Posted by ares
Nice
http://movies.crooksandliars.[....]nton_part1_060924a_320x240.wmv
[ This Message was edited by: ares on 2006-09-26 09:55 ]
Posted by borg_
Great ;D
Posted by axxxr
God i really miss Clinton....he's someone who deserves the title of President!
Check out the FOX NEWS thread for more on the news channel that likes to tell lies!
Posted by carkitter
"This video has been removed at the request of copyright owner Fox News Network, LLC because its content was used without permission".
Hahaha! Justice has prevailed.
_________________
9/11 Loose Change Second Edition Viewer Guide The Osama Tapes
[ This Message was edited by: carkitter on 2006-09-26 03:45 ]
Posted by axxxr
Trust Fox to pull a petty stunt like that...justice has other means,Here's the Video again:WATCH HERE
Transcript of the interview HERE for those of you who want to read it.
_________________
BELIEVE|TERRORSTORM
[ This Message was edited by: axxxr on 2006-09-26 04:58 ]
Posted by *Jojo*
| Quote: |
|
@axxxr - A womanizer-President
Posted by axxxr
| Quote: |
|
A womaniser president...whats so wrong with that?..that just shows he's normal like anybody else..im sure jojo you would have done the same in his shoes..i know i would have!
I think the vast majority of people would accept a womanising president rather than a president who is responsible for thousands of deaths and on top of that one that can't even string a sentence together properly.
Posted by *Jojo*
@axxxr - Oh politics again . . .
Posted by axxxr
| Quote: |
|
I was just saying that Clinton is a top man and one that rightly deserves the title of President of the United States!
That right GWB is not doing it with his intern,he's to busy killing people!
Fox News were not expecting Clinton to give them a good smack in the face....great interview!!
Posted by axxxr
I really thought that Clinton was going to punch him or something here....i so wish he did as that guy deserved it!
Posted by amnesia
Clinton is number one!
I wish he would be brought back as President.
Posted by carkitter
Hmmm... I'm confused axxxr about the point your trying to make.
You've said that Bin Laden is innocent of the 9/11 attacks which he clearly orchestrated, do you think he's guilty of the previous terrorist attacks?
In that video, Clinton vehemently states "I tiried to kill Bin Laden and if I was president now I'd still be trying to kill Bin Laden!"
Was Clinton trying to kill an innocent man? Who do you support - Bin Laden or Clinton?
Posted by axxxr
| Quote: |
|
Bin laden is innocent of the 9/11 attacks thats clear as even the FBI and CIA have openly admitted that they no solid evidence to link him to that particular attack!
How can you say that he clearly ochestrated it..can you prove it?...but think that discussion should be left in the 9/11 thread!
| Quote: |
|
Clinton tried to get Bin laden for the attacks on the USS cole and the African Embassy attacks which Bin laden did claim responsibilty for...don't forget all this happened pre-9/11.
| Quote: |
|
Bin laden has been associated with much smaller terrorist attacks but he was made the scapgoat and blamed for everything else that went wrong on from then onwards.
You seem to be very confused....Its not a matter of supporting either one....I'm supporting clinton on the basis of the thread topic which you seem to be going off!....Its about right and wrong...its not a sports match where you pick a side!
Making comparisons with Clinton and the Bush administration i think the vast majority of poeple including myself would agree that clinton is the better option although there are many policy issues which i disagreed with in the past Clinton administration.
Now please keep this thread on topic and discuss the interview with FOX ....Bin laden can be discussed in the 9/11 thread!
Posted by carkitter
Posted by Johnex
i really don't see whats funny in what axxxr said. . . . . . .
Posted by darky
as george galloway put it, 'have an attention span of more than two weeks'
don't believe everything they say on tv/the news,
I agree Clinton was way better than both the bushes, he made more alliances than ever, the U.S. had a great foreign policy and people respected it, now the U.S. foreign policy is shit, and George W. Bush is a joke to the world, even the republicans make fun of him yet the U.S. administration still seems to screw over the rest of the world to benifit from other people's misery.
Funny how Clinton is still criticized for having an affair/cheating on his spouse (something more than 80% of married americans have), but bush is not criticized for screwing up the U.S. foreign policy, making the nation seem uncredible, he can't even handle domestic situations, look at the mess that happened after Katrina (and is still happening) he even put a spying program on the nation and got away with it, the only thing Bush does is scream terrorists and his approval rating rises, sad...
The thing he has achieved is creating terrorist breeding grounds in Iraq and Afghanistan and gave the world more reason to resent/hate the U.S. , nothing like 9/11 happened during Clinton's term, makes you wonder.
Posted by axxxr
| Quote: |
|
Very well said mate,that pretty much sums it up!
Posted by ares
Clinton may be a womanizer but he was clearly one of the best Presidents the US ever had, and light years away from the ape that occupyes the seat right now
Posted by ares
John Stewart on the same subject
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DD80X9CXaw
Posted by axxxr
The Clinton/FOX NEWS Interview...an Assessment WATCH HERE
Posted by borg_
Beautiful speech by Olbermann
Posted by Krubach
"Shame on you mr. Bush ... shame on you!"
Michael Moore
Posted by carkitter
Assessments on this subject abound... here'sanother.
Posted by Krubach
@carkitter
Adolf Hitler also got to the top years before WWII, and when the rest of the world found out what he could do it was too late.
No one can track down and eliminate ALL terrorist cells that bloom everyday. They only get serious when the attack first (in this case 1996).
May my words do not prove right, but probably a terrorist cell already exists and has been reported, and in a few years from now it will strike. That day, we will say "they shoud have eliminated them back in 2006".
Posted by Debu
Soon the world will be back to normal. Link
Posted by axxxr
That still seems a million years away....besides the damage that he's done cannot be undone by any new president...will take decades for any kind of normality to return to the world!
but i still want one of those keyrings on that site!
Posted by ADT0079
someone said nothing happened during clinton.lets see first WTC bombing.clinton. and wait what about the oklahoma bombings were was he for this.ow yeah he was getting head.and just like clinton when he was in office his wife ran things just like when she had to come out about this recent interview and stick up for her man.clinton is a pussy his wife has more balls than him.and yes clinton is to blame for some of the problems we have now.he sure was quick to defend himself.he did alot of good things but also screw things up before he left office.but axxxr keep filling your head with nonsense one day you might agree with these terrorist enough to be a suicide bomber for the cause.it would sure make me and the terrorist happy.
Posted by axxxr
| Quote: |
|
Tell you what,keep head buried in the texan desert just like your facist republican friends and you might achieve your objective of becoming nazi's.
don't worry you will never achieve happiness only misery...thats what makes me happy!
Posted by PeterKay
well said bruv.
Posted by amnesia
"one day you might agree with these terrorist enough to be a suicide bomber for the cause.it would sure make me and the terrorist happy"
What does a terrorist and Axxxr have in common?
Axxxr talks about Islam.
Unless you are saying that Islam and Terrorism go hand in hand. And if so, you're a closed minded little boy.
Posted by SsTiTcH
@Adt.. Pay attention to your own history.. Oklahoma City was done by an American.. Timothy Mcveigh.. Are you related to him? As from how you post you sound like you could be.. Or are you afraid to admit America has homegrown monsters that are more of a threat to your Amerika.? Or is it now Heil George and Amerika Uber Alles.? Its scary if your an example of an average american in todays world Adt.
Posted by PeterKay
WELL SAID M8
Posted by darky
4- Now that Bush has his judges on the bench, the keychains will most likely soon be illegal (and therefore a collector's item).
now if they could only have an alarm where bush shouts "TERRORISTS TERRORISTS" I'd buy them by the dozen
Posted by soulframe
Poor old ADT0079, so full of hatred. Really doesn't have a clue what he is talking about. I pray that you educate yourself before it's too late.
_________________
P.E.A.C.E (Proper Education Always Corrects Errors)
www.davidicke.com
www.infowars.com
www.prisonplanet.com
www.ifamericansknew.org/
[ This Message was edited by: soulframe on 2006-09-28 16:08 ]
Posted by slattery69
thought this was an interesting read to add to the topic
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=31143
Posted by brix25
Bloody good interview...Clinton really laid the smackdown to the ambush tactics Faux News love to employ. I love how he admits that his administration made mistakes back in 93'...would Bush do the same if questions were asked of him on the whole Middle East debacle 10 years from now? I doubt it.
I actually had the pleasure a couple of months back to listen to Clinton speak when he was in Cape Town with Bill Gates at Government Leaders Forum.
Posted by joebmc
Very intresting, looks like there both as bad as each other!
Posted by Krubach
| Quote: |
|
And the point is... ?
Posted by joebmc
| Quote: | |||
| |||
I guess Clinton aint a saint either?
Posted by Krubach
Well...
Clinton talked about possible mesures to stop Saddam, GW applied them (i.e. WAR).
If you're talking about a missile or two targeted at industrial facilities, if GW did that it wouldn't shock me.
The point here is Terrorism and what was (not) done to stop it.
Posted by darky
um if I overthrew the U.S. now and toppled the U.S. Government would I be a patriot?
The things that Georgy and Co. have been doing don't differ that much of a dictator, they get away with everything they steal from and spy on the country, they change laws if they don't suit them, and they keep preaching that they are right and anyone who thinks otherwise is not patriotic and hell just label them terrorist. And first it was senior then junior, who is it next his brother or son, I thought the U.S. was a democrocy not a monarchy.
They are still putting Saddam on trial for executing 100 or so people who tried to overthrow the government more then 30 years ago (when the country was at war), yet no one puts Bush on trial for the 100+ a day (at least the reported ones the number is far higher) people that have died on a daily basis in Iraq since it was 'freed and democrisized' 3 years ago. According to the Geneva laws if a country invades/occupies another country it is directly responsible for the saftey, security and stability of that country.
wasn't Saddam an ALLIE of the U.S., who do you think funded him in the Iraq/Iran war, who do you think funded and helped Bin Ladin during the U.S. / USSR war, if you're young and ignorant at least take a history lesson to get your facts straight before posting that way you can defend your view more instead of just become another 'oh look TERRORIST TERRORIST'
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: darky on 2006-09-28 20:35 ]
Posted by slattery69
| Quote: |
|
the point isnt terroirism the post refers to an interview carried out in the media. my post was merely to hight light that we often forget what people did and view them through rose tinted specs as what we have in place is currently bad.
i read a survey the other day saying maggie thatcher was one of britians greatest prime ministers of this century
i remember growin up under maggie and i cant remeber to many good words said about her towards the end.just shows you what short memories we all have
as for missle attacks without wanting to take it to far off topic i did want to point out it was more than one or two. there was 24 in 1993 alone. followed by many more in 1996. a couple of links to show you
http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9609/03/iraq.wrap/index.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/155526.stm
http://www.wsws.org/public_html/prioriss/iwb9-9/edit.htm