Posted by Jonaas
Thanks Mark, next time i'll upload pictures just as they are, no resaving!
Posted by RandomHero
Heres a couple of Macro shots i took with the phone.
Sorry for size, im not sure how else to do it as i am new to this forum
Thanks
Posted by libben
more pictures plz, more macros, and more in good lightning, so we call se what it really can deliver under good conditions.
Posted by ghostfreak
RandomHero - Could you provide us with direct links please?
Posted by blackspot
nice pics guys. @RandomHero, please post larger images of your macro shots.
Posted by davidsic
Some pictures with my K800i
In complete darness with flash
Macro
Alfa brera
My car with twilight lanscape setting (night mode without flash and AF)
This phone is really nice, not only for the camera
Posted by Ja99iE
| Quote: |
|
Here's the links to the full images:
http://img351.imageshack.us/img351/5949/twoflowers1we.jpg
http://img173.imageshack.us/img173/4787/strawberries8us.jpg
Posted by blackspot
Thanks for the links @Ja99iE.
I can see more of those chromatic aberrations on those shots as well. I'm beginning to suspect they're using cheap plastic lenses.
Posted by Tervel
All the Ney-sayers should put down and step away from the crack pipe and go have their eyes examined. TO say that one does not see much differnce b/n these pics and pics from the K750 is to live in denial.
Great pics everyone! I really enjoyed some of the details shown on the fruit/vegitables as well as the ship photos.
Posted by etaab
| Quote: |
|
Or the phone just have rubbish video capture in general.
Which it does. Im completely unimpressed by the phone, and its static pictures.
Posted by RandomHero
| Quote: | |||
| |||
Thanks for doing that.
Posted by ghostfreak
davidsic: Those pictures rock!
Posted by Retox
http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/7907/dsc000816gr.jpg
Posted by admad
Nice pics, keep em coming!!!!!!
Posted by nissan_turbo
nice pics
Posted by masseur
I'm impressed enough to take some time doing a few pics...
here is one of my fav lunches from the canteen
full size
full size
Posted by Xugaa
Nice Alfa car bum... lol
No really, looks real nice!
Posted by masseur
and here is my lunch time walk in Regents Park
full size
full size
full size
Posted by BobaFett
@masseur are your cantten pix made with macro?
Posted by masseur
no, but it did cross my mind to use macro but the pics looked good enough without
Posted by jcwhite_uk
Heres one taken yesterday. Bournemouth beach was boiling hot yesterday:
Posted by london-uk
@davidsic
Nice shot of the Alfa Brera. I saw one the other day, but they are few and far between in the UK (well at least I haven't seen many in London)
Posted by JiggyJaggy
Here are some of my best mates wedding at the weekend. Loving this camera! Nice TVR and a Rolls Royce in there too!
Nice number plate on this last one!
Posted by JimDut
Here's a couple from mine... only had it today....
Posted by >500
@jimdut,
those look like some powerful cars. id love an nsx...
Posted by craiggg
when you take a picture... why do i always get a red light coming out of the back of the phone... and how do i get flash to work... i can't get nothing out of the back of the phone other than a red/orangey light .. so i can't take pics in the dark.
Posted by Phantom
i'm pretty sure that red light is to help the phone focus.
all real digital cameras have it... i know my Sony DSC-M2 has it.
it comes on in low light for me, and helps with the focus and maybe to meter the light.. i'm not sure though.
Posted by Arne Anka
Yes, the read ligt helps the AF to focus correctly. The xenon flash only kicks in if the camera considers the light too poor (there is no manual setting for it, which is a bit of a disadvantage).
Posted by thfcpoole
| Quote: |
|
i have a picture of bournemouth beach on my k800 from yesterday as well... taken from west cliff which i think is where you are... freaky!
i live in lansdowne and soon winton.... how about you?
Posted by jcwhite_uk
Post your pic of bournemouth. I live in wimborne but am always around winton as thats where my gf lives.
Posted by rickster2kuk
First two pictures taken with my K800i taken on my lunchbreak in blisteringly hot Southampton city centre:
http://img342.imageshack.us/img342/7299/dsc000036si.jpg
http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/1267/dsc000027ak.jpg
Shot in 3mpx mode on 'fine' quality.
[ This Message was edited by: rickster2kuk on 2006-07-04 19:52 ]
Posted by libben
The quality in k800i pictures is better in some way, but k750i has better pictures and focus. All pictures ive seen so far from k800 is just more pixels in the image, not really better at depth and so on in the images.
this image from k750i is far better in quality in what ive seen so far from k800i.
http://libben.fnutt.org/old/images/k750i/marianne.jpg
But yeah, k800i does better pictures, but they just seems not shine as much as good quality pictures from k750 does, i hope they will manage to correct that in next fw.
Posted by Arne Anka
There are thre comparison pictures between W900 (similar camera module as K750), K800 and Minolta Dimage in the link below (look for davidsic). Since the motive in all three pictures is the same, its much easier to compare than using different motives.
http://forum2.mobile-review.c[....]thread.php?p=438558#post438558
Its clear the K800 produce sharper and more detaild pictures than W900 (K750). However, the auto settings in K800 tends to produce a bluish tone (white balance needs some adjustment) and the pictures are abit to bright (exposure needs some adjustment).
Using manual setting for exposure and white balance could probably produce much better pictures.
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2006-07-05 01:22 ]
Posted by davidsic
| Quote: |
|
Arne Anka, it's not a compaison with the K750i but with the W900i...who produce warmer colour than the K750i
Pics comparison in 2 mégapixels (no settings)
W900i
K800i (also 2mp)
Minolta Dimage 3.2 mp (this picture in 2mp)
Other pics by K800i...
Posted by Arne Anka
My bad davidsic. Never the less, the 2 MPX camera modules SE use is pretty much the same (or similar) all over the line covering W900, K750 etc, so the difference should not be that much.
By the way, your pictures above comparing K800, W900 and Minolta can not be enlarged (they stay small).
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2006-07-05 01:27 ]
Posted by blackspot
try this links:
W900i
K800i (also 2mp)
Minolta Dimage 3.2 mp (this picture in 2mp)
Posted by Arne Anka
Works.
Posted by driftmania
looks like the w900i produces better color.
Posted by HellFire
As you can see I’m not very good at panoramic but I only done it quick
[ This Message was edited by: HellFire on 2006-07-05 06:57 ]
Posted by JiggyJaggy
I have just done a comparison of the W800i pics .vs. K800i pics and I cant see a whole lot of difference, concidering the K800i camera in mathematical terms is 1.5 times the quality of the 2MP W800i.
Judge for yourself....
W800i - yes this is the w800i pic:
K800i pic:
Your thoughts?
Posted by goldenface
@JiggyJaggy
Definately sharper on the last pic, look at the light reflecting on the shoulder of the bottle.
Did you need to adjust the brightness on the first pic?
Posted by JiggyJaggy
Nope, did nothing at all on either camera, both in fine mode. W800i=2mp; K800i=3mp setting. And K800i was on best pic.
both were on exact same time, angle, lighting and same object. I can see the difference on the sharpness, but no a mega amount like the difference between 0.6mp and 2mp which should be a similar difference from 2mp to 3.2 mp.
Im not knocking the quality, im so happy now that I can leave my digital camera at home!
Posted by goldenface
@jiggyjaggy
Was the AF switched on on both?
Posted by rockygali
i dont care about the sharpness coz it shows alright... im concern about the color realism... K800 has this blueish effect...
Posted by JiggyJaggy
yes by AF I take it you mean Auto Focus, then yes it was. Very good function btw
Posted by goldenface
Is just that the w800 seems to be focussing on the corners of the A4 paper in the background while the other seems to be focussing right on the bottle.
Posted by JiggyJaggy
I will have to check if I had Macro mode on with either of them.
Posted by datx
Just because W800 has warmer colors doesn't mean it is a better cam... on that pics k800 focused much better... the colors are just different not better/worse... and if u like warmer colors just adjust them on photoshop
And k800i is not 1.5 times the quality of w800, it is 1.5 times the size of w800
[ This Message was edited by: datx on 2006-07-05 11:55 ]
Posted by etaab
@ datx - I think the point people are making is, is that the K800i being the superior phone should automatically produce the superior pictures, without then having to resort to touching them up on a computer.
Personally, im still very unimpressed by the K800i's 3.2mp pictures. They do appear sharper, and i expect through firmware updates will have better colour reproduction than any previous SE phone, but they're nothing that make me go wow !
Im considering keeping my K750i, and buying a N93 or something to go with it.
Posted by pow1990
agreed, i want to see more comparisons with the n80 and k800i, i feel nokia may have have a better cam...
jus my 2 cents!
_________________
Ericsson->Alcatel->Nokia5110->Nokia3210->Nokia3310->Nokia3330->Nokia7210->Sony Ericsson k700i->Sony Ericsson k750i->Nokia N70
[ This Message was edited by: pow1990 on 2006-07-05 12:40 ]