Posted by number1
02 is pletty anything beyond and your gonna start getting graining pictures with jagged edges, if you feel 02 isn't enough then you could try 03 anything beyond that is silly and will reck your pictures.
Posted by jomateixa
On 2007-12-23 18:40:00, number1 wrote:
02 is pletty anything beyond and your gonna start getting graining pictures with jagged edges, if you feel 02 isn't enough then you could try 03 anything beyond that is silly and will reck your pictures.
You can test my driver and you'll realise that's not correct.
Posted by killerPK
Genus 5.8 AF LED on + Number1 2.91 Mix Camdriver
I mixed genus 5.8 exposure property with number1's 2.91 and changed flash color temperature, video is set to 18 fps.
TW landscape mode:
EV 0.0 = 4 FPS shutter
EV -1.3 = 2 FPS
EV -1.7= 1 FPS
EV -2.0 = 0.5 FPS
Download Here:
http://www.4shared.com/dir/4832495/4f09d9bc/Camdriver.html
Posted by Mike2
Is it possible to actually force exposure/iso?
I want to take long exposure shots like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:8_ball_break_time_lapse.jpg .
It seems that exposure isn't actually forced when there is light (I haven't verified it by looking at EXIF info, but the viewfinder is faster and the picture saves a lot faster too).
Posted by killerPK
Sample photo with my mixed driver in TW landscape EV -2.0:
Posted by LaurensB
On 2007-12-23 21:34:14, Mike2 wrote:
Is it possible to actually force exposure/iso?
I want to take long exposure shots like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:8_ball_break_time_lapse.jpg .
It seems that exposure isn't actually forced when there is light (I haven't verified it by looking at EXIF info, but the viewfinder is faster and the picture saves a lot faster too).
4 Seconds
I don't know what the Max on the K800i is but the W810i can handle 8 or more seconds withouth any crashes. I haven't tried enhancing the exposure time yet but I did some testing with 2 seconds and this is the results :
http://my.opera.com/LaurensB/blog/2007/12/20/long-exposure-shots
Also, can we implent a Supermode like the K750i has? It would allow for some very cool camera effects!
Posted by chestertan20
genus 5.8 twilightlandscape EV -2.0
Posted by genus
Oh, moon, did you use spot metring???
Posted by chestertan20
nope i did not use spot metering only twilight landscape EV-2.0 holding it very still hehe. you camdriver is good
[ This Message was edited by: chestertan20 on 2007-12-24 03:12 ]
Posted by quangbh30
Kop's 2.7
Posted by shahnije
I've read in w810 forum on se-nse they said that if you increased the sharpness the less noise you can produce on night picture. That's why kop 2.7 sharpness 8 give more decent picture at night!!! I had tested it really works.... thats why koptritis always use high sharpness in his cam driver..... Maybe all you cam modders should try this only increased sharpness in night scene.....
Posted by quangbh30
I think so too. I took the pics in the night very easy with kop's 2.7. And i think it is better than other cam.
Posted by genus
Here is my last camdriver 5.9
- update from 5.8
- change the exposure setting
Download link, go to below post....
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-12-24 12:03 ]
Posted by quangbh30
Merry christmas ^^ Thanks Genus
Posted by faidz85
Genus 5.8 - All auto
-
Genus 5.9 - All auto
-
Ultimate v1.0 VividColour
-
Number1's 2.92
Sorry about the scene...it's my backyard...I'm liking 2.92 for now. Although ultimate vivid is not that bad, the FF function really made me think twice.
I tested under automatic cause that's what most people would do in their everyday photo snapping.
You be the judge.
Posted by killerPK
Its clear from the pictures that Ultimate camdriver 1.0 has too much sharpness, the grass looks razor sharp. Number1 2.91 is better in my opinion.
Posted by Goldmen
On 2007-12-24 10:34:55, killerPK wrote:
Number1 2.91 is better in my opinion.
And Genus 5.9.... most real for me...
_________________
http://Goldman-K800i.4shared.com/
[ This Message was edited by: Goldmen on 2007-12-24 09:47 ]
Posted by killerPK
Number1 2.92 & Genus 5.8 Mix Camdriver (Normal & Force Flash version)
TW landscape mode:
EV 0.0 = 4 FPS shutter, Sharpness 03
EV -1.3 = 2 FPS, Sharpness 05
EV -1.7= 1 FPS, Sharpness 06
EV -2.0 = 0.5 FPS, Sharpness 07
Download Here:
http://www.4shared.com/dir/4832495/4f09d9bc/Camdriver.html
Posted by faidz85
Which part from Genus 5.8 and which part of the mod is from Number1 2.92?
I really appreciate you got the version with no FF.
Already night here. Maybe will try and upload pictures tomorrow.
Posted by killerPK
On 2007-12-24 12:14:41, faidz85 wrote:
Which part from Genus 5.8 and which part of the mod is from Number1 2.92?
I really appreciate you got the version with no FF.
Already night here. Maybe will try and upload pictures tomorrow.
Exposure part (Super Night modes etc) from Genus 5.8, rest is 2.92 and some changes by me.
Posted by genus
I forgot to post all out:
Here is it, 5.9 final
Document AF_LED on:
http://www.4shared.com/file/3[....]9_camdriver_gnus_final_on.html
Document AF_LED off:
http://www.4shared.com/file/3[....]2/59_camdriver_gnus_final.html
Download from here
Some picture here:
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-12-24 12:05 ]
Posted by showbiz
On 2007-12-24 09:17:23, genus wrote:
Here is my last camdriver 5.9
- update from 5.8
- change the exposure setting
http://www.4shared.com/file/3[....]9_camdriver_gnus_on_final.html
genus. the link is not valid.. i can't download it.
Posted by genus
I change alrdy, just above your post
for those who alrdy dl my 5.9, you can redownload this, i just change someting inside little bit only, but still 5.9
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-12-24 12:18 ]
Posted by showbiz
oh ok.. i use the new link u gave..nice pic.. tq..
Posted by genus
Night mode B
Resized, added frame
Moon..
Masjid in M'sia Penang
Posted by jomateixa
On 2007-12-24 10:03:48, faidz85 wrote:
Genus 5.8 - All auto
-
Genus 5.9 - All auto
-
Ultimate v1.0 VividColour
-
Number1's 2.92
Sorry about the scene...it's my backyard...I'm liking 2.92 for now. Although ultimate vivid is not that bad, the FF function really made me think twice.
I tested under automatic cause that's what most people would do in their everyday photo snapping.
You be the judge.
The worse pics I had ever seen. How could you make it so ugly? OMG
Posted by EduX
On 2007-12-24 13:02:56, genus wrote:
I forgot to post all out:
Here is it, 5.9 final
Document AF_LED on:
http://www.4shared.com/file/3[....]9_camdriver_gnus_final_on.html
Document AF_LED off:
http://www.4shared.com/file/3[....]2/59_camdriver_gnus_final.html
Download from here
@genus:
I enjoy using Your new driver. Thank You.
@Genus and number1 and other modders
Thank You for Christmas gifts for us. Thanks for the hours spent by developing great drivers.
Merry Christmas to all.
_________________
K810i debranded, new centur`s dispdriver, Peter's HiFi v2, Genus 5.9/Number1 2.92 camdrivers
[ This Message was edited by: EduX on 2007-12-24 19:37 ]
Posted by Vit
I simply cannot see the point in taking pictures with dif camdrivers in Auto Mode and then comparing then.
What do modders work for? I guess they all want to make the best out of the camera, and that is CLEARLY NOT achieved by always using Auto Mode.
IMO you people should get pictures at the maximum quality you can get with each camdriver and then trying to compare them.
One suggestion for modding:
I agree that 08 for sharpness is beyond our needs, but what about something just above shapness 02? Perhaps 04-05 should improve our pictures' quality.
FOR INSTANCE, TAKE A LOOK AT KOP 2.7 WITH 08 SHARPNESS. AT THE WALL IT SEEMS TO HAVE MORE DETAILS THAN GENUS' AND NUMBER1' PICTURES. PERHAPS IF SHARPNESS IS TOO LOW PICTURES MAY LACK DETAIL.
ANOTHER THING IS THAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT'S ALL THAT FUSS ABOUT NUMBER1' LATEST CAMDRIVERS. HIS 2.7 WAS CLEARLY THE BEST IN TERMS OF COLOUR REPRODUCTION, BUT AFTER THAT ALL HIS WORK SEEMS TO ADD SOME BLUEISH ASPECT TO THE PICTURES. I WOULD NOT GO FOR HIS 2.9.
TO ME THE BEST CAMDRIVER WOULD BE A MIX OF N1 2.7 COLOUR REPRODUCTION + GENUS MANUAL FLASH ISO AND SUPERNIGHT MODES + SHARPNESS SOMEWHAT BETWEEN 4-5.
Posted by number1
i made 4x crops of them pictures, i used my k800i to crop the pictures
genus 5.9 (sharpness 02)
number1 2.92 (sharpness 01)
ultimate vidid (sharpness 08)
Posted by Vit
@ Number 1:
Your pic has a low level of detail. I agree that a sharpness value of 08 is way too high, but 01 is the just the opposite.
Posted by jomateixa
On 2007-12-24 21:54:04, Vit wrote:
@ Number 1:
Your pic has a low level of detail. I agree that a sharpness value of 08 is way too high, but 01 is the just the opposite.
Too high? I cannot imagine these pics better...
Ultimate Driver will always remain at Sharp 08
Merry Christmas ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by diawollo
Yah..number1 lost this battle. Ultimate cam driver in low light and with flash is better. I have done many test. Seems that the old is the best
Posted by G-Izzat
On 2007-12-25 00:23:45, diawollo wrote:
Yah..number1 lost this battle. Ultimate cam driver in low light and with flash is better. I have done many test. Seems that the old is the best
Is this even a battle?
Posted by a_amirfarzam
Hi to all
I test and compare this tree camdriver:
2.92 Number1
5.8 Genus
1.0 Ultimate
and after it i fix the colors with photoshop CS and in end i see the
all tree driver have take the yellow wish color in all .
In this tree driver the yellow wish effect is little in 1.0 ultra one .
Now how can we fix this issue ?
@Modders
Can you compare your driver photo with fixed one with PHOTOSHOP colors ?
and now the photos :
2.92 Number1
5.8 Genus
1.0 Ultimate
Photoshop edited colors
Posted by mpasanthosh
Hey i think number1 2.92 cam driver is good ithas good colour reprodution...
It would be better if he could fix the Best pic bug..
[ This Message was edited by: mpasanthosh on 2007-12-26 07:49 ]
Posted by jomateixa
On 2007-12-25 03:05:11, G-Izzat wrote:
On 2007-12-25 00:23:45, diawollo wrote:
Yah..number1 lost this battle. Ultimate cam driver in low light and with flash is better. I have done many test. Seems that the old is the best
Is this even a battle?
This is not a battle! We are here for helping each other. Do not demotivate people with these comments please!
Just choose best driver for you.
Posted by EduX
Yes, You are right. It is not a battle. The more people, the more ideas for best result.
Posted by danekro
now i think that genus 5.8 has a really colour,and number one has a bit of brightness in his cam driver...
Posted by G-Izzat
On 2007-12-25 21:57:32, danekro wrote:
now i think that genus 5.8 has a really colour,and number one has a bit of brightness in his cam driver...
Have you tried the Vividcolour camdriver by jomateixa? And also genus 5.9?
Posted by genus
I see so many discuss abt the sharpness??? So how did you all opinion about the sharpness???
Actually no matter how sharp is it, the jagger alrdy there in the picture taken wif k800i, more shaprness juz make it more noticeable only.
@number1
So, which sharpness setting we should prefer???
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-12-26 07:05 ]
Posted by nik.ditsov
I recommend somebody post a photo made in cloudy condition
with sharpness 08!!!
It's a messsss!
That sharpness is OK for me only if it's SUNNY!
Posted by genus
Here is the differrent sharpness setting comparison
08 ( as you can see that, the detail of the leaves from tree, it is very far from me alrdy, the jagger on the yellow line on road )
02 ( no more detail of leave from tree, there still jagger on the yellow line of road, but juz little blur because not clear & sharpness )
08
02
From my test, i saw that the jagger is same in both sharpness setting, more sharpness juz make the jagger more clear to be seen
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-12-26 07:20 ]
Posted by yanyanyan881
imo, sharpness should be around 4 to 6 where overall sharpness of the trees and the yellow lines strike a balance
Posted by ahil13
Merry Christmass to @all
GENUS 5.8 sharpness 06 & colour saturation 0b
and full size
www.ImageShack.us" />
Posted by genus
Wah, really nice! Sharpness 06 good also.
Posted by xwteoh
@genus
Hey, i'm using your cam driver version 5.9, i found there the super night mode is not working. When i use twilight landscape Ev-2.0, the exposure time is not 2 second same for -1.7 and -1.3.
it that my phone problem or a bug?
Posted by xwteoh
Genus 5.8
Twilight Landscape Ev-2.0
Posted by genus
The maximum exposure time is 2s, it wil only work if the environment is dark enough. The exposure time is variable depend on the light source.
Because if we set 2s exposure time for all light source, it will cause overexposure.
-1.7EV, 1s
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-12-26 09:28 ]
[ This Message was edited by: genus on 2007-12-26 09:45 ]
Posted by xwteoh
twilight landscape Ev-2.0 using your 5.9
twilight landscape Ev-1.7 using your 5.9
First Picture (twilight landscape Ev-2.0 using your 5.9)
Exposure time is 1/2sec, ISO-100
Second Picture (twilight landscape Ev-1.7 using your 5.9)
Exposure time is 1/2sec, ISO-200
Posted by genus
This was strange for you, i'm using the 5.9 now and can get it. Did you do any change to the driver???
http://www.4shared.com/file/3[....]9_camdriver_gnus_final_on.html
Redownload it again.
Or you give me the driver to let me see.