Posted by sarmadgilani
Sarmad's 5.0 - based on 4.5
features from Kriomag's 21.6
Download Link:
http://www.mediafire.com/?0tjzhgz3mdt
Posted by mikeypants
On 2007-04-11 11:05:01, sarmadgilani wrote:
Sarmad's 5.0 - based on 4.5
features from Kriomag's 21.6
Download Link:
http://www.mediafire.com/?0tjzhgz3mdt
All of Kriomag's drivers have worked perfectly on my W810i. What is the advantage of using your file? (My W810i is CID49.)
Posted by myavu
On 2007-04-11 11:05:01, sarmadgilani wrote:
Sarmad's 5.0 - based on 4.5
features from Kriomag's 21.6
Download Link:
http://www.mediafire.com/?0tjzhgz3mdt
Sarmadgilani... Is this the bug free one? And you tested...
Posted by sarmadgilani
@myavu .. yep, I tested it and it works great.
@mikeypants .. All W810 phones are CID49
A lot of W810 users get sharper and higher quality shots with drivers based on 4.5. Only way to see what works best for you is to try
Posted by mikeypants
On 2007-04-11 11:18:30, sarmadgilani wrote:
@mikeypants .. All W810 phones are CID49
A lot of W810 users get sharper and higher quality shots with drivers based on 4.5. Only way to see what works best for you is to try
So your driver is exactly the same as Kriomag's, except it is based on the code of camera driver 4.5?
Posted by sarmadgilani
On 2007-04-11 11:23:28, mikeypants wrote:
So your driver is exactly the same as Kriomag's, except it is based on the code of camera driver 4.5?
Yep, its the same features as Kriomag's except its based on 4.5 (instead of 7.7). There might be some minor things here and there but the features are identical and work exactly the same way.. if I make any big change then I'll point it out.
I stopped making my own mods and now focus on taking Kriomag's excellent work and porting it over to 4.5's base and tweaking it for the W810.
So, credit goes to Kriomag for the real hard work.
Posted by myavu
On 2007-04-11 11:18:30, sarmadgilani wrote:
@myavu .. yep, I tested it and it works great.
@mikeypants .. All W810 phones are CID49
A lot of W810 users get sharper and higher quality shots with drivers based on 4.5. Only way to see what works best for you is to try
Thanks Buddy... I am loading the driver...
Posted by guguly
wow! the past days has been like a marathon of supercamdriver releasing and testing! hopefully, this latest version will be more stable so everybody can all rest for a while... thanks to all modders and testers,i.e. kriomag,sarmad,chengrong,kopritis and everybody else for their work..=)
@sarmad
thanks again for the customized camdriver "lite". its awesome!! maybe someday, i'll give the "fully-loaded" version a try...if its not too confusing for me... =)
@myavu
using a 7.7 based driver with my w810 gives good result but try and compare it out with the 4.5 based and like in my case, maybe you can also see the difference.
[ This Message was edited by: guguly on 2007-04-11 10:51 ]
Posted by myavu
@myavu
using a 7.7 based driver with my w810 gives good result but try and compare it out with the 4.5 based and like in my case, maybe you can also see the difference.
@guguly
I had already tested 4.5 based 21.4 & 21.5 both was superb but later was restarting on Night mode / ENM... But 21.5 was more sharper than 21.4 though it was the stable among both. I am testing 21.6 and update it in few minutes.
Posted by Kriomag
On 2007-04-11 12:02:52, myavu wrote:
@guguly
I had already tested 4.5 based 21.4 & 21.5 both was superb but later was restarting on Night mode / ENM... But 21.5 was more sharper than 21.4 though it was the stable among both. I am testing 21.6 and update it in few minutes.
now v21.5 is also fixed
(if you prefer spot instead CC)
Posted by AllanJacques
On 2007-04-11 12:47:45, Kriomag wrote:
On 2007-04-11 12:02:52, myavu wrote:
@guguly
I had already tested 4.5 based 21.4 & 21.5 both was superb but later was restarting on Night mode / ENM... But 21.5 was more sharper than 21.4 though it was the stable among both. I am testing 21.6 and update it in few minutes.
now v21.5 is also fixed
(if you prefer spot instead CC)
is this the main change or the "only" chamnge Kriomag?
i mean, is the driver the same?
Thanks and could you tell me what was causing the instability?
Posted by 679
@Kriomag.
Can you give little help to fit your driver 21.5 for my need. I don't like 16X zoom, so which line can be edited to replace 16X zoom to 4X. Thx.
[ This Message was edited by: 679 on 2007-04-11 12:25 ]
Posted by EduX
On 2007-04-11 12:47:45, Kriomag wrote:
On 2007-04-11 12:02:52, myavu wrote:
@guguly
I had already tested 4.5 based 21.4 & 21.5 both was superb but later was restarting on Night mode / ENM... But 21.5 was more sharper than 21.4 though it was the stable among both. I am testing 21.6 and update it in few minutes.
now v21.5 is also fixed
(if you prefer spot instead CC)
The new link for 21.5 fixed, please. Thanks.
Posted by mirage_bgnow
@Kriomag and @Sarmad:
Great driivers, but on main phone are unstable, i mean that the jpeg compression is may be higher and drop me on desktop after taking a pic. It's happens usually at very high sunlight and at very exactly specifical places...
[ This Message was edited by: mirage_bgnow on 2007-04-11 12:16 ]
[ This Message was edited by: mirage_bgnow on 2007-04-11 12:17 ]
Posted by myavu
Sarmad's 5.0 - based on 4.5 - Features from Kriomag's 21.6
Tested... But If I say... 21.4 (4.
is still the best of best for me....
CC - Auto - MacroOn
NoCC - Auto - MacroOn
CC - MF1.1 - MacroOn
NoCC - ENM - Auto - MacroOn
Sharpness is not upto 21.4 (4.
/21.5Fixed (4.9)
Posted by myavu
@Sarmad
I think CC is the major issue...
Natural color is providing good result... (In Day light-as I tested)
Try a 21.6 based on 4.5 with out CC...
Posted by sarmadgilani
On 2007-04-11 14:17:33, myavu wrote:
@Sarmad
I think CC is the major issue...
Natural color is providing good result... (In Day light-as I tested)
Try a 21.6 based on 4.5 with out CC...
You can just change the picture quality setting to "Normal" to turn the CC off; no need for a new driver. "Fine" will turn CC back on.
Personally, I am still using 4.8 since it gives me the sharpest picture, which you have also confirmed as well. Did you mean you wanted a 4.8 with no CC? I will post that shortly because I think that's what you meant.
[ This Message was edited by: sarmadgilani on 2007-04-11 13:45 ]
Posted by sarmadgilani
Just some different things for folks to try... these have JPEG 85 compression, so it should be stable and not kick you back to the main screen.. (85 is the default level for Fine quality in the 4.5 drivers)
I recommend the 4,8 with no CC since it gives nice clean and sharp shots on the W810.
Sarmad 4.8 with no Color Correction
based on 4.5 and Kriomag 21.4
Link: http://www.mediafire.com/?czjnwrujnnf
Sarmad 4.9 Lite
has the Enhanced Modes, but default 4x zoom and no Manual Focus.
Link: http://www.mediafire.com/?czjnwrujnnf
Posted by myavu
On 2007-04-11 14:44:41, sarmadgilani wrote:
On 2007-04-11 14:17:33, myavu wrote:
@Sarmad
I think CC is the major issue...
Natural color is providing good result... (In Day light-as I tested)
Try a 21.6 based on 4.5 with out CC...
You can just change the picture quality setting to "Normal" to turn the CC off; no need for a new driver. "Fine" will turn CC back on.
Personally, I am still using 4.8 since it gives me the sharpest picture, which you have also confirmed as well. Did you mean you wanted a 4.8 with no CC? I will post that shortly because I think that's what you meant.
[ This Message was edited by: sarmadgilani on 2007-04-11 13:45 ]
Yes... but why 21.6 is not sharper as 21.4... it was a Evolution...
CC on,off is good feature in 21.6 but 21.4 dont have that...
My conclusion...
Either 21.4 should have CC on OFF
else
21.6 should be as sharper as 21.4...
Posted by myavu
On 2007-04-11 14:52:22, sarmadgilani wrote:
Sarmad 4.8 with no Color Correction
based on 4.5 and Kriomag 21.4
Link: http://www.mediafire.com/?czjnwrujnnf
What about the stability i all modes?... any restart!... I believe you checked it...
Posted by nV
Here are a few pics with the latest drivers:
Kriomag v21. 6 with CC
and without CC
I find the pic with CC to be much more realistic (without CC there's too much green color). Just look at the grass...
Posted by myavu
On 2007-04-11 15:02:37, nV wrote:
Here are a few pics with the latest drivers:
Kriomag v21. 6 with CC
---
and without CC
---
I find the pic with CC to be much more realistic (without CC there's too much green color). Just look at the grass...
but that is for long shot... Try some close shots with details...
Posted by sarmadgilani
On 2007-04-11 15:00:59, myavu wrote:
What about the stability i all modes?... any restart!... I believe you checked it...
Yes, it is stable, I have checked it on my phone.
So.. here we have the ones I recommend for now:
Sarmad 4.8 with no Color Correction
based on 4.5 and Kriomag 21.4
Link: http://www.mediafire.com/?czjnwrujnnf
Sarmad 5.01 with Pilya's Color Correction
based on 4.5 and Kriomag 21.4
Link: http://www.mediafire.com/?fc1ztvje3g2
Two things I've noted.. with Pilya's CC, video recording looks better, and having the smooth viewfinder preview ends up giving blurrier shots on my W810; I have no clue why.. but that is why I am leaving out the smoother preview and sticking to factory default.
Also, we should take a step back and see where we've come with these mods. Just for fun, here's some shots with the factory default 4.5.. before I ever knew how to flash my phone..
At night, looks nice to me
afternoon shot
as you can see, I think 4.5 gives great shots on the W810.. and no other base gives this good of daylight quality on my phone, although 7.7 comes close. so, this is why I think its important to have 4.5 as the base driver so we can enjoy this quality during the day, and the enhanced modes in low light and at night.. best of both worlds
Posted by myavu
What is your opinion regarding sharpness when compare to 21.4?
Posted by sarmadgilani
I'd say 21.4/4.8 are the best right now for sharpness and clarity.. color correction doesn't seem to mess with the sharpness, it's just a personal preference about color saturation.
Posted by myavu
I was asking NV... he prefers with CC 21.6 but the shot was not that close or detailed
Posted by MiHaU
Thx a lot Kriomag for driver fix! I was going to reflash main.. ;p
But luckily I checked forum. Thx again.
Posted by nV
On 2007-04-11 15:23:49, myavu wrote:
I was asking NV... he prefers with CC 21.6 but the shot was not that close or detailed
Ok, I will try to make a few pics of close objects, but later...
Posted by nV
Ok, here's a close up picture of my garden dwarf
Kriomag v21.6 with CC
and without CC
Again you can see that without CC, image has too much green color...
Posted by myavu
On 2007-04-11 15:55:20, nV wrote:
Ok, here's a close up picture of my garden dwarf
What about Sharpness? I prefer 21.4
Posted by mladen750i
@All
Try to auto levels pictures example, one with and one without Color Corection in eg. Photoshop, and you will see, that one without CC is closer match... Thats example that realistics is in no Color Corectioning...
Posted by mladen750i
maybe, but maybe, CC is helpful in ENM...
Posted by sarmadgilani
with color correction, its all about personal preference in the end.
i recommend the 5.01 i posted, its the same as 4.8 (kriomag 21.4) but adds the light pilya color correction. this is especially useful for enhanced mode-no more green shots in my tests.
Posted by AllanJacques
See, what i was thinking is this: since there are 4 effects that can be used in camera, like Brighten and black and withe, i was about to present an idea...
how about use those effects as we are doing with picture quality? imagine, when you turn on black an with , for example, you instead get sopot on...
what do you modders think?
Posted by myavu
On 2007-04-11 16:42:00, sarmadgilani wrote:
with color correction, its all about personal preference in the end.
i recommend the 5.01 i posted, its the same as 4.8 (kriomag 21.4) but adds the light pilya color correction. this is especially useful for enhanced mode-no more green shots in my tests.
Did you check that purple issue... in 5.01 and what about same in 4.8 without CC ?
@mladen750i ==== Same to me too... With out CC is best... in day light as wll as room light as well as in Night Mode...
Posted by nV
On 2007-04-11 16:06:52, myavu wrote:
What about Sharpness? I prefer 21.4
