Posted by amarsidhu
I tries messing up with Lengstreet 5.11
but i was unable to do this
can someone make lengstreet 5.11 sync with mxe-60
Posted by strong
Hi to all and Happy New Year !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Milu
@Strong U know. when i see that post reply by stronh i thing " hmm 5.7 or something..."
Any way happy new year to U
Posted by strong
Ιf you think 5.6 needs improve maybe I do 5.7 some day
Posted by (zalman)
K750i@W800i CID49
Kriomag_v21.93_BETA_20080108
EM:
EM + Led + Macro:
very good driver Kriomag
narazie pasuje mojemu bratu.. jest dobry w tym ze dobre zdjecia robi na Auto.. a oto chodzilo
zeby nie bawic sie w supermode
dzieki i czekamy na kolejne prace
Posted by Sombra
Lpachuong:
In your last camdriver (A4A 11.0 Final) Macro Focus Preview don't work!
Sorry for my poor english.
Posted by fernyperez
@Kriomag:
Your 21.93 BETA looks excellent. Do u recommend me to use this on my CID49 with CID36 cam module or should I stick to using the original driver?
I´m using 5.3 with sharpness level tweaked from 4 to 6, but the difference in pics is minimal. Do u know if I have to tweak anything else like compression ratio also?
Thanks
Posted by jonaugust_69
Hi all
Happy New Year
_________________
k750 cid49 FW(w800 r1bc002)
Download Camdrivers for k(d)750/w800/w810(Site Mr.Kája) http://www.camdrivers.wz.cz/
[ This Message was edited by: jonaugust_69 on 2008-01-09 15:56 ]
Posted by leetiran
I just tested the K550 driver on my K750 cid49(old,can zoom). I replaced some top codes of k550 with those of k750,such as cam_power_on_0 ... sup_properties. when i put it in my phone. it can work. But there is something wrong on preview. but i can take picture.
It means sth like this-'$"JPEG_snapshot" 'and this' WAIT_FOR_TRIG = $h0 25 5 1000 $c0 00 $"TIMEOUT" $cx; ' can be used in our k750/w800/w810?
[ This Message was edited by: leetiran on 2008-01-09 16:19 ]
Posted by strong
@jonaugust_69
Καλη Χρονια που χαθηκες εσυ?
Posted by aabg
@Raider
nop i only use that and i don't have that patch,
i will try it uploading it again
Posted by Kriomag
On 2008-01-09 18:23:22, strong wrote:
@jonaugust_69
Καλη Χρονια που χαθηκες εσυ?
ευτυχισμενο νεο ετος!
Google translate is a very useful tool
Posted by Tomix
Ευτυχισμενο το νεο ετος σε εσας!
Kriomag is your driver fast? I mean ENM.
Posted by MAkC_UA
Kriomag,
I take your driver for camera (tested both 21.93 (20080108) and 21.91) but the both have a very big time of shooting (taking picture). It's nearly 4-5 seconds. Is it normal for your driver, or it's something with my phone (k750)?
Posted by Raiderski
ENM cannot be fast. in this case fast = ugly pic
Posted by Tomix
I mean like 1-2 sec or 5-6 or 3-4 sec. not 1/500 or 1/60000
Posted by MAkC_UA
Tomix, you see, while taking photo for 4 seconds you can't take an accurate shot if you don't have any stabilizer or at least tripod. That's why I am asking how to photo with such big time...
And one more question - does this driver works with any firmware of k750 or only with specified one?
[ This Message was edited by: MAkC_UA on 2008-01-09 21:38 ]
Posted by Raiderski
long exposure time in ENM is nice feature. this is gold key for good enough photo in bad light conditions. this is simple deal: time vs. quality. this mode must be "slow". sorry guys but you must to swallow this fact
Posted by Kriomag
On 2008-01-09 21:03:18, MAkC_UA wrote:
Kriomag,
I take your driver for camera (tested both 21.93 (20080108) and 21.91) but the both have a very big time of shooting (taking picture). It's nearly 4-5 seconds. Is it normal for your driver, or it's something with my phone (k750)?
Select Normal Picture Quality in Menu (but quality of picture will be just like with default driver = poor)
Long Exposure (Fine Picture Quality) = good photo quality
Short Exposure (Normal Picture Quality) = poor photo quality
Posted by fernyperez
This is a night mode + flash pic using K750 cid49 with cid36 cam module. FW is w800i r1bc002 with camdriver 5.3 (sharpness 6). To me, it still looks grainy even though it´s the cid36 module. Do u recommend your 21.93 camdriver?
Cheers
Posted by lpachuong
Maybe you can give A4A-11.00 final a try
Feedback for A4A is welcome and thank you. At the moment, I have exams until next month so I dont spend much time for modding and correcting the bugs. I will give another go for k750i/w800i/w810i and I will move to k800i/k810i later on
Now I can borrow my roomate's k810i
Posted by hillgx
Kriomag v21.93 BETA
my w810i
Posted by MarkJason
Can anyone explain this to me?
07 02 00 13 50 4E 4B #END
It's from SEQ_SET_PROP_5...
Posted by MAkC_UA
Kriomag,
okey, thank you!
your driver is very pretty
Can you tell me one more thing - what is the difference betwееn your driver NORMAL mode and original driver (best or normal modes) except monual focus? what jpeg compression? i just want to know for myself
Posted by Kriomag
On 2008-01-10 07:33:25, MAkC_UA wrote:
Kriomag,
okey, thank you!
your driver is very pretty
Can you tell me one more thing - what is the difference betwееn your driver NORMAL mode and original driver (best or normal modes) except monual focus? what jpeg compression? i just want to know for myself
With picture quality Normal:
- based on 7.7final (by Andeo), better sharpness, fast autofocus etc (i dont remember it all at this moment
).
Jpeg compression is (forced in all modes) ~92% in Day mode and 89% in Night mode (for stability when using ENM).
Posted by Kriomag
On 2008-01-10 02:31:29, MarkJason wrote:
Can anyone explain this to me?
07 02 00 13 50 4E 4B #END
It's from SEQ_SET_PROP_5...
Jpeg compression level for normal/led/mxe-60?
Posted by SPU
On 2008-01-10 02:31:29, MarkJason wrote:
Can anyone explain this to me?
07 02 00 13 50 4E 4B #END
It's from SEQ_SET_PROP_5...
Starting, average and final quality.
Posted by MarkJason
@Kriomag and SPU - I'm using Sarmad's 5.8 driver... His values are 5b 5b 5b.. Raiderski gave me his values... 50 4e 4b... If those values are START, AVERAGE, FINAL.. then the compression value for MXE-60 was not defined? So it would be the default HEX 32? 50%? Cause I just wanna change the compression value of the MXE-60 cause it uses high compression... i'm getting 80k~250k pictures... Raiderski's values are much the same... a little bit higher...
Posted by SPU
MarkJason
MXE is a special case.
In the original driver this is done in SET_JPEG_QUALITY macro:
We have quality value in r2 then we call SET_JPEG_QUALITY
SET_JPEG_QUALITY=
$p1 0e //check out MXE state
$c1 01 //if MXE is on
$s2 32 //override quality value (32 = 50%)
#SET_JPEG_MIN(00,01) //set min size to 1KB to avoid crash
$cx //end if
07 02 00 13 $w2 $w2 $w2 #CMD_END; // finally apply quality settings.
May be you'll find something like this in the modded drivers.
BTW, IMHO, synchronization with MXE also depends on cam_ss_sync value, but i can't check this =( I have no MXE.
Posted by fernyperez
Heeellooooo... can anyone share any opinion on the pic i posted...? How come i still get grainy pics with NM+LED if i´m using cid36 cam module??!
Cheers
Posted by Raiderski
fernyperez
this is normal, don't expect nothing more from NM+led. use drivers with long exposure modes EM/ENM
Posted by don_gori
Hi to all
I want to offer me some driver for BEST MACRO shot
Posted by fernyperez
Thanks Raiderski, i´ll try your 6.7 or Kriomag´s 21.93.
Cheers!
Posted by leetiran
Raiderski
It seems that u have changed ur phone to K800.
Posted by Randolph
On 2008-01-08 21:18:38, Kriomag wrote:
On 2008-01-08 20:40:00, fernyperez wrote:
Anybody mind answering my question about the sharpness value for a cid49 with cid36 cam module.....?
max sharpness value depends only on cammodule version
for CID36 cammodule: max value is 6
for CID49 cammodule: max value is 5
Just one question, maybe interesting for other cam-module-changers:
In an K750 CID49 with CID 36 Cam module sharpnes can be set to 6 as max value? And there are no problems with the rest of the phone´s hardware?
THX,
randolph
Posted by 679
Raiderski
Is it all right with EXIF ISO information in 6.7u?
Bellow are 2 crops from serial pictures. 1-st AF mode EM, 2-nd - Macro-ON, MF, EM, but sorry EM_RATIO=3a (i like fast shooting
)
1-st ISO=800, exposure 1/20
2- nd ISO=320 exposure 1/8
Pay attention at noise level. I guess it should be more noise on 1-st snap, but it is vice versa. I check it several times.
Posted by leetiran
I have the similar cases. the Exif bug seems still in 6.7.1u
Posted by Raiderski
679
can you send me pics or give step by step procedure for each pic? after many attempts i'm still with nothing wrong in EXIF
leetiran
yes, i'll have my own big K in next week. now i have borrowed big K in my pocket everyday. my W800 grandpa still roxx but after 2 years i decided to try something new
BTW. 679 if you can please check how other driver with EM (with 3a) behaves in this case
_________________
W800 CID36 R1BD001 (driver 6.7.1u)
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-01-10 15:52 ]
Posted by fernyperez
On 2008-01-10 14:52:57, Randolph wrote:
On 2008-01-08 21:18:38, Kriomag wrote:
On 2008-01-08 20:40:00, fernyperez wrote:
Anybody mind answering my question about the sharpness value for a cid49 with cid36 cam module.....?
max sharpness value depends only on cammodule version
for CID36 cammodule: max value is 6
for CID49 cammodule: max value is 5
Just one question, maybe interesting for other cam-module-changers:
In an K750 CID49 with CID 36 Cam module sharpnes can be set to 6 as max value? And there are no problems with the rest of the phone´s hardware?
THX,
randolph
I changed 5.3 camdriver´s sharpness level to 06 (maximum apparently for CID36 cam module). However, difference in pic quality is minimum (at least i can´t spot much difference). What i don´t really get is why do the original CID36 K750s take a lot better pictures with camdriver 4.5 when this driver has sharpness level at 04 ?? I swapped cam modules on mine and the only difference i see from the cid49 module is that night pics now have hardly any noise and are pretty sharp, and u get the full 4x zoom. However low light pics (like the one i posted in a room with just a lamp on are still grainy even if u use NM+LED. I can assure u that a mate´s K750 cid36 takes sharper pics than mine even though now we both have identical cam modules... It´d be great if experienced modders like Raiderski, Chengrong, Kriomag etc could explain this a little, that why on a cid49 with cid36 cam module, pics are still pretty grainy and less sharp, compared to a full cid36 phone, and also, on this cid49 - cid36 module swap, what would be the best firmware and camdriver to use.
Any answers will greatly be appreciated,
Cheers
Posted by Raiderski
EXIF ISO issue...
no issue. this is happening only if you change EM ratio value to something else than 40. the same is on 21.92, so i guess it's on every driver with EM
EXIF ISO issue fixed in 6.7.1u was completely different thing
_________________
W800 CID36 R1BD001 (driver 6.7.1u)
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-01-10 17:53 ]
Posted by fernyperez
Kriomag, does your 21.93 Beta work well with cid49 w800 r1bc002? Coz all the modded camdrivers i´ve used work terribly with this firmware (remember i swapped cam modules to cid36 also).
Cheers
[ This Message was edited by: fernyperez on 2008-01-10 18:38 ]
Posted by Kriomag
On 2008-01-10 19:37:23, fernyperez wrote:
Kriomag, does your 21.93 Beta work well with cid49 w800 r1bc002? Coz all the modded camdrivers i´ve used work terribly with this firmware (remember i swapped cam modules to cid36 also).
Cheers
My brother has cid49 phone/cammodule and my driver works fine (fine with cid49? lol
) - best results i have with my cid49 phone with cid36 cammodule - less noise!!! and working zoom and saturation change.
Posted by Tomix
I see many of you change the cam modules... What is this cam module and where to get it and how to change?
Posted by Kriomag
On 2008-01-10 20:06:13, Tomix wrote:
I see many of you change the cam modules... What is this cam module and where to get it and how to change?
the only way to get cid36 camera module is old k750i (broken/crashed but with untouched camera module)
I changed my camera module in service (private phone store/service ? my english sucks
), they had broken k750i but with almost as new cid36 camera module it costed me only ~17$ (50zł)
Posted by Tomix
Now understand and all i have to say is f**k! I have to live with cid49...
Btw. My english isn't better [ This Message was edited by: Tomix on 2008-01-10 21:18 ]
Posted by Raiderski
oh, Tomix you have CID49 module? then i understand why you have overexposure during EM/ENM shots. yes, this is often in CID49
Posted by Mr.Kája
Common boys:) I live with cid49 and it's easy living... I haven't seen really big-enough reason to buy new module and open phone. I can make good photos too:)) Many people think, that with new module will come miracle (although don't know why) and then, they are a bit disillusioned. So, then, for miracle is better new phone
Ach, I wish, k750 could have cam module from sony, which have imobile 902 (what a irony:)) 
((
Posted by fernyperez
You know something, Mr.Kája, you´re half right. Changing cam modules doesn´t give you the exact quality that CID36 phones have but it does correct it quite a lot. I bought mine from eBay Germany, this shop that sells new cid36 cam modules (or probably used and taken out from cid36 phones). It only cost me 8 euros + postage, about 12 eur in total. However, you´re right in that there´s no really big reason in changing nor is there a huge difference in quality. What i notice is that pics now are sharp at night and have no noise, but are still grainy with low light, nevertheless. Also, day pics are sharper than before, there´s no noise when photographing shade and you also get the full 4x zoom. Where i´m going crazy right now is trying different camdrivers because i just can´t seem to get the quality that cid36s have. For someone who likes photography, best option is waiting and getting a phone with optical zoom so u always have phone and camera on u (better wait for prices to go down first). However, for people who just want to quick snap a particular moment when u don´t have a camera on u, the K750 is just fine.
Cheers
Posted by Kriomag
On 2008-01-10 15:17:18, 679 wrote:
Raiderski
Is it all right with EXIF ISO information in 6.7u?
Pay attention at noise level. I guess it should be more noise on 1-st snap, but it is vice versa. I check it several times.
...
who uses high ISO ? you must be a masochist
if you take picture with high iso the detail level are same as low as you would have taken this picture with 640x480 resolution and then resized it to 1632x1224
Posted by Raiderski
ISO800 was mistake only, very easy to reproduce in EXIF
for sure this value in real was lower than 320 (something similar is on 2nd pic). as i wrote before this faulty EXIF description is possible only when EM ratio is changed in code
BTW: EM code changes done by leetiran with small modification can be quite good solution for 679. final result is ISO160 pic but with half exposure time of original EM code
_________________
W800 CID36 R1BD001 (driver 6.7.1u), awaiting for K800
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-01-10 22:57 ]