Welcome to Esato.com


Pages:
Previous  123 ... 495051 ... 198199200  Next


Super camera driver for k750/w800/w810


Click to view updated thread with images




Posted by 666cin
orginal
5.3 driver.







kiromag 21.8 fixed.








Posted by Kriomag

On 2007-04-28 15:16:14, AllanJacques wrote:
...
seq_set_prop_5_0=$s2 59 $s8 01 06 02 00 01 01 08 #CMD_END;

seq_set_prop_5_1=$s2 59 $s8 00 06 02 00 01 00 08 #CMD_END;
...

i dont know who made this command but its funny
why set register 2 with value 59 if its not used (because line "07 02 00 13 $w2 $w2 $w2 #CMD_END" was removed - $w2 writes value 59 from register 2 to camera module...)? heh

[ This Message was edited by: Kriomag on 2007-04-29 16:20 ]

Posted by hojjat2006

On 2007-04-29 14:46:27, Kriomag wrote:

On 2007-04-28 15:16:14, AllanJacques wrote:
...
seq_set_prop_5_0=$s2 59 $s8 01 06 02 00 01 01 08 #CMD_END;

seq_set_prop_5_1=$s2 59 $s8 00 06 02 00 01 00 08 #CMD_END;
...

i dont know who made this command but its funny
why set register 2 to value 59 if its not used (because line "07 02 00 13 $w2 $w2 $w2 #CMD_END" was removed - $w2 writes value 59 from register 2 to camera...)? heh



when i can download 21.9 ??????????????

Posted by ziupo

On 2007-04-28 18:11:51, jonaugust_69 wrote:
Kriomag_v21.8_CCkopritis_modification__Jonaugust_69_For_ALL

Autofocus fixed! :kukuh
works okay thanks

http://rapidshare.com/files/2[....]_Jonaugust_69_For_ALL_v0.2.zip


jonaugust_69 - can you send this driver at another server?

Posted by sxa
We are eager for 21.9!

Posted by Raiderski
easy dudes! please be patient for 21.9. ohh... and don't expect nothing amazing like trick to enable 4mpx mode and 3x optical zoom

@kriomag
trzeba ich uspokajac bo napalili sie jak szczerbaty na suchary, co gorsze niektorzy nie rozumieja ze nie da sie wiecej wycisnac niz to co juz jest

Posted by pRo_lama
to Raiderski: nice polish language. But I´m Slovak so I understand what have you written.

[ This Message was edited by: pRo_lama on 2007-04-29 15:51 ]

Posted by Nirodha
Hi all,

I just discovered that the W810i, with firmware version R4DB005, will consistently handle JPEG 90% (Hex '5a') in the driver. I realize this might not seem like much of a boost, compared to JPEG 89% (Hex '59'), but I feel that squeezing out every little drop of performance counts.

Has anyone experimented with just how high of a JPEG value one can use before the driver starts crashing?

Peace

Posted by Raiderski
@Nirodha
there's no rule. my bigest picture has 622585 bytes (75% compression) and was done at 592kb JPEG_MAX buffer and 90% compression. sometimes it crash especially when huge amount of details at picture

@pRo_lama
in polish but true

Posted by Nirodha

On 2007-04-29 17:02:44, Raiderski wrote:
@Nirodha
there's no rule. my bigest picture has 622585 bytes (75% compression) and was done at 592kb JPEG_MAX buffer and 90% compression. sometimes it crash especially when huge amount of details at picture


Thanks, Raiderski.

Just to be sure I understand you: as long as I set a large enough buffer to accommodate the pix, the driver/firmware will cooperate? Also, what is the largest buffer size that can be set?

Posted by Mr.Kája
pRo_lama: Well, but not allmost people here are not:)) (well, i remember it too, but he didn't said, what most of us doesn't know yet... I'm not waiting miracle and now, I' just thinking about testing, not about my next standard driver. How we says here...trust, but check..or something like it in translate...anyway, I'm looking forward to new version)

Maybe, just my opinion, but v21.8 was quite sensitive to light and quite often, i got "overfiring" (don't know how to say it in english-area full of white colour) pictures. So maybe just a little more sensitive should be good, but how I said, my opinion and maybe problem at me...

Posted by Kriomag

On 2007-04-29 17:08:14, Nirodha wrote:
what is the largest buffer size that can be set?

in 21.9 it's 616kB - maximum it can be i think. (default is 600kB)

[ This Message was edited by: Kriomag on 2007-04-29 16:18 ]

Posted by Kriomag

On 2007-04-29 17:02:44, Raiderski wrote:
@Nirodha
there's no rule. my bigest picture has 622585 bytes (75% compression) and was done at 592kb JPEG_MAX buffer and 90% compression. sometimes it crash especially when huge amount of details at picture

my biggest picture was 604kB (but jpeg settings was not stable, crashes with too much details...)

Posted by Nirodha
@Krio and Raider

Hmm, ok. I just popped off one that is 650KB (665,890 bytes) and the driver/firmware didn't crash. I took a high detail shoot, on purpose, to test it.

Maybe I got lucky.

Sarmad 4.81 with Spot and Compression Switching (modded to Jpeg 90%)

Enhanced mode, Night Mode, Auto-focus, LED Flash, Auto WB, Fine Quality


_________________
Black W810i: Crystal Case, Samsonite black leather holster, 512MB + 2GB Memory Sticks, R4DB005 firmware, Pimped FM Megabass 7.0 Acoustic, Sarmad 4.81 w/Spot Camera, 20+ extra Flash menus, custom Startup and Shutdown screens. Luvin' it!

[ This Message was edited by: Nirodha on 2007-04-29 16:30 ]

Posted by Raiderski
@Nirodha

well... all this compression settings in camdrv aren't as sweet as they look:

1. (cam_ss_jpeg_buf_size_6/7/8) 0x927C0 = 600000 = 586kb
2. original 5.3 camdrv #SET_JPEG_MAX(02,30) = 560kb

in both cases it's very easy to take pictures with larger size :/ increasing the value of the compression (probably above 85%) dramatically extend picture size so it's very easy to cross the buffer limit. ofcourse SE dudes did something like this: if picture size > buffer size then decrease compression value. even with this protection it will crash when something goes wrong.

so... max buffer size? i know the answer... it's the riddle

i will make further tests because this is very interesting topic...



Posted by EduX
@ sarmadgilani
I tried the last version of your driver 4.81_spot_jpeg_cc and in the mode "normal" it has better color than in the "fine". In the "fine" the pics are reddish. . Will you make a special version with SPOT, but without CC for me, please? Thanks.

Fine


Normal


Posted by Kriomag

On 2007-04-29 17:33:28, Raiderski wrote:
well... all this compression settings in camdrv aren't as sweet as they look:
1. (cam_ss_jpeg_buf_size_6/7/8) 0x927C0 = 600000 = 586kb

right... i've forgot that 1024... lol, so my driver has buffer 601kB (default 586kB)

Posted by Nirodha

On 2007-04-29 17:35:10, EduX wrote:
@ sarmadgilani
I tried the last version of your driver 4.81_spot_jpeg_cc and in the mode "normal" it has better color than in the "fine". In the "fine" the pics are reddish. . Will you make a special version with SPOT, but without CC for me, please? Thanks.


If you use Sarmad's 4.81 with Spot and JPEG 89%, it will give you the same quality picture in Normal, without the CC, as in Fine with the CC.

_________________
Black W810i: Crystal Case, Samsonite black leather holster, 512MB + 2GB Memory Sticks, R4DB005 firmware, Pimped FM Megabass 7.0 Acoustic, Sarmad 4.81 w/Spot Camera, 20+ extra Flash menus, custom Startup and Shutdown screens. Luvin' it!

[ This Message was edited by: Nirodha on 2007-04-29 16:49 ]

Posted by Nirodha

On 2007-04-29 17:40:25, Kriomag wrote:

On 2007-04-29 17:33:28, Raiderski wrote:
well... all this compression settings in camdrv aren't as sweet as they look:
1. (cam_ss_jpeg_buf_size_6/7/8) 0x927C0 = 600000 = 586kb

right... i've forgot that 1024... lol, so my driver has buffer 601kB (default 586kB)


Thanks for the research, both you and Raiderski

Posted by hojjat2006

On 2007-04-29 17:40:25, Kriomag wrote:

On 2007-04-29 17:33:28, Raiderski wrote:
well... all this compression settings in camdrv aren't as sweet as they look:
1. (cam_ss_jpeg_buf_size_6/7/8) 0x927C0 = 600000 = 586kb

right... i've forgot that 1024... lol, so my driver has buffer 601kB (default 586kB)


when i can download 21.9 ???????????????????????????????????????

Posted by Kriomag

On 2007-04-29 19:25:16, hojjat2006 wrote:
when i can download 21.9 ?

you cant... because its not released yet be patient...

Posted by rikardo666
were is the kriomag 21.9 ????
pleasee

Posted by mario06
we want the kriomag 21.9's or a riot wil start

[ This Message was edited by: mario06 on 2007-04-29 19:21 ]

Posted by obentou
Wait for the release, I'd rather have a quality release than some spinoff of 21.8 just to make you guys happy.

Seriously guys, get something else to do, like testing other camdrivers for the time being.

Posted by Mr.Kája
Common, If I'm not gentleman, I would say: Don't behave like idiots!;) You all see that it's not released, so why are you doing it? Krio won't be have and got under preasure...and no miracle will happen after release..maybe you will be cheering about v22..em I right? So, stop it plese...pššš ;o)

Posted by norbi_nw
Yeah! don't rush krio cuz u don't have anything else to do. He's working on 21.9 as we speak. i think 21.8 was GREAT, but i'm using sarmad's now, cuz sharpness is 6 (when you release 21.9, make a special edition with sharpness set to 6 plz) STOP ASKING FOR 21.9! i rather wait and get a good camdriver instead of rushing the man and get a nasty one...


Posted by rikardo666
hey you , pass the kriomag 21.9 pliss

Posted by GsS 7tr
@Kopritis

Can you make your last Driver without CC?

THanKS

[ This Message was edited by: GsS 7tr on 2007-04-29 21:28 ]

Posted by norbi_nw
@sarmad
Your 4.81 with 4.5 compression driver... does that also have 6 sharpness?
(also plz tell me about that driver you specially made for me with the better refresh rate... what compression does that driver use @normal/fine?)
Thx

Posted by norbi_nw
sry for double post. i have some questions
1.Does bigger file size mean better quality?
2.What is the original SE driver's compression @ fine? and is the 89% compression noticable (is it better that the original driver - can we see the difference?)

Posted by Mr.Kája
to norbi_nw: 1.) not at all, but yes, bigger size gives chance for better photos.
2.) I don't know, but don't see, we can see bigger differences.

to Krio v21.8: But I wanted to rewrite old post (it wasn't sent). Krio, I know, it's a bit late, but I think, in your 21.8, you have too high level of contrast and maybe you could do it only a litle bit "darker"....I see many "overburnt" photos from 21.8 and even had a few...

Posted by volgovt
Test pics of Sarmad's 4.81(from first release post with spot) and 5.03 (original). My opinion - 5.03 gives colors closer to reality. 4.81 tends to pinkish. I prefer 5.03

4.81 Auto,Normal


5.03Auto,Normal


4.81Auto,Normal, EM


5.03Auto, Normal, EM


4.81ENM, Auto, Normal, some EV decrease


5.03ENM; Auto, Normal, some EV decrease


4.81ENM, Incandenscent, Normal, some EV decrease


5.03ENM, Incandenscent, Normal, some EV decrease


And incredible ENM from Korpitis v6 Auto,Normal, Some EV decrease (it has obviously longer exposure, more difficult to keep hands stil for longer time:)


I must notice that night pictures were taken in really low light. Also the light has ellow-orange tone. The closest fit to real colors is in between 5.03-ENM-Auto and 4.81-ENM-Incandenscent shots, thow Korpitis v6 looks very nice .

I didn't ry yet latest Sarmad/Korpitis drivers.
I'll repeat myself - is it possible to have these mods on one driver for example Normal-Korpitis/Fine- Sarmad?They would accomplish each other well!!!
I also will try Kriomag 21.9, when it is out ...




[ This Message was edited by: volgovt on 2007-04-29 22:29 ]

[ This Message was edited by: volgovt on 2007-04-29 22:33 ]

[ This Message was edited by: volgovt on 2007-04-29 22:35 ]

Posted by pakraider
Thanks for all the feedback and sample shots guys.. I'm currently working on a new driver. 5.6.. and so far its looking good.. It's going to be a mix of the great macro shots from 4.81 and the better colors and brightness of 5.03.. so hopefully this will be good my goal is to have great sharp macro shots, and sharp and crisp landscape shots with good colors.

btw, i recommend not using CC indoors, it works great on outdoor shots at least on the W810.

Posted by volgovt

On 2007-04-29 23:39:12, sarmadgilani wrote:
Thanks for all the feedback and sample shots guys.. I'm currently working on a new driver. 5.6.. and so far its looking good.. It's going to be a mix of the great macro shots from 4.81 and the better colors and brightness of 5.03.. so hopefully this will be good my goal is to have great sharp macro shots, and sharp and crisp landscape shots with good colors.

btw, i recommend not using CC indoors, it works great on outdoor shots at least on the W810.


Great! I'll wait for the next one to try! Do you think it is worth to include any CC at all?
BTW, how did such features as Janek's ENM speed up, and Mladen's compression trick behave? Are you going to use it in future mode? Are you going to keep smooth prview, or it interferes with focus?

Posted by Raiderski
@volgovt
about Mladen auto compression... look at page 155, smaller file size but worst quality (default 75%) and that's all

Posted by volgovt

On 2007-04-29 23:55:32, Raiderski wrote:
@volgovt
about Mladen auto compression... look at page 155, smaller file size but worst quality (default 75%) and that's all


Yeah, I agree, actually for me quality is important, size doesn't matter. Any way out of interest what about BLKSNAKER's compression?

Posted by volgovt

On 2007-04-29 10:16:29, pikszel wrote:
Sarmad_5.03 with Janek's speddtrick (thanks Janek )


Thank you! I want to try 5.03 with em/enm speedup

Posted by pakraider
I'm going to stick with stock compression tables.. the EM trick by Janek has been in 4.81 and I'm going to keep it most likely, or perhaps have a switch for it to be on and off, we'll see.

btw, the BLKSNAKER compression thing is the same as Mladen.. the commands he uses for compression have typos so nothing really happens, it ends up being the same thing as Mladen (which is not defining any compression tables or values at all)

Posted by guguly

On 2007-04-28 12:12:55, kopritis wrote:
@All

can anyone test my new mod on w810? Because i don't have a w810 and i don't know if it's work...
For k750 and w800 works ok!


i had some free time and tried to test your camdriver 35.7 on my w810. unfortunately, picture comes out ALL blurry.

so, i had to switch back to 5.03. but thanks still for your work...

Posted by MiHaU
Rotfl.. Stop asking for new Kriomag's camdriver. If you want it, make it yourself.. ;/ Do you think he hasn't got job, private life, etc.? If you're so smart DO IT YOURSELF! And if you can't do it, then be patient..

Posted by cuckoo
i think the buffer is 614K.
we hope the size of picture over 700K,because the pic is very good-high quality.

Posted by cuckoo
my biggest picture is 608K,only a few. the buffer is 600K.

[ This Message was edited by: cuckoo on 2007-04-30 02:14 ]

Posted by kopritis

On 2007-04-29 22:27:14, GsS 7tr wrote:
@Kopritis

Can you make your last Driver without CC?

THanKS

[ This Message was edited by: GsS 7tr on 2007-04-29 21:28 ]


Go to the page 163... at the 1rst post

Posted by kukuh
for some1 who often after taking picture but going to standby screen (without saving), it is better using automatic jpeg compression method....

Posted by pram_zx
Still wait for Kriomag v21.9

Posted by Kriomag
Why you want 21.9 so badly? its nothing special, just modified 21.8 ...some zoom modification (4 zoom modes), brighter videos (+0.7EV by default), w900 jpeg settings, smaller filesize (18kB), etc

Posted by kukuh
@kriomag,for your 21.9 please pay attention to:
seq_set_prop_0=
and also
seq_get_prop_12=

those are effect exposure setting, i think it's better using:

seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 09 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;
and
seq_get_prop_12= 05 01 00 25 02 $f $r3 0 0 1;

i test it with w800i cid36

Posted by Kriomag

On 2007-04-30 08:37:55, kukuh wrote:
@kriomag,for your 21.9 please pay attention to:
seq_set_prop_0=
and also
seq_get_prop_12=

those are effect exposure setting, i think it's better using:

seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 09 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;
and
seq_get_prop_12= 05 01 00 25 02 $f $r3 0 0 1;

21.9 like 21.8 is based on 7.7final (best driver for me) so settins are different you can always change it later as you want

Posted by hojjat2006

On 2007-04-30 08:55:17, Kriomag wrote:

On 2007-04-30 08:37:55, kukuh wrote:
@kriomag,for your 21.9 please pay attention to:
seq_set_prop_0=
and also
seq_get_prop_12=

those are effect exposure setting, i think it's better using:

seq_set_prop_0=$s0 %0 $-0 09 06 02 00 01 $w0 06 #CMD_END;
and
seq_get_prop_12= 05 01 00 25 02 $f $r3 0 0 1;

21.9 like 21.8 is based on 7.7final (best driver for me) so settins are different you can always change it later as you want



when i can download 21.9 ?????????????? please answer

Posted by kukuh
@ hojjat2006
21.9 is under development,,be patient

[ This Message was edited by: kukuh on 2007-04-30 08:04 ]


Pages:
Previous  123 ... 495051 ... 198199200  Next
Click to view updated thread with images


© Esato.com - From the Esato mobile phone discussion forum