Welcome to Esato.com


Pages:
Previous  123 ... 505152 ... 899091  Next


K800 Firmware Overview


Click to view updated thread with images




Posted by sapporobaby
Quote:

On 2006-12-17 16:16:49, CyberVisitor wrote:
Quote:

On 2006-12-17 14:41:35, sapporobaby wrote:
/.../ The k800i had its day. It is an old phone, that was at the top of the game when it came out /.../



You really are a funny little fellow



And you are such a "Merchant Banker"


Posted by baste07
don't mind sarpy guys... he has nothing worthwhile to do i guess.

also if we might remember previous phones were way older then 6 months and still getting firmware upgrade...

So RIP?... hmmm he might have had a bad exprience with the phone.. maybe lost it....

Posted by shazzydoosh
Hi all,

I come on here to check for f/w updates and to see availability and functionality. Yet I would estimate that 60% of the messages I have to read through seem to be forum members attempting to directly, or indirectly insult each other, or in some cases apparently exercising their ego's.

This is not a personal attack on anyone, as we all keep the forum alive by posting our issues and queries, but can we not just focuss on the issue at hand, and try not to make judgement or predictions on the global "mobile phone" economy and the impacts new products will have upon said issue.

On to a more technical issue, through all my reading of this thread, I haven't noticed anyones specific comment of upgrading their f/w over the air through the K800's submenu. Has anyone used this, and how did it go?

Cheers

Posted by sapporobaby
Quote:

On 2006-12-17 16:24:45, baste07 wrote:
don't mind sarpy guys... he has nothing worthwhile to do i guess.

also if we might remember previous phones were way older then 6 months and still getting firmware upgrade...

So RIP?... hmmm he might have had a bad exprience with the phone.. maybe lost it....



Bat-sh_t,

You have never proven yourself to be anything but a whiner, "where are the upgrades? Is a new one out yet? What does it do? Help, I need an upgrade." Talk about nothing worthwhile to do.

Anyway, SE has historically not released more than 3 to 4 upgrades and maybe a 5th to fix something wrong in the 4th. There is an end of life-cycle. If you knew ANY thing about phones, you would know this.

Next time stay in school and try to learn something before opening your mouth. As always, I invite you to prove me incorrect. You have been unsuccessful so far but hey, you might get lucky.

By the way, my k800i is either in my pocket or in the draw.

_________________
*edited on a Mac of course. Mac: There is no substitute*

-/..../../...//.../../-/.//../...//--./---/../-./--.//-/---//-/...././/-../-

[ This Message was edited by: sapporobaby on 2006-12-17 16:01 ]

[ This Message was edited by: sapporobaby on 2006-12-18 05:55 ]

Posted by sapporobaby
@shazzydoosh,

Good point and good question. I have spoken to SE techies that I know back in Finland. They say it does not work too well, however it does work in limited instances.

Posted by jmcomms
This debate is quite amusing. Yes, the hardware might be 'old', but it's the same platform they'll be using for some time. No company builds a hardware platform and then replaces it in a few months! If they have to do that, they're going to seriously suffer financially. Nokia were first to cotton on to this idea, and look where they are in the world rankings.

The W850i is based on the K800i platform, and you can be sure that many of the 40-60 new products due for 2007 will be the same (that doesn't mean they can't add new features, like a better camera or more memory).

The K750i is still in production for prepay and emerging markets, in limited edition colours. SE has seen how it worked for Motorola etc to produce pink, brown, silver models etc.. The K800i is out now in a variety of new colours so it certainly isn't time to say RIP yet. Our magazine, and countless others, gave it lots of awards in 2006 and it will be a best seller at Christmas. In fact, SE will probably enjoy good sales of the K750i (prepay) and W850, K800 for contract.

Bear in mind also that Sony Ericsson is now no. 1 in the UK, having outsold Nokia for some months. Apple can't come in overnight and take over, because the millions of handsets sold with Walkman players has resulted in people that want a phone & music trusting Sony's brand. Sure, people like to have their iPod (and many don't want an all-in-one device) but why should someone that wants a phone suddenly trust Apple to deliver? Walkman was a strong brand and the reputation is being restored. No wonder Apple had to take notice of the future loss of sales if they sat on the fence.

Apple had massive success with the iPod, no doubt (partly helped by Sony's inept attitude at the time), but they've not taken over the PC world even though OSX and the design of their laptops are excellent. The fact is, they've got their niche market but that doesn't mean they will succeed in any new market they enter. Naturally, I await the time that I am proved wrong if it happens.

Posted by sapporobaby
@jmcomms,

Nice post dude.

My point is, and I think you will agree is that phone manufactures move on after a period of time. They may maintain the core platform but the build upon it and seldom look back. In this very thread, you have the hanger-oner's crying and whining over an upgrade that may or may not come. If SE feels that the k800i is stable enough, they will not bother with an upgrade for minimal things. In this very thread you have people that seem to do nothing except bug hunt and then demand a fix for something that is miniscule in comparison to something major.

The comment about Apple not taking over the computer market is moot. Microsoft makes software while Apple is a hardare/software company. The comparison is not really there. Now, if you say Windows vs. Mac OS X, then you can compare, but in reality your comparison does not make much sense. The comparison is similar to the Ferrari vs. VW Beetle comparison. They are both cars but they serve two different markets with different ideas about where they want to go and how to get there.

I am however with you on the wait and see aspect. It should get interesting and hopefully something good for us consumers.

_________________
*edited on a Mac of course. Mac: There is no substitute*

-/..../../...//.../../-/.//../...//--./---/../-./--.//-/---//-/...././/-../-

[ This Message was edited by: sapporobaby on 2006-12-17 21:06 ]

Posted by Trentors
Quote:

On 2006-12-17 16:02:22, sapporobaby wrote:
Fact: If the iPhone has just half the uptake as the iPod did, does, and continues to do, it will make a market impact that SE has never achieved.

Fact: If the iPhone, like the iPod provides its users with a great interface and the ability to load and unload songs as simply as the iPod does, SE will have a big problem on its hands because the bundles software is nothing less than crap.

Fact: How many iPods out there and how many SE phones? Go do the math Einstein.



FACT??? You use that term as if all you say is a godly truth. Jesus! Get a grip for crying out loud!

"Fact": Yes if the non-existing iPhone would gain half of iPods success it will be a huge achievement. That is kind of stating the obvious. The real issue here is why should they become such a big success? The phone market is not the same as the portable multimedia player market. A very good example of this is Apple close collaboration with Motorola. They need someone to help them get into this market because what Apple offer is only a small part of the whole mobile phone experience. And the remained part is not something they have ANY goodwill in. Who do you trust more to make a phone? Apple or Nokia? I think i know what many users would prefer.

"Fact": The iPod does not have the ability to let users use other software than their iTunes which is not a easy or even convenient way to transfer files. Especially on the PC.... and guess what people use. Oh and the "great interface" they which is a Mac-fans word for "simple" and borrowed is not necessary good for phones.

"Fact": Why don't you compare Apple with... ORANGES! Do the math Einstein: How many PC's are out the compared to Apple computers? Does this means if Microsoft creates a phone it will totally dominate everything? Did this happen with Windows Mobile phones? That is not very logical conclusion!


They did something great with the iPod because there was almost NO competition and all the other companies in this segment was rather small or didn't care for much for this market. Guess what: This is not the case with the mobile phone market...


For someone as pretentious and "wise" as you are, you really don't understand much....but preaching and stepping on other people’s opinions is right up your alley it seems.


“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. “

-Bertrand Russell, philosopher, mathematician, author, Nobel laureate (1872-1970)

[ This Message was edited by: Trentors on 2006-12-18 18:57 ]

Posted by jmcomms
Quote:
The comment about Apple not taking over the computer market is moot. Microsoft makes software while Apple is a hardare/software company. The comparison is not really there. Now, if you say Windows vs. Mac OS X, then you can compare, but in reality your comparison does not make much sense. The comparison is similar to the Ferrari vs. VW Beetle comparison. They are both cars but they serve two different markets with different ideas about where they want to go and how to get there.



Well, as a Mac Mini user (as well as an iBook and Windows PC), I think I can say that the comparison is valid. There are more PC users than Mac users, and Apple has only had limited success in changing it.

It's also looking quite bad for Apple when most publishing houses are actually going from Mac to PC (unheard of a few years ago). With the launch of Intel Mac's, you're also seeing the likelihood that people will run Windows on their Mac machines. If this happens on a large scale, you'll see the end of OS X and Apple will simply become a hardware manufacturer.

Apple make nice, no, fantastic, looking machines but developers still shun it. Now the Mac is finding itself the target of various security breaches and attacks, I suppose people are figuring that they might as well stick with Windows.

As stated elsewhere, I hate iTunes. I love the iPod for its simplicity, but when SE produced the W800i, it fitted my needs perfectly. I commute an hour each way, per day. 1 or 2GB of music is all I need. Now I use a W950i (now here's a device that we should all be whingeing about when it comes to dodgy firmware) I have 1050 tracks. At home, I've got 20GB of music but I've never seen the need to carry it all with me. Clearly other people are just as happy, because I now see as many people with a Walkman phone as I do with an iPod.

I can't help but feel the iPhone will be something akin to the W950 or N91, as battery life is essential now it's on all the time. What makes anyone believe Apple can fix the problems facing every other, established, manufacturer? Will it use a fuel cell battery? Will it have a clip on battery pack? Unlikely. I suspect it will be a fairly basic offering (a step up from the Motorola ROKR models), with Apple knowing that it will sell regardless (especially in the USA) to those who are brand loyal. I can't really see it making much of a dent anywhere else.

To be honest, the best solution would be to integrate something like the GEAR4 BluEye into an ordinary iPod, so you have your music player with up to 80GB of storage.. and can make/receive calls with your ordinary phone via the headphones (which could also be wireless). Best of both worlds. If Apple did this I'd expect it to fly off the shelves because most phones now have Bluetooth. I might even go for a superslim, basic, phone and an iPod then.

Posted by jmcomms
Here is the iPhone...

http://www.linksys.com/servle[....]ksys%2FCommon%2FVisitorWrapper

Which also shows that Apple won't even be able to use the name iPhone when they do launch something. Oh dear!

Posted by Trentors
Yes indeed.

http://www.gizmodo.com/gadget[....]e-its-cellphone-now-222393.php

I can't stand the “perfect phone “thing. Apple has NO experience in making phones and yes some phone manufacturers have lame old menus (Nokia I am looking at you) but most doesn't. I don't see where Apple will improve.

And the reason why iPod is so popular is there was no competition when they established the brand. The "famous" user-friendliness is not so perfect and Creative's players are better IMO. Also in Apples....they stole it.


Posted by aremaboy
aremaboy, silence is golden!

Posted by sapporobaby
@jmcomms,

You seemed to come off a bit offensive when I am quite sure that I did not approach you that way. In fact, I said that you had made a nice post. If you desire to be offensive, we can take it to PM and do it there. However, my point was more so about the end of life cycle that devices go through rather than a long life support system that many here think should exist. By all standards, the k800i, a nice phone, is old. Over 6 months. SE is not going to put that many resources towards future development or bug fixes if the phone is quite stable and for the most part it is. SE, as well as the other manufactures, put out a few upgrades, fix a bug or two and then move on to the next best thing.

When I write a post I tend to be very succinct and to the point as I assume, probably wrong in retrospect, that many to most have a grasp of basic concepts, points, ideas, etc..... so I get right to the point and say my piece. If this made you offensive, then my bad, if not then so be it. Life will go on.

@trentors,

I will get back to you later when I have the time or inclination.

Posted by night_66
R1GB001 <-- This firmware IS not released at SE service points ..

I was at Sony Ericsson´s Experience Center in Lund in Sweden they flashed my phone with R1ED001 !!! not with R1GB001 as you mentioned in the main topic !!! And my phone is UNBRANDED ...

Posted by Trentors
Quote:

On 2006-12-18 16:52:56, sapporobaby wrote:
@trentors,

I will get back to you later when I have the time or inclination.




Well I feel much honored. Whenever it fits your highness, is fine by me.

Posted by jmcomms
Quote:
You seemed to come off a bit offensive when I am quite sure that I did not approach you that way. In fact, I said that you had made a nice post. If you desire to be offensive, we can take it to PM and do it there.



I don't think I've said anything offensive. I've merely given an opinion and justified myself when questioned (namely the Apple vs Windows bit). I certainly don't intend to start an argument, or begin a war in private email!

I will say that I don't believe that a hardware platform is 'old' after 6 months (and, if anything, it's actually a lot older as it was shown off at the start of the year to the press and would have been in development for even longer). Nokia, Motorola, Sendo (in particular, even though they're no more), Sony Ericsson and the others all develop platforms to use for years.

Pick the correct chipset, and there's nothing to stop you adding a bigger screen, more memory, a better camera or a faster processor. The successor the K800i could easily use the same platform but still have a 5 megapixel sensor and graphics accelerator for VGA video capture.

Car makers design platforms with a lifetime of up to 10 years. Imagine if they changed them every 6 months!!

Posted by sapporobaby
@jcomms,

I agree with you about hardware having a long shelf life, but remember as I stated, I was referring to phone "years". The problem is that consumers demand new and improved every few months. I was reading in an article where Nokia has a goal to release new product lines at least every six months. You made a great point about the underlying core, i.e. software, maybe the hardware to an extent. Retooling a factory to reproduce new designs would be costly and in the end consumers would suffer. So, what they do it introduce a model. Let it sell for 6 months, give out upgrades for firmware and then they move on. This is the entire point of my original post regarding this. In phone "years" (if I can use this term), the k800i is old. It was an industry leader, but now it is beyond SE's life cycle, and probably marketing cycle. I do not see as many ads for it as before. With this being said, SE will most likely not devote more time and energy into updating software, or utilize additional resources on a phone that has reached its shelf-life. If you will, compare how much the k800i costs now as to how much it was when it first came out.

Posted by jmcomms
The K800i might not be on the TV commercials, but they're promoting it through the retail network which means it's being pushed in store. Lots of deals, the silver 'Bond' edition etc.

The W850i is another K800i platform phone, and that is being pushed heavily (along with the whole Walkman family). As a magazine, we're told in advance of ad campaigns. The K800i was around the WTA tournament, and straight after SE launched its new brand identity and Walkman campaign. Rest assured, it will die down a bit in January and then they'll be pushing something else. Advertising doesn't necessarily reflect product development of course!

I still have to say you are wrong about the K800i being old. As a phone perhaps it is looking dated to you and me, but not the underlying hardware which is in its infancy or to customers who are in an 18 month contract and looking to upgrade from a K750 or Nokia N70 etc.

Nokia will churn out phones every month, but they don't build a whole new platform for it (if they did, they would make no money on the kit they sell). The N95 is quite different, with a brand new battery being used at the same time. Most Nokia handsets (and SE for that matter) share things like batteries and screens to enable bulk purchasing. Look at when Nokia had its absolutely AWFUL 128x128 pixel 4,096 colour screen that was installed in every phone for about two years!

One of my favourite SE phones is the W810i for size and usability, and the K800i still takes better pictures than anything on sale today bar the 5 megapixel LG (which is a crap phone and was sold in limited numbers for about a month). Even the 5 megapixel N95 doesn't take indoor/nighttime photos as good as the 3.2 megapixel K800i because the sensor is too small (thus over amplified noise) and the flash is too weak.

Posted by frozenwaffles
back on topic people...
has anyone got thei new R1G firmware???

Posted by Rookwise
I installed R1EG001 from Wotanserver about 4 hours ago and I've lost the Play Now icon.

Didn't put a tick in the box to select for the Wotan client to disable it either.

Have tried to reinstall R1EG001 from Wotan and made sure that the Disable Play Now is not selected but the Play Now feature hasn't reappeared.

Have contacted Wotan but can't get any reply at all

Now my menu looks like that of a branded handset and I'm not happy at all

Posted by jazon168
i hope the put it in the auto update soon... my k800 is so screwy... sometimes numbers pop up on the menu's and stuff sometimes i receive text from person A... but person B is the one showing up

Posted by Red_Rach
I've been on R1EG001 for a while now.

Posted by Sirhackalot
I hope when Se releases the next fw that it fixes the phone call list because that is somthing manditory in a phone in this present day. I can see se releasing a model in the future that can't do somthing as crucial as a call on the release.

Posted by night_66
I called Sony Ericsson Help Desk in Sweden .. they said there is NO new firmeware .. and the latest one still R1ED001 !!! so the main topic in first page should be changed.. they mentioned that a newer firmware is released at SE service centres .. but its not true ..

Thanks

Posted by mwarner
R1GB001 was added to the first post following the information posted on pages 165 & 166.
It is rather odd that Wotan and others have yet to post this version, so I am not 100% convinced it exists. If anyone can shed light on this I would be most grateful.

Mike

Posted by aremaboy
I just visited a friend with SEtool and the latest is R1EJ001. But the earlier poster said that R1GB001 is the f/w they had from Service Centre. Local firmware,maybe?

[ This Message was edited by: aremaboy on 2006-12-23 06:57 ]


Posted by sleby
hmm..
i can take a photo of my R1GB001 if you dont believe me..

if anyone understands: http://www.se-world.info/thre[....]00i-Neue-Firmware-R1GB001.html

[ This Message was edited by: sleby on 2006-12-21 17:22 ]

Posted by bronxdude
Quote:

On 2006-12-20 05:46:12, Sirhackalot wrote:
I hope when Se releases the next fw that it fixes the phone call list because that is somthing manditory in a phone in this present day. I can see se releasing a model in the future that can't do somthing as crucial as a call on the release.



this is so true. i just updated to R1ED but after a week, the call list is not working anymore....

and hope they improve on the sounds of the mp3.

Posted by boab2791
I have a branded '3 UK' K800i, if I debrand it I understand some 3 Apps will no longer work, what apps would these be apart from MSN Messenger.

Also which site is the best to use for this procedure.

Thanks

Posted by vanity
@jazon168

This also happens to my new r1ed firmware... sender B shows up when sender A text me..

also happens to my r1cb prior WSOD

Posted by thegunners
I have problem with contact ringtone which could only ring the default ringtone and i have R1ED, when i tried to update, it's said my K800i already have the latest f/w.

Anyone has the same problem and solve it?

Posted by Gome
Is R1GB001 on SEUS...???

Posted by gareb
@Gome

Check the first page.


_________________


[ This Message was edited by: gareb on 2006-12-26 08:05 ]

Posted by dragon76ers
My call list is also messed up...I I have R1ED and also waiting for an update.

This message was posted from a W800i

Posted by shery
if k750 can be made w800 then why cant k800 be made w900.
as i am new can someone tell how to put picture on side of post.

[ This Message was edited by: shery on 2006-12-26 15:42 ]

Posted by jepherberich
As you are new you should be reading this

Quote:

On 2006-12-26 16:35:52, shery wrote:
if k750 can be made w800 then why cant k800 be made w900.
as i am new can someone tell how to put picture on side of post.



Posted by dj christian
Seems there aren't any R1GB001 firmware avaliable just yet.

Posted by sleby


Posted by tai020381
Any improvements over R1ED firmware? Are u able to post original size photos taken under many conditions with this new software? Tks

Posted by baste07
what regions is the R1GB FW available on?

Posted by Royale
I have brand new k800i "Casino Royale" edition with preinstalled Casino Royale stuff (ringtones, pictures, trailers etc). The problem is, that I can not play them, I get error sayng "Cannot play this ..." All these files are with a little key logo. I have the latest firmware, also reintalled it, but nothing. I downloaded same files from SE site and result was nothing...

I don't care about these files, but this can happen also with other files. So is this my uniqe problem or... ?

In this topic http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=131325&start=30 people with similar problems blame firmware.



[ This Message was edited by: Royale on 2006-12-29 21:53 ]

Posted by baste07
so what FW do you have?

Posted by Royale
R1ED001

[ This Message was edited by: Royale on 2006-12-29 23:16 ]

Posted by baste07
can you try upgrading the FW to see if the problem still presists?

Posted by Royale
I allready reinstalled it with SEUS, but it didn't help. According to SEUS: R1ED001 is the newest I can get...

Posted by presto
The k800i is a big dissapointment. If it was JUST the software, then that can be always fixed but the hardware faults are doing my head in. The joystick problem, camera. uhhh

Posted by frozenwaffles
R1GB is on wotan now...

Posted by baste07
really? have to take a look

Posted by frakker
Yep, appears it is. I would give it a go, but I'm a bit tipsy so don't want to mess anything up

Posted by baste07
i tried it.. its no longer showing the R1GB FW for k800


Pages:
Previous  123 ... 505152 ... 899091  Next
Click to view updated thread with images


© Esato.com - From the Esato mobile phone discussion forum