW, download the full size images and view them at full size and you'll see Jaggies all over the leaves of the palm tree in all three shots. Zoom in and you'll see they are everywhere. I'm pretty sure palm trees don't come with zig-zag leaves. Thanks kopritis for providing an image that demonstrates the jaggies in a K800 image. See, it's not just my K800. The K800 camera sucks.
I actually did some sample shots today with my very old fixed focus 1mp camera and it doesn't suffer jaggies at all. In fact it's 1mp images are superior and you can zoom in them far more than a K800 3mp image. The K800 camera is a joke - it's a gimic that fails to deliver on it claims of being a true digicam. Don't get me wrong here either, from what I've seen the N73 isn't any better - but it doesn't suffer the jaggies.
I'm still to see any driver that offers any real improvement. As far as I'm concerned the K800's 2mp images are better if you've modded the driver to increase their max file size and compression.
Posted by [c3]
On 2007-09-01 16:28:26, dEaD-nErVe wrote:
Here U Go [c3] Thanks To Kriptos
http://www.4shared.com/file/23335320/e4adbb02/27camdriver0.html
thanks for the link. Do u know if it has the 2mp mod? the one mongoos is talking about? and does it do video at 30 fps?
thanks
Posted by mongoose3800
Hey everyone, if you're going to post modded drivers can you be a little more professional and update the comments in the driver as well. It sucks to look through a driver and see the original comment about a setting only to find it has been changed by someone who couldn't be bothered updating the comment. Not only is it lazy, it makes it very hard for others to see what settings are being used. Therefore, making it harder for others to possibly improve.
Posted by [c3]
Nice. i was just thinking about that. its like u've read my mind!
Posted by hullabaloo
On 2007-09-01 15:17:23, TheNerd wrote:
options? I dont think there are any,just point and shoot.
Ok, I thought there would be some kind of ISO settings. I should have read better the whole topic...
Now another question that [c3] is asking too : What version of this camera driver supports the 30fps video recording ?
Posted by Mike2
On 2007-09-01 16:49:46, mongoose3800 wrote:
Hey everyone, if you're going to post modded drivers can you be a little more professional and update the comments in the driver as well. It sucks to look through a driver and see the original comment about a setting only to find it has been changed by someone who couldn't be bothered updating the comment. Not only is it lazy, it makes it very hard for others to see what settings are being used. Therefore, making it harder for others to possibly improve.
In case someone doesn't change the comments, just use ExamDiff to find the differences between the original camera driver and the modded one
Posted by mongoose3800
On 2007-09-01 17:29:07, hullabaloo wrote:
On 2007-09-01 15:17:23, TheNerd wrote:
options? I dont think there are any,just point and shoot.
Ok, I thought there would be some kind of ISO settings. I should have read better the whole topic...
Now another question that [c3] is asking too : What version of this camera driver supports the 30fps video recording ?
I've got no idea as the K800's video ability is crap. Even at 30FPS no one would really give a toss as it is still too small! Really, just give up on it for video - it sucks.
Posted by masada71
On 2007-09-01 18:03:46, mongoose3800 wrote:
On 2007-09-01 17:29:07, hullabaloo wrote:
On 2007-09-01 15:17:23, TheNerd wrote:
options? I dont think there are any,just point and shoot.
Ok, I thought there would be some kind of ISO settings. I should have read better the whole topic...
Now another question that [c3] is asking too : What version of this camera driver supports the 30fps video recording ?
I've got no idea as the K800's video ability is crap. Even at 30FPS no one would really give a toss as it is still too small! Really, just give up on it for video - it sucks.
Posted by myk800i
does it really make "that much" of a difference?
Posted by masada71
On 2007-09-01 18:25:55, myk800i wrote:
does it really make "that much" of a difference?
Posted by kopritis
ok! 30fps video recording for those who is curious.. kopritis 2.9 camdriver
make tests... and then we are talking about my previous post about 30fps video...
I will say't again 30fps video recording is crap!!! make tests to see your self what i say... Start a video rec and make a full zoom...
download link
http://www.megafileupload.com[....]/2-9-30fps-camdriver0-rar.html
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-09-01 18:47 ]
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-09-01 19:19 ]
Posted by [c3]
Thanx for the driver big K
the video recording is great apart from the zoom issue i dont know if youre aware of it or not? Ill post some pictures with 2.8 and 2.9 of the same object. U cant notice a big difference but it is there 
Here is my 2.8 photo
And this is the 2.9 one
U can see the difference between the two, the noise is till there, but the 2.9 one looks sharper.
thanks kopritis
Posted by norbi_nw
good job kopritis. Did you tested the 20-25FPS video? does it crash? Yes the videos are small, but they look "good" on the phone in fullscreen.
Posted by vegetaleb
photos taken by 2.8:
MIAOUUUU
_________________
Prince Vegeta,prince of all sayans
[ This Message was edited by: vegetaleb on 2007-09-01 19:45 ]
Posted by KTCY
how to extract the original driver from phone anyway ?
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-09-01 20:36:01, norbi_nw wrote:
good job kopritis. Did you tested the 20-25FPS video? does it crash? Yes the videos are small, but they look "good" on the phone in fullscreen.
no i didn't tested on 20-25fps, but i will do soon...
Posted by hullabaloo
2.9 photo sample :
3MP - Normal Mode - Taken this morning
The photo is much sharper than with the original driver. Great job Kopritis
Posted by Vinny67
On 2007-08-31 14:04:16, kopritis wrote:
On 2007-08-31 14:00:49, Vinny67 wrote:
Fantastic - can you give us an idea of what's changed?
Was I right - have you reduced the sharpness?
yea i put it back the sharpeness to FF and i "play" with other settings...
kopritis - haven't had a chance to try the 2.9 driver.
Downloaded it and noticed that you've decided to increase the sharpness again.
Any particular reason for this?
Comparing this to the unmodded 2.5 driver there seem to be a lot of changes.
Would you be kind enough to give a very brief explanation to those of us who are not as good at this sort of thing as to what settings you've changed and why?
Thanks for your time and effort for all your drivers.
Posted by Vinny67
Picture taken using the 2.5 unmodded driver yesterday.
I personally think this picture looks awful.
Does anyone know why things on the left hand side of the image seem less in focus then the middle and right?
Posted by tucurel_day
k i think 2.9 is good but i think that you could make another one without the zoom bug with normal recording sry for my poor english
Posted by kopritis
2.9 With normal video recording
http://www.megafileupload.com[....]-normal-vr-camdriver0-rar.html
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-09-02 11:45:18, Vinny67 wrote:
kopritis - haven't had a chance to try the 2.9 driver.
Downloaded it and noticed that you've decided to increase the sharpness again.
Any particular reason for this?
Comparing this to the unmodded 2.5 driver there seem to be a lot of changes.
Would you be kind enough to give a very brief explanation to those of us who are not as good at this sort of thing as to what settings you've changed and why?
Thanks for your time and effort for all your drivers.
Do you want blury pictures at night??? i think not... thats why 05 to sharpeness.
The only thing that i've change in 2.9 is sharpeness, compression, iso setting and video recording.
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-09-02 12:34 ]
Posted by tucurel_day
thanks man
Posted by magnificus
I have CID52, any instructions on how to update this camera driver?
thank you!
Posted by chrisgestapo
On 2007-09-02 13:58:12, magnificus wrote:
I have CID52, any instructions on how to update this camera driver?
thank you!
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=153863
Posted by magnificus
thank you!
Posted by carelvdmerwe
wow thanx a lot kopritis .. it looked really great.
btw..is there a way to get better quality sound on the vid? [sorry if its a dumb question]
Posted by obi none
U guys have made great improvements, Has anyone tried:
fixing issues like the blown high lights and washed out colours?
maybe even getting the image stabilizer to work in all modes eg. so the auto focus can be used too for more consistantly sharp pics?
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-09-02 16:31:14, carelvdmerwe wrote:
wow thanx a lot kopritis .. it looked really great.
btw..is there a way to get better quality sound on the vid? [sorry if its a dumb question]
I dont know man! But i dont think so!
Posted by kopritis
On 2007-09-02 16:40:15, obi none wrote:
U guys have made great improvements, Has anyone tried:
fixing issues like the blown high lights and washed out colours?
maybe even getting the image stabilizer to work in all modes eg. so the auto focus can be used too for more consistantly sharp pics?
Thanks for the great idea! I will try to fix the image stabilizer but not for all modes! Only at auto mode and night portrait....
Posted by herbellis
1mb macro shots taken with new 2.9 driver:
Get original picture
Get original picture
[ This Message was edited by: herbellis on 2007-09-02 16:30 ]
Posted by dEaD-nErVe
Thanks kopritis for the 2.9 Driver
i tried 30fps its not that good the normal video Driver is better IMO
Again Thanx
Posted by herbellis
I do hope the pictures i posted are really from the 2.9...
You see,
according to the hidden k800i menu, my cam driver is still 2.5
However, I did use XR++ to transfer the cam driver to its folder. and removed the battery afterwards..
Edit: sorry for the x2 post
[ This Message was edited by: herbellis on 2007-09-02 16:44 ]
Posted by tucurel_day
well the camera in the secret menu should say is 2.9
Posted by tucurel_day
here is one for you a cam drive that takes 35 fps with no zoom bug if you can combine with the 2.9 drive cam it would be great news http://rapidshare.com/files/5[....]camdriver_35fps_video.rar.html
[ This Message was edited by: tucurel_day on 2007-09-02 21:48 ]
[ This Message was edited by: tucurel_day on 2007-09-02 21:50 ]
Posted by norbi_nw
wow. no zoom bug? if not, im sure kopritis CAN fuse the 2 drivers together. 2.9 is running Ok for now.
Posted by tucurel_day
yes and i have noticed that 2.9 focus almost instantly with is very good even in low light the focus is made vrey fast compare to the last drivers
good job man
Posted by [c3]
im loving 2.9, it would be great if you can add the 35 fps to it, then it would be the ultimate 3.0
Posted by kopritis
i wonna test that 35fps video... and then i will post the mod 3.0
[ This Message was edited by: kopritis on 2007-09-03 00:16 ]
Posted by fraseyboy
Thanks Kopritis! Love your new 2.9 driver. Your da man!!!
Can't wait till your next release.
Posted by limzm
omg, the 35fps video rocks! indeed there's no zoom bug..
though when u see the video seems desync while taking, but when u play the video, it's totally synched!!.
can't wait for kopritis' v3.0.
[ This Message was edited by: limzm on 2007-09-03 05:50 ]
Posted by rockygali
i saw this line on that 35FPS driver...
| Code: |
|
is this sumthin like a patch where i can just copy test driver on a certain folder change them whenever i want?!
Posted by tucurel_day
can t wait the next relese
Posted by pedrops
Hey Kopritis!
I've been testing your camdriver, and number1 camdriver
Whats the diference between your driver, and his?
http://forums.se-nse.net/index.php?showtopic=14624
I mean, those items he hightghted there. Buffer, compression. colour temperature...
I'm gonna post a pic of your's 2.9 and his 2.6 later
Posted by norbi_nw
BTW with flash on, pictures get too white (shot from close distance, like 0,5-1m)
Posted by skylineR35
Normal Camdriver 2.5
Modded Camdriver 2.9
Macro Mode
Flash Fired.
Fair difference located at F Lock Button.
[ This Message was edited by: skylineR35 on 2007-09-03 10:36 ]
Posted by rockygali
how bout portrait shots....
on my K810 sometimes portrait shot with flash on makes the skin glare...
for the flash also reflects back on the cam from the skin...
Posted by skylineR35
i have not try about the portrait shots...
however i'll try to shot some pics if i have time...
btw i think previous pages have some comparison, but it does not include the 2.9 one...
Posted by rockygali
yes.. im very impressed with 2.9
just need more sample shots to convince me... coz right now im fairly satisfied with my 2.5 stock driver for K810.
_________________
:: EDIT ::
also if you dont mind... kindly try it on BestPic™.
[ This Message was edited by: rockygali on 2007-09-03 11:15 ]