Posted by RustyR605
ca we see some Chiks from Stockholm then?
Posted by janke1
ok i try to take some photos later on my chicken at my farm later
Posted by marlonski
Some nice detail seen in some of the pictures posted here that would have been lost a little with a 2mp cam, not a major difference but an improvement nevertheless and the inclusion of active stabilization will indeed be a very useful addition !
Lets see some more shots please guys
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: marlonski on 2006-06-29 22:59 ]
Posted by *Jojo*
Quality resembles that of the K750i for me . . .
Posted by rrojas260
Question: Will the K790 have a 512mb M2 card in the package?
Posted by ghostfreak
Very nice pics, will have to take some when I first get my k800i (hopefully start of next week) and put them up here
Posted by rockygali
ok a lil more convincing please... so far im not disappointed with K800 with the way you guys are talkin... it is what i expected it to be...
Posted by etaab
Anyone wish to post a (paltry QCIF) video taken with their K800i ??
Posted by goldenface
I like Stockholm.
I think I might visit this summer.
Seriously.... those pics are crackin....
Posted by Xugaa
| Quote: |
|
Yeah there's loads of difference there mate...
Ecspecially when watching the football, notice on normal tv players when they run have blotchy pixels around them, with Hi-Definition the picture is perfect, them blotchy pixels have gone.
Posted by kallegod
The image stabilizer can only be used when you have poor light conditions, for example in the Twilight landscape mode.
Posted by goldenface
@kallegod.
I wonder why that is. You mean it you can't have it on by default.
That doesnt make sense.
Image stabiliser comes on because
believes people get more shaky in the dark?!!!
Posted by kristianm
Is it just me or artifacts on object edges are really more noticeable in K800i photos, because of the strong sharpening filter being applied (IMO, it's too much)?
Posted by kallegod
I just found the possibility to turn it on also in usual Landscape mode and the Beach/snow mode, so what I said of poor light conditions, isn't true. But when you choose automatic mode, you cannot find the image stabilizer...
Posted by goldenface
Strange! There must be a reason why it can't be used.
Which menu is image stabiliser on??
Posted by godo_beaver
lets see full res pictures guys
Posted by kallegod
I can find the stabilizer only when I'm in menu Scenes and choose Landscape, Twilight landscape or Beach/Snow. In video the stbilizer seems to be visible all the time. You must self turn it on or off.
Posted by kallegod
_________________
Mobile history: GF388 -> S868 -> T28 -> T65 -> S45i -> S55 -> T610 -> SHG-E700 -> SL55 -> SX1 -> K700i -> S700i -> K750i -> P910i -> K600i -> K800i
[ This Message was edited by: kallegod on 2006-06-30 11:32 ]
Posted by admad
Now that is quality!
Posted by Arne Anka
| Quote: |
|
No, but the exposure time is much longer in poor light conditions than in good light conditions. The longer it is the more likely you will get a fuzzy picture due to hand shake. With other words the stabiliser makes more sense in poor lighting condition than in good lighting condition.
Posted by goldenface
@arne anka.
Thanks for explaing that, it make sense now.
Posted by Sir-SonyEricsson-man
hmm still can't get cybershot to work.. Can someone please tell one more time in details?
thanks
Posted by goldenface
Do you mean Bestpic?
Posted by croatia
2mpx is enough for standars 15x10 pic and photoshop is always here if you need if you do not need a photoshop better, i am satisfied with my 750 but 320x240 video bigger 320x240 screen 72 voices sound wap all over the screen etc is more interesting for me but k800 is ugly for me and i will stay on my 750 for now, really sorry for my broken english greetings from sunny zagreb,croatia
Posted by Sir-SonyEricsson-man
| Quote: |
|
I'm not sure how it works.. Do i have to activate bestpic for making something out of cybershot?
Posted by croatia
bestpic mean .got 9 pics at once when you take a shot and then you pick up the better after you see pics rest of pics you can delete if you understand me? my english is .................
Posted by goldenface
| Quote: | |||
| |||
Yeah.
Posted by Sir-SonyEricsson-man
ohhhhh thank you bouth.. Know my day is good..
But than you can't use the flash light???
_________________
World of sonyericsson-man | New and improved
Easy SEUS update
[ This Message was edited by: Sonyericsson-Man on 2006-06-30 15:25 ]
Posted by Jonaas
http://files.upl.silentwhisper.net/upload1/DSC00026-fez.JPG
http://files.upl.silentwhisper.net/upload1/DSC00027-eca.JPG
http://files.upl.silentwhisper.net/upload9/DSC00028.JPG
http://files.upl.silentwhisper.net/upload9/DSC00037.JPG
Last pic taken in complete darkness.
Posted by >500
@jonaas,
if that last pic is in total darkness, wow!!!
my k750i nad w810i are nothing like that, they have soooo much noise.
that flash is aewsome, i think i need to buy one of these phones...
Posted by Jonaas
Yes, total darkness, I was on a boat and there were no windows in our room so I took the card just when we were going to sleep.
I'll upload some more pics in total darkness if you'd like later!
Posted by Sir-SonyEricsson-man
| Quote: |
|
But please with girls on it
PLEASE
Posted by bavlondon2
CAN ANYONE PLEASE UPLOAD A VIDEO ?
Posted by JiggyJaggy
Close up macro to the point you can read the writing under the phone!
Posted by kallegod
Nice to see that the phones are coming up in other countries too, so we see pictures not only from Sweden...I am curious to see other peoples results, too
Posted by JiggyJaggy
Im a big photo enthusiast but I am going to give my digital camera to a family member....this new 3.2 mp camera is more than enough for me to be honest!
Posted by Xugaa
By the way that Macro photo you took was a bit poor and I know that the phone can do much better than that, even a K750 can do better...
Not to diss your photography skills offensively though
Posted by JiggyJaggy
No offence taken...I know it can be alot better than that, I was in such a hurry to get them uploaded though!
Posted by bavlondon2
Is no one here interestd in the video ?
Posted by Jonaas
http://files.upl.silentwhisper.net/upload9/DSC00025-wjp.JPG
That went pretty good.
http://files.upl.silentwhisper.net/upload7/DSC00056.JPG
That was, okay, I guess. Though I didn't put the Macro-mode on in that pic, so i'm sure it's not hard to make a better one.
Posted by jj03
some lovely picture's through this thread so far...the detail in some of the pic's are excellent.
Posted by etaab
| Quote: |
|
I asked on page 4 of this thread, but it would seem everyone is in denial over the K800i and its video quality.
Posted by jehrameel
nice pics jonaas
...
Posted by fatreg
www.fatreg.co.uk/k800.3GP
not bad quality but not what id expect from a 3.2mp cam....
fatreg
Posted by bavlondon2
Well judging from that video so what laffen said before the phone being released about it having improved video is rubbish then.
Posted by Sir-SonyEricsson-man
did send you a video @ hotmail adress you gave me..
Posted by manfran
Frankly, i don't much difference with the quality of the photos compared to the k750's.
Posted by Mark_Q
Jonaas,
Quite nice your photo of fruits. Something interesting I noticed as I looked at the Exif data though: the listing order of Items are different to a photo taken straight from the K800 without any software in-between.
Just compare the difference here. Is it a big secret, or would you kindly tell us which software you used?
Here "straight" photo:
Here you fruit photo:
The camera mobile is the same, as well as firmware version, so please tell us?!?
Posted by Jonaas
Hm, the only thing I did was to open the picture in Ms-Paint, then save in another folder. Now I see that the file has went from 634kb to 278kb, that's weird. I don't remember doing anything else actually. I can upload some more pictures tomorrow and upload on exactly as it was taken, and one when resaved to another folder (But I guess you could try that a little faster yourself..)
Hope that helps!
and sorry for bad english.
Posted by Mark_Q
Jonaas,
Thank you for the explanation!
Just a valuable tip: please dont open and save JPG files just for moving them from folder to another. Because JPG is compressed lossy file format, and every time you re-save the file, the quality suffers. One could select 100% quality level while saving, if the image editor allows it, but then the file size gets bigger.
EDIT: seems like Ms-Paint is such a simple application, it only makes things worse...
Just use Windows Explorer to copy/move files from folder to folder. Really no need to open them. Or, if you open to look at them, don't save just close.
[ This Message was edited by: Mark_Q on 2006-07-02 07:08 ]